It's 1687, Isaac Newton drops the right club banger called Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica introducing his physics of gravity, however it could be argued (and it will be because I'm fucking going to) that perhaps his biggest leap was his idea that the rules down here on Earth world are the same rules that are up there in space world. So if a theory of gravity works for apples (which never fell on his head by the way that's bollocks) then it will work for stars, galaxies, and black holes too. Sounds obvious enough to us, living in the future but it was revolutionary back then and it changed physics forever. And anyway, what what did you ever do? Bugger all probably, so just shut up. Anywho that eventually led to the discovery of big G or *ger*. *ger* is the gravitational constant and it guarantees that wherever you go in the universe the attractive force of two objects will always be proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The point as far as we know is the big G never changes anywhere in the universe. Ever. It's a constant and constants are important because the universe is as mad as a bucket of coked-up ferrets and depending on where you are or what you're doing the speed of time can go wiggly, the local strength of gravity can change (denoted by little G or *goo*), mass, momentum, everything is variable. We need things to hold onto if we want to know what the really real rules of the universe are. So if you're feeling social, let me introduce some of the fundamental constants of reality. The rules that dictate everything. En, the speed of light. Doesn't matter what you're doing, how fast you're going or if you wish your girlfriend was hot like me, the speed of light in a vacuum never changes as far as we know. That means if you're going at 1 meter per second then the speed of light is traveling this fast away from you and if you're going at 298 million meters per second then the speed of light is still traveling this fast away from you. If the speed of light doesn't change, ever, then everything else has to change around it. Like time and distance. And that's partly where we get relativity. Anyway, it's called *ker* and it's a constant. Cool. *Burp* Two, the fine-structure constant. This is alpha. It basically denotes how strongly electromagnetism can fuck with charged stuff like protons and electrons and it comes out as 137. That number is so fundamental to nature that if aliens contacted us, before we reply with nudes or pictures of cats, sending 137 might be the best proof to them that we are big boys and big girls now, and come say hello, please. Tre, Planck's constant. Planck gave us h, which basically defines the relationship between a wave or particles' frequency with his total energy. For one thing it tells us, that energy actually comes in little packets called quanta. And from that we also get the Planck length, mass, time, charge and temperature. These are the master units of reality. They're not defined by silly human measurements, they're made of other constants. If there is a god he's probably using these to boil his tea and put up his shelves Fiera Finally, the mass of the proton and the electron are also good yardsticks for the universe. Since they don't change, as far as we know, and they come in at these values but I don't know what they are yet because I'm writing this script on the bus, and I consider internet on mobile phones to be the pinnacle of millennial degeneracy. Now that's all very interesting, you might say, but where do the constants get those values? Well, before we fail to answer that it's not just the constants that are set up rather specifically in our universe. It's fucking everything. Hey, this is cool, huh? So fundamentally we live in three-dimensional space. Oh, OH, FUCK! So we live in three-dimensional space with one time dimension, which is fine but it's not too silly to imagine a universe that could have been set up with only two spatial dimensions or four even, and what would four look like? So, you have the usual vanilla x, y and z axis, and let's add one more for funsies called w. This is a fourth dimensional axis. So we've added a whole new dimension to space. Now it's a bit difficult to conceive of because we're built for three-dimensional thinking. but you can see as you vary the fourth dimension in the environment everything goes a bit to put it mathematically totally up the fuck. So objects are moving through a dimension we can't see, and to us disappearing. We know this is mathematically possible. You could have a universe that works like this or with even more dimensions, but the point is we don't know if three dimensions is the only spatial way to do things. We just happened to find ourselves living in a universe with them. Why is our universe only three dimensional with one time dimension as far as we're aware? No one has a clue. It's not self-evident. Time for a personal anecdote. As the icing on my genetic cake, I was born more or less blind in one eye and worse, it would just wander off sometimes if it got bored. It really was a piece of shit. And in the prime of my adolescence I felt a touch conscious about this, so I went to a doctor and asked and he said "Yeah, sure, let's get it sorted." Fun side note: What I didn't expect was that A while before the operation, to check you won't get double vision from the surgery, they inject Botox into you surrounded by 15 very attractive student doctors while you try to pretend you're totally fine with a needle in your fucking eye. Anyway, a while later they put me to sleep and I woke up with some bandages and then I didn't really have a lazy eye anymore And that was it. A few months passed and the novelty wore off and then I got to thinking: How did they put me to sleep anyway? What is this anaesthesia nonsense? And I looked into it because I didn't know how anaesthesia worked and as it turned out no one else fucking did either We know general anesthesia stops vital areas of the brain talking to each other so you can't form memories and we assume you're unconscious too, or we hope so, but we don't understand the mechanism yet. And I couldn't believe this so we're using this thing thousands of times a day for opening people's skulls and rib cages and all sorts and we don't even know how it works. And then you start to notice this pattern everywhere. The things we use and trust all the time without any knowledge of the mechanism behind them. Our languages, our medicines, the biology of underlying sleeping or what sleep is even for. Consciousness, imagination And then finally just the world. Why natural laws work or are there at all? We know they keep going, we know we can wrap them up in equations but we don't have a clue what they are. Ever since then I've never been able to let go of this horrible feeling that we're living on the top of this enormous iceberg and we've drilled down like a foot into it but there's still 400 miles of the thing below us that we can't see and we don't understand. Yet, here we are, living on top of it. Just going about our lives as though everything's fine. And it all comes back to the constants. Start with any phenomenon the fizziness of lemonade, the collapse the Xing dynasty, the antics of Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, and keep asking why it exists or why it happened and eventually you'll come back to the fundamental physical constants to the rules of reality. Every explanation stops somewhere and it almost always stops here. So W.T.Fuck? where do the constants come from then? Well, maybe God / Digital overlords? Regardless of one's religious persuasion, it is possible that an intelligence set all this stuff up, on a similar note, it's getting old fashionable of late, to suppose we're living in a simulated universe where physics is determined by someone or something else above us. Maybe, presumably though whoever's running the simulation also lives in a universe with laws, so what determines those laws then? Also if you ever noticed every time we invent a new technology that becomes the metaphor for everything, now, if you've got a hammer everything's a nail. Psychology used to be really into theories about compression and diversion of pressure I wonder where those ideas came from? Likewise, recently we're getting really into the idea that lots of stuff is computation and simulation. I wonder where those ideas came from? No doubt, we'll invent other clever stuff in a few decades and that will be the new bee's knees in our theories. Just saying, reality is really complicated and maybe we don't have the right metaphor yet. Maybe we do. Anyway, variation over time Another possibility is that the constants aren't actually constant. They might be slowly getting stronger or weaker. This isn't that uncommon an idea. So the speed of light might be slowing down, for example, there's a whole class of these called "VSL" (variable speed of light) theories However, firstly we don't have any definitive proof that the constants are varying yet. There is a possibility that alpha the fine-structure constant is varying but again, we don't know The thing is if the constants are constant we don't know why yet. And if they aren't constant, we also don't know why yet. So maybeee Multiverses? A bunch of constants we found are set up in such a way that if they were just a little bit different things would be catastrophic for us. Anyway, If gravity had been stronger or weaker by just one part in 10^40 then stars probably wouldn't have formed at all. So why is our universe so cuddly and well made? Well, maybe there are squillions of other universes all of them with slightly different constants. Why are the constants the ones we see? Because we live in this universe not these ones. It doesn't then explain why there are squillions of other universes in the first place but still, it's getting there. And finally, hard logicality. Another fun theory is that there's something special about our constants and our physics that they're baked necessarily into reality. And I made the term up so there's no point googling it. Like it's tricky to imagine a universe where pi doesn't Dictate the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter Unless, that universe had a very weird indifferent geometry. It seems like pi is built into logic. The idea is that the mass of the electron, the electric charge of the top quark, the furniture of reality, all of this stuff also derives from logic somehow. The all of matter pops out, of say, pure geometry. And one day we'll find the necessary bridge between the two, and everything will be explained from the bottom up. Anyway, right now, we know lots about what the rules of reality are but almost nothing about why there are these rules and it seems like we should be talking about that a bit because if particles, and waves, and space, and time, and us are the marionettes there is a ghost above the stage pulling the strings dictating how they and we behave and we don't know what that ghost is. Why is physics even here at all? And what the hell gave it its character? Einstein once said what really interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world? As in, is this the only way you can make a universe? And what is the origin of the structure of reality? Likewise, Edgar D. Mitchell Was one of the twelve astronauts to walk on the Moon, and he said the most amazing part of the trip was the return journey. When he was looking out of the window of the capsule and he could see the Earth and the Moon and the Sun and he suddenly realized that every molecule in the spacecraft, in his body, and the other astronauts bodies had all originated from some ancient star and he had this overwhelming sense of unity. It was all the same LEGO bricks. All part of the same game. The same cosmic terms of service. And it's no different for you and I. Just having thoughts in the first place is made possible by electromagnetism conveying signals between neurons in our brains. Plus holding our molecules together. As well as the strong interaction kindly keeping the nuclei of atoms specifically the protons and neutrons in place. Meanwhile, the curvature of space-time: gravity, has been keeping us from casually leaving the ground like balloon boy and going for a quick wander through a passing jet engine. Meanwhile the weak force has been quietly keeping quarks transmuting, regulating the nuclear fusion that powers the stars, some of which billions of years ago, prototyped all the carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in our bodies allowing us to exist in the first place. And all of this has been facilitated by the fundamental constants of nature obeying the speed of light, gravitational constant, and all the rest. The buttons, the universe has done her coat up with You know, I don't have the charisma, looks or predilection for orgies required to start a cult, but if I did we'd need something to dislike. And that would be this weird recreational cynicism one comes across sometimes that the world is boring and everything's been discovered. Has it? Has it fucking really? I must have been on the toilet when that particular ontological memo came through. Isn't it nicer and just more honest in a way to admit we don't have a handle on anything yet. That there's nothing normal about reality. It's just an insane jigsaw puzzle devised by a madman that's persisted long enough for us to accept as routine. And in a predictably ungrateful fashion, we still somehow invented a word for boredom. I don't know if you're having a shit time right now, maybe work sucks, or you are in a pinch or whatever and I'm really sorry to hear that, but may I recommend that it is possible to put stuff into perspective just for a moment by remembering that every atom in your body is the direct result of universal laws we have no idea to the origin of. That there is in plain sight, a mystery called everything, and nothing is self-evident and really, if we're honest, we don't even have a clue what the ffFUCK reality is doing here, in a first place.
The fine structure constant is not constant, it varies with energy, that is called renormalisation [1]. The Planck units are not only defined in terms of the Planck constant [2]. Masses of particles are also renormalised [3].
I think what is means with "constants" here are actually "free parameters". QFT which governs particle physics, as far as we know it, has a handful of numbers that must be fixed to reproduce our physics. But what does choosing other numbers mean? (this seems like the more accurate formulation of premise of the video.) Modern theoretical physics is, in a sense, trying to figure out just those questions. In string theory for example, some of these constants are set by the size of the extra dimensions, others could possible be explained by intersections of higher dimensional objects known as "branes", and string theory may give a more fundamental understanding of why there are [4] multiverses (or a landscape of "vacua" as we would say), as asked in the video.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant#Variation_with_energy_scale
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization
[4] If you are trying to explain these numbers through the anthropic principle (and if there indeed would be multiverses) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle
This is wrong. The idea that the laws of physics, or as they would have put it, the laws of nature ("physics was just the Greek word for "nature") applied consistently throughout the universe was already believed. What Galileo changed (among other things) was the understanding of gravity. He discovered that gravity was the attraction of objects by mass, whereas before it was believed that gravity was the attraction of things towards the center of the universe (a pretty reasonable hypothesis given the empirical evidence, e.g. that the world was round and that things fell).
Now this attraction was not believed to apply to everything but only to things that are "heavy," which is why people believed that things like gasses rose, and it was believed that things like stars were made of a special material that behaved in a special way. But this is still a consistent theory, because it did apply the scientific principles equally, in the same way that the theory of relativity is consistent even though the behavior of say, light, is different than "normal" things. No one thinks that modern physics is inconsistent in how it applies its rules because how a black hole acts is very different from how things act on earth.
Not that anyone on this site gives a shit, because no one here cares about being fair towards ancient people's beliefs.
Theres a single frame with text within the formulas near https://youtu.be/EH-z9gE2uGY?t=520
This triggered my anxiety attacks
Goddamn, been a while since I've watched some exurbia.
AnyHway...
8:42 single frame
enjoyed watching this.. even with errors pointed out in comments.
This works in well with another of his videos that essentially says the answers are simply beyond our understanding and always will be.
It is a cool idea to think that everything can be boiled down to geometric patterns at its origins. Also I too like otters