A History Teacher Reacts | "Holy Roman Empire Explained" by WonderWhy

[Music] hey youtube welcome back to another history teacher axe video with mr. Teri's a continued search for historical knowledge here on the Internet alright today's video comes from our awesome patreon members and they voted on this video this week into the era and the weekly poll and that is the Holy Roman Empire explained by wonder why so I'm looking forward to this because the Holy Roman Empire is an interesting thing from the fact that a lot of people say it's not what it says it is famous Voltaire quote said the Holy Roman Empire is now wholly not Roman not an empire and it's very much a lot of what it says it is but in name only right but it's also one of the older and and longer-lasting institutions that we've had in history as it exists for about a thousand years in lots of different ways shapes and forms so I'm interested to learn more definitely and hopefully you guys are too and excited to yeah check this out with you and let's let's see what we can get from this and I'll see what I can add if anything of what I know or any context or anything like that but you know what I'm doing here is trying to learn more share what I can and kind of go through this together grow our community and our interests in history over here all right with that before we get going if you would like to vote in future polls you can join our patreon - it starts at just a dollar a month if you'd like to have access to our weekly polls mo more influence on the channel you're going to go down below and do that if you like this original video I always put a link down below so you can head over there and give them a like and subscribe and the very least a view that's really important to me that you do that any of you if you haven't slept in my channel I'd love to have you do that and thanks for liking the video and let's go ahead and get started though so the Holy Roman Empire explained all right learn us Roman Empire was a large collection of thousands of political entities made up of different ethnicities that existed for more than a thousand years of a heart of Europe stretching from modern-day isolated to Denmark from France to Poland the Holy Roman Empire was an important part of European history it was several countries that exist today having a marriage from the empire keeping in line with the Empire's complex nature there as an even a universally agreed upon deed is to win the Empire actually started now as I'm in trade I'll talk about the impression that I was under was that it starts with Charlemagne I mean kind of more or less officially when the Pope crowns him Emperor but I mean with what authority does the Pope have to crown a political leader necessarily but nevertheless it kind of being the the starting point of it with Charlemagne from the Franks who were a Christian group that had had converted to Christianity about a what about century or so before and had been kind of defenders historically of Christianity and spreading Christianity and then when the Pope needed help that was rebellion I believe back in in Rome Charlemagne helped and and help kind of squash this rebellion thus kind of making the Pope eternally grateful there and maybe sealing the fact that the the Franks are a true defender of the Christian faith and then crowning him repre and then from what I would I have just known what I'm going off right now is that although it changes shape a lot and function over that millennium you saw the dates over there that it was officially abolished with Napoleon Bonaparte okay in the early eighteen hundreds that was impression I'm under but I'm already interested to see if they're saying that there's that it it could be more complicated than that so let's see what I got about five seconds but there isn't even that universally agreed upon deed as to when the Empire actually started the two day safety czar 809 sixty-two AD after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the first century the Roman Empire was reduced to its eastern half of course the capital city it was no longer Rome with Nick the Greek city of Constantinople now all the inhabitants of this empower continues to see themselves as well the Roman Empire sure modern historians tend to refer to them as the Byzantine Empire based on the open debate for another time but yes mm-hmm we've had this debate my committee for a long time are the Byzantines actually Romans Red Bull name for the capital city Byzantium anyway three centuries later the Frankish king Charlemagne was crowned emperor of the Romans now one thing we can't say though all right is as the headquarters of the church kind of moves to the east that in a way created more of a power vacuum that the church who still remains out west okay it's gonna be able to fill a little bit the the political power vacuum that's gonna be the church becomes more politically influential starting with yeah I mean the movement of the capital to the east of Constantinople then especially of course when the western half of Rome Falls the church became more politically influential than as well as the Pope transferred the imperial title from East back to waste at the time the tattoo was considered vacant because it was hailed by a woman known simply as Irene who killed her own son to take power from him the Frankish kingdoms were split and reunited several times with many kingdoms emerging they would make up the core of the Holy Roman Empire and this is why it's always been confusing too it's just always breaking epic you had it at its height I think with Charlemagne there early on and that pretty much breaks apart and I guess that's why they're saying also that they don't consider it the start of maybe not the start of the Holy Roman Empire because it kind of was getting going with Charlemagne and then it breaks apart when he dies because there were power struggles and stuff like that and it does become unified with was Otto or whatever a later Holy Roman Emperor so you get that going on but it was at its height pretty much edits that it's beginning there what actually had France right and you can see here I know yeah you don't you don't have you can see my mouse just so in western France you don't have that so that that kind of came and went pretty quick as far as its size goes but from from my understanding to the the the the most consistent part of the Holy Roman Empire's basically been Germany German Kingdom the Italian Kingdom and the Burgundian Kingdom there was also the kingdom of Bohemia but that didn't become a kingdom until 1198 a 961 or two the first king of germany came to the assistance of Pope John the 12th as the papal States were invaded by bérenger ii of italy otto conquered northern italy and opposed the behringer as his own troops abandoned em seems to be a recurring theme now of the empire as the empire becomes more official right when they go and save the you know butts of the church there ya then and then then it's like really it just officially observed like thanks let's make sure everyone knows your good deeds by giving you a title or emphasizing your title the pork rind off to an emperor and named 62 the first germans become emperor almost all successors in french german for the rest of the Empire's existence the early years of the Empire's history are dominated by a strained relations with the papacy seemingly never-ending power struggle between Avedis emperors and popes over the course of several centuries because a major thing that's that's been happening is you'll get like maybe someone like Otto or someone like Charlemagne who gets crowned sort of by a pope and actually they have a good relationship but what the Holy Roman Empire that the the large struggle in a way for for Europe has often been when they when the Holy Roman Emperor and then the the Pope right so here the Holy Roman Emperor and the Pope may not get along a lot of it from the perspective that they may be trying to step on their toes a little bit where it's like the Pope might be telling the Emperor hey stay out of the theological and religious issues but then the Holy Roman Emperor might say okay well stay out of political issues right let us run the political stuff or maybe think that they should have more influence in the church about I know there's there's there's some later on controversies later and things about what role should should like the Holy Roman Empire have in getting like bishops appointed or something like that because those you know church officials often have a lot of political power as well but feel like they should have influence over that so it's always been a history of you know who is more of an authority and without them really it seems like making it very clear that there's these different jobs all right religious leader and then political leader when they often are trying to step over each other that way they could never agree who is superior Pope or Emperor in the mid 13th century the Empire had an interregnum and which no king was crowned emperor for 67 years this would actually be the first of three interregnum as another two times in the next century and a half would see long stretches of time with a crowned emperor during the rule of Charles the fourth knowledgeable of 1356 some major changes to the Empire 750 letters were chosen who would to save the king of Germany what should become a symbolic title of the elected but not yet coronated emperor is where again an issue right ecclesiastical or church leaders or secular more government leaders and how they're gonna feel justified who has the authority here of things I get electing of people they all want a piece of the the the ability to influence this right in 1440 with the election of Frederick a third as Emperor this began three straight centuries of emperors from the same royal family the House of Habsburg from Austria during the rule of Maxim's Berg Hosparus greatly expanded their influence through political marriages acquiring Spain burgundy Bohemia and Hungary this is one Europe for me as somebody who's always trying to study history and then also need to teach it it starts to become so chaotic to me when you start to see these like like the Hapsburgs who are like these leaders of something that's like supposed to be unified but it's also not but they're scattered all over they're like be in the Netherlands and then they're over here in Eastern Europe and then parts of Italy I'll be honest just as someone so Larry's in history as a profession pretty much it complicates things for me it makes things confusing for me and I have to keep study study in this and yeah I'm sure there's a lot of people that know this more than me that I'm trying to learn from trying to make sense of all this this is their continuity here because it seems so different than the rulership we see traditionally in history of kingdoms and stuff it seems just way more complicated and when do where do you draw lines on things I don't know let me know if here is let me know if you're as confused as I am on a lot of this stuff especially this era of European history for war broke out on the Italian peninsula primarily between the house parts and France over various territories under respective inheritance most notably Milan Naples and Sicily the war would continue on and off for more than 60 years and effectively ended imperial rule and Italy in 1517 Martin Luther from Saxony published his 95 theses criticizing the Roman Catholic Church and many of its practices and what became known as the Protestant Reformation this is where I know that the Holy Roman Empire is really gonna get rocked by this as it is going to really break apart a lot of their authority when people start rejecting the authority of the church which is something the Holy Roman Empire is you know had often had as a source of its of its authority is the church because the church has basically a monopoly on religion in the lives of people and that's where you start to say yeah Luther has to go and answer to the Holy Roman Empire and that's gonna be a problematic because people are going to support him and then reject that which is going to bring a whole religious question of Holy Roman Empire of potential freedom of religion and stuff like that which doesn't fully happen but does start to break that apart and maybe this is the beginning of the end kind of for the the Holy Roman Empire with the Reformation profoundly changing the course of utopian history the Holy Roman Empire became too faded as many of the Emperor's subjects I thought had Lutheranism try to Berlin just changes that would last for more than a century and to an extent even to this day it was around this difficult time that probably the most well known Holy Roman Emperor began his drill Charles the faith the the feature aid for all the Habsburg is the chin the chin and one of the things that they talk about a lot or they talk about the hapsburgs is like they were really him bred they're all marrying within their family and they all had that like big old chin stick out there Charles was already king of this is the guy by the way that gets the answer for their Reformation it's pretty hard it's under his watch that the Reformation is gonna happen which I know undermines his authority is they're going to lose a lot of their support as a result of those so how does Burke power reached its peak with a fast array of territories both N and I of the aim so this is what I this is someone help me with this a little bit this is where again when the half spur thing confuses me look at look at the territory here now are we saying this is more of a unified entity Spain Netherlands that are they totally separate as it more just alliances through family members this is where I need to learn more too about how connected are these instant political institutions because the Holy Roman Empire but there's stuff out of the Holy Roman Empire so does the Holy Roman Empire technically include Spain at this time good I mean is it is honestly one of my weaker areas power his rule was dominated by religious Corn Flakes first starting with a war against Vedas Lutheran princely estates known as the schmuck Celtic League who were defeated by Charles and several Catholic friends great name the P dude look at that guy Lou this guy John Frederick of Saxony do I like this guy a Celtic League who are defeated by Charles and several Catholic princes the Peace of Augsburg in 1555 very important lose the right to choose their own legend of data states Catholicism or Lutheranism based on the principle of curious ratio a usually you shortly afterwards Chuck okay maybe I'll get you I don't make sure it's clear though what happens the Peace of Augsburg which the the violence that is going to happen here is crazy between Christians Luther or yeah the Christians most Luther is insane and Catholics alike and what ends up happening the Peace of Augsburg is not full religious freedoms to compromise what it basically says is whoever is the king of that sort of province they will be deciding the official religion of their Kingdom and but you still only have two options which works cuz most people at this time now with with the Reformation especially in Germany are going to be Lutheran or Catholic so this was I think what I understand is one of the early big blows to the to them is giving a little bit of that autonomy to these princes because I already know too that especially in Germany there was already long-standing problems with these German princes and the Holy Roman Emperor for the same reason where they wanted more authority over their smaller little States within the whole aronia because hold on Empire I know is is very diverse and it's more a bunch of kingdoms together and and and like smaller states that are semi-autonomous but still are under this umbrella of authority of the Holy Roman Empire but it's long been been problematic also just added the Reformation which were my favorite things to study though was the fact that the support that some prince has had with with with Martin Luther I forget I forget the Prince's name that helped him out Luther out basically helped them be in hiding and protected from authorities and which showed though that they like like the it exposed that the problems already had with some of these local leaders with the larger Empire at large and kind of use Luther as a reason to kind of push back a little bit across the faith abdicated splitting his inheritance between Spain and Austria his son fell at the sake and succeeded him in Spain while his younger brother Ferdinand took over as Emperor and Archduke of Austria starting the cadet branch of the house of habsburg religious tensions continued as a rebellion started in the Spanish Netherlands eventually leading to the establishment of the Dutch Republic with seven of the seventeen provinces seceding from Spain and the Empire in 1618 the 30 Years War started mohini out with the defenestration of Prague which is just a fancy way of saying throwing someone out of a window mm-hmm this began the Bohemian revolt which spiraled into a continent-wide power struggle with all major European powers involved the war ended with the devastating war yeah turning point in the Empire's history many view this as the beginning of the end of the Holy Roman Empire Dutch independence was finally officially recognized as well as the independence of Switzerland and the territories in northern Italy the Empire became even more decentralized on the hospita can today go complicate that is look at all these states there's no unity here claim I mean I mean empires by definition are multicultural anyways though otherwise they're just large kingdoms but something a piece of Westview yeah it becomes less relevant to talk about the history of the Holy Roman Empire as a whole because what happened in the last 150 years of the Empire's existence relates more to the princely estates as individual entities and their own right there were several very important and impactful war throughout the late 17th and early 18th century such as the franco-dutch war the named years war and the war of the Spanish Succession there were always Imperial princes on both sides of these conflicts there was also the long Turkish war but this is more related to the husbands and their possessions given that much of the fighting was over hungry which was never part of the Empire mmm the failures of the Empire were dominated by the rivalry between Austria and the wind I saw are the two most dominant German powers Austria had a succession crisis and the Hosparus three centuries of ruling the Empire came to a temporary end as Charles the seventh of Bavaria took over in 1745 the two powers clashed in the global conflict the Seven Years War or Silesia as France and Austria unsuccessfully tried to curb the rising Prussian power the Holy Roman Empire came to an end at the hands of Napoleon and revolutionary France Austria was invaded in 1792 and renewed tensions in 1806 caused the last emperor francis ii to officially dissolve the empire and in just over 1000 years of existence making a bag obey the holy roman empire I am of course legally obligated to mention the faulty record that it was a holy nobleman or an empire it's important to look at the context though Voltaire lives through the 1700s where the Empire was much and Esther claimed he was also French and part of the Enlightenment movement so if you understand that we took a somewhat negative view of the Empire viewing as something of a relic of the past that had no place in modern society yeah so just how true is his statement well although the time is good I'm glad I'm glad he's getting into this because I like that years after its creation I liked it elegant rule for the Empire to fall I like to share this you know just the Holy Roman Empire I thought when that talk about the lighten meant shared a lot of famous quotes and stuff from from him so I'm glad I can look in a little bit more into the breakdown because I you know I teach to my lights not why they say it's not holy roman holy roman or an empire but let's validate any of this the years after its creation the holy attempts go sian t so just how true is his statement well although the term holy wasn't used until some three hundred and fifty years after its creation the holy element absolutely essential for the empire to function sure his primary purpose was to provide a stable political order for all Christians right the Emperor was supposed to be the guardian of the Pope and defend his subjects against infidels at the time the show of a secular power was inconceivable Oh any reference to a divine authority mm-hmm right that's an important thing the whole Divine Right rules why should you be able to rule over me you know now it is a feudal era and you generally as loyalty is based on who can take care of you especially here later in the sort of Middle Ages with the church being again exceedingly more powerful that Divine Right is they you know how if you can be convinced that the person is sort of ordained of God are supported by spokesman's of God then that person naturally should have have authority right and it would be hard to argue that if this is truly you know God's mouthpiece or God's anointed God's chosen then you should listen to them and you should do what they say and be unified under that premise makes sense in practice of course the Vedas Emperor's and Pope's throughout the years had somewhat strained relations and the papacy became less and less in and the Empire's politics as the years went on the term holy Empire was first years in 1157 by the ruling Stoffer family who tried to shift the emphasis from a monarch to a transpersonal holy Empire that had already sanctified his Devane mission and therefore the Empire did not need approval from the pole so anything the addition of the word holy was actually an attempt to distance the Empire from the papers okay was problematic so lots were more tricky this is easy obvious to some that was quite clearly not Roman Louis German it's pretty clear there was not a direct continuation or the Roman Empire and even if it was it wouldn't have revived the Western Roman Empire that actually had role as its capital but rather it would have inherited its Roman nest from the no Greek Eastern Roman Empire when the title of Emperor was transferred from Constantinople back to Rome the debate between the Latin West and the Greek East had been growing stronger over the preceding couple of centuries Charlemagne was crowned in the year 800 with a somewhat tenuous link to the ancient Roman Empire the prestige and authority commanded by the title of Roman Emperor still held a lot of weigh in the waist and Charlemagne was recognized as Emperor yeah that that's thing it's when I teach it I often think of when Charlotte Charlemagne is doing is in a way trying to create Rome 2.0 right out here in the West Rome kind of 2.0 and they did a lot of things awry or vive latin learning even though again he's not a Latin per se and so there's an attempt at that for sure of trying to be like in another Rome giving him a mains power and status people are taking really dead view the Empire as a direct continuation from ancient Rome Frankish rule over Italy didn't begin until 774 and although the Franks had been crash dazed and even somewhat romanized they didn't want to completely lose their own identity as the years went on of course it became much less Roman and much more German after a few centuries most emperors didn't even travel south of the Alps and their entire reign except to be crowned by the Pope and even that was discontinued after Charles the faith the word empire doesn't really have a universally agreed-upon definition sort or not really possible to definitively see that it was or wasn't an empire the idea of an emperor was the he was a monarch above that of a king a sort of king of kings now according to the divine mandate the Roman Empire was to be the last and greatest Empire okay I think a more classical definition for Empire is gonna be its multi-ethnic that's a big thing it includes a involved annexing place places that are different than you right culturally racially if you consider it that way sometimes religiously they're they're different than you it is multi-ethnic otherwise you just got a larger Kingdom at hand right so that's the I think the one that's that usually classically been been been talked about is how is it an empire a diversity of subject people's okay and there could only be one the idea of an empire was singular and universal this idea of singularity was deeply rooted in Christian thought at the time empires could not coexist this was based on the theory of translation and pattie the pretext used by the Pope to transfer authority from Constantinople for most of its history the Holy Roman Empire was referred to as simply the Empire without any qualifiers even an official documents there were no other empires that were recognized in the West for most of its history the Holy Roman Empire wasn't just an empire it was the Empire whether or not I could be classed as an empire by today's standards okay at the beatable an extensive group of states or countries ruled over by a single monarch and oligarchy or a sovereign state yeah I mean yeah I I do still kind of stake just when you look at those that have been called empires often are it's it's again more multi-ethnic right the people are different the different peoples are different otherwise you know how do you cut you you just say extensive so it the only difference between a kingdom and an empire it's larger that's hard to I think that's not as useful of a definition the Empire was quite decentralized and many of the regional princes commanded more power in their territory than the Emperor that the Holy Roman Empire was quite a unique political entity there's not really much else that is compatible so maybe I mean it is it meets the definition for being like kind of multi Kingdom multi-ethnic writers different all kinds of different differences between the people but you probably you do need for it to be an empire is to be have to have some centralization right otherwise you're more of a confederation or something like that there's got to be some centralization like like I've liked with the Roman Empire had like there was some autonomy in some of the provinces but you still answer to an emperor and people understood that and you could enforce them the Holy Roman Empire used the complex system of feudalism to rule over as many territories local authority was delegated to vassals who would normally in turn have their own vassals creating a hierarchy of lords and vassals who swore allegiance to each other lords would rotate their vassals and vassals would help and advise their lords and often pay them in cash work or military assistance there's the one you usually hear in school about feudalism and this is more of the structure than a larger entity because it's like this this system existed before the Holy Roman Empire and what the Holy Roman Empire is almost like put itself on top or you had this Lord and a vassal but then you're gonna have a king and that you're adding one more entity up there an emperor just above that so it's kind of the the Holy Roman Empire became a blanket over a feudal structure that already dominated European continent a vassals could either be immediate or mediate vassals immediate vassals were those that were immediately subordinate to the Emperor while media vassals had at least one overlord between themselves and the in our immediate vassals of the Emperor were referred to as Imperial princes and their territories were Imperial estates Imperial estates could pay a general tax to the Empire to take part in the Imperial diet or the Reichstag those who did not pay the tax were not involved in the sessions and had no vote after 1489 the Imperial estates were divided into three separate chambers or colleges prince-electors imperial princes and Imperial cities there were also the Imperial Knights that we're immediate vassals of the Emperor but not represented kings and other Nobles did not have a vote despite their immediacy status although the we're gripped and two benches that had a collective fort the princi letters were considered of a higher status than that of the other princes the prince-electors had the important task of elect in the Emperor for most of the Empire's history there were seven prince-electors three ecclesiastical electors and for secular electors the elective process quickly became corrupt and the imperial title was pretty much just gained via bribery yeah it's like that when you have the more moving parts you have an a government the more likely it can be corrupted right yes you know there's just more opportunities for that in the year 1500 the Empire was divided into sects Imperial circles the circles were created to better organize the Empire's defensive structures as well as to facilitate tax collection in 1512 a further three were added and Saxony was divided into two there were also areas that were not part of any imperial circle most notably Bohemia plus the Swiss and Italian parts of the Empire no one forced Swiss being independent what only due to its complexity it's impossible to represent the hierarchy of the Holy Roman Empire with a neat little pyramid with the Emperor at all there was no single chain of command and many of the internal hierarchies were interconnected Imperial princes could have the same political status as each other but with different prestige based on their noble title so f king jook and they're gonna hate that the most part too many titles to competitive children's jealousy right toll Imperial estate for centuries Austria created their own title Archduke brandenburg-prussia became a kingdom in 1701 and for 71 years Kings were titled King n Prussia as opposed to King of Prussia because Prussia fell I would say to the territory of the Empire and therefore did not require imperial authorization you're following us Prussia was well in his way too a great power in his own race and really there was nothing the Empire could do to start them anyway at the start of the video I mentioned that the Holy Roman Empire was comprised of three core kingdoms Germany Italy and burgundy plan Amalia but that's a lot different so who was the king of Germany and how did this title play into the hierarchy of the Empire well the king of Germany Italy and burgundy were three separate titles but in practice for most of the Empire's history all three titles were held by the same person who was usually the Emperor as well this wasn't always the case and in the earlier years it was more complicated but generally speaking it was one person that held all titles Bohemia was its own autonomous Kingdom being elevated from a Duchy in 1198 the Bohemian crown lands came under Habsburg rule from the 15th century onwards with some gaps so many of the Bohemian kings were in fat Emperor simultaneously the Holy Roman Empire lasted for just over a thousand years and oversaw central Europe's transformation from a feudal agrarian and religiously uniform region to an increasingly centralized urban and religiously diverse urban well the Holy Roman Empire was a significant power for a large part of its history it didn't seem to be able to survive the changes in European society they eventually rendered it obsolete yeah I'm trying to thank all them well Roman Empire was dissolved in just over two centuries ago but here's an interesting thought what would the world look like if the Empire existed today what if the Holy Roman Empire was somehow resurrected okay well looking at that very question and his latest video is my friend real-life lore so I encourage you to go and watch his video right now let me know if that's something that you'd be interested in especially patreon members thank you so much for watching and I'll see you next time [Music] resolved it just all right so it's still very complicated it seems like the question I was gonna ask was at what points in history throughout this a thousand a thousand years right that we got here I guess was the Holy Roman Empire necessary as an entity when did it actually matter than it that it was an empire that makes sense because it sounds again like its whole history has very much been one of autonomy for a long time for much of it so at what parts is it more just those first what they say coronations where you got you get like like Charlemagne or Otto or just as examples there as an entity there and is it is it more of what you think it's more of what Voltaire called it you know that it's it's far more just in name than anything else that an actual entity I don't know what do you guys think what has been what is your impression of the whole Roman Empire what have you been taught about it and how does that reflect I mean how does that reflect you think what's being discussed here because it is it is i think i'm doubtedly quite complicated it's a changes shape and there's so much inner workings and they're saying they're always changing the structure all the time and no wonder it's hard to keep up and to be honest it doesn't get taught as much I mean it gets real like in generally in education it gets referred to a lot but like actual its function and I could see why it's it's hard to learn about I mean maybe I'm wrong here and it's more complicated to me than what other people think but definite let me know if you find this yeah this history of the whole Roman Empire is confusing Tufton as I do but anyway this is great definitely learn some more things a little bit more about the intricacies of it one of the big things that I didn't know is that where wasn't referred to as the Holy Roman Empire for that term was even used very much and especially wasn't used till much much later on so that was some interesting again that I learned and about kind of the different kingdoms and I know no there's just so many of them but the larger ones and maybe that's what's turned off a lot of people to is when you look at how many yeah the kingdoms you got a understand and how it's different how it changes so much but all right well anyway this video again was chosen by our patrons so thank you patrons for choosing this video and if you'd like to join you know links down below to all kinds of stuff to the original video go there if you liked it be sure you go over and go to the original video to give them a like subscription it's a good channel think this is this first chant or a first time I've looked at this channel wonder why so looks like they do some good things some good research and information there that's great so anyways overall though what do you guys think of the Holy Roman Empire what is your impression of it how do you summarize what the Holy Roman Empire was and I guess sort of its legacy in a way you do that in comments or better yet Joan or discord community there's a link down below too you can get down and start talking about it and there's a lot of people that talk about the Holy Roman Empire a lot down there and if I get questions answered or just simply hang out down there to do that but thanks again for watching thanks for subscribing and we'll go ahead and call it here and we'll go ahead and see you guys next time bye [Music] [Music]

Channel: Mr. Terry History

Views: 48,624

Keywords: react, history, holy roman empire

Id: EgZn-dMtWhw

Length: 36min 32sec (2192 seconds)

Published: Sun Mar 08 2020