I've come to Caltech because there is a
brand new gravitational wave discovery. Let's go find out what it is. Can we talk about the discovery, Rana?
-Yeah. Can I-- I want to sit on one of my black holes.
-Alright. If you notice, this one's a big one and that one's a little one.
-This one is a little one.
-Yeah. I-I always feel like I'm the most excited out of everybody. Really?
-Yeah. Because excited when nothing's happening.
Cleaning some dust off a piece of glass and it still seems exciting, because I think
this is the key piece of glass in our system and I'm just clean dust off of it.
How cool is that? On January 4th, just like a few hours after midnight.
Boom. We got another signal much like the first signal we found in September of
2015. And it's also well represented by these black holes that we're sitting on.
One of the black holes had a mass of about 30 solar masses and the other one
was about 20. And this one lasted longer than the first one. Both because
our detectors are better at the lowest frequencies and because the signal is
from black holes which are smaller, so they last longer. And it's really
dramatic if you listen to the audio. The first signal that we got, it's only
audible for about a tenth of a second. It's just, "boomp," like this. But this new
one sounds like "bvoom." It's a little bit more drawn-out and it comes from
farther away. It's the furthest black hole merger that we've been
able to detect. So it's about three billion light years away, which means that signal-- the
merger actually happened three billion years ago and the signal has been
propagating to us for three billion years. What's particularly interesting in
this merger are hints that the two black holes weren't spinning with the same
orientation as each other or as their orbit. This suggests that rather than
forming out of binary stars, they formed separately and later became entwined
through orbital dynamics. This one really says,
okay, we now know that we're going to be seeing a lot of these things. It's a... It's a relief to have another signal to know
that the universe is not just populated by all tiny, tiny black holes or by no
black holes. If we improve our detector sensitivity by say a factor of two or
three, the rates will go up from, you know, seeing one every month or every two
months to seeing one every day or every week. I would say it's very surprising
now that our first three signals came from binary black hole mergers which,
were pretty much an unexpected source as of mid-2015. There's a working theory --
kind of exotic -- that says that some of the black holes we're seeing are
primordial, alright? They weren't formed through, you know, conventional supernova
explosions. They were formed during the Big Bang themselves. And they could be a
part of Dark Matter, component of dark matter. So we may actually
determine after we get statistics on lots and lots and lots of these black
hole mergers that we're actually seeing maybe a hint of dark matter. It's sort of
scratching at the door of the biggest mysteries that we have today in
cosmology. In the past before there were any signals,
people used to use this phrase, which I completely disagree with. And they would say, "you know if we don't
find any signals it will be even more interesting than if we do."
I said no no no no no. No no no no. Lots of signals. That's what we want. But now that we have a few,
I'm feeling a little bit more complacent. And so I'd say we really
expected to see a lot of binary neutron stars, and if we don't, well isn't that interesting?
It means there's something going on-- You know, you have all the
pieces. We already know how neutron
stars work. We've seen neutron stars
using radio astronomy. We know they're out there, we know that they come
together in binaries. But why don't we see their gravitational waves? So it could be something else happens to them just before the final merger and there's
something in their evolutionary track which goes off in a different direction
than what we expect. And I think that would actually be interesting.
I guess I've become one of those people that said if you don't see it then maybe it's
interesting, because we'll learn something. You never know how many more signals we
have sitting in the can that we're not telling you about. Can you say that again? I don't think so.
-Would you give me the exclusive, Rana? I would! You know it, Derek. Come on.
If I had secret signals, you'd be the first to know. These lights are the
first two tentacles of the jellyfish I'm building, and there's a neural network
which then drives this little chip, which modulates these lights. And it's going to use these sensors like the proximity and the sound to figure out if people are close
to it. And the neural network is going to train itself to flash the tentacle
lights to make people come closer to it.
That professor is wicked chill.
Crazy to think that there's so much energy being released that we can detect it 3 billion light-years away. And yet, if I understood correctly, these huge events happen weekly or even daily. The universe is a big place, man...
Can anyone explain what they mean when they are talking about binary in this video?
Oh wow they actually used my colleagues video at 3:45. Really awesome!! I guess if anyone has any questions I can probably answer them.
I really want to see that guy's octopus.
TIL Leonard is an Indian man IRL
Hey "science" guys, wheres the f'n audio? I want to hear what the alien mothership warp drive sounds like.
that first shot was way too stable to actually be hand held
he was running to hear about the gravitational wave discovery like yall do to get that first commentο»Ώ