Joe Rogan Experience #1159 - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: PowerfulJRE
Views: 15,996,761
Rating: 4.783905 out of 5
Keywords: Joe Rogan Experience, podcast, JRE #1159, JRE, Neil deGrasse Tyson, comedy, comedian, astrology, NDT, Star Talk Radio, jokes, stand up, funny, Joe Rogan
Id: vGc4mg5pul4
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 201min 8sec (12068 seconds)
Published: Wed Aug 22 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Hah! Love that Joe invoked the first Sam/JP podcast.
2 1/2 hours of that, ladies and gents.
Thought this sub might be interested in this given the conversation about "truth" Sam had with Peterson.
Personally I don't agree with having such an elastic definition of truth. Makes it more difficult to say something is false.
edit: oops! title typo.
I thought this was absolutely hilarious. Like he wouldn't fight back if people started redefining words he cared about, like "physics" or "astronomy."
personal truth seems like an oxymoron to me
Godspeed is from Middle English "speden" meaning "to prosper". It's "good luck" not "don't slow down and have rapid unscheduled disassembly." That's some serious folk-etymologizing there.
NDT has a lot of insight into a lot of topics, and is a wonderful presenter, but he's infuriating when he does stupid things like this while presenting it the same way as something he is well versed in.
I would say the usefulness of these three terms is only in clarifying the usage of someone deliberately abusing the terms. Much like splitting "racism" into "institutional racism" and "racial prejudice" to someone that abuses the term "racism" to only mean the former; or clarifying "faith" to "trust", "religion", "fidelity", or "acceptance without evidence" when the term is abused in to say something like "Science requires faith".
NDT needs someone to break up the term "atheist" for him as well, because for whatever reason he has attached baggage to the word that doesn't belong. It's as if he avoids all animal derived products, but is loathe to say he's a vegan "because those people are always combative with people who eat meat".
edit: What the hell, exactly what I mean.
Yeeeaaaah that's just bullshit. What he means is that there's only one kind of truth but there are things about which he can tolerate people's false beliefs.
I'm not a NDT fan at all, but I love this segment. But in a perfect world, Joe Rogan asks, "Is 'gender is a social construct' an objective truth, a personal truth, or a political truth?"
And then we see what NDT says, and we learn not only about truth, but also about him.
Difference is, Neil does appreciate objective truth as much as anyone, he does not deny it neither. Totally different from Jordan and Sam (in which Sam was and still is completely right). But I agree, it's mildly confusing and MIGHT be mildly unhelpful.
I'm sure this is exactly what Trump meant.