Gifted, creative and highly sensitive children | Heidi Hass Gable | TEDxLangleyED
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: TEDx Talks
Views: 417,301
Rating: 4.8403649 out of 5
Keywords: Personal education, Choice, Youth, English, Self-help, Canada, Connection, Teaching, tedx talk, tedx, Classroom, Depression, tedx talks, Schools, Relationships, Achievement, Self improvement, Children, Learning, ted talks, TEDxTalks, Education, Success, ted talk, ted x, Parenting, Students, ted
Id: ybmgVSdsMu8
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 38sec (938 seconds)
Published: Tue Mar 10 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Interesting but anecdotal.
It sounds like her children were already enrolled in self contained gifted classes, based on the cross disciple project based learning comment, but one of her children was still struggling because the education wasn't self-directed.
If I were a policy maker, and I'm not, I'd want to see how many children require self-directed learning on top of self contained gifted classes.
Give me numbers, data. Not just some person's story on what worked for their family.
OMG, that message “she’ll be okay” is all I heard thru public school. I was ok in class because I learned how to make so many different kinds of paper airplanes. I passed notes in 4 languages. I was ok in high school because 1 teacher each year fed that intensity, and because senior year I skipped at least 1 day a week.
My kids went to Montessori school, specifically to address the issues I faced in a more flexible way. They did so much better. In each skipped a grade when transitioning out into public school after 6th grade.
This is an excellent mom, doing excellent work with and for her kids.
While I agree with her saying that it is sometimes necessary to create a unique path for some gifted children, I find the actual story she tells kind of unsatisfying. What she tells is more or less:
This raises a lot of questions: Was it ever evaluated what caused the problems of her kids in the "fantastic" school? Was it bullying, boredom, issues caused by ADHS etc., the programs being fancy but ultimately not for gifted kids? Without a reasonable answer to this question, randomly unschooling your children is not a good idea.
We also don't know what she really did with her kids during the year of unschooling. She says she gave up on teaching them anything, but kids also learn things when they watch their parents do stuff. I guess that her family life is somewhat middle classy, so her kids have the opportunity to learn a lot just by watching what she does. There are pretty silly cases of unschooling where the parents are university professors. If kids spend their daily life with family interaction in a family where learning and intellectual pursuits are at the core of the family, it's no wonder that they can learn better than without any school. But any kind of educational policy should not rely so heavily on the kid's family, since not all kids grow up in intellectual homes.
With alternative pedagogy, the thing is more or less the same. Alternative pedagogy does many things that are very pretty and nice, but it often skirts around topics that are somewhat ugly, but are a must learn for children. Such things are reading, handwriting & spelling, basic math skills in primary school, and then later (pre)calculus and learning a foreign language. Alternative pedagogy, to some degree, also relies on the parents being able to fill in the holes in the education of their children, which also makes it a way of schooling tailored to the middle class. The same problem appears in the "learning to work hard"-department, alternative schools often do not push gifted children more than normal schools, they only hide it behind a mask of niceness instead of one made out of structured boredom. If the parents do some pushing behind the scenes, it is probably ok, but again, it relies on the parents.
This leads us to the last question: Did what she did solve all problems? She says her children are happy now, but all we know is that they improved their Minecraft and Magic: The Gathering skills. This is probably fine for middle schoolers, but after puberty, it is important that the children are able to transition into a system that relies on achievement (ultimately, you have to be able to do something where people give you money, no matter what the alternative pedagogists say). This is again a question of whether the parents are able to give the right support at the right time. I'm not necessary against alternative pedagogical woo, but I think it's the parents job to balance the permissive teaching of alternative pedagogy with some authoritative parenting that leans on the demanding side.
As a sidenote, she mentions development psychologist Gordon Neufeld, who - as far as I can see - does (among other things) some kind of attachment woo. Doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, but in raising gifted children, it's a good idea not to rely too much on theories that are probably more targeted towards the average child.