This episode of Real Engineering is brought
to you by Brilliant, a problem solving website that teaches you to think like an engineer. On the 24th of May, SpaceX launched a Falcon
9 rocket filled with 60 satellites into space. This marked the beginning of their ambitious
new project called “Starlink” which aims to provide high quality broadband internet
to the most isolated parts of the planet, while also providing low latency connectivity
to already well connected cities. [1] SpaceX aim to make their broadband as
accessible as possible, claiming that anyone will be able to connect to their network if
they buy the pizza box-sized antenna which SpaceX is developing themselves. This launch of 60 satellites, was just the
first of many. Spacex has 12,000 satellites [12] planned
for launch over the next decade, dramatically increasing the total amount of spacecraft
around Earth’s orbit. This will cost SpaceX billions of dollars,
so they must have a good reason for doing so. Let’s see how this network will work, and
how it will compete with existing internet providers. Back in 2015, Elon announced that SpaceX had
began working on a communication satellite network, stating that there is a significant
unmet demand for low-cost global broadband capabilities. Around that time, SpaceX opened a new facility
in Redmond, Washington to develop and manufacture these new communication satellites. The initial plan was to launch two prototype
satellites into orbit by 2016 and have the initial satellite consetllation up and running
by 2020. But the company struggled to develop a receiver
that could be easily installed by the user for a low cost, this delayed the program and
the initial prototype satellites weren’t launched until 2018. After a successful launch of the two prototypes,
Tintin-A and B, which allowed SpaceX to test and refine their satellite design, SpaceX
kept pretty quiet about what was next for the Starlink project, until November 2018
when SpaceX received the approval from the FCC to deploy 7,500 satellites into orbit,
on top of the 4,400 that were already approved. On May 24th, the first batch of production
satellites were launched into orbit and people around the world quickly started to spot the
train of satellites moving across the night sky. This launch is a sign of things to come, while
this initial group of satellites are not fully functional [8], they will be used to test
things like the earth communications systems and the krypton thrusters which will be used
to autonomously avoid debris and de-orbit the spacecraft once it has reached the end
of its lifecycle. Let’s look at these functionalities first. We have explored how ion thrusters work in
the past, which you can watch for more detail, but essentially they use electric potential
to fire ions out of the spacecraft to provide propulsion. Xenon is ideally used, because it has a high
atomic mass allowing it to provide more kick per atom, while being inert and having a high
storage density lending itself to long term storage on a spacecraft. However SpaceX opted for krypton, as xenon’s
rarity makes it a far more expensive propellant. [2] This ion thruster will initially be used
to raise the starlink satellites from their release orbits at 440 km to their final orbital
height of 550 km[1]. They will also be used in conjunction with
on board control momentum gyroscopes located here, and the US Governments’ space debris
collision prediction system to allow the satellites to adjust their orbits to dodge collisions,
which we have also spoken about in more detail in a previous video. When the satellites have reached the end of
their service life they can then use the same attitude controls and thrusters to de-orbit
the satellite. Space X have included all the necessary hardware
to minimise space debris risk. In their Federal Communications Commission
approval application [3], they claim that 95% of the satellite will burn up on re-entry. With only the ion thruster internal structure
and silicon carbide components, standing a chance of survival. Those silicon carbide components are likely
to survive, as they are essential materials for the operation of lasers and thus have
an extremely high melting point of 2,750°C. [9] Which brings us to our communications abilities,
the primary function of the satellite. Spacex have been tight lipped on many of the
details of the satellite, but thanks to that FCC filing [3] we know that the satellites
will contain 5 1.5 kilogram silicon carbide components, which indicates that each satellite
will contain 5 individual lasers. These lasers, like our fibre optic cables
here on earth, will use light pulses to transmit information between satellites. Transmitting with light in space offers one
massive advantage over transmitting with light here on earth however. The speed of light is not constant in every
material, in fact, light travels 47% slower in glass than in a vacuum. This offers starlink one huge advantage that
will likely be it’s primary money maker. It provides the potential of lower latency
information over long distance, in simpler terms let’s imagine this as a race between
data packets. A user in London wants the new adjusted price
of a stock on the NASDAQ from the New York stock exchange. If this information were use a typical route,
let’s say through the AC-2 cable [RI-3], which has a return journey of about 12,800
kilometres to make through our glass fibre optic cable. In a vacuum light travels at a speed of 299,792,458
meters per second [5]. The speed of travel in glass depends on the
refractive index and the refractive index depends on wavelength, but we will take the
reduction as 1.47 times slower than the speed of light in a vacuum [203940448 m/s]. [6] This means the data packet will take roughly
0.063 seconds to make the round trip, and thus has a latency of 0.063 seconds, or 62.7
milliseconds. With the additional steps that add to this
latency like the conversion of light signals to electrical signals on either end of the
optical cable, traffic queues, and the transfer to our final computer terminal, this total
time comes out at about 76 milliseconds. Figuring out the latency for Starlink is a
lot more difficult, as we have no real world measurements to go by, but we can make some
educated guesses with the help of Mark Handley, a communications professor in University College
London. [10] The first source of latency for Starlink will
be during the up and down link process, where we need to transfer our information to and
from earth. We know this will be done with phase array
antenna, which are radio antenna that can control the direction of their transmission
without moving parts, instead they use destructive and constructive interference [7] to control
the direction of the radio wave. Each satellite has a cone beam with a 81 degree
range of view. With an orbit of 550 kilometres each satellite
can cover a circular area with a radius of 500 kilometre. At SpaceX’s originally planned orbit this
coverage had a radius of 1060 kilometres. Lowering the altitude of a satellite decreases
the area it can cover, but also decreases the latency. This is particularly noticeable for typical
communications satellites operating in geostationary orbit at an altitude of about 36,000 kilometres. The time it takes data to travel up to the
satellite and back down travelling at the speed of light is around 240 milliseconds
[13] 369% slower than our subsea cable. However, since Starlink is intending to operate
at a much lower altitude, the up and down link theoretical latency could be as low as
3.6 ms. This is why SpaceX needs so many satellites
in their constellation in order to provide worldwide coverage. Each individual starlink satellite has four
phased array antenna located here, here, here and here. This directional beam was an essential part
of SpaceX’s FCC approval application [3], as thousands of satellites broadcasting undirected
radio waves would cause significant amounts of interference with other communication methods. Once that data is received by one starlink
satellite, it can begin to transmit that information between satellites using lasers. Each time we hop from satellites there will
be a small delay as the laser light is converted to an electric signal and back again, but
it is too miniscule to consider. Things get tricky here with using lasers,
as we need to accurately hit the receiver on neighbouring satellites to transmit that
data. Let’s look at SpaceX’s proposed constellation
to see how this will work. Space X’s first phase of 1584 satellites
will occupy 24 orbital planes, with 66 satellites in each plane inclined at 53 degrees. That will look something like this. Communication between neighbouring satellites
in the same orbital plane is relatively simple, as these satellites will remain in relatively
stable positions in relation to each other. This gives us a solid line of communication
along a single orbital plane, but in many cases a single orbital plane will not connect
two locations, so we need to be able transfer information between these planes too. This requires precise tracking, as the satellites
travelling in neighbouring orbital planes are travelling incredibly quickly and will
come in and out of view. This means the starlink satellite will need
to switch to a new satellite in the network. This can take time, the best figure I could
find is about a minute [9] for the European Space Agency’s Data Relay Satellite System,
which is a currently operating geostationary internet constellation designed to serve european
imaging satellites, and other time critical applications. Such as serving emergency forces in remote
areas, like those fighting forest fires. Starlink may be faster, but it won’t be
instantaneous, and thus it has 5 optical communication systems on board to maintain a steady connection
to 4 satellites at all times. If we now use this system, transmitting from
New York to London and back, with the shortest path possible, using the speed of light in
a vacuum as our transfer speed, we can achieve a latency as low as 43 milliseconds. Even if we took the shortest route possible
with an optic fibre, which does not exist, this would take about 55 milliseconds, a 28%
decrease in speed. The actual current return trip time for your
average Joe is about 76 milliseconds, as we saw earlier. A 77% decrease in speed. This is a huge deal for the two financial
markets working out of these cities, with millions of dollars being moved in fractions
of a second, having a lower latency would provide a massive advantage in capitalizing
on price swings. In fact, it wouldn’t be the first time a
communications company has made a massive investment to specifically serve these groups. The Hibernian Express cable is a privately
owned optic cable that is currently the lowest latency connection between the NY4 data centre
in Secaucus, New Jersey and the LD4 data centre in Slough, England at just 59.95 milliseconds,
39.4% slower than our best time with Starlink. [11] The previous best time was held by the
AC-1 cable at 65 milliseconds. At a cost of 300 million dollars this 5 millisecond
increase in speed was justified to just connect across the Atlantic. Imagine how much these time sensitive industries
will be willing to pay for a 17 millisecond increase in speed. It becomes even more valuable when you realise
this time differential increases with increased transmission distance. New York to London is a relatively short distance. The improvements would be even more pronounced
for a London to Singapore transmission, for every additional kilometre we travel the potential
gains in speed increase rapidly [5]. [RI-2] But SpaceX aren’t just planning on
serving this super fast internet to some customers, they primarily advertise this system as a
way to connect every human on this planet to the internet, and they should have plenty
of bandwidth left over to serve these people. Although the internet has been one of the
fastest growing technologies in human history, by the end of 2019 more than half of the world's
population will still be offline (4 billion). Users will connect to this internet using
a Starlink terminal which will cost around $200 each, this will still be far outside
the purchasing power of many third world citizens, but it’s a start and vastly cheaper then
similar currently available receivers like the Kymeta version at a price of $30,000[15]. Elon Musk says that these will be flat enough
to fit onto the roof of a car and other vehicles like ships and airplanes. This will allow Starlink to compete with traditional
internet providers. It’s estimated that moving the US from a
4G to a 5G wireless connection will cost around $150 billion in fiber optic cabling alone
over the next 7 years, [16] SpaceX plan to complete their entire Stralink project for
as little as $10 billion. Each Starlink satellite cost around $300,000
which is already a massive cut in cost for communication satellites. SpaceX are also saving on launch costs, as
they are launching on their own Falcon 9 rocket, something that no other satellite manufacturer
has. If everything goes to plan, Starlink is estimated
to generate $30 billion to $50 billion in revenue each year on the back of premium stock
exchange memberships [14], demolishing their current annual revenue of around $3 billion. And this is a vital part of Elon Musk's long
term goals. The money generated from Starlink will mean
SpaceX will have vastly more funding than NASA. Which could go on to fund research and development
of new rockets and the technology needed to monetise lunar and martian colonies. For now the project is simply connecting the
world even more and potentially opening avenues for education for third world countries that
do not have adequate connections to the internet. Imagine if Leonal Messi, the greatest footballer
alive, was never found and brought to Barcelona to develop his talents. Where he received vital medical treatment
for growth hormone deficiency. We would have been deprived of his talents,
and this happens regular for remarkably talented and intelligent children in countries where
simply do not have access to education. Widely available internet will help solve
this problem, and platforms like Brilliant have taken great steps to remedy this through
their high quality interactive math and science learning. Brilliant has helped thousands of users realize
their potential in math and science, and it’s stories like this why I am proud to promote
Brilliant every month. They have a huge number of courses that will
allow you to educate yourself. From foundational maths courses to courses
taylored for you to ace the American Mathematics Competition, with others geared for computer
science and physics. Brilliant recently introduced a new feature,
called “Daily Challenges”, which will present with you with interesting scientific
and mathematical problems to test your brain every day. If I have inspired you and you want to educate
yourself, then go to brilliant.org/RealEngineering and sign up for free.And the first 500 people
that go to that link will get 20% off the annual Premium subscription, so you can get
full access to all their courses as well as the entire daily challenges archive. As always, thanks for watching and thank you
to all my Patreon supporters. If you would like to see more from me the
links to my instagram, twitter, subreddit and discord server are below.
TL;DR:
(Elon mentioned first gen was 20ms and future revisions will aim for 10ms during E3 interview)
Super TL;DR:
If you're super up to date on Starlink this isn't technically new information, but it is a really well done video that clearly lays out all the hows and whys of Starlink. His channel in general is worth watching for a number of excellent videos including quite a few that are Tesla and SpaceX related.
He does some good videos. It's worth checking out his channel. He's had other space, SpaceX, and Tesla related videos, among others.
And if you're are wondering about his accent, he's from Galway in Ireland.
For those of us that have been paying attention- not much new here.
For those of us trying to explain the concept and future impact of Starlink to others, WHAT A GREAT VIDEO! Thank you for this.
He mentions that "95% of the satellite will burn up on re-entry" with the Ion thrusters and Silicon Carbide components surviving, however this is only for the initial version and it will be redesigned to completely burn up.
Also the video states that the Starlink terminal will fit on a car which is contrary to last weeks Tesla Shareholder meeting:
What about northern Canada? Looks like the network stops just above the 60th parallel.
Will SpaceX offer "net neutrality" or charge a premium for low-latency services? It seems wrong to artifically increase latency for some customers, but stock traders would pay a fortune for a latency advantage, which could fund affordable (but higher-latency) access in rural areas and countries with poor cable infrastructure (as well as Mars colonisation).
The video doesn't address how Starlink solves bidirectional communication. Usually, people have an antenna/satellite dish to receive data from a satellite. But how easy is it to send a clear signal to a satellite. What happens if it is cloudy it rains or there is a thunderstorm?
Reporting in from Rural Canada here, can't wait! (Elon, if you're reading this, please let me beta test. I'l pay well!)