ALLOWING PORN AND ADULT CONTENT  ON THEIR SITE. TOP STORY STARTS RIGHT NOW.  >>> GOOD EVENING.  TONIGHT FOR THE FIRST TIME,  PRESIDENT BIDEN SIGNING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER RESTRICTING  ACCESS AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER. THE PRESIDENT ANNOUNCING HIS STRONGEST IMMIGRATION ACTION YET. WILL IT WORK AND IS IT EVEN  LEGAL? HERE IS THE PRESIDENT TODAY. >> REPUBLICANS HAVE LEFT ME NO CHOICE.  I AM ANNOUNCING ACTIONS TO BAR THOSE FROM CROSSING THE BORDER UNLAWFULLY FROM RECEIVING  ASYLUM.  THIS WILL ESSENTIALLY HELP US  MAINTAIN CONTROL OF OUR BORDER.  WE MUST FACE THE SINGLE TRUTH. TO PROTECT AMERICA AS A LAND THAT WELCOMES IMMIGRANTS.  WE MUST SECURE THE BORDER AND  SECURE IT NOW. >> HERE'S WHAT THE BORDER  ORDERABLE DO.  ONCE THEY PASS 2500, IT WILL BAR MIGRANTS FROM REQUESTING ASYLUM.  IT WILL LAST UNTIL THEY DIP  BELOW 1500 PER DAY.  RIGHT NOW AVERAGE ENCOUNTERS IS  AMONG 4000 MEANING THIS  ORDERABLE GO INTO EFFECT IMMEDIATELY. A REMINDER, THE BORDER SPANS NEARLY 2000 MILES FROM SOUTHERN  CALIFORNIA ALL THE WAY DOWN TO TEXAS. THERE ARE MORE THAN 3000 POINTS  OF ENTRY.  THERE ARE QUESTIONS ON WHETHER THE U.S. EVEN HAVE THE MANPOWER  TO MAKE THIS A REALITY.  THE BIDENS ORDER SIGNALS A HUGE  SHIFT ON IMMIGRATION.  A MOVE HE STRONGLY CRITICIZED  ON THE DEBATE STAGE BEFORE BECOMING PRESIDENT.  >> I WOULD IN FACT MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS IMMEDIATELY A  SURGE IN THE BORDER FOR ALL  THOSE PEOPLE SEEKING ASYLUM. WE ARE A NATION THAT SAYS IF YOU WANT TO FLEE YOU SHOULD  COME.  AND THOSE WHO COME SEEKING ASYLUM, WE SHOULD IMMEDIATELY  HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ABSORB  THEM, KEEP THEM SAFE, UNTIL  THEY CAN BE HEARD. THE FIRST PRESIDENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE SOMEONE SEEKING ASYLUM CANNOT  COME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. >> WHY IS THE CHANGE?  >> IMMIGRATION IS ON THE TOP OF  THE MIND FOR VOTERS. IT COMES IN AT NUMBER TWO  BEHIND INFLATION ACCORDING TO  AN NBC NEWS POLL.  AND IT IS GOOD NEWS, ESPECIALLY  IN AN ELECTION YEAR. THIS NBC POLL FINDING 59%  APPROVE OF HOW BIDEN HAS HANDLED THE BORDER.  BIDE DETERMINING THE POLITICAL  WEAKNESS AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST FIVE MONTHS UNTIL THE NOVEMBER ELECTION. SOME ARE WONDERING IS THERE  EVEN ENOUGH TIME?  FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP IS  SAYING THIS ABOUT THE NEW  EXECUTIVE ORDER. >> HE COULD HAVE DONE IT VERY  EASILY.  ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS SAY CLOSE THE BORDER.  THAT IS THE POWER OF PRESIDENCY.  >> NOW, THE COURT HAS NOT  ALWAYS AGREED WITH THAT. KEEP IN MIND, THE BIPARTISAN ORDER HAS FAILED TWICE AT THE  HANDS OF REPUBLICANS AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP REQUESTED IT.  THE NUMBER OF POOR SLEEP BORDER  ENCOUNTERS HAS SHARPLY DECREASED FROM REACHING RECORD HIGHS BACK IN DECEMBER, WE SHOULD POINT OUT.  PANAMA'S PRESIDENT IS SAYING HE  WILL SHUT DOWN ONE OF THE  WORLD'S BUSIEST, BUSIEST IMMIGRATION ROUTES AND NOW MEXICO IS WORKING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BORDER WITH ITS OWN  EFFORTS AS WELL. THIS MORNING NBC NEWS SPOKE  WITH A VENEZUELAN FAMILY WHO SAID THEY SLEPT ON THE STREET  IN MEXICO WHILE AWAITING.  >> Reporter: HOW LONG ARE YOU  WAITING? SEVEN MONTHS AND SIX DAYS, HE  TELLS US, SAYING HE CAME TO THE  U.S. TO WORK TO FEED HIS YOUNG FAMILY.  >> THAT IS JULIA ANSLEY WHO IS AT THE BORDER. IT IS BECAUSE OF STORIES LIKE  THAT THAT THE ACLU IS NOW SUING  THE BORDER ADMINISTRATION. THAT ESSAY.  THE SAME ACLU THAT TOOK ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.  EVERYTHING FROM CHILD  SEPARATION TO WHAT PRESIDENT BIDEN IS NOW DOING IT. SO WHAT DOES THE ACLU THINK  ABOUT THIS MAJOR EXECUTIVE ORDER IN A MAJOR CHANGE COMING FROM JOE BIDEN?  THIS IS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT. HE LED SOME OF THE BIGGEST LAWSUITS IN THE TRUMP  ADMINISTRATION.  THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING  TOP STORY TONIGHT. THIS WAS BOTH UNDER THE TRUMP  ADMINISTRATION AND NOW UNDER THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.  TALK TO ME ABOUT WHY THE ACLU  IS NOW SUING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.  >> YEAH. WE SUED UNDER TRUMP. NOW WE HAVE A HUNTER BIDEN.  HE LEFT US NO CHOICE.  THE POLICY IS LEGALLY THE SAME AS WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DID. SO WE SUCCESSFULLY SUED ONTO TRUMP AND WE THINK WE WILL HAVE  TO HUNTER BIDEN. WE WILL WHEN THAT TIME IS TO BE  DETERMINED.  IT IS BASICALLY THAT THE EXECS CANNOT DO THIS WITHOUT CONGRESS.  CONGRESS HAS VERY CLEARLY SAID YOU MAY APPLY FOR ASYLUM, BUT  BE AWARE WHEN YOU ENTER. THE REASON IS VERY CLEAR.  SOMETIMES PEOPLE CANNOT GET TO A COURT. SOMETIMES THEY ARE PUSHING YOU THROUGH AT DIFFERENT PLACES. SOMETIMES THEY JUST DO NOT KNOW  WHERE THE PORT IS. SO CONGRESS HAS SAID IF YOU ARE  GENUINELY IN DANGER, JUST GET  TO U.S. OIL AND WE WILL SCREEN YOU. I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT A FEW THINGS.  WE ARE NOT SAYING EVERYONE IS  ENTITLED TO ASYLUM BUT WE ARE  SAYING THAT EVERYONE IS  ENTITLED TO SCREENING AND THAT IS A SOLEMN PROMISE WE MADE  AFTER WORLD WAR II.  THIS WOULD NOT EVEN GIVE PEOPLE  A SCREENING FOR ASYLUM.  IN YOUR INTRO, YOU TALKED ABOUT  THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND THAT IS  RIGHT. I THINK THERE IS A MISCONCEPTION ABOUT WHAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WANTS. THEY WANT SOMETHING BALANCED AND IN THE MIDDLE. THEY DO NOT WANT TO SHUT OFF ASYLUM COMPLETELY. LOOK, THERE'S A FAMILY AND THEY  ARE BEING PERSECUTED BECAUSE OF  THEIR RELIGION.  BECAUSE THEY ARE CHRISTIAN.  WHATEVER.  AND THEY MAY BE IN DEADLY  DANGER.  WOULD YOU WANT THEM TO HAVE A  SCREENING FOR ASYLUM?  THEY MAY ALSO WANTED TO BE STREAMLINED SO PEOPLE ARE NOT  WAITING FOR YEARS WHILE THERE  IS CHAOS AT THE BORDER.  WE ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF STREAMLINING THE PROCESS BUT WE  DO NOT WANT PRESIDENT BIDEN TO GO TO THE OTHER END TO PRESIDENT TRUMP DID AND SAY WE ARE GOING TO BAN ASYLUM  COMPLETELY.  >> LET ME GET YOUR TAKE FROM THE OTHER END. >> TODAY, I AM GOING PAST  PUBLIC INSTRUCTION AND USING A SET OF AUTHORITY AS PRESIDENT  TO DO WHAT I CAN ON MY OWN TO  ADDRESS THE BORDER.  FRANKLY, I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED  TO HAVE ADDRESSED THIS ISSUE TO  BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO  ACTUALLY GET THE KIND OF SYSTEM  WE HAVE NOW THAT IS BROKEN FIXED. >> SO YOU JUST MENTIONED THIS. HE NEEDS CONGRESS. HE SAID HE TRIED.  HE CANNOT GET ANYWHERE WITH OUR  PUBLICANS. HE IS LEFT WITH NO OTHER OPTIONS. >> WHAT I THINK PRESIDENT BIDEN  HAD IS THAT ANOTHER OPTION WAS COMPLETELY SHUTTING OFF ASYLUM.  WE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE  SEEN THEM SURGING RESOURCES TO THE BORDER AND TRIED THAT. AS YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE BEEN TO  THE BORDER MANY, MANY TIMES. FAMILIES ARE NOT TRYING TO INVADE.  THEY WALK ACROSS THE BORDER AND  SIT DOWN AND WAIT FOR AN OFFICER TO SAY NOW IS MY TIME TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM AND BE SCREENED.  WE DO NOT NEED MORE  ENFORCEMENT. WE NEED MORE ASYLUM OFFICERS TO  SCREEN PEOPLE TO MOVE VERY QUICKLY. WE GET THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC  WANTS THIS SYSTEM TO WORK MORE EFFICIENTLY AND MOVE IT SO THERE IS NOT CHAOS.  DO WE THINK THE PRESIDENT COULD  HAVE DONE MORE WHILE HE WAS  THERE? MORE IMPORTANTLY, CONGRESS NEEDS TO ALLOCATE MORE RESOURCES. I THINK THAT IS THE WAY TO DO  IT.  I THINK THE REPORTING HAS SHOWN  OVER THE YEARS WHEN PEOPLE ARE THAT DESPERATE, THEY ARE GOING TO LEAVE THEIR COUNTRY NO  MATTER WHAT. I ALSO THINK THAT ULTIMATELY WE  NEED MORE LEGAL PATHWAYS FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO WORK. I DO NOT KNOW A SINGLE ECONOMIST NOW SAYING WE DO NOT NEED MORE WORKERS IN THE U.S.  AND MORE IMMIGRANT WORKERS.  IF WE OPENED UP ALL THESE LEGAL  PATHWAYS, PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE  SO DESPERATE TO LINE UP AT THE BORDER AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE  SHORTER LINES AT THE BORDER FOR  PEOPLE WHO GENUINELY NEED IT AND PEOPLE COMING IN WITH LEGAL  PATHWAYS TO WORK.  AND THAT WOULD BE A BENEFIT TO OUR COUNTRY. AND EVERYTHING IS SO POLARIZED THAT PEOPLE THINK ALL THESE  FAMILIES ARE HERE TO DO HARM.  THEY ARE NOT HERE TO DO HARM IT.  THINK ABOUT THE IMMIGRANTS YOU KNOW.  THEY ARE NOT FITTING THAT  NARRATIVE. >> I WENT TO SPEAK ABOUT.  NEW YORK CITY MAYOR ERIC ADAMS HAS BEEN SPEAKING ABOUT THAT.  AND WHAT PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS BEEN DOING TODAY RIGHT BEFORE  THE ELECTION.  DO YOU FEEL DUPED? >> YOU KNOW, LOOK, THE REALITY IS A LOT OF THINGS PLAY INTO THIS SITUATION.  I WOULD SAY WE ARE DISAPPOINTED  THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS  TAKING THIS ROAD BECAUSE THE POLICIES ARE MISGUIDED.  I THINK THEY PLAY INTO EVERY DECISION EVERY WHITE HOUSE MAKES. I DO NOT WANT TO FOCUS COMPLETELY THINKING THAT IT IS THE ADMINISTRATION AND NOT THE COURTS.  IT MAY BE THE ADMINISTRATION THAT ROLLED IT BACK OR MITIGATED IT.  I THINK THAT THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO HEAR FROM PEOPLE SAYING, YEAH, WE HAVE NAMED IMMIGRATION AS A BIG  ISSUE FOR US BUT THAT IS NOT HOW WE WANTED TO GO. WE DID NOT WANT AN EXTREME TRUMP POLICY.  THERE STILL TIME FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO MITIGATE IT  IF YOU WENT TO.  >> I HAVE COVERED THE BORDER FOR A LONG TIME AND I HAVE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE THOUGH  WHEN YOU TALK TO MIGRANTS. I SPEAK SPANISH AND I'M VERY SENSITIVE TO THIS ISSUE. THE DIFFERENCE I NOTED IS THAT WHEN YOU TALK TO MIGRANTS YEARS  AGO, THEY WOULD GIVE YOU A VARIETY OF REASONS WHY THEY  WERE COMING OVER.  NOW, WHEN I SURVEY MIGRANTS, AND A LOT OF IT ARE VENEZUELANS  -- AND, TRUST ME, I HAVE BEEN  TO VENEZUELA.  THEY HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES THERE.  THAT BEING SAID, THEY ALL SEEK ASYLUM.  THIS ONE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO  WORK.  THEY CANNOT EAT. IF EVERYONE IS SEEKING ASYLUM, DOES THAT HURT YOUR ARGUMENT IN  THINK WE NEED TO GIVE ASYLUM?  IS PRESIDENT BIDEN'S HANDS NOT TIED?  >> SO THAT IS A FAIR POINT.  THIS IS WHAT I WOULD SAY.  ONE IS, IF YOU HAVE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO WORK, AND THEY SEE NO  OTHER PATH THAN  TO APPLY FOR  ASYLUM, THAT IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR DESIGN.  LET US HAVE LEGAL PATHWAYS TO  WORK.  THE OTHER THING IS YOU ARE RIGHT. NOT EVERYONE HAS AN ASYLUM CLAIM BUT THEY STILL NEED  SCREENING. FOR THE PEOPLE WE SEND BACK TO REAL DANGER WHO HAVE ASYLUM  CLAIMS, WE ARE GOING TO SEND YOU BACK TO TORTURE. SO WE NEED A PROPER SCREENING  SYSTEM AND YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY  RIGHT. IT NEEDS TO BE MORE EFFICIENT. WE ARE NOT GOING TO SAY  EVERYONE CANNOT WIN. WE ARE GOING TO SEND EVERYONE  BACK.  >> THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER TAKES  EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.  BUT IT IS GOING TO BE STOPPED  PRETTY QUICKLY BY THE COURTS IF  THEY ROLLED LIKE THEY RULED ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.  >> WE ARE HOPEFUL. WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT THE  TIMING OF THE LAW. WE JUST GOT THE ROLE TODAY.  WE WILL GO THROUGH IT CAREFULLY  AND DECIDE THE TIMING OF THE LAWSUIT AND WHERE WE ARE GOING TO FILE IT.  THEN WE WILL HOPE FOR QUICK  ACTION BY THE COURTS.  I THINK PRESIDENT BIDEN AND HIS  TEAM HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THERE ARE REAL DOUBTS ABOUT THE  LEGALITY OF IT.  I THINK THEY WERE EXPECTING A  LAWSUIT. YOU WILL SEE.  NOTHING IS GOING TO PREVENT YOU  FROM FILING THAT LAWSUIT UNLESS  THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION PULLS BACK.  >> YOU ARE GOING FORWARD WITH  THE LAWSUIT? WHERE ARE YOU FILING?  CALIFORNIA OR NEW YORK?  >> WE HAD NOT DECIDED. THE OPTIONS ARE CALIFORNIA AND D.C. I WILL CERTAINLY KEEP YOU POSTED ON THAT.  >> YOU THINK THIS IS EVEN  POSSIBLE KNOWING THE MANPOWER  ISSUES AT THE BORDER?  IF THIS WERE TO GO INTO EFFECT IN THE ORDER IS THE LAW OF THE LAND, WILL BORDER OFFICIALS -- WILL THIS ACTUALLY WORK? IS IT FEASIBLE?  >> I DO NOT THINK IT WILL WORK IN THE SENSE THAT PEOPLE WILL  NOT STILL COME TO THE BORDER.  LIKE LET'S JUST TAKE OUR CHANCES WITH DANGER IN OUR COUNTRY. THEY ARE STILL GOING TO COME.  BUT I THINK WHAT IS SO TROUBLING THAT HAS NOT GOT ATTENTION IS I'M NOT SURE HOW  MANY RESOURCES IT WILL TAKE  BECAUSE UNDER NORMAL POLICIES  YOU HAVE TO AFFIRMATIVELY ASK  PEOPLE, WILL YOU BE TORTURED?  WILL SOMETHING HAPPEN TO YOU?  YOU NEED TO SCREEN THOSE RESOURCES. WHAT THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION  IS DOING WHICH IS REALLY DRACONIAN, UNLESS YOU ASK TO BE  SCREENED, YOU WILL GET NO  SCREENING. SO THEY WILL NOT NEED ASYLUM OFFICERS THERE.  THEY ARE JUST GOING TO PUSH YOU  BACK ACROSS THE BORDER.  AND SO WE ARE VERY WORRIED THAT  EVERYONE IS GOING TO GET PUSHED  BACK ACROSS THE BORDER WITHOUT ANY ASYLUM OFFICERS SEEING THEM.  >> IF YOU ARE A MEXICAN  IMMIGRANT, YOU WILL GO BACK TO MEXICO.  BUT IF YOU ARE VENEZUELAN, IF  YOU'RE FROM AFRICA, IF YOU'RE  FROM ASIA -- THESE COUNTRIES ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE YOU BACK.  >> I GUESS YOU HAVE GOTTEN SOME  AGREEMENT IN MEXICO. PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW WHERE TO GO IN MEXICO. >> THE U.S. CANNOT EVEN HOUSE  ALL THESE MIGRANTS.  >> THEY WILL BE ON THE STREETS.  THEY'LL BE SUBJECT TO CARTELS. >> THIS IS FROM EARLIER TODAY  ON THE SAME DAY THAT BIDEN ANNOUNCED HIS ORDER. THIS IS AN INTERVIEW WITH TIME MAGAZINE.  IN IT, TIME RIGHT THAT BIDEN SAYS HIS ONLY REGRET ABOUT LIFTING TRUMP'S ANTI IMMIGRATION MEASURES  IS THAT  HE DID NOT DO IT SOONER. HIS GOAL AND SECOND TERM IS TO FINISH WHAT HE STARTED.  ISN'T THAT A COMPLETE REVERSAL OF WHAT WE ARE SEEING TODAY? >> YEAH. I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO WOULD SAY THAT BIDEN'S TRUMP. >> WE ARE NOT SAYING THAT. >> BUT THIS IS EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTING. HE DID PROMISE HE WOULD HAVE A HUMANE ASYLUM SYSTEM.  >> WHERE DO YOU THINK THE NEXT STEP IS HERE?  DO YOU THINK YOU ARE SUCCESSFUL  IN YOUR LAWSUIT OR DO YOU THINK  THE ORDERS PUSHED THROUGH? >> I THINK THEY'RE NOT LOOKING TO PULL THAT EXECUTIVE ORDER.  I THINK THEY WILL MAKE A DECISION ON HOW TO DO IT.  I THINK AT THIS POINT, YOU WILL  PROBABLY HAVE TO RELY ON THE COURTS AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. DEFINITELY GOING TO WIN OR LOSE.  THERE'S TOO MUCH AT STAKE HERE.  WE ARE SEEING A SEA CHANGE IN  AMERICA NOW. THE ASYLUM SYSTEM IS DIVERGING FROM THE REST OF THE WORLD.  WE SAID WE WOULD AT LEAST GREEN  PEOPLE BEFORE WE SEND THEM BACK  TO DANGER. >> WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? CLEARLY THERE IS A CRISIS. I MEAN, CLEARLY WE HAVE TO HAVE  LAWS AND BORDERS.  I KNOW YOU ARE ON THE FRONTLINE  FIGHTING BUT WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?  >> TWO.  WE NEED MORE LEGAL PATHWAYS SO EVERYONE DOES NOT HAVE TO LINE UP AT THE BORDER.  THEY COME IN AND CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY. THE SECOND THING IS WE NEED TO PUT MORE ASYLUM OFFICERS AT THE  BORDER TO DO THE SCREENINGS. WE HAVE THE RESOURCES. THERE IS ALREADY A LAW IN PLACE  THAT ALLOWS THE SCREENINGS TO  HAPPEN VERY QUICKLY. WE DO NOT NEED MORE ENFORCEMENT  AGENTS.  THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO ESCAPE. THEY ARE TRYING TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM.  THOSE ARE THE SOLUTI