William Lane Craig vs. Lawrence Krauss - Life, the Universe, and Nothing
Video Statistics and Information
No captions available for this video.
Channel: Sentinel Apologetics
Views: 205,638
Rating: 4.7041683 out of 5
Keywords:
Id: mj4nbL53I-E
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 296min 18sec (17778 seconds)
Published: Sun Oct 21 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
What do you think of Stephen Hawking as a mountain climber?
petulant whiny child who is way out of his scope of practice, can't stand to listen to krauss philosophize..
Essentially a liar, since he makes claims which are false or blatantly unproven. Hes also pathetic at doing philosophy, something fellow atheist philosophers have berated him for as well.
1- Claims the universe comes from nothing, however that is a lie, since he redefines "nothing" as something, simply obfuscating the question and not answering it.
2- Makes bold claims that might fly in the dumb atheist community, but in the scientific community they do not. His theory of how the universe began rests on many unproven assumptions and some of them are rejected by many scientists on purely scientific grounds.
3- Just like Dawkins he's just an obnoxious "con-artist atheist" trying to claim he has solved "the big mystery" but really hasn't.
4- His ideas on The Universe From Nothing have been rejected even by most atheist philosophers.
The disrespect, he has no class
He had a debate with John Lennox on the radio show Unbeleivable and he was the same way: whiny and constantly interrupting. The physicist David Albert (who is an atheist) criticized his book a few years ago, and Krauss spewed all sorts of insults and then got him uninvited to a panel on cosmology. So that pretty much sums him up.
Edit: here's the Albert review. Definitely worth a read. https://web.archive.org/web/20200416103339/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html
Krauss is very disrespectful.