Is Dust Mostly Dead Skin?

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments

When Google decides to sponsor a video which will play on Google's video platform!

Jokes apart, love the kind of sponsors Veritasium can pull, speaks volumes on the quality of their content.

๐Ÿ‘๏ธŽ︎ 5 ๐Ÿ‘ค๏ธŽ︎ u/thebadconsultant ๐Ÿ“…๏ธŽ︎ Aug 18 2020 ๐Ÿ—ซ︎ replies
Captions
[Music] this is me at the end of college so anyway so today i'm packing up my room is absolutely disgusting uh there's dust all over the place unbelievable how much dust this place accumulates just unreal 21 year old me was apparently fascinated by dust but where does it all come from well in this video we are going to get to the bottom of this now this video was sponsored by google and when they approached me about sponsoring a video i suggested i show you how i use google to research a complex question after all research is just research anyway i couldn't pick a simple question like how far away is the moon how old is derek muller or how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood because the video would be over already but in the space of all possible queries questions like these with clear unambiguous answers are by far in the minority in fact of all the billions of search queries typed into google every day fully 15 are ones that google has never even seen before so google never actually gives you answers instead in just a fraction of a second it uses algorithms to select the most relevant information from the hundreds of billions of web pages it has indexed what you do with that information is up to you so for this video i intentionally selected something surrounded by myths dust unbelievable so a while back when i was filming a different video a phd scientist told me you know 70 of household dust is dead skin and i'd heard that before and chances are you have two if you type is dust into google the top autocomplete result is dead skin because that's one of the most common ways people complete that query but a quick scan of this page suggests that the claim is not true it's a misconception from live science sometimes a specific percentage of dust is said to be dead skin usually about 70 or 80 percent but unless you're a molten bird or reptile or you work in dr frankenstein's laboratory very little of your environment is composed of dead body parts or bbc science magazine which asks what is dust made of think it's human skin think again the article says it's a misconception that it's mostly from outside the rest is carpet fluff and clothes fibers and sure enough all over the web you'll find people debunking this idea so is that it case closed hardly i mean i'm not just gonna do one search and call it a day it's important to be aware of your own biases when i started this search the claim seemed false the idea that 70 to 80 of dust is dead skin it's exactly the sort of thing that is gross enough to spread as an urban legend but it just seems implausible i mean if most dust is dead skin then why do abandoned buildings get dusty over time the debunking claims fit my preconceptions so it would be easy to stop here but you got to be careful not just to search to confirm what you already thought a common mistake people make is putting the answer they are looking for right in the search query looking more closely these websites lack scientific papers as references and i'm curious if the idea that 70 to 80 of dust is dead skin if that's totally wrong then how did the myth get started in the first place surely some dust must be dead skin but how much well a good strategy is to start broad how do you define dust exactly well dust is generally defined as particles that can become airborne for a significant period of time when perturbed by natural forces but how long is a significant period of time and what are natural forces exactly so the definition of dust has fuzzy boundaries kind of like dust itself if you ask the question how big is a dust particle you get different answers the international standardization organization defines dust as any particle smaller than 75 micrometers in diameter that's roughly the width of a human hair the glossary of atmospheric chemistry terms includes anything up to 100 micrometers but i've found several papers that include particles as large as two millimeters this large discrepancy is due to the fact the most important property of a dust particle is not its size but its settling velocity which then determines how long it can stay airborne a 100 micrometer metal ball would fall to the ground very quickly while a two millimeter long cotton fiber could float on indoor air currents indefinitely so to get around the different sizes shapes and densities of dust particles the international standardization organization has a way of calculating an effective diameter they define it as the diameter of a hypothetical sphere of density one gram per centimeter cubed having the same terminal settling velocity in calm air as the particle in question regardless of its geometric size shape and true density by any of these metrics a single human skin cell with an average diameter of around 30 micrometers would count as dust so then how many dead skin cells are we shedding you'd think the average rate of skin shedding would be well established but the internet is a tangled web of misquotations and missing citations when it comes to skin in trying to answer this question i found dozens of web articles saying we shed anywhere between 30 000 skin cells per day to 300 000 skin cells per minute and estimated weights of dead skin as high as nine pounds a year per person using google scholar a great resource for searching published scientific research i was able to track down several peer-reviewed sources that agreed on the numbers every hour you create about 20 million new skin cells as those new skin cells form they push older cells up through the layers of the epidermis and over a period of weeks they flatten out and harden forming the barrier that protects our bodies from the outside world ultimately these dead skin cells fall off usually one by one for healthy skin so we are constantly molting like a snake we just don't notice it because our skin comes off one cell at a time fun fact dead skin cells are shed more rapidly from your forearms than from your back and more rapidly from your back than from your abdomen and one of the ways scientists have measured these rates of skin shedding is actually by taping containers onto people's skin and collecting up the dead skin cells shed over at least a 48 hour period yeah i'm gonna regret this based on these measurements we know that each square centimeter of your body is shedding around a thousand dead skin cells per hour now the average adult body has a surface area of nearly two square meters meaning you are shedding nearly 20 million dead skin cells per hour that adds up to half a billion dead skin cells per day now half a billion dead skin cells weigh between one and two grams that's just a little bit less than the weight of a penny over a year that means you shed half a kilogram or over a pound of dead skin if you want to think about it another way in a single year you give off around 180 billion dead skin cells that's roughly the same number as there are stars in our milky way galaxy an average family of 2.6 people could cover the entire horizontal surface of an average 2 000 square foot home with a layer of skin cells one cell deep in around 200 days that is assuming all their dead skin cells accumulate around the house which of course is not true some will come off in the shower and some will get captured in clothes and bed sheets and be rinsed out in the wash not to mention dead skin cells shed outside the home still the amount of skin we shed is not small but how much is it as a percentage of household dust well that turns out to be a trickier question because there are a lot of other sources of dust like pollen fibers from rugs clothes and furniture dirt from outside even micro meteorites dust from space [Music] to clear things up i called around to some dust experts and they pointed me to this book house dust biology by johanna van brunswick from 1981 and sure enough on page 37 there is this graph now it appears to show the fraction of skin particles in airborne dust as 80 except not really this is a stacked area graph so dead skin accounts for only 20 percent of dust particles between 100 and 300 micrometers could a simple misunderstanding of this graph be the source of the urban legend i mean it's possible but what's more interesting to me is that the legend is not that far off according to this a full 50 of dust particles under 100 micrometers is dead human skin the book also reports on a study where they vacuumed a mattress and studied the resulting dust ball under the microscope 53 of the dust was skin particles so the debunkers are debunked while not 70 to 80 percent dead skin cells do make up a significant portion of household dust of course the exact percentage depends a lot on how much other dust is contributed by the environment these studies were conducted in houses in the netherlands which typically have hardwood floors and therefore less dust than homes with carpeting it also depends on how large of a particle you consider dust dead skin cells account for roughly half of the small dust particles but much less than half of what is sucked up by your vacuum cleaner oh that is gross unbelievable i guess it makes sense that the place where we find the most dead skin cells is in and around our beds where we spend a third of our lives shedding a third of our skin in our sleep so then is it true that your mattress actually doubles in weight every 10 years this claim was actually published in a major news outlet 20 years ago with the increase in mass attributed to dust mites that feed on your dead skin the claim which lacked a scientific reference is so disgusting it has spread throughout the internet but it's not true if two people slept on the same bed for a decade and even if all their dead skin cells ended up in the mattress it would only gain around three kilograms or seven pounds and by conservation of mass the dust mites that feed off that dead skin could not weigh more than that so the total weight gain would have to be less than 10 percent the weight of an average mattress and remember dead skin cells are small and light enough to become airborne just making the bed has been found to increase the number of skin flakes in a cubic meter of air from 21 000 to 107 000 skin scale dust is inevitable and it occurs in higher quantities where there are more people scientists have studied the airborne dust in the london underground and found that fragments of dead skin cells make up around 10 percent of all small dust particles by weight and it's not just skin we are shedding a ton of tiny organisms live on our bodies a teeming microbiome of bacteria fungi and mites every hour we shed approximately one million microbes in a cloud that spreads out a radius of about 1 meter from our bodies in one study an individual was placed in a clean room for 90 minutes scientists then identified who had been in the room not using their dna but rather using the characteristic fingerprint of their microbial cloud the technique was so accurate the team wrote that it clearly suggests a forensic application for indoor bioaerosols meaning that one day we will likely use microbial dust clouds to solve crimes dust can reveal a lot about us because a significant fraction of it literally is us i mean everyone has heard the expression dust to dust but they're probably not thinking about how each and every day part of us is becoming dust you know when i was reading this house dust biology book i found some sections that sounded to me a little bit like poetry so studying uh dust from an office under a light microscope revealed tree fibers from paper eraser dust rubber calcite and pumice human hair various dyed wools cottons and synthetic fibers such as nylon rayon cellulose triacetate and orlon dander tobacco cigarette ashes graphite wood shavings oil soot paint chips glue fingernail filings and traces of quartz and starch i love all these words because they bring vivid images to mind it's like the tiniest fragments of our lives can paint a full picture of reality of who was there and what they did you know searching through dust is a little like searching the internet there are so many pieces it's fuzzy nebulous but with the right tools and a bit of perseverance i'm confident that we can uncover the truth buried in there in this case the truth is that dust particularly these small particles and dust around beds is mostly dead skin why does that matter because it is something we can be certain about i mean for centuries science has beaten back the shrouds of ignorance and knowing what is really true is the only way we have been able to make progress the internet gives us a great opportunity to share that knowledge but only if someone takes the time to research and establish what really is true to perform a lot of this research i have of course been using google which might make you wonder how they figure out what to show you in the first place well good news google is not a black box they have an entire website that takes you under the hood of the search engine and explains all the testing and improvements they make check it out by clicking the link in the description and when you go to make your next search try it a few different ways start broad don't include your answer in the query use image search and most importantly remember google shows you the most relevant information it's up to you to decide what to do with it thanks to google for sponsoring this video learn more about search by clicking the link in the description
Info
Channel: Veritasium
Views: 2,518,249
Rating: 4.932086 out of 5
Keywords: veritasium, science, dust, skin, cell, cells, dead skin, made of, come from, is dust dead skin, myth, urban legend, house, mattress
Id: jn5M48MVWyg
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 12sec (912 seconds)
Published: Tue Aug 18 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.