Why Companies NEED People Back In The Office
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: How Money Works
Views: 913,016
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: work from home, companies work from home, is working from home better, careers, business, return to office, working from home layoffs, home office, working from home more efficient, hybrid work, companies hybrid work, office rental crisis, office rent, converting office space, open plan office, how money works, how history works, why companies hate work from home, layoffs
Id: jrsRvozsUQ8
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 13min 12sec (792 seconds)
Published: Thu Jun 08 2023
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
My supervisor can't wait to RTO. Every time he mentions it, I remind him that of course he's looking forward to it, he's a supervisor. The office is where he has status and power.
But for the rest of us cubicle sitters, commuting to the office is an expense...so less money in our pockets, to sit in a Grey, dank environment with no fresh air or windows, share a bathroom with strangers, to work on the shittiest equipment the company could buy in bulk, and somehow we're supposed to keep up the same level of enthusiasm and productivity...while having less money in our pockets, + adding hours of unpaid, work related time to our week.
And oh yeah, we get to pay for parking.
For the company, it's all upside. For the worker, it's a crap deal.
Some offices won't even have cubes. They'll do "hot desking". Lame.
- commuting to the office is an expense...so less money in our pockets, to sit in a Grey, dank environment with no fresh air or windows, share a bathroom with strangers, to work on the shittiest equipment the company could buy in bulk
Supervisor here. Corporate mandated RTO last month. I have the same expenses as everyone else, commute frustrations (hour from the office on a good day). Got into my cube this morning joined by a cockroach. I had this huge 38" monitor at home - no budget for monitors so I'm on a 13" laptop screen. Secure facility so zero windows. So far the AC has failed twice in the past couple of weeks (in Florida). No one on my team is here at this office, they're in different cities. But hey, collaboration. I can generally get behind decisions that our leadership makes but this seriously makes no sense at all.
/end rant
At its core this is about major shareholders whispering in the ears of the CEOs who report to them to get office utilization up. These same shareholders who also own the buildings and will see massive write-downs of their assets. Itβs no coincidence that every single newspaper is framing a pro-RTO narrative right now- these same shops are owned by the same shareholders. Itβs like that video that went out showing every Sinclair-owned local news station parroting the exact same lines. At the end of the day though- capital flows to where it is freest and most efficient- I.e not tied to assets (real estate). WFH will grow as shareholders divest themselves of commercial property over the coming decade, and as they see the value of lowering real estate costs for actual businesses and apply these savings to their net and projected earnings and thus share value.
Me listening to this in the office after my company upped the amount of days we work in the office:
ποΈπποΈ
Investors need a new breed of corporation with few offices, mostly WFH, more productive, more production oriented. Fuck management frivolities. New corporations not bogged down with "old" office buildings in expensive, high cost cities. This is a decision to be made by investors, not management! Something like Apple Lite, or Microsoft WFH corp.