Kermode Uncut: Great Films You Don’t Like
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: kermodeandmayo
Views: 245,505
Rating: 4.910049 out of 5
Keywords:
Id: 6z5MVbQxRRI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 6min 18sec (378 seconds)
Published: Tue Jun 19 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Citizen Kane, I think, deserves all of its praise. It’s slow, and boring, is what I hear most of the time. Despite that, it’s also so far ahead of its time in doing that. If PT Anderson had done Citizen Kane right now, I feel those very same people would excuse it. That movie came out in 1941 (I believe), and was so far ahead of its time time, and really focused on not only character, but the different perceptions of the the character by other people. It’s amazing how Welles pulls this off, and on top of that, the cinematography is outstanding. You get to know the character through several accounts of people that knew him. I’m in the book of people that think this movie deserves its title (its amazingly beautifully shot), and also represented something “real” and not hammy for the sake of entertainment. That’s just my opinion, but I think Citizen Kane deserves all of its status. The movie is beautifully shot, even if you get bored, which I, personally, did not.
Is the film really great as a whole if people hate the story regardless of how well it was executed? What if it was any other flaw and everything else was great?
I don't think you can say its a great film that people don't like, as great film sounds all encompassing. In effect, you're stating each element of the movie is good. From the sound to the video, to the actors, ambiance, music, soundfx and more.
These are just good films in your opinion.
Citizen Kane is a perfect example of something that some people consider good/great/amazing overall, while others don't care for the presentation, or even the story. Good film for some, not for others.