Building a Shipping Container Home | EP01Permits and Foundation Design
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Modern Home Project
Views: 3,637,135
Rating: 4.8682051 out of 5
Keywords: how to build a house, building a house, shipping container houses, how to build a shipping container home, shipping containers, shipping container homes, shipping container architecture, tiny houses, diy tiny houses, building a tiny house, how to build, ben uyeda, building a modern house, the modern home project, homemade modern, container house, container architecture, container building, permits for a shipping container house
Id: QA5fh29rhLs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 13min 0sec (780 seconds)
Published: Wed Feb 13 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I watched this recently, video is produced well enough and the topic is somewhat interesting, but I just got the feeling that the whole shipping container is massive gimmick and a regular house would have ended up being larger, more practical and cheaper.
To each their own but I have an irrational annoyance with the video series. They use a cargo container but they never utilized any of its advantages. It feels like an episode of iron chef and the contestant didnโt really want to use the ingredient.
I mean first of all, itโs a container home. You could have built this offsite in a warehouse or yard and then moved it to your property. Thatโs literally one of the biggest advantage of container homes over onsite construction for remote locations. He could have easily built this in town, at the dock, or even in Boston. Any place that wasnโt in the middle of a desert. Also, since he was building three of them and perhaps more in the future why not setup a container workspace?
Another thing that bothered me was he did the concrete foundation himself but hired out the drywall work. The foundation is the most critical component of the whole thing with zero margin for error and is super laborious.
Thereโs more but I guess what Iโm trying to say is this project was so impractical I canโt believe it got off the ground. I wish nothing but the best for him. I hope he does some more research on how others build and design container homes and try to improve from there instead of literally starting from scratch.
Honomobo builds some damn beautiful container homes.
I've been researching this kind of stuff for quite a while.
After a pretty long thought process, reading things written by people who've actually lived in them, and seeing the actual data I've come to the conclusion that a shipping container house is, 90% of the time, less economical and usable than a regular home.
As he mentioned, transportation costs can be extremely high.
What's more is traditional builders and architects aren't really used to working with this kind of structure so, for the most part, you'll be paying a premium for labor. You also generally have to scrap one of the key benefits of building a home; standardization.
A lot of what brings the price of home construction down is the fact that a lot of the things that go into the process are standard sizes/weights and so can be manufactured en mass and drive prices down. With a container home, things have to be custom fit or shaped which usually requires some specialized labor if you're not doing it yourself or else you're spending a lot of time making things fit.
What he has not yet addressed in this video is the paint. A lot of containers have chemicals mixed in with the paint to prevent corrosion and infiltration by insects. These chemicals are generally toxic and not fun to be around. They need to be removed, generally by sandblasting, before you can build with the container. You now have to either pay to have it done or do it yourself and pay to dispose of the sanding medium which is going to be considered toxic and has to be specially disposed of.
The same with the wood flooring. He didn't really address it (which irks me) but the wood flooring that's found in these containers is treated similarly and generally isn't something you want to live in/around. The flooring has to be removed and disposed of similarly to the blasting medium because of the contamination.
I also have serious questions about the insulation. In the third video he talks about it but I'm skeptical about the ability of a metal building in that environment (which I am familiar with, I grew up near there) to resist blasting sun and 110F+ temperatures. You really don't have a lot of room for insulation in a shipping container and the outer skin of the building is going to act like a thermal battery and soak up heat during the day, dumping it at night and keeping you nice and toasty throughout most of the night.
ISO containers derive their strength through rigid framing and the process for converting them into habitable spaces means that a lot of that strength is lost or just flat not utilized. If you chop a wall, you have to reinforce it so you're in essence kinda building it twice.
Overall, a container home works only if you have certain things already in place. Maybe you inherited the land or you found some containers local that you can score for cheap or you have a couple buddies who work construction and are willing to help out for pizza and beer.
If you just try to raw dog it, you'll probably end up spending as much for one as you would have for a regular home and end up with less usable space.
Some side notes:
"OMG California has too many building regulations!"
Yes, California has some extremely strict and voluminous building codes, especially Southern California.
SoCal contends with fires and earthquakes more than any other natural disaster. I lived there for 30 years, we learned the hard way what happens if your buildings aren't strong enough to resist an earthquake or handle a fire. The building codes are crazy but there's a reason why no one from California will get out of bed for an earthquake less than a 4.5.
I would never build a home there because of the codes but I understand why they're in place and I can respect that they do their job when something happens.
As an architect, could we please let this container thing go? It doesn't make any sense economically or environmentally.
The local University architecture department built a container home in partnership with Habitat for Humanity.
They kind of stretched the definition though, by using pieces of three different containers, and by framing and insulating the outside instead of the inside.
The net result was neat, but, yeah, conventional framing would have been cheaper.
An article about it here
I see it was recommended to you too.