"Mandir from "Masjid" or "Masjid from "Mandir" In starting first minute we should know about some important questions related to this case because after that you should not be in doubt, that why this Ayodhya dispute is why so lengthy and complicated The history of this case is nearly 500 years old which starts from 1528 So if the question is about the ownership right and title of this land, so from which date should consider this right from 1528 when Babjri Masjid was built or from 1949 when Shri Ram's statue was kept there Or from 1992 when Babri masjid was demolished What was the decision of Allahabad court? and why that decision was not been accepted ? What was mentioned in the report of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)? and why mediation got failed? The three parties related to this case, what evidences they have and according to that evidences what are their demands ? By keeping all the emotions and faith beside, the 2nd longest case in the history of Supreme Court ever after 40 days of hearing, what will the effect of this case decision? Hey everybody! This is Priya and you are watching Finolgoy Legal In today's video we will get to know about all the important facts related to the "Ayodhya" dispute by which you get will know about the seriousness and the decision of Supreme Court on this matter So lets start. Hindu peoples sayings were different so as the muslims, apart from this what is the story being we will look that In 1528 the commander of Babar, Mir Baqi built Babri Masjid The belief of local peoples of that place was that Masjid is Built after demolishing Ram Mandir over there and because of this the first Riots happens between Hindus and Muslims between 1853 to 1859 To stop this Riots, British Government comes around And they say that, we will divide this area in to two different parts the inside portion of that area will be used by muslims and the outside portion will be used by hindus after stating this they do fencing of that area after that in 1885 for the first time this matter goes to court, when Mahant Raghubir Das demands for building the roof on the outer side for puja and worship Now lets see what has happened after the independence the first very imp date is 23 december 1949, when on the main part of the Masjid Lord Ram's Statue was placed so now Hinuds started worshiping on that part of the land also, once again the situation got tensed For controlling the situation, the government of India closes that whole area, put complete ban over there neither Hindus can enter nor muslims, so for removal of this governmental ban many civil cases gets filed like in 1950- Mahant Ram Chandra Das filed a case for Right to Worship for hindus in 1959 Nirmohi Akhara files a cases saying that the possession of that area should be handed to them after two years of this in 1961, Sunni Waqf Board also files a case saying that the ownership of that place (Babri Masjid) should be given to them all the discussions are not done in court, so outside the court what different religious were preparing we will also look that Vishwa Hindu Parishad formed a committee for building Ram Mandir and by this time the cases filed for the removal of governmental ban, the results were also coming by that time One such result came in 1986, when Faizabad court allowed Hindus to worship on that place angry on this decision Muslims formed a committee for them selves- Babri Masjid action committee after that in 1989 another case was filed named " Ram Lalla Virajman " They also wanted the ownership right, whole possession of that land now the situation was getting tensed day by day In 1990 Minister Lal Krishna Advani starts a Rath Yatra form Somnath of Gujrat to Uttar Pradesh The result of this act was very dramatic, situation got more tensed, Riots begins all over and Mr.Advani got arrested in Bihar, Lal Krishna Advani was the senior leader of BJP so opposing the arrest of Advani, BJP took back their support from the VP singh government after that in 1991, looking at the tensed situation and to stop the riots, like the british government, kalyan singh government of Uttar pradesh comes around and take that land under thier control Next important date is 6th December 1992, when thousands of kar sevak moved to Ayodhya and demolished Babri Masjid and at the same place they built a temporary Ram Mandir After this incident the whole India was suffering from Riots on 16th December 1992 about the matter of demolition of masjid who was responsible and to look after the situation Liberhan Committee was appointed At that time, in Center there was Narsimha Rao's congress government so the proposal of congress government was at that disputed land of Ayodhya, A Ram Mandir, A Masjid, library and A museum and other facilites should be provided This proposal of congress was strongly opposed by BJP so now we come to 2002, when there was BJP government in center Prime Minister shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee started a Ayodhya Vibhag whose main objective was resolution by talking to Hindus and Muslims and come towards solution In April 2002, for deciding the ownership right of that land a bench of 3 judges constituted at Allahbad court The 3 judges were Justice Sudhir Agrawal, Justice S U khan and Justice D V sharma For the hearing of case Allahabad High Court tells Archaeological Survey of India to investigate that land and tells to submit a report on that and in 1528 on the same area a Masjid was built, and time period of 300 years between there is no evidence for that but if we connect the dots we will see that, in 12th century there was a temple and on 1528 there was Mosque and if we listen to the local peoples, the Masjid was Built after demolishing the temple only So this was ASI's report after considering all the reports and evidences, the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High court on 30th September 2010, delivered a historic judgement They divided the whole disputed area in to 3 parts the first part of Ram Murti was given to Ram Lalla Virajman the second part, Seeta Rasoi, Bhandara and Ram Chabutra was given to Nirmohi Akhara and the remaining third part was given to Sunni Waqf Board On 9 may 2011 supreme court put a stay on the decison of the Allahabad court On Feb 2016, for the nirman of Ram Mandir Subramanian Swamy filed a case in Supreme court and on march 2017 the Chief Justice of Supreme court Justice JS khehar advised to solve this dispute out side the court by discussion between related parties Till December 2017, there were 32 appeals in Supreme Court against the decision of Allahabad court Supreme court said the hearing of this case will start from Janurary 2019 For the hearing of this case Supreme Court composed a bench in which there were 5 judges, Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul Nazeer on 8 march 2019 on this dispute Supreme court says to settle it by a Mediation Panel regulated by the court on may 2019 mediation panel submits their final reports in the court after that in Supreme court 40 days of hearing goes on from 6th August to 14 October After the hearing Supreme Court reserves its Judgment but it tells to the parties to submit Moulding of Relief Moulding of Relief means which ever party has asked for their claims, if in case supreme court doesn't deliver that so in that case court asks them to submit what they want in alternative to that now lets know about the Arguements of the three parties Sushil Kumar Jain represented Nirmohi Akhara, Sunni waqf board was represented by Rajiv Dhavan and Ram Lalla Virajman was represented by CS Vaidyanathan One by one we will see that what were the issues and main responses of these three parties Nirmhi Akhara was saying that possession of Inner Courtyard yard from 1934 should be given to them But they didn't have any document to prove their demands that from 1934 they only had the possession of that area while representing Sunni Waqf Board Rajiv Dhavan said that On December 6 1992 on that place there was Masjid on that area and this fact should only be considered on 1949 in the middle of the night Ram murti was placed on the Masjid which was an illegal act and from this illegal act no other party should be benefited from this Sunni Waqf Board said that in Ram Chabutra Hindu people worship and It is the birth place of Lord Ram and they don't have any problem Hindu people worshiping in Ram Chabutra but the inner courtyard belongs to them and should get them only CS Vaidyanathan said that, there was only Ram mandir since from the begining and Babri Masjid was built after demolishing the temple he also said that from 1949 when the murti was placed since then the area was in their possession and muslims or Sunni Waqf Board doesn't have any exclusive possession on that place he stressed on ASI's report and said that in the slabs and pillars of Babri Masjid, Hindu motives and scruptures were found which indicates that there was Ram mandir here before After hearing the arguments of the three parties, Supreme court said that based on the talking's of people or based on the report of ASI, any lands ownership right cant be decided the title of the land is decided based on the legal principles and proper evidences and evidence clearly shows that being a Masjid over there, Hindus were never being stopped to worship there Along with this commenting on the decision of Allahabad High Court, Supreme Court said that the decision of Allahabad court of dividing that land in to three parts was a unsustainable decision and it was a wrong relief. why? Because this relief was never being asked by any party so Supreme court said that the judgement of Allahabad court was wrong After this Supreme Court said that, majority of this case is based in historical facts and figures and by relying on the probabilities it is clear that from 1857 Hindus were worshiping in the outer place of that area by which their control being establishes' Court also said that, the stay on the muslims for doing Namaaz over there was from 23 December 1949, means from that date when the murti was placed in the Masjid by which in their 400 year old masjid muslims right to worship got deprived Then Supreme Court using its power of the constitution's Article. 142 which ever mistakes has been made, it corrects that and gives a final decision and said that the land of Babri Masjid means 2.77 acre of land will go to Ram Lalla Virajman and from Central government or State government Sunni Waqf Board will be given 5 acres of land Both the parties will get their alloted land on the same day only History has always witnessed that, in any court case both parties never been satisfied with courts decision while coming out that's why Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Justice kehar, Supreme court Bench and all other peoples wanted that this dispute should be solved by the mediation or mutual understanding Because of all other try's were not successful, that's why Supreme Court has to Interfere in this case And what is the effect and reaction of this decision of Supreme Court we will get to know about this in coming days only I hope by this video you will able to understand both this topic and the decision of Supreme Court and you interpret this decision as unity and integrity That is for now see you in the next video. By By!
