- Thanks to Indochino
for keeping Legal Eagle in the air and helping me look fly. Humans have been jetting off into space since April 12th, 1961,
when Russian lieutenant Yuri Gagarin became the first
human to orbit the Earth. Alan Shepard became the first American to enter space less than a month later. Yes, that's right, the Russians beat us to space by less than
a month, but who's counting? We didn't wanna be first in space anyway. It's cold and it's dark up there. Human space travel is
just a couple of years shy of celebrating its 60th birthday, which means 60 years of weightlessness, freeze-dried food, and figuring out how to use the bathroom
without any gravity. However, despite more than 50 years of humans traveling to
and living in space, NASA has never had to address
the issue of space pirates. No, I'm just kidding, space crime. But space crime is really
crazy and interesting, too. What happens when a crime
is committed in space? Who has jurisdiction? Who are the space police? And where is space jail? These are the questions
we're going to answer today. (light trumpet music) Hey Legal Eagles, it's time
to think like a lawyer. And today we are dealing with potentially the first case of space crime. Summer Worden, a former Air
Force intelligence officer, has accused her ex-spouse Anne McClain, a decorated NASA astronaut,
of identity theft and improper access to
private financial records. When Worden became suspicious of McClain, she asked her bank to trace
the location of any computers that had recently
accessed her bank account using her own login credentials. One of those computers, it turned out, was in outer space aboard the
International Space Station. Acknowledging that she had
indeed accessed Worden's account while in outer space,
McClain defended her actions and claimed that she was merely taking care of the couple's
intermingled finances. Nonetheless, Worden filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and her family filed yet another complaint with NASA's Office of Inspector General. Both could be historic
in that they contain the first allegation of
criminal wrongdoing in space. So let's talk about the
history of space law. The Treaty on Principles
Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration
and Use of Outer Space including the Moon and
Other Celestial Bodies, or the Outer Space Treaty,
as it is more commonly known, was entered into by 105
different parties in 1967. The treaty was essentially
the Magna Carta of space law. It established general principles for the international use
of and exploration of space, favored commercial activities in space, and sought to ensure that the
exploration of outer space could be conducted only for
the benefit of all countries. Article six of the Outer Space Treaty also emphasized that all
nations would, quote, "bear international responsibility "for national activities in space, "whether these activities were carried out "by governmental or private parties." Since entering into this
international agreement, the United States has
substantially developed its own national space law. Most recently, the extensive US space laws were recodified in 2010 in
Title 51 of the US code, which was enacted to
transfer a number of statutes dealing with national space programs into a single place in
the United States code. While Title 51 addresses a
number of space-related areas, it does not discuss
criminal acts in space. Title 51 does, however,
contain a blanket statement which presumably forbids any
sort of criminal activity. Quote, "This civil space station "may be used only for peaceful purposes." 51 USC, section 70901. But what about the
International Space Station? The International Space Station was placed into orbit in
1984 by the United States, and other nations were
invited to participate in its development and use. In order to facilitate cooperation among the participating nations, Canada, the European partner states, Japan, Russia, and the United States, signed the agreement
concerning cooperation on the International
Space Station in 1998. Article 22 of the agreement also outlined criminal jurisdiction aboard the ISS, and determined that each
participating nation, quote, "may exercise criminal jurisdiction "over personnel in or
on any flight element "who are their respective nationals." But what actually happens when a crime is committed onboard the ISS? To date, we're still not entirely sure. But in discussing criminal
jurisdiction in space, many scholars have equated
intergalactic crimes with those committed
in Antarctica or at sea in an attempt to consider
what actual development space law would look like, and, of course, to avoid common pitfalls. By way of analogy, the Antarctic Treaty was signed in 1959 by 12 nations whose scientists had been
working on the continent. To date, there are a total of 54 parties to that particular treaty. Similarly to the respective
jurisdictional rules which govern the
International Space Station, the Antarctic Treaty provides that, quote, "observers, scientific personnel,
and members of the staffs "accompanying any such persons "shall be subject only to the jurisdiction "of the Contracting Party
of which they are nationals "in respect of all acts
or omissions occurring "while they are in Antarctica "for the purpose of
exercising their functions." So, if you are a US national
doing research in Antarctica, the treaty seems to imply
that you are governed by the rules of the United States while you are domiciled in Antarctica. And, by analogy, if you're in the ISS and you commit a crime, you're governed by the laws of the United States. Still, the drafters of
the Antarctic Treaty left a lot of questions unanswered, and when in 2000 an
Australian astrophysicist died in the South Pole, the nations involved were unsure how to confront the fact that he was likely poisoned. After Dr. Marks unfortunately passed away, an autopsy was performed, and methanol was found in his system. For those of you who don't
have advanced degrees in toxicology, which I
will assume is most of you, including myself, methanol
is a colorless liquid that smells a lot like ethanol, otherwise known as alcohol,
but that is far more toxic. So the question remained, did
Dr. Marks knowingly ingest a highly toxic substance,
or was he poisoned? The United States had an interest
in investigating the death since Marks died on a US base and was an employee of
an American contractor. New Zealand maintained its own interest in investigating Marks' death since it considered the
location of the US base to fall within its own territorial claim. One officer from New
Zealand who handled the case stated that he could not rule out that the scientist's demise
was the direct result of the act of another person in the base. However, despite those suspicions, unresolved jurisdictional questions, competing jurisdictional claims, and conflicting interests prevented anyone from ever getting to the
bottom of Dr. Marks' death. To this day, no one knows
if he died by murder, suicide, or an unfortunate accident. In a similar way, international waters pose similar jurisdictional
questions and conflicts with those raised in
Antarctica and in space. Maybe at some point this will
have to be an additional video because if I had a nickel
for every time a Legal Eagle asked me to cover maritime law
and the law of the high seas, I would be a very, very rich man. At the United Nations
Conference on the Law of the Sea held in 1958, certain
provisions were adopted to regulate activities
in international waters. Articles five and six
respectively state that, quote, "Ships have the nationality of the State "whose flag they are entitled to fly, "in particular, the State
must effectively exercise "its jurisdiction and
control in administrative, "technical and social matters
over ships flying its flag." And, quote, "ships shall sail." That's so hard to say. "Under the flag of one State
only and shall be subject "to exclusive jurisdiction
on the high seas." (sighs) I'm so glad I was able
to say that correctly. A fugitive or a criminal sailing on a ship in international waters
is therefore subject to the laws and regulations
of whatever country the vessel is registered to. The United States can also
exercise special jurisdiction in international waters,
such as when, quote, "Any place outside the
jurisdiction of any nation "with respect to an offense by or against "a national of the United
States," end quote, is involved. Despite the uncertainty that
still surrounds space law, however, many say that with
the onset of space tourism we'll soon have no choice
but to expand the laws that govern the
International Space Station. And frankly, that's how our law was created in the first place. American law is a subset
of English common law, which means that the law was created, basically, as judges went along. They got a new case and
when there were new facts that had to be adjudicated
for the first time, they just kind of made it up as they went. In contrast to a lot of
the civil law societies in Europe, where the law is codified and judges just simply follow that and they never have discretion in terms of creating new common law on their own. And the funny thing is that
when you're in law school, you read a ton of railroad cases, because in the 18th and 19th centuries, trains were the newfangled
technology of the day and required courts to wrestle
with new legal principles to deal with new legal situations. So really, when you think about it, rocket ships and
International Space Stations are just the trains of today. Without wheels. In space. And as Mark Sundahl of the
Global Space Law Center said, the more we go out there
and spend time out there, all the things that we do here
are going to happen in space. Since Worden and her family
filed their complaints against McClain, an
investigator specializing in criminal cases with NASA's
Office of Inspector General has begun to look into the issue surrounding these novel circumstances. While no charges have been filed, a seemingly trivial domestic dispute could get the ball
rolling and push the US, and presumably other space
powers, to take a hard look at their interstellar criminal
laws, or lack thereof. You know, before we know
it, everything that happens down here on Earth will
eventually happen in space. And while that may eventually
mean shopping on the moon and yoga on Mars, it could
also very well mean crime that's out of this world. Now, if you go into space,
you'll need a spacesuit, but if you're back here on
Earth, you need an actual suit. If you're looking for
a custom slim-cut suit that is shockingly affordable, I can't recommend Indochino highly enough. Indochino. By now you guys know the drill. I love my Indochino
suits, and I negotiated a special deal for Legal Eagles. All of my suits are now
custom made by Indochino, including this gray two-button
that I'm wearing right now which was custom made just for me. See, the secret to a great
suit is all about the fit. I'm a reasonably athletic guy, and I can never buy suits off the rack because they just simply never fit right. If the shoulders fit, then
the waist is way too small. It either doesn't fit or it costs a ton to have a tailor fix it. But with Indochino, you can
send in your measurements online or you can go
to one of their stores and have a stylist take
your measurements for you. For me, I made an appointment,
went to the store in person, had a stylist work with
me for over 90 minutes when I went in for the first time. My personal stylist Andrew
took my measurements and a couple of weeks later, I got the best fitting
suit of my entire life. It was perfect right out of
the box, and if it hadn't been, they would've tailored it
for me until was perfect. Indochino will make you a
fully custom tailored suit specifically for you for less than $400. And the best part is, they still use the best materials like super 140's wool. In fact, I asked Indochino
to give Legal Eagles specifically the best deal possible, and they're giving you
guys the exclusive ability to buy any premium suit for $359. That is the best deal you will find anywhere on the internet. I will never get an
off-the-rack suit again. And once you try it, believe
me, neither will you. Legal Eagles can get any
premium Indochino suit for just $359 when you enter
the promo code LegalEagle at checkout or use the
link in the description. Clicking on the link really
helps out this channel. That's indochino.com,
promo code LegalEagle for the best custom suit
of your entire life. So, do you agree with my analysis? Are you worried about space crime? Or do you think the current
laws already deal with it? Leave your objections in the comments and check out this playlist over here for all of my other real law reviews where we cover all of the
legal topics of the day where I will see you in court.
