Triangle of Terror | Lippisch P 13a

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
As the war in Europe slowly progressed,  the Luftwaffe found   itself in a desperate struggle to fend  off ever-increasing Allied bombing raids.   These desperate times demanded a desperate  solution, which came in the form of many   experimental aircraft and other technological  proposals. Some of these included developing   ramjets engines that could be powered using  alternative fuels, and aircraft designs that   could potentially reach supersonic speed. The  man who tried to combine them into a single   design was Alexander Martin Lippisch and  his bizarre-looking P 13a flying triangle.  In the later stages of the war, chronic fuel  shortages caused major issues for the Luftwaffe   in opposing the Allies. As one solution to  overcome this rising problem, it was proposed   to speed up the development of the ramjet  engines. They were designed to use compressed   air mixed with fuel to create thrust but without a  mechanical compressor. In contrast to jet engines,   ramjet engines were much simpler to build in  theory and could be adapted to use other types   of fuel beyond aviation gasoline. The downside  was that it could not function during take-off,   as it required a high volume of airflow to  function. Thus, an auxiliary power plant was   needed. The first working prototype was built  and tested in 1942, mounting the engine on   a Dornier Do 17 and, later, a Do 217. While the ramjet was being developed,   the Germans needed a suitable aircraft for it  to be equipped with. This is where tailless   delta wing designs enthusiast and engineer  Alexander Martin Lippisch came into play. He   made a breakthrough with the construction of  a rocket-powered glider known as the DFS 194,   and after some time spent refining this design,  it eventually led to the development of the Me 163   rocket-powered interceptor. In 1942, Lippisch left  Messerschmitt. Instead, he joined the Aeronautic   Research Institute in Vienna, where he continued  working on his delta-wing aircraft designs. In May   of 1943, he became director of this institution,  and at that time, work on a supersonic aircraft   was initiated. In October 1943, Lippisch won  a contract to develop the experimental P 11   delta-wing aircraft. Lippisch became interested  in merging his new work with a ramjet engine,   leading to the P 12. In the early stages of the  project, Lippisch and his team were not completely   sure what to use as fuel for their aircraft.  The whole project had a major setback when   the facilities where he and his team worked were  bombed by the Allies. In addition to the damage   to the project itself, over 45 team members died  during this raid. To further complicate matters,   the scarcity of gasoline meant that Lippisch's  team was forced to seek other available resources,   such as different forms of coal. This led to the  creation of the slightly modified project named   P 13. In contrast to the P 12, the cockpit was  relocated from the fuselage into a large fin.   This design provided better stability while also  increasing the aircraft's aerodynamic properties.  The P 12 and P 13 small-scale models were  successfully tested at Spitzerberg Airfield near   Vienna in May of 1944. The project even received  a green light from the Ministry of Armaments.   In the early stages of the project, there were  some concerns that the radical new design would   require the extensive retraining of pilots.  However, the wind tunnel test showed that the   design was aerodynamically feasible and that the  aircraft had no major control issues. Based on   these tests, work on an experimental aircraft  was ordered to begin as soon as possible.  As the work on the P 13 went on, the name  was slightly changed. This was necessary as   different variations were proposed. The original P  13 received the prefix ‘a’, while the designations   of later variants continued alphabetically.  After a brief period of examination,   the P 12 project was discarded in favor of P 13a. The P 13a did not have a traditional fuselage,   but rather a base consisting of a delta wing.  A large fin with a pilot cockpit was placed on   top of it. The exact ram engine type was never  specified, but it was positioned in the central   fuselage, with the air intake to the front and  the exhaust to the back. The total fuel load   was to be around 800 kg (1,760 lbs). Combustion  was to be initiated by using small quintiles of   liquid fuel or gas flames. The overall engine  design was changed several times during the   work on the P 13 without any real solution to  the issues of output consistency. Given that   the ramjets could not work without air thrust, an  auxiliary engine had to be used during take-off,   though a more practical scenario would have been  to tow the P 13 until it could start its engine.  The wing construction was quite robust and  provided with deflectors that would prevent   any potential damage to the rudders. The wing  design also incorporated a sharp metal plate,   similar to those used for cutting enemy balloon  cables. A plausible reason for this choice was   the fact that, given it had no landing gear, the  aircraft design had to be robust enough so as   not to be torn apart during landing. The wings  were swept back at an angle of 60 degrees.  The fin had to be enlarged to provide good  flight command characteristics. The fin cockpit   was provided with a large glazed canopy that  offered a good view of the front and sides.  While this is often how the P 13a was portrayed,  Lippisch never fully decided whether he should   use this version or the second version that used  a smaller fin with the pilot cockpit placed above   the engine intake. These are drastically different  from each other. Lippisch, for unknown reasons,   presented the version that used the smaller fin  to British intelligence officers and the large   fin version to the Americans after the war. Landing was a bit unusual. To save weight,   no standard landing gear was to be used. Instead,  a small dolly would be used to move the aircraft.   Once sufficient height was reached, the  dolly was to be jettisoned. In theory,   this was an easy process, but in practice, this  operation offered a good chance of failure and was   much less safe than a conventional landing gear. The aircraft would land with the nose raised from   the ground and then use a landing blade skid. To  help absorb the landing impact, additional torsion   springs were to be used. This contraption  had to be activated before the landing,   emerging from beneath the aircraft fuselage,  with the rotation point located at the front.   Once released, it was to guide the aircraft toward  the ground, with the torsion springs softening the   landing. This whole contraption seems like  a disaster just waiting to happen and it's   questionable how practical it would have been. The main issue with the P13 project was finding   the most suitable fuel. A great deal of  time was spent testing and evaluating   the most suitable forms of coal that could be used  as fuel. Initial laboratory test runs were made   using solid brown Bohemian coal in combination  with oxygen to increase the burn rate. The fuel   coal was tube-shaped, with an estimated weight  of 1 kg, and encased in a mesh container through   which the granulated coal could be ejected.  The testing showed serious problems with this   concept. While a fuel tube could provide thrust  that on average lasted 4 to 5 minutes, its output   was unpredictable. During the testing, it was  noted that, due to the mineral inconsistency of   the coal fuel, it was impossible to  achieve even burning. Additionally,   larger pieces of the coal fuel would be torn off  and ejected into the jet stream. The final results   of these tests are unknown but seem to have  led nowhere, with the concept being abandoned.  While working on the P 12 and P 13, Lippisch  was approached by a group of students from the   Darmstadt and Munich universities, who were  interested in being involved in his projects.   Lippisch agreed to this and dispatched one of his  assistants. This group moved to a small warehouse   and began working on the DM 1 wooden glider. It  did not have a traditional fuselage, but instead,   its base consisted of a delta wing with a large  fin on top. The cockpit was positioned in front   of the aircraft, within the large vertical  stabilizer. To provide a better view of the   lower parts of the nose, it was glazed. The  landing gear consisted of three small landing   wheels which retracted up into the wing-fuselage.  Given that it was to be used as a test glider,   no operational engine was ever to be used on it. While it was under construction, preparations   were made for its first test flight. As it  was a glider, it needed a towing aircraft,   and a Sibel Si 204 twin-engine aircraft was chosen  for the job. However, this was not to be done like   any other glider, being towed behind the larger  aircraft. Instead, the DM-1 was to be placed above   the Si 201 in a frame, in a similar combination  as the Mistel project. In any case, the glider   was almost completed by the time the war ended and  was later captured by the Western Allies. Under   the US Army's supervision, the glider was fully  completed and sent to America for evaluation. The precise purpose of the P 13a is  not quite clear, even to this day.   Despite being briefly considered for mass  production, no official offensive armament   is mentioned in the sources. So how would  the P 13a have engaged the enemy?. In an   after war interrogation by British officers,  Lippisch was asked if the P 13 was to be used   as an aerial ram aircraft. He responded “.. The possibilities of using the P.13   as a ramming aircraft had been considered  but Dr Lippisch did not think that athodyd   propulsion was very suitable for this purpose  owing to the risk of pieces of the rammed   aircraft entering the intake. This would  be avoided with a rocket-propelled rammer…”  This statement contradicts the building  description issued in late 1944. “...Due   to tactical considerations, among other things,  the speed difference of fighters and bombers,   preferably when attacking from behind, though  the thought was given to the installation of   brakes .. and although ample room for weaponry is  present, the task of ram fighter has been taken   into account – so that the ramming attack  will not lead to the loss of the aircraft,   thanks to its shape and static structure.” This meant that this concept may have been   considered by Lippisch at some point  in the project's development. The P 13   overall shape closely resembles aircraft that were  intentionally designed for this role. That said,   the use of such tactics had been considered  but rejected, as it was seen as a futile and   flawed concept. The project itself never got  far enough to have an armament decided for it. In May 1945, Lippisch and his team had to flee  toward the West to avoid being captured by the   advancing Soviets. They went to Strobl in  Western Austria, where they encountered the   Allies. Lippisch was later transported to Paris  in late May 1945 to be questioned about his delta   wing designs. He was then moved to England, and  then to America in 1946. The following year,   American engineers with the National Advisory  Committee for Aeronautics tested the DM 1 glider   at the unique Full-Scale Wind Tunnel of the  Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory in   Hampton, VA. The test seemed promising and it was  suggested to begin preparation for a real flight.   Ironically, Lippisch was not mentioned  in this report, as technically speaking,   he was not involved in the DM 1 project.  Nevertheless, he was invited for further   testing and evaluation of this glider.  Whether this glider and work had any real   impact on the US designs is not quite clear. Despite no flight-ready aircraft ever being   completed, one full-size replica of this unusual  aircraft was built after the war. The replica   can now be seen at the American Military  Aviation Museum located in Virginia Beach. This concludes our look at the  DM-1 and P 13a. What do you think   about these two aircraft? Wunderwaffe or  Wunder-waste-of-time? Let us know in the   comments. If you like what we do and want  to see more, remember to subscribe so you   don’t miss a single video. Also, don’t  forget to take a look at our extensive   collection of articles on our website:  plane-dash-encyclopedia.com. Thank you.
Info
Channel: Plane Encyclopedia
Views: 92,324
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: DjaSEMk8B2w
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 12min 38sec (758 seconds)
Published: Sat May 04 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.