Gregg Braden - Understanding the Geology of our Past & The Great Reset 2030

[Music] hello friends greg braden here welcome to this edition of our questions and answers i'm going to give this one a name today i'm going to call the geological segment because we have two questions they both pertain to the geology of our past and what it means in our lives today and what it means in terms of the events happening in in the world now and in our near future and i'm excited to talk about that so i'm going to get to it right now the first question is from michelle and once again i am i'm not using last names to honor your privacy and uh so that you know it's you michelle this is michelle from phoenix arizona so if you're watching michelle this is your question first question there's a little context here she says i stumbled on a pole flipping video through the youtube channel so she's referring to the magnetic poles of the earth flipping reversing as they do periodically she says uh it was through a youtube channel they have a compelling series on why earth is about to flip again in the next 20 years i'd like to get your take on their dire findings and she's asking if i know the organization i don't know the organization that is publishing that information so let me uh i'm going to address this in a couple of different ways first some of you may not have seen previous videos and i don't want to rehash the previous videos but so i'll summarize here geology 101 the magnetic field of the earth i know that many of you have heard about it you speak about i see people talking about it and i can tell from what they're saying often they don't understand what the magnetic field is so let's start with the very beginning the magnetic field of our planet originates from within the planet it's not from something outside of us you may have done an experiment when you were in school that would help to understand this and i'll just run through this quickly if you take uh an iron bar or an iron nail and you wrap copper wire around that bar or that nail and so you're wrapping the copper wire and then you've got two loose ends of the wire one from the beginning one from the end if you take those loose ends and you attach them to a power source it can be as simple as a little double a battery one wire goes to the positive one wire goes to the negative and what happens as the electricity is flowing around the coil in the copper winding it is creating a magnetic field through the way that those electrons are moving through the wire and interacting with the properties of the iron if that makes sense then you've got the principle for what's happening on earth on a big level earth is not a solid planet when you do a cross-section you see the outer layer that we live on the crust it's a relatively thin layer this is this is the the oceans and the mountains and the fields and the plains that is all part of the earth's crust below the relatively thin crust is a very thick part called the mantle of the earth uh and from i'm just doing this from memory i believe it may be as much as 8 800 miles deep but i could be wrong on that i i didn't know i was going to say that so i didn't write it down i think it's around 1800 miles thick and then there is the core of the earth and the core is made in two layers the inner layer is a solid uh core it is believed to be iron primarily iron and the outer core is iron and nickel and it is a molten iron all right so you've got solid iron in the middle and molten iron well the solid iron in the middle would be the equivalent of the iron nail or the iron bar the molten iron is is in motion all right and that is the equivalent of the electrons moving through that copper winding now another another dynamic is that as our planet rotates all those layers they do not rotate at the same rate isn't that interesting we have the inner and the outer core rotating the inner core is rotating at one rate the outer core at another rate then the mantle and the crust another rate slipping past one another and it is the composition of the iron core and the molten iron and that rotation that's the equivalent of as the the outer core is moving around that inner core the inner core is generating a lot of heat uh some of that is through an nuclear processes some of it is through because of tremendous pressures that heat is coming out of the the inner core into the molten core and that heat and the motion of the earth is the equivalent there it's creating uh electrons electrons are moving and they're moving around that core the way that electrons in the copper wire were moving around the iron bar that's our magnetic field all right so i hope that helps to know where the magnetic field is coming from now two things happening one the magnetic field is uh is dynamic it is not static so in two different ways first of all anytime you have a magnet you're gonna have a north and south pole and we we do we have a magnetic north and south it's it's moving it's always moving it migrates so the magnetic north of our planet is not always where the north pole or the south pole of our planet is not always where the physical the geophysical south pole is going to be it's not right now so right now the north pole is migrating towards siberia in northern in northern russia and there is it's called polar wandering polar migration so it's a phenomenon that we've known about began to measure i think back in 1950s during something called the igy international geophysical year and it is a phenomenon that is so important that magnetic maps are updated about every 30 days now for pilots for example pilots in aircraft they are using these magnetic fields for navigation if if you're on a runway and you see those funny letters sometimes marking the runways often there are magnetic references that have to be updated and changed and if you're a pilot you know this so i'm just trying to think the first airport the first major airport that went through and revamped i think was in the 1990s they started re-releasing the the magnetic maps every 30 days it was in in the north uh central part of the united states it may have been minnesota but like i could be wrong on that but it was it was somewhere in the north-central united states but this is something commonly done all right that is the poles themselves now that's one of the dynamics the other dynamic is that those poles every once in a while we're reversed the north becomes south the south becomes north there's a lot of mystery around this phenomenon and the reason is because it has never happened since humans have lived on the earth we emerged about 200 000 years ago is what scientists tell us and they're pretty much an agreement on on that date anatomically modern humans emerged it's not to say that there could have been other other intelligent life before that but anatomically modern humans us we showed up about 200 000 years before present and the last time that the magnetic poles of the earth flipped was just under 800 000 years ago about 780 000 years bp before present so we've never seen it in our lifetime we can see evidence of it in the geologic record and it comes about in a number of different ways sometimes the magnetic orientation of the planet is preserved in minerals it can be preserved in certain clays and this is how when you go back in human history you can look at the magnetic particles in ancient pottery for example and see where those particles how they're aligned uh compared to where the north pole is now you can see or the south pole and you can see how much the poles have have changed in in that time so we have never seen it so we have to infer what uh what it is that that's happening now what scientists do know is that before those poles can drop the the composite measurement has to decline to a certain threshold so it can't go from a high and then just boom just reverse it's got to become weaker and weaker and weaker and then it reaches a threshold of weakness and it loses its support and it's just kind of like free falls so we know right now the composite measurement for earth it's uh and i'm hesitating because i i don't want to get too much in the weeds what i'll say is there are seven different parameters that are used to determine the magnetic field strength of the earth and when you put all those together right now the average strength it's between 25 000 and 65 000 what are called nano tesla is a unit that's used to measure the magnetic field of the earth they also use gauss but the nano tesla i believe is 25 000 to 65 000 so it's somewhere uh those are the extremes and we've got an average in there of what would be at 40 i guess 45 000. what we know is that that number if we take that average uh it is uh when we look at the the previous high for the magnetic field then what the scientists tell us is that that high has to fall down to 10 of the previous high and right now we are only at 58 percent from that previous high so i hope that makes sense see if you go the the previous high of the the earth's magnetic field it has to decline and that threshold is about 10 percent and we're nowhere near that 10 percent we're at 58 percent from that that previous high so it is true that the magnetic fields of the earth are weakening and we can see beginning 2000 years ago that the fields began the weekend and they've continued ever since we're we're at the weakest point now that we've been uh since the last 2000 years and the last 200 years i think it's uh that the average is about maybe nine nine percent per century something like that that that the magnetic fields are are declining and again it's uh they're different ways of measuring this so the point that i'm sharing is that we are nowhere near that 10 threshold that we need to reach of weakness before that reversal occurs uh and if it took 200 years if it's taken 2 000 years to get to the point where we are now we're only 58 percent down it's not going to happen today tomorrow it's not going to happen this year next year uh as a geologist it will happen i can tell you that and in and when it happens i think it's significant but here's why i'm saying this to you we live in a world of chaos well you know that and i know that and there are so many things on our radar to be concerned about and some of them are consciously nagging at us all the time you know we've got to be prepared for supply chain shortages or breakdowns or fuel shortages bank closures you know social unrest we're looking at war now in uh in europe the first time we've seen in a very long time so what i want to say to you is a poll reversal possible absolutely will it happen at some point absolutely is it going to happen this week next week or in the next 20 years i personally am not seeing the evidence to support that i'm not saying that there isn't evidence out there maybe there is that i'm not seeing what i will say is that does not fit what the geologic record has shown us since we've been studying the magnetic field since the 1950s now barring a black swan event are there things that could accelerate that sure there are if we had like a massive solar flare from the sun or if we had uh mushroom clouds from nuclear weapons simultaneously you know in different parts of the earth you know things like that meteor giant meteor impact on the planet it would ring this planet it would ring that iron core like a bell and that would be enough uh scientists believe to to trigger that pole reversal those are called black swan events we don't know when they're going to happen we don't know if they're going to happen we can't really prepare for them so barring a black swan event i personally don't see the evidence to support a magnetic field reversal in the next 20 years so i don't want you to worry about that of all the things to be concerned about and prepare for i don't want you to worry about how would you prepare for that anyway well let me talk about that a little bit because the world you and i live in right now the technology that we depend on is based upon an assumption with the magnetic field of the earth and that assumption is that it's always there and it's always oriented the way it is now your computer my computer your cell phone my cell phone uh the electricity that powers our planet the electricity that powers our automobiles all of that is the data the memory the flash drives hard drives everything assumes that the magnetic fields of the earth are a constant in terms of where they're oriented and that they exist so much so that we never talk about it so much so that all the technology even billions trillions of dollars poured into developing technology with the thinking that the magnetic field is a given it's always there well when a magnetic field reverses we've never seen it here personally but we have seen it on other planets and we see it in the sun and it can happen in a couple of different ways one way that we see in other planets and we see this in the sun by the way the sun does not have a single north and south pole the sun has many magnetic fields and you see them as sunspots when you see those dark spots each of those is a magnetic vortex and what happens on the sun is those vortices begin to break down and they go into chaos and we see this in other planets as well it doesn't necessarily mean that the field goes completely to zero before it reverses it may but it doesn't necessarily have to it can go into chaos still a magnetic field but what happens is you instead of one north and south pole you end up with many fractured magnetic vortices many little north and south poles and then as they all become oriented into the new position then we normalize into a new a new north and south what used to be north is now south and vice versa so that is one way that this could happen a lot of indigenous traditions talk about a very strange day actually three days in the history of our plan i wrote about this in 1986 called a lot of flack for it it was shared through some of the indigenous traditions that i had studied and some of the elders that i'd spoken with and they talk about a day and it's referred to in biblical traditions as well is is a long day when uh the indigenous traditions talk about a day where the sun the sun today rises in the east and sets in the west they talk about the day that the sun used to rise in the west and set in the east and then there was a long day more than 20 hours where that didn't happen and when it began to happen again it was reversed the sun was setting rising in the east and setting in the west the feeling is that could only happen uh if the rotation of the earth itself or the rotation of those inner portions of the earth were to uh to slow and stop and then begin again but we've never seen it and i'm not saying that's what's happening i am just sharing that you will hear about this in indigenous traditions the long day when the sun either the sun remains in the sky for an abnormally long period of time or if you're in another part of the earth where it's dark for an abnormally long period of time usually 72 hours is what they talk about that 72 hours comes up a lot three days and um you know many of the ancient traditions it is uh three days of renewal uh christian traditions they talk about three days for resurrection and that was what was demonstrated so there's a lot of there's a mystical component to this and it's beyond what i can do well here i just want to acknowledge that they do exist and again i'm going to go back to we've never lived through a poll reversal it appears that it is not life-threatening however it could be emotionally and psychologically uh a difficult day if you don't know what's happening if you're not you know if you had no idea what was going on so i'm saying this because you see this in some of those videos that are out there and some of the papers that are written all to say and i'm not discounting it i'm just saying of all the things on our plate right now i think we can put this off the plate all the things on the list of things to be concerned about we can put it at the bottom and then cross it out for right now because i think we've got bigger bigger problems to solve right now but i hope this under uh helps you to understand a little bit about magnetic fields of the earth pole reversals uh what they mean to us michelle asked a second question in the same question so michelle i'm going to go ahead and answer to the best of my ability your second question as well it's about climate change she's asking why do they and they is in the rabbit quotes whoever they are the powers that be we've talked about this in some of the other q and a's why do they continue to double down on the climate catastrophe angle wow there's so many ways to answer this question so first of all who are they the powers that be uh there are local powers that be there are regional powers that be there are global powers that be so i believe that the the most honest way to answer this question this question why are they doubling down on the climate catastrophe angle is coming within the context of what you and i are living through right now it is an attempt for what is called the great reset and i know many of you have heard that you've heard me speak about it uh the coin was termed by the world economic forum they produced a book it's no secret that they would like to remake the world and in that remaking that they are seeing the uh the opportunity or they're seeing the pandemic as an opportunity to remake the world what does that mean it means a new economic system it means a new financial system it means new industrial system it means a new social order it means new governmental systems it means new relationships between new nations that are forming and they talk about this very very clearly there's a goal that they have to accomplish this by the year 2030. in the year 2019 the world economic forum wef wef signed an agreement with the united nations for the u.n to help to implement the vision of the world economic forum and you're seeing much of this play out through what is called the sustainable development goals un sdg 2030 united nations sustainable development goals for the year 2030 and i know there's a lot of information that is out there about those goals and you know this is it's a delicate conversation and it's a hard conversation and i think it's important to have an honest conversation i have worked uh in some capacity with organizations that are in one way or another supporting those goals i'm no longer working with those organizations and one of the reasons is when you look at the goals themselves they are truly beautiful goals who wouldn't want food security who who wouldn't want to eradicate disease on the planet who wouldn't want uh you know equality in terms economic equality and things like that beautiful goals and then you read the fine print of how what the plan is to accomplish those goals and in my opinion uh to get to those goals uh the way that's being proposed i think there are other ways to achieve those goals with much less suffering in the world i'm going to say it that way so i i think the goals are beautiful the the methods to get to the goals i think are concerning and i've said that publicly before this is this is nothing new so the question why are they doubling down they're doubling down on the climate narrative uh to to push and further the thinking that we need to reset the world to achieve those goals climate is it's a tricky one because it has been politicized and as a geologist i can tell you that i've got videos out there i've got videos on this channel talking about climate change and i know some of you haven't seen those videos so let me just say this climate change is a fact we know that i've been i began discovering as a geologist in the industry in the 1970s we've been talking about i've been talking about publicly since 86 that we need to prepare for climate change because climate change is part of a natural dynamic of our planet in we can see in the geologic record you can see in the ocean sediment records you can see in the ice cores of greenland and antarctica if there are no humans on earth climate change is still happening we can go back the the green or the antarctic ice cores go back 420 000 years before bp before present there were no humans as we know it living during that time yet we were going through the warming and the cooling cycles have we contributed to climate change i have to say absolutely we have and i have to say that because we are contributing co2 into the atmosphere is this the warmest our planet has ever been absolutely not is this the most co2 that's ever been in the atmosphere absolutely not does the planet die when the co2 levels are high absolutely not and this is just this isn't political i'm just sharing sharing information so let me let me give you a couple of examples here geologic time there was so first of all carbon dioxide is being demonized in our world today in a very sad and a little bit of a frightening way young people are being taught to hate it to fear it the truth is we cannot live without it when the carbon dioxide levels of our planet drop below 180 parts per million ppm our planet's in trouble because the plants that need carbon dioxide is to a plant like oxygen is to you and to me if there's not enough co2 those plants can't live and when the plants in the forest begin to die off we are in trouble because you know that the forests are called the lungs of the planet uh making all of the the ecological uh keeping all the ecological balances in place that we have heard about so much that need to be there so you don't want the climate of the earth you don't want the co2 levels to drop below 180 parts per million and the last time we saw those levels was when the it was about let's see 2.6 million years before present the earth was much cooler at that time because there was not co2 to to create the warmth plants died it was uh it was a very very interesting time in in the history of our world now we're right now close to 400 a little i think we're over 400 parts per million uh we are according to the the readings taken from the the hawaiian station over 400 parts per million is that the highest that we've ever been i'm i'm not saying we want to go back to this but i just want you to know there have been times where we have in the cretaceous period cretaceous is a long period in history as a geologist i enjoyed it because there was so much life and so many fossils and that changed over this period of time it ranges from 66 to 145 million years before present during the cretaceous the co2 levels reach 4 000 parts per million and earth was probably the greenest one of the greenest times that we've ever seen because life flourishes in the presence of that high co2 temperatures were much warmer temperatures right during that time i just want to give you a really good five to ten degrees celsius above what they are right now we're not the warmest that's ever been i'm not saying we want to go there but what i want to say to you is that it's not like everything dies it's not like the planet ends when there's uh higher levels of co2 most of the the ice melted the temperatures were warmer most the ice melted during the cretaceous the ice isn't on the poles you know where it is that means sea levels are really high and they obliterated much of what we now know as uh as seashores today on on the coast they obliterate much of the coasts of what we see as the land masses today i'm going to say this another way it's relatively rare to have some of the land mass exposed in history the history of earth that we have exposed today it's relatively rare to have parts of southern california parts of florida the gulf uh parts of the gulf states have typically been underwater and that's why they have the kind of geology they have that's why uh they are fertile uh in terms of of you know being able to grow crops and things like that so during the cretaceous time most of the ice had melted the sea levels were high almost all of the flowering species that we know emerged during that time a lot of new forms of life emerged during that time earth did anything but die the last time we saw 400 parts per million which is what we're seeing right now co2 was during what's called the the pliocene period and the temperatures were a little warmer they were about three degrees celsius above the average and i know we're we're trying to keep those temperatures down so i just want to be very honest with you because we're being led to believe that we're in this extreme that was created by humans when the truth is if humans weren't here we would still have climate change and when the climate has changed and the co2 levels have kicked up not from industry but from nature the earth did not die during those times i just want to be very honest with you about that what's causing that climate change as a geologist what i can say to you is the primary driver is earth's location in space with relation to the sun earth does a dance a tilt an angle and a wobble called the malonkavic cycles very well known in the circles that study this and those cycles are always driving this dynamic the problem is that humans began to build society and civilization without knowing that assuming that climate was static and we built right on the edge right on the edge of the shorelines we built in flood plains assuming that would never change it is changing and now rather than adapting to the change we're being told that we need to change the planet to fit our lifestyles that's literally what's happening and i think it's um the evidence doesn't support that narrative at all now the other side of this if we we are contributing to co2 we need to stop we need to stop burning fossil fuels we've had the technology as you've heard me say for over 60 years to produce clean green sustainable energy electricity with zero greenhouse gases uh materials that are abundant in the earth's crust that are inexpensive everybody has them nobody can hoard them they don't cost a lot to create in a way that cannot melt down like a fukushima reactor it cannot be weaponized the way uranium is uh or plutonium is and in the weapons day is a byproduct of uranium uh the waste becomes can be recycled into the new fuel it's not perfect but it's a stepping stone toward a more perfect form of energy when we finally reach vacuum energy from empty space and we will the energy i'm talking about is thorium i did a whole video on this i'm not going to reiterate that now here's the point if they that michelle asked about if they were serious about climate change i personally believe this is one man's opinion that they would have allowed this technology to emerge and become prolific when it was when it was developed back in in the 1960s we had these thorium reactors up and running 60s through they were shut down the 80s then a lot of them but we had some in the u.s india's had some china's had some russia's had some they're developing now china is developing new thorium reactors element number 90 russia is as well so when you read that they are not proven it's not true because we already built them we've already used them so if they were serious about cutting back on greenhouse gases i think we would have eliminated those greenhouse gases so i guess i'm answering this in a couple of different ways number one climate change is not human caused number two humans are contributing to it number three we are not the warmest that it's ever been and this is not the the highest level of co2 in the atmosphere that's ever existed we can look back and geologically i'm doing this because i've got notes on my desk that's what you're seeing me refer to if if we want to be honest with ourselves we can go back and we can see what happened uh to the oceans to the ice caps to the green life and the flourishing of life that emerged when the co2 levels were higher and i'm not saying we need to do that now i just don't want you to be afraid and this is the whole thing why are they doing this now this is my opinion if the powers that be would come to the people of the earth and honestly say to us that what we have done in the past served us because we're here now and it is unsustainable and we now have the technology to move into a new era and a new way of living our lives new ways of generating electricity new forms of finance and economies let's work together and build this if they would say something like that to us i think people would probably be more willing to go along with the plan the thinking is done from research and studies back in the 1960s that that people are reluctant for that kind of change so the only way to get people to adapt that change is to frighten them so climate is being used to frighten people into a narrative or a narrative supporting it and into a way of thinking uh that will embrace the alternatives that are are being touted as the saviors as the savior for for what we're doing so it's uh in my opinion it's unnecessary i understand the thinking i just don't think that thinking is necessary i think the people of the earth are ready for change and and that we could work together and build a new world but minimize the suffering the changes that are being implemented now that are being offered those changes are causing suffering because they're abrupt they're disruptive and they're being done from a place of fear rather than for the love of our global family a love for this planet and there's a lot of anger and a lot of hurt based on the misunderstandings around the science it's sad it's unfortunate it's it's unnecessary so um so i hope this helps to understand a little bit michelle was a good question why they're doubling down they've identified the year 2030 is the year they would like to accomplish a lot of the great reset you and i are seeing that play out on the world stage by the rapidity of the change just the magnitude of the change that is being pushed the economic systems the economic change borders are being redrawn industries are being remade i'm just going to go back one one last thing you know as a scientist uh i've studied nature a lot my primary degree is in geology but i have a strong background in earth and marine sciences i was an ocean science major in marine geology before i went into terrestrial geology so i have a strong background life sciences and i'm an amateur archaeologist as well as anthropologists spend a lot of time with indigenous people throughout the world and what i can say to you is this the most sustainable form of living at any time and especially in times of extremes is localized living so localized sources of energy localized sources of food localized economies localized finances localized education all of that and the reason is because centralized living puts a population at risk when those centralized support systems break down everybody suffers whereas when it's localized things might break down here but over here they're not and these people then can help these people and we can work together and you see this in nature in the animal kingdom you see it with ants you see it with birds you see it in indigenous traditions this has always been the model this is precisely the opposite of the model that is being pushed in the great reset they are pushing for centralization discouraging rural living to force people into [Music] large centralized population centers which in my opinion especially after pandemic i think you can see the the downside of that but not just the pandemic just in terms of how people people live so what i am seeing is this great reset intuitively flies directly in the face of what nature shows us as a most sustainable way of living the the world economic forum is he wrote the book uh this is where it came from it's i mean what i'm saying is not a secret they believe that this is a good change they believe that it can be done in a relatively short period of time and we'll have a better world for it the the ideas originating from the world economic forum they have had really no way to implement those ideas until the year 2019 2019 they signed the agreement and it was televised you can see videos of the handshake between the world economic forum and the united nations to implement the ideas for the great reset and you're seeing that play out through the u.n implementation of what are called the sustainable development goals for 2030. it's called un sdg 2030 nine nations sustainable development goals for the year 2030. the goals themselves are beautiful if you look at those 17 goals you know who doesn't want food security you know who doesn't want equality uh in finance who doesn't want equality for women who doesn't want to eradicate disease among children and you know all over the who doesn't want those things but then you read the fine print of how those goals that the plan to accomplish those goals and i have to tell you that what that fine print says uh for me uh is difficult to see because it it has the potential to cause a lot of suffering for a lot of people in the world in the way that the things are being implemented you've heard the term the devil's in the details so if people don't read the fine print everybody says man i'm on board with this who wouldn't who wouldn't want that who wouldn't want food security but then if you look at how that food security is being accomplished with large corporate farms for example or using a lot of uh gmo based seeds and you know the pesticides are being used which are needed if you're going to have a huge corporate farm you that's that's the way those things are run uh in my opinion that is probably not the way to go and i'm hesitating a little bit i i had the opportunity and have worked with a a non-uh governmental ngo non-governmental agency who sharing new ideas about the sdg 2030s and i was excited to do that and what i found was that the the thinking is so strong that we need these goals and that we need to support these goals that i could no longer support those in good conscience so i'm no longer supporting those goals i am supporting the things that we're talking about here localized living localized living and all the ways that i've talked about uh the transition of energy if we're serious about it it's already available to us you've heard me talk about blockchain technologies and how that can revolutionize personal finance and uh and global economies in a way that's not tied to a government in a way that's not tied to a nation and now for some people it sounds frightening and for other people it sounds like uh utopia and i think there's something in between so i i think what it all comes down to for me it's about being honest how can we solve the problems of the world if we're not honest about the problems that we face we cannot solve a climate change problem if we're not honest about what the data is telling us and if we keep cherry-picking the data and if we keep using legacy media to perpetuate frightening narratives without talking about the big picture and the full picture uh so i i know that we can build a beautiful world because we have everything we need to do that and i know the people of the world are ready for that they're ready for more than the war certainly they're ready for more than the suffering and we love our planet we want to preserve our planet so my prayer my invitation i wish those powers that be i know they're doing what they think is best in their minds and if we all work together and and looked at this from a little bit different perspective i think we could accomplish great and beautiful things i personally believe it's possible to raise the standard of living for every human on the planet using the technologies that are now available and what we now understand rather than elevating those standards of living for relatively few at the expense of many that are working and suffering to support that i know that world is possible the question is what world are we going to choose michelle you asked the question you know why are they doubling down on this narrative they're doubling down to support a vision of of what they a relatively few number of people believe is possible for the world within the next nine years so where we go with that uh i think we're watching it play out right before our very eyes every day thank you for asking the question i went a little longer on this i shared my opinions a little bit more than i did on the facts especially with this climate change because i'm very passionate about it i know you all have feelings about it too some of you won't agree with what i'm saying some of you have other information there are a lot of things i could have said that i didn't just to respect you and to respect this channel i want to keep the channel up and running and you all know how that goes so thank you for sharing part of your day with me today i hope this has helped michelle thank you for your two very thoughtful questions i look forward to our next q a thank you so much [Music] you

Channel: Gregg Braden Official

Views: 219,535

Keywords: inspirational, motivational, cutting edge science, transformation, quantum physics, self empowerment, human potential, the power of the human mind, spirituality, self healing, power of beliefs, science based techniques, intuition, philosophies, intuition philosophies wisdom, real-world solutions, wisdom, modern science, pioneer, educator

Id: dXPFeToPxuw

Length: 52min 57sec (3177 seconds)

Published: Tue Apr 05 2022