200,000. >> John: BIG NUMBERS FOR AUGUST. BIDEN ADMINISTRATION FACING LEGAL CHALLENGE. ARIZONA ON TUESDAY BECOMING FIRST STATE IN THE NATION TO FILE A LAWSUIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NEWS COMES AS RECENT POLLS SHOW THE PUBLIC MAY BE LOSING FAITH IN THE ADMINISTRATION'S ABILITY TO HANDLE THE PANDEMIC. ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK BRNOVICH JOINS US NOW. THE CASE BETWEEN BRNOVICH IS EQUAL PROTECTION ARGUMENT. YOU SAY UNDER EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, VACCINE MANDATE IS NULL AND VOID BECAUSE IT DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT MIGRANTS WHO ARE COMING ACROSS THE BORDER ILLEGALLY, WE SAW 208,000 WITH NEW NUMBERS IN AUGUST, MAKE THE CASE FOR US THAT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T APPLY TO MIGRANTS, THE WHOLE THING NEEDS TO BE VOIDED. >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME ON, JOHN. IT IS QUITE FRANKLY AS SIMPLE AS THIS, I DON'T THINK WE CAN HAVE A SERIOUS DISCUSSION ON COVID THAT DOESN'T BEGIN WITH TALKING ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON AT OUR BORDER. IT DEMONSTRATES HYPOCRISY OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, WHICH HAS A GREAT EFFECT ON US. THEY SAID, IF YOU ARE A NON-CITIZEN, YOU HAVE OPTION TO TAKE THE VACCINE OR NOT, A U.S. CITIZEN WILL BE REQUIRED TO TAKE THE VACCINE. THAT VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE. SECONDLY, IMPORTANT TO EMPHASIZE, IF YOU READ OUR LAWSUIT, WE MAKE THE CASE THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF DOES NOT HAVE ANY POWER, ANYWHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE NINTH AND TENTH AMENDMENT TO MANDATE ANYBODY ANYWHERE SHOULD GET THE VACCINE. FROM JUMP STREET, OUR POSITION THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXERCISE OF POLICE POWER AS PRESIDENT DOESN'T HAVE AND FURTHERMORE, IF HE COULD, HE'S DOING IN SUCH A WAY CONTRARY TO CONSTITUTION, GIVES PEOPLE HERE ILLEGALLY, PASS, OPTION TO TAKE IT AND FORCING U.S. CITIZENS TO TAKE IT, THAT SHOWS HYPOCRISY IN THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION. >> John: PARAGRAPH 12, THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A KING WHO CAN EXERCISE THIS UNBRIDLED POWER UNILATERALLY AND EVEN GEORGE III WOULD NOT HAVE HAD ROYAL DECREE ALONE. YOU ARE CLAIMING IT IS ONE OF A SERIES, GREATER SERIES OF CONSTITUTIONALLY INAPPROPRIATE ACTIONS. >> JOHN, THERE IS A CASE IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CAN STOP BIDEN ADMINISTRATION FROM HALTING DEPORTATIONS. WE SAID FEDERAL LOSS HAVE TO DEPORT PEOPLE WHO HAVE DEPORTATION ORDERS. THEY WERE NOT DOING. THERE ARE SERIES OF ACTIONS AND WHETHER NATIONALIZING ELECTION, MASSIVE TAX BILLS THAT ARE BOON DOGGLES, FOR GREEN ENERGY CAUSES, WE HAVE SEEN ATTEMPT TO CONSOLIDATE POWER IN D.C. I SUBMIT TO YOU ISSUE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE POWER, HAVE YOU ENABLERS IN CONGRESS ALLOWING BIDEN TO DO IT AND CONTRADICTORY TO THE CONSTITUTION AND SOMETHING I THINK THAT IS UNPRECEDENTED. THINK ABOUT THIS, JOHN, NOTION THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE PRESIDENT CAN ORDER YOU TO INJECT SOMETHING IN YOUR BODY AND REGARDLESS WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE VACCINE, GOOD, BAD, DOESN'T MATTER, IT IS PRINCIPLE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ONE MAN, ONE PERSON CANNOT TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR BODY AND TELL YOU WHAT YOU HAVE TO PUT INSIDE IT. THESE ARE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES WE ARE FIGHTING FOR AND I HOPE FOLKS SEE THAT. I WORRY ABOUT POLITICIZATION OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, I WILL KEEP FIGHTING. >> John: THIS IS BEFORE THE COURT, FEDERAL COURTS, IT WILL BE UP TO THE THIRD BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT TO MAKE DETERMINATION IF THIS IS CONSTITUTIONALLY SOUND OR NOT. "WALL STREET JOURNAL" HOLMAN JENKINS WROTE ABOUT THIS YESTERDAY SAYING THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT THE JOE BIDEN VACCINE MANDATE, LAWYERS AND JUDGES WILL HAVE BOTH INSENTIVE AND DUTY TO APPLY CLEAR THINKING ABOUT COVID, WHICH HAS BEEN LACKING. THE QUESTION IS NOT WHETHER VACCINES ARE GOOD OR BAD, BUT WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT HAS SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND GROUNDS TO OVERRULE PERSONAL CHOICE AND WHETHER TO TAKE THEM. TOO, ATTORNEY GENERAL BRNOVICH, THE TREND LINE FOR JOE BIDEN IS GOING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. THE NEW QUINNIPIAC POLL, 48% OF RESPONDENTS APPROVE OF HOW HE IS HANDLING IT, WELL WITHIN THE MARGIN OF ERROR, THE TREND LINE GOING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. YOUR THOUGHTS? >> JOHN, I HAVE A PUBLIC SCHOOL KID, I DIDN'T GO TO IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL, BUT I UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE, MY FAMILY FLED COMMUNISM, MAKING SURE THERE IS RULE OF LAW IN A GOVERNMENT, ESPECIALLY PRESIDENT THAT RESPECTS THE CONSTITUTION. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ISSUES, IF YOU ALLOW THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO GET AWAY WITH THIS, IT IS UNFETTERED AMOUNT OF POWER IN THE HANDS OF ONE PERSON, ANY ONE ADMIN STRAGZ 6789 I /* /* -- ADMINISTRATION. THIS IS INVASION OF OUR BODIES AND RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND OVERREACH BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IF YOU ALLOW THIS PRECEDENT TO FAN, ALLOW THE PRESIDENT TO DO THIS, WHAT CAN HE NOT DO? UNFETTERED POWER AND CONSTITUTION SAID THAT WAS NOT HIS JOB. YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THE SYSTEM AND CHECKS AND BALANCES OF THE JUDICIARY GETTING INVOLVED, LET US NOT FORGET, MADISON AND THE PEOPLE THAT WROTE THE CONSTITUTION, UNDERSTOOD STATES WERE ULTIMATE CHECK AND WOULD GUARD LIBERTY AND RIGHT OF CITIZENS AND THAT IS WHAT WE'RE DOING. THIS SHOULD BE ISSUE WHERE THERE ARE 50 CHECKS ON PRESIDENT BIDEN, ALL 50 STATES. >> John: SEE IF THE ACLU TAKE
