TIME YOU SPOKE WITH HER. >> NO. >> THE STATE TODAY OPTING NOT TO QUESTION BRADLEY. >> DAVE AMBERG, STATE ATTORNEY FOR PALM BEACH JOINS US NOW. THIS LOOKS MAD, OR MAKING A DECISION FINDING EVIDENCE THAT WOULD REMOVE, HER DID IT MOVE THE NEEDLE WHAT WE SAW TODAY? >> A LITTLE BIT, BECAUSE THIS IS NO LONGER A QUESTION OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS MUCH AS IT IS ABOUT LYING. BECAUSE NATHAN WADE SWORN AFFIDAVITS THAT SAID THE RELATIONSHIP BEGAN AFTER HE WAS HIRED AS SPECIAL COUNSEL, AND SPLIT THE EXPENSES. NOW THE JUDGE HAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER HE'S TELLING THE TRUTH, AND IF IN FACT IT IS PROVEN THAT HE AND FANI WILLIS LIED TO THE COURT, THEY WILL PROBABLY WILL BE THROWN OFF THE CASE AND SANCTIONED BY THE GEORGIA BAR. >> LET'S SAY THE JUDGE DOESN'T THROW THEM OFF THE, CASE THEN WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INVESTIGATION. IF SHE CHOSE TO STEP DOWN NOW VERSUS IF THE JUDGE REMOVED HER. >> IF SHE CHOSE TO STEP DOWN, THE SAME THING WOULD HAPPEN AS IF SHE IS REMOVED. IT WOULD GO TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THEN REASSIGNED TO ANOTHER DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN GEORGIA WHO PROBABLY WON'T HAVE THIS DEAL ABOUT THIS CASE AS FANI WILLIS, AND IT WILL BE SLOW WALKED IN MY OPINION. WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE. ONE THING I THINK WE KNOW FOR SURE, THIS CASE IS NOT GOING TO BE TRIED BEFORE THE ELECTION, AND IF SHE IS THROWN OFF THE, CASE IT MAY NEVER BE TRIED AT ALL. >> THIS HAS BECOME SO NOISY THAT FANI WILLIS IS NOW THE ESSENTIAL FOCUS OF THE GEORGIA CASE. I DO NOT REMEMBER THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT DONALD TRUMP AND THE 20 ODD OTHER CODEFENDANTS. HOW BIG OF A PROBLEM IS THAT? >> IT IS A PROBLEM. THIS IS A PROBLEM. WHEN THE BIG LATER ON YOU WHEN YOU GO AFTER THE FORMER PRESIDENT AND YOU ACT RECKLESSLY LIKE THIS. EVEN IF THERE WAS NO CONFLICT HERE, BY THE FACT THEY SUBMITTED THE AFFIDAVIT TO THE COURT, THAT SAID THIS WHOLE THING IN MOTION. THIS HEARING NEVER HAD TO HAPPEN. THEY COULD HAVE COME CLEAN, THEN I THINK THEY WOULD HAVE MOVED ON. I THINK ANYTHING WEIGHT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REMOVED AS SPECIAL COUNSEL, BUT NOW THIS HAS ALREADY GONE TOO FAR. I THINK THIS IS HEADED TO VERY LIKELY DISQUALIFICATION. >> LET'S SAY SHE IS ALLOWED TO STAY ON, HOW DOES SHE DO HER JOB SUCCESSFULLY. I DON'T KNOW THAT I SEE A SCENARIO WHERE HER NAME IS OUT OF THE STORY. >> I THINK -- I THINK NATHAN WADE HAS TO GO HERE. I THINK SHE COULD SURVIVE, POSSIBLY, AND IF SHE SURVIVES SHE HAS TO RELY ON THE OTHER TWO SPECIAL PROSECUTORS. THAT IS SOMETHING A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REMEMBER, HE IS NOT THE ONLY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR. THERE ARE THREE OF THEM. THEY'RE ALL GETTING PAID THE SAME HOURLY WE. HE JUST HAPPENS TO BE BUILDING A LOT MORE THAN THE OTHERS, AND HE IS THE ONE WITH THE SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BOSS. >> CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO THE AUDIENCE WHY HE BUILT MORE THAN OTHERS? THAT IN AND ITSELF RAISES EYEBROWS TO SOME. >> HE IS THE HEAD GUY. MY PROBLEM IS, ON ONE DAY HE BUILT 24 HOURS IN THE DAY. I'VE NEVER HEARD OF ANYONE DOING THAT. >> COME ON NOW, LAWYERS, THERE'S ONE THING ON HOW TO DO, BILL. >> FOR 24 HOURS? AND SO, IT DOESN'T LOOK GREAT. THERE IS THIS PERCEPTION OF CONFLICT, BUT TO REMOVE HE