Darrelle Revis | Who Was Responsible For The Success In New England, Tom Brady or Bill Belichick?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: I AM ATHLETE
Views: 1,138,414
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: brandon marshall, brandon marshall highlights, brandon marshall podcast, i am athlete, i am athlete podcast, chad johnson, fred taylor, channing crowder, ochocinco, nfl, nfl 2021, nfl podcast, sports, sports podcast, superbowl, super bowl, football highlights, super bowl highlights, football, DarrelleRevis, NewEngland, Patriots, Tom Brady, Bill Belichick, Jared Odrick, Darrelle Revis, PTSD
Id: BN4yHjjfDok
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 49min 38sec (2978 seconds)
Published: Mon Oct 11 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Even if this were true and Brady really were 100% the brains behind the dynasty, I'd imagine Belichick would deserve something more than 0% of the credit for drafting him and sticking with him over Bledsoe in '01.
Oh weβre still doing this?
At one point Revis said something like "that's why the relationship was severed between Bill and Tom". Don't we know this is a falsehood at this point? I don't know, I think after the whole media spectacle that NE-TB was last week I've given up on any hope of drama between those two guys. The more time goes on the more it just seemed like a business deal that Belichick didn't want to happen because who wants to lose Brady? But he couldn't do much with the corner they'd painted themselves in to win the past decade. And I don't think Tom necessarily wanted to leave but he wanted to win still and NE wasn't gonna be able to do that for him. But stacked Tampa would.
But does Tom Brady know what en passant is?
TB was a steal? Thank u captain obvious!
If a great quarterback alone could produce a dynasty, Drew Brees would have more than 1 ring and Dan Marino more than 0. It takes more than just that. Even when those guys were paired with great coaches it didn't happen for them.
It's inane to act like Brady wasn't a massive part of the success the Patriots had. He was. It's also pretty inane to believe that same success could have happened anywhere, with a different head coaches under completely different circumstances.
I don't think anyone was winning more rings with Brady than Belichick. Nor is it believable that Belichick wins nearly as much without Tom.
Is bill belichick a system coach
Tom does in fact know how to move chess pieces. He played a game against JaMarcus Russell back in 2009 and JaMarcus tried to move the Queen like a knight.
I mean, there's some truth to it. But only some. To me the Patriots org was key to Brady's development, and they just worked well together. Why do we have to say its one or the other?
With that said, the some truth is Brady was a cheat code to team development. You could give Brady a box of scraps and still come within 5 yards of making a SB (see the 2006 New England Patriots with Reche Caldwell as a #1). Brady made offenses work 99/100 (his last year in NE being the exception, but I swear that was because he's old and tired of making chicken salad out of chicken crap). Not to say all his offenses were bad, but it sure helps when you can run out offenses without a true #1 and your star TE got hurt and still at least make the AFCCG.
So yeah, having Brady made it so he could run complex offenses with moving parts without too much investment and focus instead on development elsewhere.