HOW IT WORKS: Nuclear Propulsion
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: DOCUMENTARY TUBE
Views: 1,434,071
Rating: 4.7898536 out of 5
Keywords: physics, speed, spaceship, aviation, future, engineering, energy, reactor, mechanics, spacex, aerospace, lecture, things, chemistry, learn, interesting, course, class, fiction, UFO, star, marvels, deep, systems, how, math, fuel, new, old, project, 101, degree, structured, MIT, NASA, light, made
Id: Zm7PNlK5Aco
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 4sec (1084 seconds)
Published: Wed Apr 11 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Interesting film ... clearly it was created not long after 1968; that's the last test they mention. The narrator goes into detail of how US nuclear rocket engine propulsion was designed, how a ring of rods on the perimeter of the reactor spin to regulate the reaction, etc.
I'm amazed they showed an Isp (specific impulse) of 800+ seconds, and even hoped for 900.
The last 1/3 or so spends time on a Mars mission architecture using such rockets. The more things change, the more they stay the same!
For my part I'm curious how this technology (from 50 years ago) compares with Russia's bleeding-edge nuclear-powered cruise missile.
You may recall a plume of radioactive Iodine-131 appeared above Europe about a year ago, and nobody could figure out where it came from. The Kola peninsula looked like a source, but Moscow insisted they were just as baffled as the rest of us. Later in 2017, a cloud of radioactive Ruthenium-106 came wafting over eastern Europe, with some agencies saying its source seemed to be near the Russian border with Ukraine.
CNN says Russia has been crashing flying reactors into the ground for some time, so it's hard to say.
I did a project on this in grad school. I was lucky enough to take the first course in nuclear engineering that Virginia Tech had offered in decades. Here is the NASA report on the ROVER program, which also includes overviews of KIWI and NERVA.
TL;DR People did wild stuff back in the 1960s. The big problem with nuclear rockets is that the core fractures. They had chunks of fissile material flying out the nozzle. Also, one time, they melted a nuclear rocket down, just for fun.
Follow-up comment: We've made a lot of progress in materials science in the decades since the ROVER program. We have much better embedding materials available, and the technology might be feasible now. That being said, Putin's claim that Russia has an operational nuclear rocket is absolute bullshit. We've got better embedding materials, but we haven't had them for that long.
Given the opportunity, working on modern day nuclear thermal rocket engines would absolutely be one of my highest engineering aspirations.
Here's the full film, the original documentary, minus the youtube ads https://archive.org/details/NuclearPropulsionInSpace1968NERVA It's really shady to cut out all the credits at the end and put your own website.
Im surprised how simple this is
Space is the one place where nuclear does make sense. It's comparatively light/compact and it cannot contaminate the environment. I never understood why it wasn't being used.
Those rotating control shafts are absolutely genius. I was wondering how the fuck they controlled it, from the very start - and then they show that. Amazing.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this only works in space because it would spew radioactive hydrogen freaking everywhere if it took off from ground?