You are currently hurtling through time at
the speed of light. But be careful. If even a tiny bit of your breakneck temporal
velocity leaks into one of the dimensions of space. And you’re standing in the wrong place at
the time, you will rapidly accelerate to your doom. You think I’m kidding? I just described the true source of gravity. Don’t look down. Clocks run slow in gravitational fields. Our GPS satellites tick faster by a factor
of 1-in-a-billion - enough to thrown their position accuracy off by 11km per day. In our recent episode, we saw why this gravitational time dilation is inevitable - it follows as surely as 1+1=2 if we accept the two axioms of Einstein’s relativity theory: that the speed of light is constant for all observers,
and that the weight induced by acceleration is fundamentally the same as that induced
by gravity - the so-called equivalence principle. But none of this is very satisfying. We know that gravity must cause clocks to
run slow on the basis of logical consistency. And we know that gravity DOES cause clocks
to run slow based on many brilliant experiments. But I never explained WHY or HOW gravity causes
the flow of time to slow down. And I’m not going to explain it now - because
in a sense it’s not true. Gravity does NOT warp the flow of time. It’s the other way around - the warping
of time causes gravity. That’s what I’m going to show you right
now. If you didn’t watch the previous episode
- do it, though it’s also ok if you watch this one first. Just don’t forget. So how is it that time causes gravity? Let’s start with … a teapot. I lA nice china teapot hanging in space, minding
its own business. Absent a gravitational field or any forces,
if the teapot starts motionless it stays that way. At least, it stays motionless with respect
to the three dimensions of space. Everything is moving through the dimension
of time. We can show this with our old friend the spacetime
diagram. Let’s have just two dimensions of space
and so we have space … for time. We show progression through time as the object
moves up. You could say that it has a positive velocity
through time, and zero velocity through space. OK, now let’s add a second object - something
nice and massive … the planet Earth will do. We know that the presence of mass and energy
warp spacetime - and the most intense part of that warping is in time - our gravitational
time dilation. Things closer to the Earth move through time
more slowly. We can show this as a bunch of identical clocks. They tick as they move up. Clocks closer to the Earth take longer to
tick for every tick on a distant clock. Velocity through time increases away from
the Earth. If we move particles through time according
to those velocities, we have this sense of time flowing in a gradient - faster streams
distant from the Earth, slower streams near it. Kind of like how water in the center of a
stream flows more quickly than the edge, where the shallower stream drags on that flow. It’s almost like Earth’s mass creates
a drag on the flow of time around it. So what happens to an object sitting in this
stream of time - parts further away from the Earth age faster, right? Well, yes, but that’s not all. We can think of any object as being made of
many tiny clocks. Each atom, each subatomic particle trying
to tick at its own rate. And each of those clocks has a velocity vector
in time. So what’s the temporal velocity of the entire
object? In Einstein’s relativity you have to remember
that time and space are not independent of each other. Objects don’t just have a velocity through
space or through time - they have a velocity through spacetime. We call this their 4-velocity. To get at this, let’s move away from our
teapot for a second and talk about boats. Imagine two boats on an actual stream. One near the edge moves slow and one near
the center moves fast. The slow boater reaches out an oar which the
fast boater grabs. What happens? Instinct tells us that the fast boat is pulled
tow ards the shore. We can think of the two objects as becoming
one object, and the difference in velocities across its length causes a torque that rotates
the overall velocity vector towards the shore." It’s the same with the 4-velocity of an
object in a gravitational field. The gradient of velocities cause the overall
4-velocity of the object to be rotated. All individual 4-velocities start out being
purely in time, but the sum is rotated partially into space. And it’s always rotated in the direction
of decreasing flow - which in a gravitational field is downwards. So this is the motion of any object in a gravitational
field - it gradually picks up velocity in the down direction - it accelerates - and
it pays for that acceleration by losing velocity - Decelerating in the time direction. There's a certain way of interpreting the
math of relativity that says that everything travels at the speed of light. Light travels at the speed of light through
space - obviously enough - and we know that nothing with mass can reach that speed traveling
through space. But if we interpret time as a dimension like
space, then a stationary mass really is moving at the fastest possible speed in the temporal
direction. This is something we can come back to another
time - for now let's go with it. The 4-velocity of a massive object is pointed
almost entirely in the time direction. On the other hand, light itself travels at
the speed of light through space only, and not at all through time - a photon’s clock
is frozen. You might imagine it’s 4-velocity is entirely
rotated out of the time direction into space - although technically photons and other massless
particles don’t have a 4-velocity, which is defined according to the ticking of your
own clock - your proper time - which is zero for the timeless photon. In this picture, a falling object trades some
of its enormous velocity through time to pay for a small velocity through space. To us currency exchange looks favorable for
space - a teapot gains a rapid plummet to its doom for an imperceptible slowing of its
clock. We see the same favorable exchange when we
try to convert mass into energy via Einstein’s most famous equation, E=mc^2 - the speed of
light is the exchange rate, and the speed of light is very large. By the way, two of my favorite physics channels
have great, slightly different explanations of this effect. Check out Nick Lucid on Science Asylum and
Eugene Khutoryansky’s channel to get their takes. So is that it? Do we now perfectly understand the source
of gravity? Well speak for yourself - I’m still confused. This raises thorny questions. Like - what about a particle with no size
- supposedly point-like particles like electrons, quarks, etc. Well, actually, nothing truly occupies only
a single, perfectly defined position in space - quantum uncertainty means that everything
is always at multiple places at once, and so experiences the gradient of time flow. But actually general relativity doesn’t
need quantum mechanics to explain gravity. It’s enough to imagine clocks that are infinitesimally
separated and we still have our time gradient. The other thorny question is about light itself. If photons are already fully rotated into
the spatial direction, how is it that they’re also affected by gravitational fields? They have no “velocity through time” to
trade. But light DOES bend in a gravitational field
- astronomers see it happening all the time in the effect we call gravitational lensing. In fact, the imaginary paths of light rays
were one the most important tools that helped Einstein develop both special and general
relativity. So we’d better understand the effect of
gravity on the path of light. To do so we’re going to need to shift our
perspective in a couple of mind-bendy ways to see how the flow of time determines the
path of even timeless particles. And with those new perspectives we’ll get
a new insight into the source of gravity that seems weirdly at odds with everything I just
told you - and yet is simultaneously exactly as correct. But first you’re going to need to some time
to think on everything I’ve just told you and let it settle, and we’re going to need
some time to make that new episode of space time. Last time we talked about the gravitational
wave background - the ambient buzz of gravitational waves from the distant and ancient universe. Which, by the way, we may have detected using
a pulsar timing array. Ivan Kilmoc asks where he can find the audio
files of the pulsars that we played in the episode. Sorry, I should have linked those in the description. I’ll link them in the description for this
video. They’re from a number of different radio
telescopes, but were collated by the Parkes Observatory in Australia. Stu Lora asks if I can elaborate on my comment
“the time before the big bang” - which I mentioned in reference to a potential component
of the gravitational wave background. I was referring to the extremely energetic
events during the inflationary epoch - fluctuations in the so-called inflaton field, or in the
final decay of those inflatons at the end of inflation. I call this “before the big bang” because
many physicists are moving away from the picture where you have the big bang, then you have
an instant of inflation, then regular expansion. For example, in the eternal inflation model,
inflation may have lasted for a very very long time and still be continuing almost everywhere
- but it ceased in isolated bubbles - corresponding to the formation of a new universe. It makes more sense to talk about the end
of inflation as the beginning of such a universe, rather than the beginning of global inflation. So in that case the last instant of inflation
IS the instant of the big bang, and gravitational Kinkusnacht asks whether gravitational waves
can be used to test ideas in quantum gravity. The answer is absolutely. The most well known prospect is by detecting
the signatures of primordial gravitational waves - waves from the inflationary epoch. These could be found in the gravitational
wave background, but also indirectly through their effect on the cosmic microwave background. Interaction of those waves with matter right
after inflation may have caused characteristic patterns in the distribution of matter, which
we might now see in the way the CMB light is polarized. The BICEP2 experiment claimed detection of
these so-called “b-modes” but it turns out they were wrong. But the b-modes may be there, and we’re
digging deeper to find them. During inflation it’s believed that quantum
gravitational effects would have been very important, so if we can get any type of signal
from then perhaps we can learn something. No Mercy8008 says that the way I described
the boats rocking on the ocean suggests that I would be an awesome dungeon master. Hm. I'd say I'm at best an ok dungeon master. I think I just rolled a nat 20 on my skill
check to describe boats rocking on the ocean. Or did you fumble your saving through versus
being impressed by someone describing boats rocking on the ocean? Anyway, thanks for the compliment and for
reminding me how much I miss the game. So... who wants to play?
I’ll make a guess before watching: “it’s complicated”