Why Canadian Lottery Winners Must Answer a Math Question

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments

Question about the beginning of the video, that American flag in the first cut looks like it only has 13 big stars spaced like the 50 star flag. Does anyone know what it is?

👍︎︎ 2 👤︎︎ u/Chainweasel 📅︎︎ May 29 2020 đź—«︎ replies

Good video.. what irks me is that some online contests that one can enter and in the contest rules it states that the promoter will only call the winning person - not fair and not accessible to people who are hard of hearing or deaf - they can't receive the phone call and answer the math question to win whatever prize!

👍︎︎ 2 👤︎︎ u/crackerjack71 📅︎︎ May 28 2020 đź—«︎ replies
Captions
This video was made possible by Tab for a Cause. Raise money for charity with every tab you open by signing up at the link in the description. In times of turmoil, it’s important to remember that all Americans are united by one shared dream: the dream of Steve Harvey showing up on our doorstep with a large novelty check from Publishers Clearing House. You see, more than 55 million Americans enter some form of sweepstakes or contest every year, and these promotions net around $2.8 billion annually for the companies that host them, which might make some of you think “gee, that’s a lot of work for poor Steve Harvey,” but the smarter of you might think “gee, those figures kind of pale in comparison to the $71 billion dollars that Americans spend on the lottery annually—I mean, really, why don’t these companies just host lotteries instead? Aren’t sweepstakes just convoluted lotteries? Is this a setup for a long explanation of American lottery law?” Well, in order to answer those questions, we first need a long explanation of American lottery law. Right, so, by definition, a lottery has three key components: a winner chosen by chance, a prize that has value, and the exchange of money or something of value to enter. Now, only state governments can legally run lotteries, so in order for private businesses to run contests legally, they need to eliminate one of these components. Most do this by eliminating the third—the entry fee. Businesses generally attach their sweepstakes to the purchase of a product, but provide a free method of entry in the fine print. Yep, that’s right—any legal sweepstakes in the United States can be entered for free. That time you suffered through sixty-five boxes of dry, tasteless animal crackers only to win a lifetime supply of more animal crackers? You could’ve done that for free—kind of. In reality, most of these “alternate methods of entry” require divulging tons of personal data that can then be packaged and sold to telemarketers who will haunt you for the rest of your life, so, really, they’re only free if you don’t value your sanity, or lost it altogether sometime maybe around March 2020. Now, this loophole might work wonders for money-grubbing Yanks, but it doesn’t quite cut it up north—or down south, actually, if you live in Detroit. Canadian law prohibits “disposing of any property by lots, cards, tickets or any mode of chance” whatsoever—theoretically, this means no lotteries, no sweepstakes, and no gambling on the outcome of underground chimpanzee wrestling matches even if the underground chimpanzee wrestling matches provide a free method of entry in the fine print. However, bigger Minnesota, also called Canada, still wants to run contests so, since the 19th century, Canadians have tried to subvert these laws by adding small tests of skill to their lotteries and sweepstakes as a qualification for claiming the prize, which means that they’re not technically games of chance—y’know, sort of like how pizza isn’t technically a vegetable, or spending your entire paycheck on Half as Interesting t-shirts isn’t technically a good idea. Up until a few decades ago, private businesses and the Canadian government constantly went to court over what did and didn’t count as a game of skill. For example, guessing beans in a jar—according to the Ontario High Court of Justice, that’s a skill. Peeling a potato—not so much. Estimating the time that it would take for a barrel to float down a river—pure skill. Answering questions about the city of Montreal—nope. Answering questions about the city of Montreal with the correct answers given to the player before they respond—shockingly, also a no. Sniping a turkey from fifty yards with a rifle? Well, this should be obvious: of course not, what sort of early 20th century gentleman can’t snipe a turkey from fifty yards with a rifle? This squabbling finally came to a head in 1984, when a Canadian court approved a simple math equation as a suitable test of skill for sweepstakes and lotteries: (((228 x 21 + 10,824) / 12) - 1,121). Go on, I’ll give you a few seconds to do some quick maths. Just pretend like your ownership of a brand-new luxury catamaran depends on it, but also, feel free to pause the video and use a calculator, because, much like the Canadian Competition Bureau, I have no way of monitoring when, where, and how you solve the equation. Also, much like the Canadian Competition Bureau, I really don’t care that much. Alright, time’s up! Did you get 180? I really hope you did, because this was about as easy to cheat on as online AP tests. Anyway, this case set an important precedent and four-part math equations were adopted nationwide, regulating the largest national lotteries and the smallest local giveaways. Over time, these problems have gotten even simpler, sometimes only using three parts and single-digit numbers, or even asking contestants to divide by 1. But, after all, basic arithmetic isn’t quite as simple as sniping a turkey from fifty yards with a rifle, so it’s still possible to screw up—though that doesn’t necessarily mean that you lose the prize. In fact, a cursory search of Google finds just one example of someone who even came close to being punished for failing a skill-testing question. The woman in question won a GPS in a 2007 Tim Horton’s giveaway, and was asked to solve 8 x 6 - 5 + 9. She gave the answer of 51. Tim Horton’s asked her to submit a different answer, but, feeling satisfied with her first answer, she submitted 51 again. Tim Horton’s denied her the GPS at first, but after submitting several complaints over the course of two months, she eventually got her prize anyway. So, we all like free money, right? And we all like helping others, right? So, what if I told you you could generate free money that is used to help others by doing basically nothing? I mean, that’s crazy right? Nope, that’s Tab for a Cause. This browser extension displays a few small ads each time you open a new tab, and then they donate the money generated from that to a nonprofit of your choice. It’s that simple, and to prove they’re legit, their website is completely open source and they publish quarterly financial reports showing where the money goes. So far, they’ve raised almost a million dollars for worthy causes, and right now they’re running a series of campaigns for nonprofits combating the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. So, start making the world just a tiny bit better by installing the browser extension in less than thirty seconds at http://tab.gladly.io/hai.
Info
Channel: Half as Interesting
Views: 1,516,311
Rating: 4.8978367 out of 5
Keywords: half, as, interesting, canadian, lottery, math, sweepstakes, lottery law, strange laws, weird laws, test of skill
Id: jOmnx-V1zBo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 56sec (356 seconds)
Published: Thu May 28 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.