vivo X100 Ultra vs Galaxy S24 Ultra - The Ultra Camera Comparison!

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
[Music] ever since I saw the Vivo x00 Ultra I've been craving to test this phone so I jumped on the opportunity to import it and test the cameras and to no one's surprise this phone is an absolute camera beast and to show you folks how good it actually is let's just compare the cameras to the Galaxy s24 Ultra in this battle of Ultras hi I'm ashad you're watching track and te English your destination for dettin incisive Gadget [Music] reviews the biggest advantage that the other Ultras like the x00 ultra fx7 Ultra and the 14 Ultra have over this Ultra is the Sony lyt 900 sensor now that's a 1-in sensor and the physical size is definitely larger than the 1X 1.3 in sensor used by the s24 ultra and that is why when you look at the 100% crop of the images you see way more details on the x00 ultra compared to the s 24 Ultra Plus the sharpness of the finer textures are better in vivo's picture and this is true for wherever you look in the sample that's just physics you know now Vivo obviously has different color modes you get Ze natural Ze WD and Ze textured but I used the Ze natural one to compare and evidently Vivo does capture the true colors of the Reds Blues greens and the yellows in the scene Samsung is a tiad bit more contrast to deepen out the shades but otherwise it's not too Off the Mark which is a huge upgrade when you consider Samsung's algorithm because Samsung never took natural looking photos it was always boosted which is not true for the s24 ultra though although the color sense consistency between the different lenses primary Ultra and telephoto are better achieved by Samsung than Vivo now the skin tone rendition although is Pitch Perfect on both the phones Samsung exhibits closer to neutral tones where Vivo is slightly warmer to make things look more pleasing because I switched to the zoom lenses next on Samsung it's 3x or 69 mm and on Vivo it's 3.7x or 85 mm now when you look at the samples just take a look at that natural creamy poker captured by the x00 ultra and when you crop 100% vi just mokes Samsung here this 3.7x Periscope camera is the absolute bump vivo's camera Engineers definitely deserve a race by the way I'll talk more about that Periscope soon now in my HDR comparison both the phones Show excellent Flagship HDR tuning but technically Vivo does bring out more details in the shadows and cuts out the noise as well moreover the Highlight control is slightly better too the only problem with the right now is that the multi-stack processing is messing up the white Ballance the color of the sky and the entire look of the scene has been Faithfully reproduced by Samsung here also the HDR tuning is slightly inconsistent on VI it misses a lot especially when you shoot the sun directly like in this case it's a little inconsistent it's very early software so keep that in mind in low light physics comes into play once again vivo's 1-in sensor pulls way more light than the 1X 1.3 in sensor on Samsung when you look at the 100% crop Vivo sample has has way more details and sharper textures Samsung also exhibits a lot of green luminance noise which is not a problem for Vivo the algorithm is much cleaner easily the x00 ultra is better for low light photography than the s24 ultra now portrait mode was slightly difficult to evaluate side by side primarily because both of these shoot at different focal lengths Samsung shoots at 23 mm 46 mm 69 mm and 115 mm with the 5x where R shoots at 24 35 50 85 and 100 mm now comparing the wide 24 mm portrait Samsung actually beats VI you get better Edge cutout and a cleaner boka drop off plus you will also notice a problem with Vivo skin tones now when you shoot Portage shots VI tends to make skin brighter which I think is a Chinese problem more than anything else because you know Chinese skin tones are fairer so when the global release happens maybe it'll get fixed but will a global release happen or not we don't know but what we do know is that tracking English provides great content so hit that subscribe button and you know support our Channel and help us reach 1 million by the end of 2024 so that you can see a clean shaving that shot yeah that thing's happening now at 2x Samsung's portrait has better skin tones while Vivo is brighter but VI's semantic segmentation of edge cutout is better but when we talk about Vios 35 and 85 mm portraits you cannot compare that with Samsung wikin do 69 mm and 115 mm but the portrait performance is the same Vivo has better Edge detection but brighter faces Samsung has better exposure and skin tones but slightly weaker Edge detection but what we does better than Samsung is definitely low light portraits plus you get so so many different size portrait lenses that gives it versatility what I really want from the x00 ultra portrait mode is more natural looking skin tone just like when you would shoot in the regular mode now talking about the ultra wide angle camera you get a slightly wider field of view on Samsung 13 mm compared to 14 mm but more importantly Samsung's Ultra wide shs are more detailed compared to Vivo which is also true for the low light Ultra wide shots more details on Samsung and less grains as well all right it's time to start zooming in and the results are very very interesting so starting with the 2x in sensor crop Vivo gets off to a good start by capturing more details than Samsung at 3x it's obviously Advantage Samsung because Optical 3x is greater than digital 3x of Vivo at 3.7x it's vivo's Optical Victory now zooming into 5x it's a victory for Samsung but difference is marginal now Vios 5x is actually very very close in terms of quality zooming in even further at 10x and 20x I was in for a shock Vio beats Samsung easily wow we also zoomed in further to 60x here things are interesting because Samsung's text enhancement algorithm with AI comes in handy to enhance that you know Refuge area text but if you look at the crisscross patterns of the net VI actually does it way way better now at 100x Samsung does capture finer Textures in the text once again but other parts of the image Vivo is more natural looking you know this difference in the algorithm reminds me of somebody who wants to age gracefully and they're proud of the gray hair that they have at the same time somebody who wants to look better with the use of artificial resources like a hair dye and make it black you know that's Samsung for you and you know what when you zoom in to take pictures in low light Vivo beats Samsung at every level whether it's 2x 3x 3.7x 5x or 10x and that's not it with this 3.7x camera you can also do tele macro and oh my God the focusing distance is so close is the vi x00 Ultra the best macro camera that I've used yes is it better than the s24 ultra double yes all right moving on to selfies I had a slightly tough time evaluating it if not for the skin tone differences you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Vivo and Samsung here just look at a zoomed in crop both capture the same level of details but Samsung wins it because it has better skin tones than VI but in portrait selfies take a look at the edge cutout on VI every single strand of hair of my you know standing hair captured and ien ified and you know Edge DED very well although in HDR selfies Samsung Does It Better even in low light Samsung does it better so overall when you look at you know which is the better selfie camera between the two Samsung's better but the difference is very little the difference is also very tiny when you're shooting 4K 60 FPS videos using all the cameras on these phones now comparing the rear camera video quality technically Vivo does capture slightly higher bit ratees so it has slightly more details otherwise both are equally matched in HDR and stabilization Samsung does have slightly better sound qu quality though I am talking from you know in front of the phone arav is behind can you say something yes I am talking from you know in front of the phone anav is behind an can you say something yes VI slow light video recording is slightly Superior with better noise control and you can see that for yourself and now when you evaluate the ultra at 4K 60 FPS again it is very difficult to spot the differences really now I also shot with the telephoto and I zoomed in with the cameras and what I noticed is that both these phones do not offer a smooth Zoom experience like iPhones 2 now that's been a problem with Android phones for ages I don't know when it's going to get fixed however both are almost equally matched in terms of image performance when you zoom in up to the 20x capability of both the phones now just like the selfie camera picture quality where Samsung beat weo even in videos I think Samsung is slightly better than Vivo primarily because you get better HDR performance and better sound recording quality as well this is the front-facing uh video sample recorded using the X Ultra and uh the Galaxy s20 4 ultra so both are recording at 4K 60 FPS now that's the performance of the cameras themselves but both these phones offer a plora of features vivo's new camera features that I really like is that new stage mode for when you want to shoot a concert which I think is like a very useful feature and there's a humanistic street style mode which is a very detailed manual mode with spot metering focal length adjustments EV adjustments wide balance selections and more it is just very very detailed now in comparison Samsung uses a lot of algorithm and Galaxy AI to give you some really interesting features as well the one that I really like in the Galaxy a sort of features is one where you can convert any regular video into a slow motion video see I'm not going into the depth of which one has better features because both have you know a lot of features and are almost equally matched in terms of quantity so you know what the x00 ultra is basically a camera that's been given some smartphone capabilities on top of it that's actually what Vivo says as well it was just built way from the ground up it's a great tool for photographers whether you're an amateur or a professional if I can assure you one thing is that this camera sorry this phone can actually make great photographs now with the Galaxy s24 Ultra I don't get that same feeling though and I don't think Samsung wants that either because their definition of an Ultra phone is slightly different now the s24 ultra is an Ultra phone because it lets you do absolutely whatever you want to do with E and that includes photography as well basically this is Samsung's most Ultra phone in all aspects not just the camera that's how I look at it what do you folks think of it do let me know and I'll see you folks in the next one adios until they keep tracking and stay safe
Info
Channel: Trakin Tech English
Views: 134,263
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Trakintech, trakin Tech English, vivo x100 ultra vs, vivo x100 ultra, vivo x100 ultra review, vivo x100 ultra unboxing, vivo x100 ultra camera test, vivo x100 ultra specs, galaxy s24 ultra, vivo x100 ultra release date, vivo x100 ultra features, vivo x100 ultra 2024, vivo x100 ultra news, samsung galaxy s24 ultra, vivo x100 ultra leaks, vivo X100 Ultra vs S24 Ultra, Galaxy S24 Ultra vs X100 Ultra, X100 Ultra vs S24 ultra camera comparison
Id: lXmkATDfDgU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 10min 17sec (617 seconds)
Published: Sat Jun 01 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.