Parallel Worlds Probably Exist. Here’s Why

a portion of this video was sponsored by Norton 360 classical mechanics is great if you know the state of a system say the position and velocity of a particle then you can use an equation Newton's second law to calculate what that particle will do in the future in quantum mechanics if you know the quantum state of a particle that is its wave function you can use the Schrodinger equation to calculate what that particle will do in the future usually it spreads out over time as it is doing here note to make this animation we really solved the Schrodinger equation so there's a beautiful symmetry here if you know the initial state you can use an equation to evolve that state smoothly and continuously into the future the problem is in quantum mechanics we never actually observe the wave function like this instead when we measure it we find the particle at a single point in space so how are we to reconcile the spread-out wavefunction evolving smoothly under the Schrodinger equation with this point like particle detection now I think it's understandable that when the founders of quantum theory approached this problem they considered the measurement more real than the wavefunction after all the measurement was something we had actually observed and it matches our experience of a world of matter particles it was harder to say what the wavefunction was exactly Schrodinger formulated his wave equation because scientists notably debroglie suspected that matter has wave-like properties but it took a third physicist Max Born to propose how we should interpret the wave function at each point in space the wave function has a complex amplitude essentially just a real number plus an imaginary number Max Born suggested if you take that amplitude and square it you get the probability of finding the particle there the fact that you have to square the amplitude actually appears as a last minute footnote in boran's paper but that is how probability was introduced into the core of our picture of reality that's a pretty big philosophical leap I mean no longer is the universe deterministic this made a lot of scientists especially Einstein uncomfortable but the born rule as it is now called remains at the heart of quantum mechanics because it is spectacularly successful at predicting the outcomes of experiments so the way quantum mechanics came to be understood and the way I learned it is that there are two sets of rules when you're not looking the wave function simply evolves according to the Schrodinger equation but when you are looking when you make a measurement the wavefunction collapses suddenly and irreversibly and the probability of measuring any particular outcome is given by the amplitude of the wave function associated with that outcome squared now Schrodinger himself hated this formulation which is actually why he invented the famous Schrodinger's cat thought experiment put a cat in a box with a radioactive atom add a radiation detector that triggers the release of poisonous cyanide gas now although it was only meant as a thought experiment Schrodinger helpfully notes this device must be secured against direct interference by the cat anyway the whole point of the experiment is to magnify the state of the atom up to the state of something macroscopic and tangible he could have picked anything it didn't have to be alive but Schrodinger selected a cat if the atom decays the detector detects radiation releases the poison and the cat dies if the atom doesn't decay the detector doesn't detect radiation poison is not released and the cat remains alive since the state of the cat and detector apparatus are directly tied to the state of the atom we say they are entangled where things get weird is that according to quantum mechanics the state of the atom does not have to be either decayed or not decayed generally it's in a superposition of both decayed and not decayed at the same time assuming no measurements have been made this superposition state of the atom gets entangled with the detector and then the cat so after some time the wavefunction of everything inside the box is in a superposition of the atom has not decayed poison not released cat a live state and the atom has decayed poison released cat dead date so according to quantum mechanics the cat really is both alive and dead at the same time only when we open the box and make a measurement does the wavefunction collapse and the cat actually becomes either dead or alive these days Schrodinger's cat is often used as a way to show how weird quantum mechanics is but that wasn't Schrodinger's point he wanted to show that quantum mechanics as formulated was wrong so taking up Schrodinger's argument in this video I want to show that there is a better way to think about Schrodinger's cat in fact a better way to think about quantum mechanics entirely that I'd argue is more logical and consistent to get there we have to examine the three essential components of Schrodinger's cat superposition entanglement and measurement to see if any of them is flawed the superposition is the idea that quantum objects can be in two different states at the same time this seems like a crazy idea and something we'd never observe but we do indirectly with the double slit experiment fire individual electrons through two slits at a screen and the pattern you see is not just the sum of electrons going separately through one slit and the other slit it is an interference pattern we are forced to conclude that a single electron somehow goes through one slit and the other slit simultaneously this is superposition of course it's easy to understand superposition with waves they are spread out in space and it's clear how the peak of a wave from one slit cancels with the trough of the wave from another slit to produce the interference pattern and luckily we know that when we're not looking electrons are represented by a wave the wave function the double slit experiment then is concrete evidence that this wave enables individual electrons to pass through both slits at the same time so superposition is on solid ground the next concept is entanglement consider two electrons fired toward each other with equal and opposite velocities we know they will scatter off each other but we don't know exactly how their trajectories are given by spread out wave functions that only give us probabilities but as soon as we measure the momentum of one of the electrons we immediately know the momentum of the other one it must be equal and opposite otherwise conservation of momentum would be violated now this may seem obvious but consider that before the measurement the momentum of each electron was in a superposition of states measuring one instantaneously collapsed the wavefunction of the other and this would be true even if those electrons were light-years apart these electrons are entangled what's really going on here is that after interacting the electrons do not have separate wave functions at all they are described by a single wave function and this is what it means to be entangled this explains why measuring one immediately affects the state of the other one because the single wave function has collapsed in fact if we were being rigorous we'd have to say that there is only one wave function the wave function of the entire universe which includes absolutely everything but in the case of isolated unentangled quantum particles we can reasonably talk about their individual wave functions and then once they interact with something else entanglement is the result so what we've seen is superposition is really the same thing as describing systems with waves an entanglement means that after particles interact they are described by a single wave function these are fundamental parts of quantum theory describing systems with wave functions that evolve according to the Schrodinger equation which leaves only measurement remember the measurement postulate was added as a second set of rules to connect the mathematics of quantum mechanics to what we actually observe but doesn't it seem weird that there should be one rule for how systems evolve when we're not looking and a different rule for when we are when you boil it down measurement is just the interaction of one quantum system electrons and photons with another quantum system and we know exactly how to deal with that we simply evolve their wave functions according to the Schrodinger equation so what if we throw out all the rules associated with measurement well then in the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment the radioactive atom in a superposition of decayed and not decayed gets entangled with the detector and in turn the cat now remember we are also made of electrons and atoms which obey the laws of quantum mechanics so we are quantum mechanical - so when we open the box there is no measurement no wavefunction collapse we simply get entangled with the state of everything inside the box so we see the cat alive and we see the cat dead now how is that possible I'm guessing you've never seen both an alive and dead cat before but the solution is it's because the you that saw the cat alive and the you that saw it dead actually inhabit separate worlds by that I mean they exist in their own complete realities and those realities will never interact but where did these separate worlds come from well something I haven't mentioned yet are all the particles of the environment the air molecules photons everything that we are not keeping track of if a quantum object in a superposition gets entangled with the environment it is said to undergo environmental decoherence this branches the wave function of the universe essentially splitting the universe into two slightly different copies so a more realistic account of Schrodinger's cat goes like this the radioactive atom evolves from 100% not decayed into a quantum superposition of decayed and not decayed the detector becomes entangled with this superposition state of the atom but the detector is being bombarded by all these air molecules and photons in the box which would bounce off differently if it is detected radiation than if it hasn't so almost immediately the detector becomes entangled with the state of the environment it D coheres branching the wavefunction in to at that moment you are split into two identical copies one entangled with each outcome of the experiment you continue to be identical until you open the box but in this case the cat actually is alive or dead you were just finding out by opening the box what we are unaware of is that the other outcome also happened just to someone who is not you anymore I mean both observers came from you but they are no longer you and they're no longer identical to each other this interpretation of quantum mechanics is called many worlds and it was formulated by Hugh Everett and if it's true the branching of the wavefunction is happening all the time so frequently in fact that the rate may well be infinite creating infinite subtly different worlds all the time may sound implausible to put it mildly but consider that all those worlds are naturally part of the mathematics of quantum mechanics many worlds just takes them seriously to get rid of them requires something like the collapse of the wavefunction and the point is our experience of reality would be the same in the many-worlds picture as it is if the wavefunction collapses but the formalism is so much cleaner and more elegant all we have are wave functions that evolved under the Schrodinger equation the implication is that the founders of quantum theory may have got it exactly backwards the wavefunction is the complete picture of reality and our measurement is just a tiny fraction of it the part we become entangled with when we interact with a quantum object in a superposition the universe also goes back to being deterministic every outcome happens a hundred percent of the time it only doesn't look that way to us because we only experience our tiny sliver of the multiverse now I imagine that a lot of you have questions and possibly objections to this so I went to the expert okay so I wanted to make this video about many worlds but I was concerned I was gonna screw it up so I've come here to meet Caltech professor Sean Carroll who has literally written the book on many worlds look something deeply hidden available wherever books available let's ask probably the common sort of YouTube questions the good arguments against this yes how many how many worlds are there now the first one is energy energization how is energy conserved is completely clear in the math the energy of the whole wavefunction is a hundred percent super-duper conserved but there's a difference between the energy of the whole way function and the energy that people in each branch perceive so what you should think of is not duplicating the whole universe but taking a certain amount of universe and sort of subdividing it slicing it into two pieces the pieces look identical from the inside except that one has spin up the one has spin down or something like that but they're really contributing less than the original to the total energy of everything let's ask the question about how many words there are how frequently are they branching right we have no idea there's a short answer to this and I think it's embarrassing that we don't have any idea it's certainly often it's certainly a lot right the universe branches whenever a quantum system in superposition becomes entangled with its environment so you have atomic nuclei in your body that are radioactive they decay 5000 times a second there's a radioactive decay in your body every one of those either decays or doesn't do you think of it as a superposition once it decays it sort of interacts with what's around it becomes entangled and the universe branches its wave function right so branching is happening many many times a second just because a radioactive decays in your body now is it happening infinitely often we don't know because we don't know whether the total number of possible branches is infinitely big or finite its joy mungus by any stretch there's plenty of room for all these branches to exist and it might very well be finite but that the details hinge on things we don't understand about quantum gravity and cosmology and the theory of everything and all that stuff so it's a big number but we don't know how big let's deal with the misconception that many-worlds means everything that could possibly happen happens yeah that's not true many worlds means the wavefunction obeys the Schrodinger equation that's what it means the Schrodinger equation predicts many things could potentially happen but not everything so for example an electron will never convert into a proton it would violate conservation of mass conservation of charge all of these things things of the Schrodinger equation gives zero probability to ever happening what about you becoming president yes that could happen there there is a world in which you're president there is a world well to be SuperDuper clear not be me who is president Raney a version of me right right but there is the branching happens your those are two separate people now but there is a version of you who is currently president yes that's right and who was tweeting it's a very low amplitude world it's a very small probability but it's there yes I mean I think this is the way in which it feels more complicated than or it feels more ridiculous then Copenhagen because Copenhagen's like there's just one world this is it that's what you experience and but look the universe the good old universe forget about quantum mechanics okay just like the cows mantra universe where we see all the galaxies and everything we don't see the whole universe we see a finite amount of it because light moves at the speed of lights is a place beyond which we can't see the universe could be infinitely big we don't know it's certainly very plausible universe is infinitely big it's plausible that everywhere in the universe looks more or less like what we see with galaxies and stars in the whole bit if that's true there's an infinite number of copies of people exactly like you some of them are presidents some of them are winning NBA championships some of them are supermodels whatever this just because there's a lot of different shuffling around of the atoms okay has nothing to do with quantum mechanics or weirdness does that bother you does that like rub you the wrong way kind of I think but but but I agree it's less weird than the quantum idea and I think in both cases it's it's because you know human beings there's some cognitive bias I don't know what it's called but there's a cognitive bias that says the only probabilities for anything or 0% 50% 100% and when I tell you something can happen but the probability is really really really really really really really really low you feel like but it could happen let me focus on that come on that possibility that it happens I'm like no don't do that it's just not sufficiently probable that it's worth worrying about in any way when the world branches here does it branch instantly far away the answer is it's up to you this is the annoying part of the answer I can write down a description in which the branching happens instantly throughout all of space I use that description to make predictions about what people will see all those predictions come out percent completely true I can write an alternative description in which the branching sort of spreads out of the speed of light and I make a different set of predictions but guess what they're exactly the same predictions there's no difference between what those two pictures actually predict and what this is reflecting is God doesn't know about branches there's the wave function of the universe that's all it really exists okay breaking the wave function the universe into different pieces that you and I call branches or Worlds is very convenient for us human beings but that's all it is it's not built into the fabric of reality itself it's just like it's exactly like for the air in this room rather than listing the position and velocity of every single air molecule I just tell you the temperature and the pressure and things like that right that's a convenient description for us human beings it's not the full description of the reality and branches are exactly the same way so if you get annoyed that there's two different ways of describing the branching you have to remember that the whole idea of branching is just a human convenience hey this portion of the video is sponsored by Norton 360 a global leader in cyber safety Norton 360 comes with multiple layers of protection for your devices not just antivirus and anti-spyware but also things like dark web monitoring powered by LifeLock this software monitors the dark web for uses of your personal information now of course no one can prevent all cybercrime but it's important to take a multi-layered approach to protection because cyber threats are constantly evolving that's why Norton 360 also comes with a virtual private network or VPN a VPN creates a private encrypted data tunnel that helps prevent cyber criminals from hacking into your Wi-Fi and intercepting the data you are sending and receiving this is particularly useful when you're using public Wi-Fi I like to use it when I'm traveling so when I'm connecting to Wi-Fi is in hotels or airports or coffee shops it just gives me that extra peace of mind right now you can get up to 60% off by using promo code veritasium or by clicking the link in the description now Norton 360 has graciously given me Norton 360 deluxe to try out for myself and I'm really enjoying it so I want to thank three-sixty for sponsoring this portion of the video and I want to thank you for watching

Channel: Veritasium

Views: 6,443,047

Rating: 4.8649445 out of 5

Keywords: veritasium, science, physics, quantum mechanics, many worlds, Schrodinger, Schrodinger's cat, shrodinger, cat, Sean Carroll, Everett, norton 360, norton, lifelock, norton antivirus, norton security, norton secure vpn, norton vpn, cyber, quantum, multiverse, parallel universe, universes, superposition, entanglement, branching, wave function, decoherence, security, cyber safety

Id: kTXTPe3wahc

Length: 19min 59sec (1199 seconds)

Published: Fri Mar 06 2020

Reddit Comments

[u/[deleted]]

[removed]

[u/Berkyjay]

The title of the video is really unfortunate.

[u/Badfickle]

I find this really disappointing. Veritasium should know better. Parallel worlds theory is just one possible interpretation of quantum mechanics and there is ZERO experimental evidence that it's right.

It makes great sci-fi (and sometimes not so great) but to go with that title is irresponsible and bad science journalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics#Summaries

edit:

Also I have to object to his appeal to the guy selling a book Sean Carrol as proof you should believe many worlds. Nothing against Carrol but he really should have at least interviewed someone else with another opinion on the matter for a little balance

[u/quinson93]

Can anyone elaborate on what Prof. Carrol means at 13:00 when he explains energy conservation in the theory. From what I gathered, the energy of both a spin up and down particle is accounted for in the 'whole wave function', but the energy observed in each branch is less than the total energy of 'everything'. I thought the energy of an electron was identical to the energy of its wave-function, specifically as it goes back and forth between a superposition and a known spin. How can its energy be endlessly subdivided without energy loss or gain, and remain constant? Where does this subdivision and conservation fit in to this?

[u/Awesomodian]

PBS spacetime is in the midst of a series on QM interpretations, it's very well done

[u/hirunekurabu]

I’m not sure that I like the title. They say in the video that this is just an approximate model, but the title contradicts this fact. Seems like some people could be mislead to believing this is how the world actually works.

[u/HawkinsT]

PSA: It's 'de Broy', not 'de Brog-lee'.

[u/haplo_and_dogs]

There are real reasons that many worlds is not the most popular interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Born rule is just as fundamental to Quantum mechanics as schrodinger's equation.

Extracting the Born rule from a many worlds interpretation is not trivial, and most just lead to you introducing conscious observers as a requirement of the theory to explain why probabilities exist.

I really like Sean Carol but the whole "Many worlds is just Quantum Mechanics taken seriously" is a not a good argument to be making in an out reach video.

Arguing if multiple worlds exist isn't useful or helpful. It leads to no new predictions, and saying to people "There is a version of Sean Carol who is the President" is just garbage.

[u/xInsanityyxz]

6:20 wouldnt the electrons fall bc the sum of the momentums equals 0?