Jane Goodall on how Bigfoot might be real
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Yahoo Entertainment
Views: 912,269
Rating: 4.8311353 out of 5
Keywords: Jane Goodall, Bigfoot, Jane, documentary, animals
Id: 9ukvQfUlAog
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 4min 9sec (249 seconds)
Published: Tue Aug 28 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I get being skeptical, I really do. I honestly still kind of am. But when one of the worldβs leading primatologists says that the existence of Bigfoot (or something similar) is not just likely, but certain, how can there still be people who outright deny it?
What was that clip they showed of the sasquatch when she first started talking about it? I have never seen that video before and it looked pretty legit. But, the clips they showed for the ufo and loch ness monster were obviously not real so maybe the bigfoot was b.s. too.
Look folks, it all boils down to this:
To prove the existence of Sasquatch, you need scientific evidence. Scientific evidence is repeatable evidence!
Video evidence might meet that criteria if was clear, high resolution, and taken on multiple occasions in a given area, and made by a videographer with unimpeachable credentials, like Jane Goodall.
Footprint evidence you say, dermal ridges you say? As a whole, somewhat compelling, but no single tracks are repeatable enough to meet the criteria. Lots of noise in the data as well because of hoaxers.
they cut to a video of a shaky bigfoot footage, anyone know what that is from?