Gravitational Wave Background Discovered?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: PBS Space Time
Views: 533,691
Rating: 4.95192 out of 5
Keywords: Space, Outer Space, Physics, Astrophysics, Quantum Mechanics, Space Physics, PBS, Space Time, Time, PBS Space Time, Matt O’Dowd, Astrobiology, Einstein, Einsteinian Physics, General Relativity, Special Relativity, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Black Holes, The Universe, Math, Science Fiction, Calculus, Maths, Graviational Waves, LIGO, VIRGO
Id: L9L_gNogNes
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 25sec (1105 seconds)
Published: Wed Feb 17 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Guess what I'm watching tonight before bed.
Are there estimates/theories about the energy density of the GWB outside of the observed spectra?
Do current models give us an idea of what is going on in the spectra that cannot currently be observed by LIGO/VIRGO and the Pulsar timing array?
In particular, does anyone know if the energy distribution / total energy of the gravitational waves can be estimated (assuming full knowledge of the contents and processes within a given region of space) and do we currently assume, that the gravitational field has some sort of UV cutoff, like the other fields?
I mean, High-frequency noise on the Gravitational field could for instance be generated by all kinds of momentum exchanges, even from individual particles that undergo acceleration (including interactions of atoms or subatomic particles, due to the other 3 forces). This could imply that, in regions with regular matter, a lot of activity in the GWB occurs as noise in the ultra-high frequency regime (due to heat, EM interactions, blackbody-absorption/emission of photons, radioactive decay, etc.).
However - at the most basic level, my first question should have been:
How do GWs contribute to a galaxy's gravitational well?-
- They could either intrinsically not be considered "local" somehow (i.e. part of the stress-energy-momentum tensor) and therefore not be adding to the overall (static) curvature of spacetime. Makes no sense to me - at least from the perspective of an observer outside the wave, the galaxy didn't lose any energy (yet) - But perhaps my intuition fails me here, as I'm only considering it in terms of basic (special) relativity, so the merger hasn't happened yet for this observer...
- They could be a form of energy like any other - seems more reasonable in my head...
But: If so, what happens after a wave has passed - is the well still deeper than from the merged BH alone? Or does it abruptly rise when the GW passes (since it disperses the energy content radially around the merger at the speed of light)? Think about when you are deep below a planetary surface - the planetary shell material above your altitude cancels its gravitational pull on you (no net force downwards), but the additional time dilation from its material is still present (at least when the shell is dense enough).
So, do star systems near the merger still "feel" some of the original time dilation (be in the well of the wave around it) for some time or is is more or less insantaneously lifted because it doesn't project the "gravitational influence" of its energy content backwards due to its speed? To be clear: I can see that the gravitational "pull" from the merged (remnant) BH is reduced (accordingly to the BH mass loss) at the instant the energy of the gravitational wave has passed completely - but is the time dilation also lifted at the same rate or does it linger until the wave is further out?
Hope that someone here knows enough General Relativity to enlighten me on this one...
My thoughts are also going in the direction of dark matter contributors:
What if there is so much energy in the high frequency GWB noise near galaxies, that it significantly increases the total energy of the region? After all, Black Hole mergers lose a lot of mass sending out those relatively low frequencies - wouldn't higher frequency GWs carry even more energy (per wavelength, as for sound)?
As a disclaimer - I don't want to suggest that GWB energy would be sufficient as a dark matter explanation, but it could change the energy density we would expect (in halos around galaxies) to some extent and may even be a factor to consider when calculating the required dark matter / regular matter ratio - even if it turns out its effects are miniscule compared to the matter part of the equation.
Of course, all of this is purely speculative and I'm totally not an Astrophysicist, but it seems like there is a lot more to find out here... For instance - could the activity of virtual particles (in the vacuum) absorb the UV part of the GWB spectrum and how would this be manifest in the resulting range of higher frequency GWs? Just thinking out loud here - don't shoot me, if this sounds too much like MOND to you or is just complete nonsense for any other reason.