"The Minuteman Prerogative" by Nutnfancy

hello world hello TM peers another philosophy video from Metin fancy here it comes or start off with a question how do you feel when you see a civilian in possession of a gun like this okay this is a semi-automatic ak-47 variant rifle specifically SGL 21 by arsenal outstanding gun Vulgarian circle tin normal capacity magazine quark maelstrom tactical light weaver 2 by 7 scope masked specifics for guys who care but getting back to the big question how do you feel let's say you go to youtube you just happen to run into a video of a guy wearing camouflage clothing he's got a rifle like that he's wearing tactical gear what I refer to as lde load-bearing equipment like this lots of magazines maybe has a pistol to kind of like this myth and Wesson M&P 9 strapped to him he's out there running and gunning he's shooting humanoid targets he's doing this he's doing that how do you feel is it threatening to you ok there's lots of videos out there now by me nothing fancy doing just that ok dress up just like I said it probably dries a lot to the fact that I'm at a school gear review that's what I do here on YouTube so one of my main goals providing unbiased independent hopefully quality data points for my law enforcement military and outstanding and responsible so they in Sheepdog audience that's what I do I take my viewers along for the ride and showing how I come up with those data points in other words if I say certain thing about a gun it's fun going to the desert or wherever I've shot and I can say this is how I've kind of arrived to this decision shows competency in the review it's interesting it's entertaining for the for people like it but more importantly it shows the testing situation it shows a reality and the facts of a lot of things that happen in the testing process but let's forget about that let's say i'm not a gear reviewer that's not what I do that's not my purpose here on YouTube or let's say better yet you tune in to a dude that isn't any of those things that he's just a guy out there in camo ak-47 semi automatic variant rifle shooting humanoid targets humanoid being their shape like humans or paper he shooting him up how do you feel about that you know guys roll into a nun fancy video getting back to me and they'll say well you're crazy you're cuckoo man what are you waiting for Armageddon what are you practicing for Armageddon World War 3 Civil War all the above you're nuts crazy is that a true statement is it true you know is that threatening to have a rifle like this if you do have a rifle like this if your neighbors came over would you try to hide it from them if so why you know friends family loved ones would you try to hide it from I think a lot of you are answering yeah I would because there is a perception of just that that if you're in possession of a gun like that again not military not law enforcement then you're cuckoo where does that perception come from is there any truth to it is there any reality to it or is it perhaps a result of some program thinking in our society hmm kind of driving to the heart of what I'm going to call the Minuteman prerogative and that's what this video is the the Prague ative of a citizen in the United States of America to arm themselves just like that that it doesn't threaten society doesn't threaten you that it's a normal course of events if you have an understanding and grasp of the Constitution of the u.s. about where our rights are derived from real rights and I'm going to try to talk to that as best I can let me say this to excuse me how do you drink have a lot of people a lot of friends that are not on board with a gun issue and they're still my friends they're well-intentioned people there are people that for whatever reason do not agree that a person should have a rifle like this they think you threaten society that you are not to be trusted with this hmm yes I disagree with that of course I disagree with that it's been out on video form for a long time go look up my dangerous things video where I lay out my feelings on what I prefer to as a protectionist culture that seeks to abolish anything that's dangerous to our society and they raise our children in the same way that you are to be fearful of dangerous things to avoid them at all costs and heaven forbid you become proficient and safe in their use and we don't teach responsibility to our children okay all that's contained in dangerous things also other videos that I've put out that will lay foundation work for this video sheep dog concept put forth by Lieutenant Colonel Grossman and I jump I use that as a springboard and elaborated on it as I saw it have a video out on that obligation of carry you know the concealed carry protocol also foundational to this but I got to stay focused on why this videos gonna be way too long getting back to the question is that dangerous you know oh and I was talking about people who differ there are a lot of more well-intentioned you know they're good people they just don't see you need that's one group of people are going to find this video some of them you'll never convince that no matter how rational how logical your argument is how you take them back into history to see the derivation of right to see their development to understand that they are not given to and I'm going to talk about out and state my case for that of the government they won't be on board with it they are probably the products of society popular media movies shows that pretty much indoctrinate to a large degree how society thinks if you think otherwise I disagree you know there's a powerful powerful message that's always sent when it comes to guns in media and it's one of their to be feared they're dangerous okay another group of people maybe they're middle of the rotors they're not really for or against the gun issue and I'm talking about this type of gun a defensive tactical carbine they're not really forward against it maybe they come from a hunting family where they grew up hunting and to them a gun was a way to procure food or to go enjoy sports shooting maybe its target clays you know trap skeet deer hunting bird hunting you know but to them lot of them will say you don't need a gun like that not necessary the ones that actually anger me to be honest and disappoint me are the ones that do own guns for self-defense and yet they draw the line and said you don't need a gun like that you know yeah you can have your revolver you can have your single shot shotgun go ahead you don't need a gun like that though you're crazy if you have a gun like that you're insane then you go to their channel page in YouTube and you see there are a gun guy and yet they're lambasted other people for doing this and you just like scratch your head and go I don't get it no I don't either and then you'll have the people that when I ask the question are you threatened by this you'll immediately say no I got one you know they're on board they understand their derivation of rights they understand how they're not threatening society with it all stripes all political stripes you know maybe I'll change the way you think maybe I won't but this is the way I feel it's foundational to the nutnfancy project to what I do let's get into it if we were to go back many hundreds of years and we talk about the derivation of rights we have to talk about kings because Kings ruled the land in Europe okay my European viewers are neither heads up now yep know something about that and they were powerful they were all-knowing and it was commonly accepted back then that Kings derived their powers directly from God direct I mean there are huge and elaborate coronation ceremonies that reinforce this fact that the king was appointed directly from the man upstairs and that he would delegate this authority you know to his Dukes his Lords his governors throughout the land who would rule over the subjects okay the common men who were given freedom as the King saw fit who were given rights as the king saw fit established was a royal absolution in other words it they were not to be questioned because it was akin to questioning God himself if you were to do that and a lot of times it was punishable by very severe punishments don't do it the king was not subject to the will of the people that he could do whatever he wanted you know and they did a lot to control the minds of men to keep them down trodden if you will because when they kept the subjects downtrodden and dependent upon the crown they wouldn't have to fear maybe the overthrowing of their power structure now during this time and again let me just say also now I'm going to discuss as briefly as I can but establishing a case of several political / philosophical principles I'm not the end-all expert in it ok and there might be some historian so let's say hey that fact is wrong I'm doing the best I can bear with me I think for the most part the facts will be straight and they will definitely support the argument that I'm going to put forth okay during this period arose what was referred to as common law ok common law came from man not God but man in other words it was created by perhaps judges who would rule a certain way in a certain situation ok and common law uh basically was a body of legal decisions it was put forth from man's judgment and then when a similar situation happened they go well how did this how do we treat it last time oh yeah we have a you have a case study over here how we did it we'll do it the same way and a common way of thinking came out of it common law and that's why maybe some rights were given due to common law and say well we didn't have that right you know hundred years ago why would we have it now there's a lot to this we get really deep and very detailed but suffice it to say that common law was held to a very high standard so the king was all-knowing he was great his powers came from divinity don't question him and it was said that there is no such thing back then as bad law because if it is bad it is not law how's that for covering your bases in other words what they're saying is that hey if we made law it was supposed to be that way you better obey it or else and it was this way for hundreds and hundreds of years now again I'm doing a broad stroke over the course of human history bear with me then came the Age of Enlightenment the Magna Carter and 1215 started changing things it started breaking away the concept that the subject that is the common man was nothing and that he was to be dominated by government and the government were to give him powers and rights as they saw fit or as they did not see fit Magna Carta Magna Carta I should say acknowledged basic human rights legal procedures and then finally it kind of said hey Kings you're bound by law - you can't just do whatever you want you're accountable to the law uh and then that ties into again common law again that started to improve things it started a new way of thinking and this new way of thinking continued on into the 17th century when arose an outstanding political philosopher by the name of John Locke John Locke really broke new ground because he very much departed from this common law way of thinking and the deity way of thinking with the king and that the common man was nothing he espoused a theory called natural rights also referred to as unalienable rights moral rights I like to call him god-given rights and simply they were life liberty and property and that let me just read a little expert excerpt from him to properly understand political power and trace its origins and I don't want this to be boring so I got to go fast we must consider the state that all people are in naturally that is a state of perfect freedom acting and disposing of their own possessions and persons as a think fit within the bounds of the law of nature that was a huge departure back then huge departure to say that a man was equally created to his other fellow men and that he had the right to pursue maintain property his life and that influenced our forefathers here in the United States of America specifically Jett Thomas Jefferson Andrew I'm sorry Alexander Hamilton and James Madison very influenced by the writings of John Locke and they took a lot of his ways of thinking and incorporated them in to the Declaration of Independence and also later our the Constitution very a huge hugely different way of thinking now I'm not going to go into a big detailed discussion about natural rights and about hey you know there's some people who'll say if we really subscribe to the theory of natural rights and we'll have no government at all everybody can do what they want there's no inhibition at all I don't agree with that nor did Thomas Jefferson when he wrote anarchism that is absence of government is completely inconsistent say completely inconsistent to any great degree of population in other words when you have a society you have people living together you're going to have to have a government what the thinking of John Locke did as he passed that on to our forefathers I'm going to use Thomas Jefferson for instance what he did though is to change the nature of government okay before again this way thinking came about King was all knowing all great and that the power came from God to the king and the king did whatever he wanted with it and he would delegate it to his ministers and then the common man had no say in it that changed and specifically it changed when the United States of America was made the declaration of independence for instance incorporated this way of thinking what it said is well we don't believe in that we think and we believe that power is given from God to man directly to the subject so it's delegated to him he's given certain unalienable rights there's that word again natural rights that government does not give or dispose of and then from those rights man delegates to government you know certain powers and those were talked about at length they were debated at length what are those powers well in a nutshell government exists only to secure and preserve and protect the natural rights in other words the unalienable rights and they are given just powers that is very limited and specific powers to secure those things okay because if there wasn't any government like I discussed them with mine without rule of law don't hasten the day video things are bad you know everybody's watching out for themselves you know you have to where you look over your shoulder all the time so I might be trying to be trying to steal from you kill you there's no you know rule of law that provides for the common defense and for the peace of society you need government but that government has to be limited and what it does again securing and protecting the natural rights and along with that was integrated a philosophy of if a government does not do that and if they become egregious in their neglect in doing that or if they take to themselves much more power than they were granted then the common man that is man himself has the right to change things you can call it the right of revolution if you want and no I'm not advocating that I'm talking historical stuff right now okay this is in our Declaration of Independence I'll read parts of it to you and this is a huge change that now that all men were equal that men ran the government not the king and you know the whole concept of they have no say in it and you are to salutes Martling do it you're told was done away with and it didn't sit well let's get to the declaration indepence I don't want this to be boring and I don't want you guys go to sleep but again making a case here and there's two concepts that I got to talk to and thanks also to an awesome team Peter Paul my attorney friend down in Texas and he was very instrumental and helping me prepare this brief thank you Paul another awesome team here so yeah I got lots of lawyers who follow me too when in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them one with another actually with another to assume the powers of the earth to separate equal station to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them this is a declaration of independence ban right there what the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them in other words they're saying Father in Heaven ok these rights were given we're not giving them we're acknowledging them a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation ok so they're setting the stage of why they're going to make the case why are we separating from England ok I'm not going to get in that again I'm time constrained got a press we hold these truths to be self-evident and again I'm reading this because it's so appropriate what truths that you have certain unalienable rights they're not given to you by a king then I grant it to you by a government you are born with it they're part of who you are you know life liberty and is they're going to call it here the pursuit of happiness there it is and among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness John Locke called it property to me it means the same thing that you're able to obtain dispose of property you're able to pursue a life that makes you happy without fear of death retribution you know unfair searches and seizures and all that stuff that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men there we have it ok so guys that go overboard and go well we don't need a government now bullcrap you need a government's right here in the Declaration of Independence the question is is what kind of government and the answer is a limited government a government which secures your unalienable rights and protects them and preserves them and provides for the common defense and other things that are set forth in subsequent documents deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed whoa all right I got to reread that that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men I talked about that deriving their just powers just powers in other words they're limited or defined they're very specific on what they're intended to do and accomplished from the consent of the governed again it turned the world on its head that here we had a declaration of independence by our forefathers including Thomas Jefferson said listen this is what we feel is that the consent the governed are the ones that give the government power okay it's not the king and you know in people are laughing there go why you reading this because there's a lot of people nowadays to think that we're got their rights come from excuse me we're rights come from is the government today let's just say in the United States at the United States that our government is defining what rights you have and they say well I don't have a right unless the government says I have a right that is incorrect and that's one reason I'm making this video the Minuteman prog ative says that your rights are god-given okay they're recognized by the founding fathers the documents they drafted and spent much blood sweat and toil giving us this day and we should know what they say and that's all I'm saying wow that's awesome that whenever any I got to go on then when any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it and Institute a new government right of revolution it's right there in the Declaration of Independence some guys would say well now's the time for Civil War we need to go now I mean our rights are so trampled we need to do it calm now I don't think it is definitely I'm definitely not espousing now I'm talking historical stuff here will it be used in the future I don't know I talked about that my role of without rule of law video don't hates in the day about a year and half ago whatever was I don't have a cape out at all but it is the right of the people to do that if they so see it being necessary be careful though and even it's drafted right here from Thomas Jefferson and founding fathers be very careful how you approach that you don't just say hey you know what the government screwed up yeah time for another government that's bad bad bad bad bad it's better to put up with some in justices and tolerate some imperfections in government just like we are doing today and work through the system trying to improve it and to do otherwise you really really need to understand that and I'm big on that I support it I support the Constitution and I work through the process okay little aside there prudence indeed will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes okay there you have it right from the founding fathers declaration independence accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable in other words the government isn't perfect you know you can't just say hey it's time to move the trash is full you know we're going to sell the house trash is full now you work through it you improve it there's a good system there use that system as long as it's functional then - right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed okay here's the caveat but we long train when a long train of abuses usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right it is their duty to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security okay first two paragraphs Declaration of Independence read by nutnfancy interpreted by nutnfancy for what it's worth probably not much so you have a right if it becomes so intolerable and that the government becomes you know just what it says here a despotism and you can't it's suffocating and that your rights have are so horribly transfer you know trampled you have to make a change okay and it's right there in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence and this drives to my question you know is that gun back okay let me ask you this when they wrote that in a declaration independence by what form do you think they intended you know the free man to overthrow the government by debate by logic look at the Revolution the American Revolution how do they do it let me take you back to that time if you were to walk into a cabin and there was a gun back then you know a musket leaning against a fireplace with that person be thought of as crazy you know a threat to society but none fancy that was a long time ago things were different well I will grant you is a long time ago but I will also submit to you that our way of thinking has become muddled and that there has been a control exercised over the mind of a lot of Americans and actually people all over the world to say to say you know what this is bad this is bad it's threatening to society it's threatening to the government it is a right their duty to throw off such a government to provide new guards for their future security will it ever get to that level where that's needed not going to address that I don't really know but I do know this is that to answer the question and it's you could draw a thread all the way through these founding father documents about this to include the Bill of Rights that were drafted later 1789 and that's an issue I'm going to take an aside here I'll get back to the other point here in a second the bill rights were tagged on there to prevent a misconstruction or abuse of its powers and I'm talking to government and there was a debate among the founding fathers whether to even include a bill of rights they said for one Alexander Hamilton was against it he didn't want it not because he was against the rights that were enumerated but he had some misgivings let me quote here he says against it with the constant he said because with the Constitution people surrender nothing as they retain everything they have no need for particular reservations he was fearful that if we had any unmentioned right in the bill rights that they would be misconstrued as being non-existent hmm does that make sense in other words there was a contingent of people said hey don't put a bill rights in there these they have these rights they don't have to be enumerated and if we fail to enumerate in the years to come they'll say well that wasn't in the bill so they don't have a right BAM we're going to lay the smackdown on them but they did one of them is the Second Amendment of course of course that's what this is about that the people have a right to be armed and it shall not be infringed you know they also have a right not just a right according to the found of founding fathers it is their right is their duty to throw off a totalitarian government that is not responsive and again let me be very clear on this issue that has a long train of abuses and usurpations okay I'm quoting directly from the Declaration of Independence okay and that's a very serious thing there there's nothing wrong with a free man owning a gun like this okay the Minuteman prog ative you're a watchman says so right there I just read it okay who holds the power who holds the rights to government let's say right now in 2010 who owns those rights you do you hold those rights okay you're the watchman over government if government reaches that horrible level again we're not talking levels down here and that's as a matter of a lot of debate I hope my guys understand that I'm not saying this is this is not a radical video it's not a extremist video this is a historical video and it's I'm going over and establishing the historical precedent of where your natural unalienable moral god-given right to be armed comes from that is from Father in heaven okay it's not given to you by government okay it's your right to monitor things see what's going on you know um you know guys will say well why do you have a gun like that well there's a lots of reasons one recreational maybe guy just wants get out there have fun with it shoot fun maybe what's the play soldier who cares let him play does it threaten you know you know you're never going to pass a law that's going to effectively out long you never will if you don't believe me go look in England no go look in all the countries which have attempted gun control and F miserably their violent crime rates have skyrocketed so let's not even go there okay you just won't work you know if someone is evil and they want to kill people they will find a way to do it unfortunately I like this huh maybe we should outlaw bulldozers - how about cars a lot of people run over people with cars they kill them either accidentally or on purpose okay dangerous things video again go look at it it says everything you need to know um you know ak-47 semi automatic variant rifle not a threat to society okay now you have some people rolling well that's great understand your stand but there's some people that should not be trusted with those guns okay not going to go there in this video that's going to add length what I will say is that the vast majority the vast majority of people who have these guns are good people they are the sheepdogs of society okay go watch my sheepdog concept video if you don't believe me talk about that and they're not whack jobs you know so what if they dress in camouflage so what if they have tactical gear who cares no good for them you know back in the Revolutionary days you know if a guy was out there practicing with his musket do people walk by and go oh look at that kook what's changed I'll see what changes the control over to the mind of man in other words you've been led to think that way now over time either through the media's coverage of certain events about how the news is portrayed about how the government has portrayed certain things that you have been led to believe that is dangerous dangerous to society for someone to have a gun like that and there must be a whack-job they're a threat Society in fact they're not dirty that's completely a polar opposite of what you should be saying they're not a threat they're actually a safeguard to society a safeguard and again you're not going to prevent bad people from getting them you just can't no matter what laws you pass you're not going to prevent bad people from doing bad things with dangerous things it'll happen hopefully again bleed some other vids I made there'll be a good person there with a tool of equal nature that can save lives okay the Minuteman prerogative it is your prerogative because of your god-given rights to be armed to be a watchdog over government does have anything to do with hunting doesn't have anything to do with sporting activities target shooting it is plain and simple you are a watchdog as per the Declaration of Independence which is a legal document and also the Constitution of the United States the Bill of Rights to be a watchdog you know and if you feel like you need to go practice you need to go train go for it no I'm not advocating so war heavens no advocating working through the system I'm advocating peace I'm advocating take care of your fellow man just as I thought I've always have but to say that this is dangerous that it's threatening I'm sorry but it's an untruth that is not true and God owners if you own a revolver you own a shotgun and that and you somehow have some dissonance and go I don't know I'm not for those you know there's you know which you might refer to as high-capacity semi-automatic weapons I think you need to go back and look at where you derive your way of thinking and I would hope that you would read and understand our founding father documents and you should support your fellow gun owner that how's that just as we support you don't fractionalize that's dangerous Wales Australia England all those gun owners fractionalized know they didn't have a bill right so the Second Amendment but still fractionalization did not serve them well all gun owners should hang together support one another and I see some amazing divisions here on YouTube I just it blows my mind it blows my mind and it needs a stop you need to represent you know the logical intelligent well-spoken face of the American citizen and if he or she chooses to be armed yes even to this level rock on brother rock on is given to you right there in our documents that we just referred to the Minuteman prerogative it is your choice it cannot be taken away from you at least legally by the government because it's not given to you by the government's not given to you by a king by a magistrate it's given to you as a natural unalienable right thanks for watching this isn't that fancy see you later on

Channel: nutnfancy

Views: 277,652

Rating: 4.8614035 out of 5

Keywords: national, rifle, association, nra/ila, gun, owners, of, america, rights, second, amendment, foundation, constitutional, declaration, independence, thomas, jefferson, arsenal, sgl21, ak-47, common, law, natural, unalienable, john, locke, s&W, M&P9, nutnfancy, gear, tnp, reviews

Id: vZ4_V2sBsw8

Length: 36min 17sec (2177 seconds)

Published: Tue May 11 2010