WHO, Sinister developments

well welcome to this talk and a particular welcome to James rusi uh James thank you for coming back on the on the channel well thank you for having me I know it was very short notice and this is a timely issue so I appreciate that thank you so much and there is a degree of urgency here I think isn't there now we're talking about the international Health regulations could you start off by giving us a bit of a a timetable as to what's going on here as regards the adoptions of these some might say uh Draconian orwellian regulations James well you know um the last thing in the world I want to do is be seen as fearmongering okay I I I want to make sure that people get the facts straight and to start off what we have to clarify is that a lot of what is being said in the media a lot of times talks about the pandemic treaty well it's that's a totally different thing we're not talking about that maybe some other day what we're talking about are two separate seate collections of amendments um the primary one that we're going to be talking about today actually was adopted by the World Health assembly um on May 27th 2022 and the deadline to reject those amendments is 18 months which is scheduled for December 1st 2023 about 2 months from now there's a separate pile of amendments over 300 that were submitted on September 30th of 2022 so those have been secretly being negotiated they're going to be submitted um to the uh International Health regulations Review Committee scheduled to be submitted to them on December 15th and there has been no release of any revised addition no version 2.0 no public comment no debate in Parliament or Congress or sen it nothing on the news everybody's talking about the Treaty and this is just quietly rolling along and and the danger of it is in the method in which it is officially adopted and this this is the part that hurts everyone's brains because it's different in my opinion it's different than it should be but I deal in reality and so this is how it is and we're right in the middle of it if the unelected unaccountable and largely unknown delegates from the 194 member nations meet in Geneva like they did in 2022 and they adopt amendments to the international Health regulations it is assumed that every nation is okay with that there's an 18month period where the leader of every nation can step up and just write a letter to The Who and say I invoke article 61 and I reject whatever that was for our nation Every Other Nation can accept them if they want to but for our nation we reject them well they've procrastinated and said nothing for 16 months now there's two more months left and in the United Kingdom and in Canada and in Australia and handful of other nations as well there are official petition mechanisms and um last time I checked in the UK 67 days ago the threshold um of 100,000 signatures was reached and the people in the UK have been waiting for more than two months for a scheduled um discussion of this issue and that's really what this is about what's with all the secrecy you know the things that really concerned me James and why I was so pleased that you you chose to come on was first of all this idea that it's all going to happen by default unless there's active intervention we're just rolling into this it's like a car with a handbrake off it rolling towards the end of a cliff if someone doesn't put the handbrake on we're just going to go over that cliff and these are going to be adopted it's a default situation it's almost a fail Danger sort of situation and I wasn't aware of these further amendments that have been put into shall we say spice up the international Health regulations I suspect they give it even more Draconian Powers now could you just tell us um a little bit about the history of the international Health regulations what these amendments are and and why you're concerned well um to really give sort of a full history you got to kind of go back to the 1850s and and if you think of a time when people used horses to travel and so there was excrement all over the place and you didn't have indoor plumbing and septic systems and sewage you know treatment plants and all that um sanitation was a problem and so it started with the international sanitary regulations fast forward to World War II by that time um people were driving cars they had indoor plumbing sewage you know not everywhere in the world but in a vast you know swath of civilization we cleaned up our act I mean the sanitation regulations did a good job disease rates plummeted and then they start jabing people and they give credit to the Jabs for what sanitation actually did so the who when it was founded inherited the control of that and in 1969 they renamed it the international Health regulations and it was only dealing with some specific ailments and then it had some small amendments in the 80s and in 2005 after SARS 1 and the um anthrax scare and all that sort of thing they did a lot of amendments to it and and so the form that it is currently in we've been dealing with for about 18 years and arguably um you know I have things I would nitpick about it and I would certainly like to change some things but you know it's been serving for 18 years but now they really really really really want to change it now the Amendments that we're talking about that are the deadline to reject them is um December 1st there were only five amendments so it's a very simple thing to wrap your head around and primarily one of them is what's really important now the way this all happened was very interesting because there were negotiations going on at the end of 2021 but then the Biden Administration quietly in on January 18th 2022 submitted a bunch of amendments that I talked about last year and ultimately what happened was that submission was kicked to the curb it was not brought up for a vote or consideration because many nations made it very clear that there was not going to be consensus and the and the who likes consensus they don't want to see a roll call vote to see you know the opposition so a different set of amendments were submitted at the last minute and the United Kingdom was one of the Nations that signed on as a proponent to this along with the US and the European Union and Australia and Japan and Monaco and Bosnia and heroina a handful of other nations and it would shorten the time period that Nations have to reject what is coming this big pile of 300 amendments would not have 18 months to be rejected it would only have 10 months to be rejected well if that had been in place um everybody would have missed it okay we're already 16 months past the Amendments you know that we're considering now and and so shortening the period of time to change an international set of regulations um there's a reason for it and um this is you know I I mentioned to you John earlier you know I stick to facts so um come come with me onto speculation Island all right because now I'm going to engage in in speculation um the Biden Administration initially wanted to shorten the time period to six months if you think forward on your calendar to May of of 2024 and goes 6 months beyond that you're in November of 2024 it doesn't have anything to do with our elections it would still be the Biden Administration but that got negotiated out to 10 months which actually would bring you to about April 1st of 2025 so potentially there could be a new Administration and a new Congress right so I hold out hope right because the negotiations were tough in 2022 and they did not get their way the the change that they want to make is to shorten it from 18 to 10 months but they wanted it to be six months well I got to tell you six months to consider you know 200 pages of amendments to an 84-page document what what is the reason for that what is the rush you you you can adopt them quicker if you want to but to force Every Nation to shorten the time frame clearly we've gone more than 10 months and nobody said a word and so you know I wish I could devise systems that would benefit from procrastination because that's what we're dealing with the simple fact that members of parliament and Congress and the Senate and everybody else the media just by not doing anything something happens that is the danger that we're dealing with and we will deal again with with these many amendments the the rule is not that all of these amendments will come back to Parliament or Congress or the senate for an approval the approval is assumed unless the leader of your nation writes a letter rejecting them well hold on a minute those are the people who submitted them they're not listening to the people they're not listening to 100,000 people who signed a petition and also in in Canada um in April and May um in the Canadian system uh they only need 500 signatures in 30 days to have a petition supposed to be submitted to Parliament they got 18,900 73 signatures in 30 days in Australia they got 55,78366 Tuesday October 3rd so we already have there's already 100,000 signatures but you know part of this is just to raise everyone's awareness of why has there not been a discussion not about the Treaty yes I know they had a debate in Parliament on April 17th and maybe five or six members of parliament you know were there talking about it that was a different document and I got news for you the document that they discussed in April about the quote unquote treaty well that's been thrown away and they had a new document on June 2nd and that's being thrown away and they're promising a new document for the framework convention mid October end of October to be made public well it's a whole new thing so whatever they discussed back in April forget about it and in terms of the 300 plus amendments since they've been negotiating for a year and we have not seen any new document any comment about the details that are in there as egregious as they may be we're Flying Blind there's been no public comment no public discussion no reveal and um from October 2nd to October 6th the working group for the amendments to the international Health regulations are me meeting in Geneva to discuss some very important things they're they're scheduled to discuss articles 1 2 and 3 which article one is the definition of terms so words like vaccine or pandemic or safe and effective or case nothing and um this brings to mind something that I unfortunately I didn't get a chance to put in the notes that I sent you um but I I'll mention it because I think it's really important um please article 21 of the wh Constitution says that the wh shall have the authority to write regulations and they list five things that they have the authority to write regulations about now regulations are supposed to mean to make regular you set standards now some of the things they're supposed to be setting standards for I I hope they would but I don't think that this is what they're talking about they're talking about many different things one of the things they're supposed to set standards for is the safety of biological products that go in international trade do you think they've been doing a good job of that I haven't even seen anything from their um Quality Assurance work they're supposed to set standards for advertising and and labeling well what's with all of the blank inserts there should be a regulation that does not permit that um they're also supposed to set standards for nomenclature right terminology like I've been mentioning as well as um disease Diagnostics um the the set of symptoms for coid could be a whole heck of a lot of other things and it kept changing and I didn't really ever you know see Clarity on well we're using this thing that's not really a test it's a process called PCR and depending upon the cycle threshold you get a 97% um false positive how is that the who fulfilling their obligation to write regulations about diagnostic testing so they're failing to regulate the things that they're charged with regulating and what they're getting into are areas that you know involve building out infrastructure and factories and Laboratories and transfer of wealth from um wealthy Nations to poor Nations under the guise of equity and um you know just things that they don't have authority to do I wrote an article a couple of months ago about well here's all of the things that they're doing can you match those up with the authorities that they've been given to write regulations in the Constitution they don't seem to match up they're they're not questioning well you know what are the standards for a mask right if you wear a mask it's it's a source control device so that you don't maybe sneeze on somebody but it doesn't protect you and they know it right if you're wearing um you know a respirator that might protect you but it has a vent on it so you can actually wear it for a long period of time well you're certainly not protecting other people okay um you know did they analyze you know remes and mazam and mup and Pax lovid and whether or not you know that and the ventilators and the protocols that were enforced did those save people or did those kill people you know where is the analysis of that to write protocols for such things they're not they're not talking about health if you actually pull up the international Health regulations they're improperly named if you just go through the articles in the document they would be more properly named the international um surveillance monitoring reporting emergency declaring fear-mongering control regulations now if you if you look at just the Articles and you realize that that's what they are you ask yourself what is it that they're doing they're not doing the things that we the people know in our hearts and in our minds need to be done we need to examine we need to do uh you know an after event review what just happened right okay let's not do that again well the lessons that they seem to have learned are well we were able to get 75% of the Western World to accept the jab but only 25% of the developing world we need to do better in getting Jabs into black and brown people and so they want this transfer of wealth to what I call the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex and so what we're looking at here are not negotiations about health they're not calling in doctors I mean they could call you in and have you talk about all of the facts that you've been presenting for months but that's not what this is about this is about money um intellectual property and a good example of what has triggered this is and and I feel it should be a negotiation maybe for the World Trade Organization because it's really a trade dispute if you think back to the time when South Africa and Botswana said ooh we we've got some genomic sequences and this Omron thing it's really different and they alerted the world that something was going on well rather than be thanked and praised and you know supported for having done good investigative work and honestly letting the world know they were greeted with you know travel restrictions and now they're looking at now they're looking at five and madna taking that information turning it into boosters and making billions of dollars and what they're arguing for now now this is in the um framework convention they want a pathogen access and benefits sharing system well that idea comes from a 1992 convention on biological diversity they're basically saying hey if we go into a batcave or you know a chicken Coupe or our septic system or SE treatment plant or I don't know a wet Market or a Pengalin enclosure somewhere and we find a new fancy pathogen it's ours and if you want it you're going to have to pay us you're going to have to give us some benefit right pathogen access benefit sharing system so I put together the people's declaration you know the UN is trying to make all these declarations if you go to the people's declaration my personal declaration and you're free to say whatever it is you want to say is well hold on a moment you're negotiating on a worldwide basis something to want to stop the next pandemic well what if that pandemic came from the Wuhan lab and you want to go out into the country side and gather pathogens that are not necessarily causing pandemics but they have the potential to do so you want to bring those into the lab share them all around the world um that seems to me to be very close to biological weapons research what I would like to see is negotiations you know shut these things down you're not doing what you need to do shut them down and negotiate a treaty to put an end to gain of function research well that's not what they're doing doing they're negotiating the capacity to spend billions of dollars to do what could be viewed as biological weapons Warfare research and and so if their goal is to prevent the next pandemic I don't think building more Laboratories to look for more pathogens to go work on them to make them more transmissible and and you know give them additional function um boy does that seem wrongheaded to you John it does seem to have the potential to be uh let me think of a term here weaponized utilized in in ways that might not be good for people that were infected with those viruses and and that's really what we're interested in now there's there's so many things have alarmed me that there James the the Biden Administration trying to cut out the period of um consultation now if someone from the Biden Administration would like to come on the channel of course they'd be more than welcome if not let me know why you think they might have wanted to Cil the period of negotiation why hasn't my prime minister written this uh what was it James article 61 he could just write send a letter and say no you know what I represent the British people I am for the British people I don't want them to be subjugated to these unelected Bureau rats in Geneva who may have ulterior motives for what they do who may be controlled by external influences in what they do I want the British people to be proud and free he could do that but but but but hasn't done that I just find it such a travesty of democracy and I wasn't aware of of how how extensive this pathogen sharing thing was I mean potentially if you're sharing pathogens you could have the same pathogen that could mistakenly be released in six countries all at the same time and then what chance would we have um one of the things that happened doesn't doesn't bear thinking about one one of the things that happened recently um came as a bit of a surprise but it actually gives me hope that there are um diplomats or bureaucrats around the world who do know the rules okay and so there's there's many things we've been talking about but uh in in uh September uh the United Nations got together and they were hoping to put out all of these various declarations about the soci um sustainable development goals and pandemics and um Universal Health Care and tuberculosis and they had this same sort of procedure they set up the meeting a year back on September 2nd 2022 they scheduled a meeting for um you know this year and at the beginning of September this year they circulated these documents as part of what they call their silence procedure and the idea is if nobody says anything then it means you're okay well interestingly enough on Sunday the 17th of September the day before all these meetings were supposed to start 11 Nations got together and wrote a letter to the president of the um United Nations General Assembly and they said they they literally John they used the word they used the word pretend they said we don't really appreciate that you're pretending that this highlevel meeting speaks for the entire United Nations General Assembly and they basically said we object to this and so what happened at the meeting was that they said well or the president of the uh General Assembly GED the meeting into Open Session and he said oh well you know we're going to start off with this declaration and I trust that everybody here is good with it and so subject to what these 11 Nations demanded in a letter he said subject to at some later date we'll take this up with the full um General Assembly we adopt these and that is how they roll right they then put forth the propaganda machine to make it sound like that was was the fullon United Nations General Assembly putting their stamp of approval on it but that may come at some point in the future you have to know how to pay attention to the little tiny things that they do that aren't the way they're presented in the media and so what's what we're being fed is misinformation from the very people who claim that when we expose the truth that you know quite frankly you know I'm adopting it John what you've been doing is presenting all of the information that everyone else is missing right so you know misinformation from people such as yourself is actually the missing information that the official people don't want you to catch on to so you know thank you for doing all that you've been doing in that regard not at all James it sounds like we're being manipulated and international agencies such as the United Nations are being manipulated by a relative small group of what some might see as vested interests now when I read these regulations um the original regulations were saying things like uh there won't be compulsion and the Amendments of the regulations we're just taking out a single word to change it from won't to will or things like that so the the the impression I'm getting is there's going to be a whole host of these regulations that are going to be enforcable at the level of the the nation state in other words my concern is that this unelected bureaucratic group potentially representing vested interest can put forward its dictates some might say its tentacles into different countries in the world and their word from Geneva will have the power of law in in my country and in your country because when we put our last video up James been well viewed the last video many people simply said well I'm not doing this I won't comply this this I'm I'm not going to accept this but the point is if you've got the power of the state saying you will accept this then You' have no choice because it's got the power so it seems to me that they are usurping the power of the nation state that our governments correctly have over us because otherwise we' have Anarchy and they're using that for their own some might say parasitic purposes I just find this whole thing really Sinister well I I agree with the Sinister nature of it um you know certainly nefarious and let me give a couple maybe three examples um in in the bureau's text and I I'm sorry for the word salad but I've been living on word salad since I started looking at the who um documents in our viewers are smart James they can cope with it in in the bureau's text of the wh convention agreement plus that was published on June 2nd and I call it a framework convention because that's what it is chapter 3 sets up a framework convention where they would have a conference of the parties that would be a bureaucracy that would be created and given Authority so if you agree to give up authority to a bunch of unelected you know unknown unaccountable bureaucrats I think you're behaving strangely to say the least but what that group would be made made up of is delegates from the Nations but also representatives from corporate organizations things that are in my view um they're pandemic profiteers the the companies that make Jabs and drugs and testing equipment and laboratory equipment and personal protective equipment whatever if they're accepted because they're buddy buddy with the people who are in the conference of parties then they get a seat at the table and they have an inside view as to how they're going to spend the $30 billion a year that they want to pump into the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex add to that United Nations agencies and all of the foundations and relevant stakeholders like Bill and Melinda Gates and so forth those people would make up the conference of the parties and under article 38 of that document they could write detailed protocols every time they meet going off into the future to Infinity well it's kind of like if you had a contract that you were going to sign and the person that you're working with says well hold on a moment let me put you know a couple of dozen sheets of blank paper in here I'll have my people that I pick later fill in all of the details just s just sign here on the dotted line it's that insane now don't take my word for it go back to 1992 and look up the framework convention for climate change if you think Insanity has taken over our world I don't think you need to look too much further than an agreement that puts Authority into an unknown group of people to make decisions about climate well what affects the climate they think it's everything do you w to have your nation agree to a framework convention for pandemic prevention preparedness and response that includes the one health approach which says pretty much everything you could possibly think of has an impact on your health so we're in charge do you really want to give authority to an unknown band you know a cabal of of oligarchs who want to set up a cartel to create a laboratory Network where they can share pathogens and develop more biological weapons and take your public money and fund the building which they're already doing of factories and Laboratories to make more poisons to inject into more people to turn healthy people into customers I say no stop this just stop it no treaty no amendments where is the review and not a cockamamy made up you know government sponsored review like you know the Warren Commission report after the JFK assassination or the 911 Commission report or the Challenger commission you know we the people know what happened the last four years and they're not addressing any of that they're going forward with the lessons that they learned which is they fooled some of the people and there's a bunch of people that they're going to try to fool Again by fear-mongering oh we found a new pathogen um we've turned it into a jab that you have to take to protect you for something that would not require statistics that so many people got sick so many people died they would just be able to say it has the potential to cause a pathogen therefore you got to do this this this this this and this I I I simply say no shut this down and quite frankly I've been pushing um exit the who.org um when you're in a relationship with an abusive partner or if somebody you know was in an abusive relationship you don't negotiate for better terms no you leave and that's what we need to do just get out get out absolutely so there's problems here that may be genuine problems or problems that have been overstated that are being used as an excuse to centralize power potentially oppressing the rest of us and all our all our leaders have to do is write this letter with with Section 61 and we're out of it and the fact that President Biden and my prime minister and the leaders around the world have not done this um I must say I find surprising that they're prepared to uh seed so much sovereignty so lightly I mean in in the past armies have fought and died over issues like this let me let me uh join me now we just seem to be saying okay never mind take it away join me again for a moment John on speculation Island okay um because I can't I can't prove this um with what happened with the 11 Nations that wrote a letter at the last minute okay think about this scenario there's 194 Nations Plus two Observer Nations that are party to the international Health regulations they all have the opportunity to reject the Amendments that were adopted last year but they have to do so by December 1st I encourage those 11 Nations to do again what they did to the UN and you know somewhere at the end of November what if some of the nations are on the ball and they realize that these amendments to shorten the time period to make changes um they're irrelevant you can make changes quickly if you want to but if you agree that you have to quite frankly that's a stupid thing to agree to you can always move quickly if you think something needs to happen and you can adopt a change fast but if you agree that you have to do it fast maybe you're going to miss something and make a mistake in in my prayers many leaders from many nations will find the wisdom and the courage to stand up to The Who on behalf of their nation and say you know what these changes are ridiculous they they don't improve anybody's Health at all and it's going to shorten the time period that we're going to have to consider these big changes which are stupid but why would anybody say we want to shorten the time period to consider such important so in my prayers I see many leaders of many nations Having the courage to just say nope thank you very much now if they do it at the last minute and the deadline ends then all of the stupid leaders in the countries who didn't understand how politics works and they were asleep and they did not reject the Amendments they're going to be bound by them and then we're all going to get to look at our stupid leaders who got punked by Nations who are smarter and more Savvy and have more courage to tell the who to go take a hike we'll see what happens yeah and and the share inactivity from our leaders raises to me the potential of stupidity of course but it also to me raises the possibility that they are already compromised in some way because why aren't they acting to protect the sovereignty of individual nation states so it really is quite um yeah there there's a few possibilities there for why this isn't happening but I must say from what I've been told James I'm reasonably pessimistic about this it looks like these are going to be we're going to fight it of course but it looks like these could well be accepted there's going to be a loss of sovereignty there's going to be a globalization an internationalization a particular Elites will take disproportionate amounts of control and the rest of us can be subjugated on various pretexts uh pretext of it being for our own good when when it's anything but for our own good it makes me a little bit uh pessimistic are you optimistic or pessimistic well um you know I wouldn't be doing what I was doing if I wasn't optimistic and um yeah there's a couple of things that we talked about and and maybe we can wind this all up because I know people's attention you know time is precious and so let let me try let me let me try to summarize what what I you know what I what I feel okay um first and foremost I do this all the time and people think I'm crazy but I've met spectacular people so if anybody has any questions about any of this my phone number is 310 61935 I'm in the United States I'm in California I'm on Signal and Telegram and WhatsApp so you can text me or call me or use any of those apps if you have any questions at all I am that serious about it there's been groups all around the world who have joined into this if you go to exit the.org you can see if somebody in your country is pushing back and get connected with them the information about the Amendments is on stopthe amendments. and it's about both sets of amendments stop the amendments. comom don't do a search for that because search engines will take you on a wild goose chase somewhere that is the domain just type it in and and go there my personal declaration in regards to all of this and you're welcome to copy it and adapt it and do whatever you want with it is on the peoples declaration. comom and a year ago um I set up screw Theo who.com and hundreds of people have recorded their opinion and so if you go to screw the who.com you can see what people had to say a year ago well John if if the who really had their way um I I don't think they would want us to even be having this conversation I think they would have preferred to just keep it all nice and quiet have their little meetings get into May 2024 adopt these amendments let time go by let them be enacted into you know legally binding law and then start implementing it and then everybody goes hey you know what are you doing you can't do that and then they would be able to say oh but we told you you know posted on some website quietly somewhere and and you had all of this time to speak up okay well I encourage each and every person watching this there's a simple thing you can do take the link to this video and if there is a single person that you know of and you can contact and you do not share it with that person and by that I mean share it with everybody your friends your family your politicians your you know government officials public servants up and down the thing share this with everybody because if you don't then you're engaging in censorship so share this information obviously the algorithms are not going to do it for you right so the easy starting point is take this link to this video share link we'll post below this video share it far and wide because it's our job in a representative form of government to instruct our public servants what we want they're busy listening to donors and lobbyists and the world economic forum and whoever it is that pulls their strings we need to get in touch with them we need to attach our strings to them and we start we need to start yanking on their chain to do what we tell them to do they don't tell us what we get they work for us and so honestly we the people have maybe failed a little bit in keeping an eye on our employees and they're starting to lose their minds if not already and so if we get in touch with them and we clearly tell them what it is we want and then they fail to do what we instruct them to do then it's their bad if you don't do that then you have to look in the mirror and blame yourself yeah James I want to close the some words written 2 and a half thousand years ago by a guy called Ezekiel because I think this applies to to you because you you are the Watchman uh for for for many people and we thank you for that but these are the words son of man speak to your people and say to them when I bring the sword against the land and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their Watchmen and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet to warn the people then if anyone hears the trumpet but does does not heed the warning the sword comes and takes their life their blood will be on their own heads since they heard the sound of the trumpet but did not heed the warning James thank you for blowing the trumpet thank you John I appreciate the time bless you you too bless you

Channel: Dr. John Campbell

Views: 1,030,459

Keywords: physiology, nursing, NCLEX, health, disease, biology, medicine, nurse education, medical education, pathophysiology, campbell, human biology, human body

Id: UScNk39xUTk

Length: 44min 22sec (2662 seconds)

Published: Fri Sep 29 2023