Talking with Russians | Mikhail Avdeev | EP 217

hello to all of you listening to my podcast your attention is appreciated and never taken for granted i hope you find it challenging useful and engaging i've certainly learned a lot doing it as you might know this show is ad-supported i have a policy that requires all the projects i'm working with to be financially self-sustaining this helps ensure their long-term operability improves the efficiency with which they are run and aids me in prioritization as an alternative however for those who would rather listen ad free we have now uploaded a premium version of the podcast at a subscription rate of 10 a month your subscription will also include ad-free access to all four seasons of previous podcast episodes a monthly ask me anything episode for subscribers and priority pre-sale access to future live events subscribe if you like at jordanbpeterson.supercast.com that's jordanbeterson.supercast.com or scroll down to show notes and click the link after doing so the premium ad free podcast will appear automatically on your spotify or apple podcasts or whatever other platform you might prefer again you can subscribe at jordanbpeterson.supercast.com or scroll down to show notes and click the link or you can continue to listen to this free podcast with my wonderful daughter reading ads from our wonderful sponsors thank you very much for your attention [Music] your bible lectures and your books have a healing effect on people people write about it in the comments all the time because their lives begin to order and they find new purpose in life find something to strive for you encourage them and it seems to be an enduring effect it's something that lasts for a long time there are a lot of cases like that so you can't say that's a random effect it's a pattern people who read 12 rules who watch your lectures and especially those who have read maps of meaning and the books you recommend experience rapid personal growth their emotional state their health and their relationships change i'm shocked and surprised yes we try to do it we're doing our best and i can tell you that every day on our different channels in different countries people ask when will you post the next bible lecture when will we hear the maps of meaning and it's not fake it's not generated by any kind of advertising you know it's not something artificially created we were just trying to do our best to do the best job we could andrew and matt did a vast amount of work for the channel eric helped us a lot so i'm not that surprised that our channel took off we didn't use all those traffic boosting methods we just took a very careful approach to translation and quality of the content my team and i spent hours every day talking to publishers from different countries and to your fans from different countries trying to figure out what kind of translation they wanted how should we approach the translation what kind of voice is the best for the voice over we found a different tone for each lecture and it worked in the beginning we planned to make a single centralized hub for video production but we realized very quickly it will sooner or later turn into a treadmill and the quality and attention to detail that are important for say korean or arabic viewers can only be provided by the team that shares the same mindset as those listeners and so we almost immediately began to hire and form teams within each country that's how we created the korean team that's how we created the arabic team the russian team is now fully formed and these are people who know their thing very well they know your works and lectures and they are aware of all the things that surround it aware of the whole range of scientific knowledge they need to possess in order to properly communicate your ideas i want to thank you very much for introducing us to eric neumann for example it was very interesting for us to get acquainted with his work i have something to say about that so i spoke with professor camille pelia a while back a couple of occasions and she's one of the west's foremost literary experts and commentators and palia told me independently of my like liking for for eric neumann that she thought the whole history of universities in the west would have been different if the english departments in particular had read eric neumann and understood him instead of jacques derrida and michelle foucault and i believe that to be the case and i was amazed that she said that that's something i had thought for a very long time neumann is extremely profound thinker the origins and history of consciousness is a remarkable book and and so is the great mother and he in some sense he provides a well an overview and summary of jung's thinking which you couldn't get unless you read like 20 volumes of jung it's all packed into those two volumes origins origins and history of consciousness and the great mother and uh so i'm i'm amazed but also extremely happy that his work has been more recognized because he's very under-appreciated in my estimation i mean his books have been in print forever but but he hasn't had the impact on literary critics for example english departments etc people concerned with literature that he should have second-rate thinkers instead and he's not a second-grade thinker he's a very deep thinker he is a very good psychologist and the fact that you mentioned him in your works has inspired a particular interest in him in russia viewers of our channel began to buy books by eric neumann after hearing about him in your interview with camille palia that's really good news and also the fact that you mentioned him in maps of meaning has sparked a lot of interest in eric neumann so the other person we should talk about then probably is merce merce elliada because his he has a three volume history of religious ideas and it's also a great work in my estimation i i really learned a lot from everything i read that merce eliade published and so for people who are interested in neumann he's another person to to study in depth and the history of religious ideas it's a three-volume set and it's very readable it's easier to read than jung and easier to read than neumann and it provides a great overview of his amazing career as a surveyor of world religions it's a phenomenal book and so if people are interested in maps of meaning they're interested in neumann they're interested in that it's an anthropological and sociological analysis of religion but it's also deeply psychological and it focuses on meaning so it's in the same vein of thinking and that's another book set of books that that are very much worth pursuing for anyone that finds this kind of material captivating we will definitely do an event dedicated to mercha eliade i think it will be met with great interest and so what do people what how are the russian viewers responding to the more to my reliance on alexander solzhenitsyn and my my use of the events in the soviet union in the 20th century i don't know how a soldier nissan is regarded in russia now people in russia have a critical attitude towards him in general solzhenitsyn is a unique writer and this is recognized by everyone however what he described in his works is rather his point of view it's a cry from his heart it's a work of fiction and the problem is that this work of fiction began to be perceived as a documentary and when the soviet union began to fall those who dealt the final blows to it they did it in the name of solzhenitsyn and it was really hard for the ordinary people because after 1991 more than a hundred thousand enterprises were closed down overnight the country plunged into chaos and for 20 years all the media kept telling us that all the people in our country were to blame for the soviet union and that they had to redeem themselves in the eyes of alexander isaiah in the eyes of the western world and it caused people a lot of pain because they weren't doing anything wrong they were working in institutes they were translating books they were raising children and then suddenly all the media started humiliating them and the sense of guilt they tried to create was so painful that after 1991 in the 90s there was a huge wave of suicides people didn't know how to live their lives anymore this information kept being shoved in their faces they kept being told that it was their fault that people were being exterminated in the concentration camps although they had nothing to do with it and that is why people have mixed feelings towards alexander isaiah and everyone understands that it was a terrible time and a very difficult one and this wound has not healed to this day and even now as we're talking as i get back to those events so so everyone i mean we see that i think we see that everywhere in the world now that guilt in in the west in the united states in canada there's a lesser it's a lesser phenomenon i would say than what you're describing and lesser than what the german people felt after world war ii but there are accusations of colonialism and white supremacy and guilt over the terror the terrors of history that brought all of us to where we are now and i think that it's something that we all face in some sense as an existential problem i mean there are permanent existential problems death suffering deceit sin and all of the catastrophes of history that for better or worse put us where we are now and the issue of how each of us bear guilt and responsibility for things that were done by the culture that we're part of say or by our immediate ancestors or even by our distant ancestors that's a very difficult psychological question because we're historical creatures the existential psychologists following heidegger i believe talked about that problem as the issue of throneness thrown as in t-h-r-o-w-n you're thrown into the world all of us and you're thrown into your culture arbitrarily you're thrown into your family arbitrarily you're thrown into your body arbitrarily and we all have to deal with that and figuring out how to do that individually is very difficult i mean what i was trying to do in maps of meaning was to bring this down to and in my other books for that matter was to bring this problem down to the individual level because each of us in some sense have the capacity to do all the terrible things that anyone has ever done and you see that manifest itself on mass very frequently and that happened in the soviet union it happened in in germany it it happened everywhere really if you just have to look hard enough and long enough in some ways and so i i felt that it was necessary it seemed to me and this was so the question is what do you do about that that that guilt that's part and parcel of being a member of any culture that has done things that are reprehensible in the past and the answer to that is try not to do it to understand it and try not to do it in the future and so we we all do have that guilt and we all do have that responsibility it it's very difficult not for that for that not to become overwhelming if you look into it deeply and you have to look into it deeply to some degree to scare yourself badly enough into putting your life together so that maybe the probability of such things will be less in the future it's a very tricky thing to manage so i think maybe partly what you do is you you regard it and this is what the existential psychologists were pointing to it's it's part of the nature of being human to bear that historical guilt so it's impersonal in some sense you still have to take it seriously and you still have to do something about it but but it's not it's there's an impersonal and universal element to it and that makes it somewhat easier to bear i can say that a careful study of this issue and your writings helped me to cope with the feelings that arise from the fact that some great guilt a great burden is crushing me now when i do not even know if my relatives participated in these events i know that they were repressed that's something i know for sure and i can't understand and many other people can't understand what they are guilty of when their grandparents were the victims you gave some very good advice about how studying existential psychology can help you get a broader perspective on this issue if i may ask a few questions yeah well part of the problem so for example there's this trope in in this is particularly the case in the united states that all white people are racist and that goes along with this claim that american society in particular but not only america european society in general and that would include russian society are in some deep sense white supremacist and those accusations are variations of their variations of political thinking emerging from from this sense of universal guilt the answer the the quest the answer to the question are all white people racist is yes but it's also no and here's why and are all people racist well yes all of us and why would i say that well the anthropological literature is quite clear on this as far as i understand it that virtually every society that's ever been discovered especially when they're isolated tends to refer to their own group members basically as human beings and all those outside of that group as some other category and so and i think that's a reflection of our in-group preference and our ability to cooperate and form bonds so it's not trivial and it's difficult for all of us to extend to immediately extend that sense of kin and that's the root word for kindness that extent that extend that sense of kin beyond our in-group and it's also extremely difficult because well how many people can you actually attend to and care for you know you're limited in your scope and so the answer to the question are all white people racist is yes but but it's it's still a bad it's still a bad question because the inclusion of the word white implies that it's unique to say white people and that's just not the case it's true of human beings it's probably true of our closest biological relatives in in a profound and meaningful sense chimpanzees go to war that was discovered by jane goodall in the 1970s it was a great shock they go on raiding parties and if they outnumber if small troops of generally juvenile males go on raiding parties near the border of their territory and if they find a chimp from another territory and they outnumber them they'll tear them to pieces and so this is a deep problem and we it's all it's a problem for all of us because it's tangled up it's actually tangled up inside our goodness that's also what makes it so difficult because the fact that i really love my family members let's say and then my community around that that in some sense is also why i'm not so positively predisposed to anything i see outside of that that i think might disrupt disrupt it and so we have to have some sympathy for for that proclivity and we need to understand what we do about it now in the modern world where it's doing more harm than good because maybe we don't need to be parochial in that sense like we were in the past and and perhaps we can't afford to be because we're so technologically powerful now that that tendency to demonize the out group member that'll destroy all of us if if we don't figure out how to get it under control and so i felt that the best because maps of meaning the reason i wrote maps of meaning essentially was to figure out how you get that under control as an individual and that took me deep into religious work and and religious morality i would say and i think the answer to that pro the answer to the question of that problem is that we have to become better people we have to become more conscious we have to become more conscious of our ethical obligations we have to become more conscious of the nature of good and evil to put it bluntly and and we have to bear the responsibility the ethical responsibility that our powerful technology demands that's also something i learned i would say most explicitly from carl jung and his he made the case it's a very interesting argument that he believed that the scientific endeavor emerged out of the alchemical endeavor and and he has his reasons for believing that and i think it's a reasonable proposition historically there's many roots of the scientific endeavor but newton was an alchemist so you know there's there's one staggeringly important example an alchemy was a fantasy about the value that might be lurking in the material world and jung believed that we needed to fantasize about what value might be held in study of the material world for thousands of years before we could organize ourselves psychologically to do something as technically sophisticated as science so but alchemy was still you know one-tenth science and 90 imagination and religion in some sense and then the the scientific part of it blew up massively over the last 400 years and it's put us where we are technologically but the ethical part the religious part didn't blow up and expand in the same way but it has to we have to be as ethical as we are powerful or or we won't manage and we'll destroy ourselves with and maybe we'll do it because we want to so so we have to grow up in some sense and and that means we have to become conscious of things that we have not yet been become conscious of and i think that that that means becoming more conscious of what what it means that there are religious values what that means ontologically so what that means for the nature of being itself and what it means in terms of how each of us perceive and act and what our obligations are and what the costs are of not doing that we have to become very serious about such things in a way that we are not serious yet most of the discussion i see about the relationship between science and religion is the sort of discussion that takes place between the viewpoint that's put forth most eloquently and powerfully likely by the atheist materialists like dawkins and and and harris and daniel dennett and as far as i'm concerned they're just not contending with the problem what they do is they there's a sleight of hand there's an intellectual sleight of hand that's unnoticed by those that they're arguing against and the sleight of hand is they implicitly and explicitly presume that the enemy they're fighting which would be religious belief as such is a fundamentally a set of propositions about the explicit propositions about the structure of the material world in some sense so it's akin to a scientific theory and then having made that presumption and having that presumption not be questioned they can take relatively straightforward steps to demolish it but the problem with that is is that well there's a variety of problems but problem number one is that first move is not kosher because that's wrong what part of what religious is is what happens to you when you look at the night sky in the pitch black and you can't confront infinity and there's an embodied set of experiences that that manifest themselves independent of your will and part of that is fear in trembling in the presence of the infinite that's the awe but there's also a call in that there's an intrinsic call in that to greater being on your part to be better than you are that's part of that experience there's an ennobling aspect to it and none of that is rational and propositional it's deep it's instinctive it's part of the instinct to imitate and serious scientists would contend with that and serious people would as well there's a set of experiences that ensnare all of us dancing to music is another what are we doing when we're dancing to music well we don't know but it's and it's easy to think of it as mere entertainment or something trivial but it's not i had a one of canada's national treasures here yesterday rex murphy very very astute and profound person and he said he this wasn't his words but he read them and remembered them all art aspires to the condition of music yes well what does that mean well it's something outside rationality greater than rationality and every virtually everyone loves music well what does it mean that they love music why does that why does that feed the soul music what exactly is going on there well something profound is going on there it's something that's calling us to align ourselves harmoniously with the patterns of being and this isn't this isn't none of this is optional and the other issue is well if the religious enterprise is failed and anyone with any reasonable intellect can see that then from whence do we derive our values exactly because the science i know has convinced me and these are the most serious psychologists that i've read of people like um an ecological approach to perception is that the book i can't quite remember the title always escapes me gibson nope gibson nope gibson gibson gibson a visual approach i can't remember the book eric maybe you can just look that up briefly it's it's uh it's gibson perception anyways gibson was quite convinced that we perceive meaning not objective reality and he didn't mean that he wasn't a religious thinker that was his conclusion from studying the visual system in depth and it is the case we see the world through the lens of value where do we derive from where do we derive our values and more and maybe even more importantly from where should we derive our values and you can say science yeah but that's a facile answer and it's a dangerous answer too because it risks the politicization of science and science strives at least in some sense to be value free and and and perhaps for the better and perhaps that's a necessary part of the sense scientific enterprise but we need values there's they're not optional the necessity for value is built into us at an unbelievably deep level biologically not conceptually not as a secondary consequence of our rationality none of that it's a precondition for perception itself and we haven't wrestled with the significance of that discovery now you see the the earth shattering significance of that discovery manifested itself in part in the realization of ai artificial intelligence engineers that it was virtually impossible to build an intelligent machine that could perceive the world unless it was embodied and the reason for that was that the problem of perceiving the world was way more difficult than we thought because we thought we just saw the objects that were there the material objects that were there but that isn't how it that isn't the case it's really not the case it's so much the case that if you try to build a machine that perceives the world that's just looking at the objects that are there so to speak you can't it doesn't work and so people like rodney brooks mit robotics engineer and a genius he started figuring this out in like 1992 that in all probability a machine would have to be embodied to perceive because perception is so tightly cl associated with action and action and perception are also so tightly associated with value you can't perceive without a framework of values where from where do we derive our values from nowhere and are they real or not well what do you mean by real exactly you can't see without them so they're a precondition for the perception of material reality itself and then we also know we all know we all know this some values are more important than others some things are deeper than other things we all have that sense we know the difference between a shallow story and a deep story and but we don't know what we mean by deep and we don't know what we mean by shallow but we mean something and so then i would say well the deepest values are religious that's a definition it's an observation and so when i could say we should scrap the entire religious enterprise as intelligent 21st central century rational intellectuals but well what about all these other problems they don't they're not going away and they're not the in they're not problems that are imagined by some codery of superstitious religious scholars these are profoundly difficult scientific questions at least in part the problem of perception and then the problem of depth well are some values deeper than others are some values more basic than others that means there's a hierarchy of values and that means there's something at the top that unites it all or everything is fragmented those are the alternatives and then so one of my propositions is that well what christianity is psychologically speaking at least in part is the attempt to specify the nature of the highest value and part of that's an abstraction and so that's what god is in the old testament is an abstract representation of the highest value and then there's another problem is once you abstractly represent the highest value how do you bring it down to earth so that it can guide your actions and the i the notion of the incarnation is the answer it's at minimum it's the answer provided by the collective imagination of western civilization to the problem of the embodiment of the highest value and are we gonna what are we gonna do are we gonna be are we gonna be children in the face of that or are we going to think about it because it's a problem but one of the things eliad pointed out was he was commenting at least in part on nichi's observation of the death of god and elliot said well god god has died time and time again because one psychological problem with abstract ethical religious thinking is that the highest value can become so abstract that no one can have any relationship with it anymore you don't know how you don't know what it means for you you don't know how to act it out you don't know how to embody it and so it's meaningless it disappears it floats away but then when that happens to a culture there's no central unifying value and then the culture fragments that's in that in in a manner that's analogous to the tower of babel in some sense and so something has to serve as a uniting value and it is the highest value and i don't i do not believe that the rationalist types the rationalist atheists i don't believe they contend with these problems at all they and it's not because it's because they don't understand them they don't know these problems exist they exist these are fundamental problems and when i say that christianity is the attempt to answer the question of how the highest abstract value should be embodied i mean that most seriously and then you ask yourself as well you know you said to me earlier that the people who've been translating the biblical lectures have experienced some transformation in their own life it's that's because they started to embody the the ethic i can tell you like are you going to strive to embody the ultimate ideal or not because i could ask you do you have anything better to do how could you possibly have anything better to do and if you don't want to do that why don't you want to do it well i don't believe in that it's like what do you mean by that exactly do you not believe there are any values do you believe you can just pick and choose do you believe that there's no uniting values and if there are uniting values do you believe that you have an ethical obligation to act in accordance with them or not and then what do you think will happen if you don't because i know what will happen if you don't you'll fall into a pit and you'll drag the people around you into the pit with you and as you suffer because you're in the pit you'll delight in the fact that you're there and that you've dragged all those other people in there with you yes you you reminded me now it's the ecological approach to visual perception and gibson none of that book is religious in nature in fact quite the contrary but it doesn't matter because what it shows is that a value structure is a precondition for perception itself and i should say that over and over and over a value system is the precondition for perception itself you were talking about people dragging each other into a pit and it reminded me of peter brogle's painting the blind leading the blind but they all fall into a pit it really resembles people who don't want to see these values and don't want to aim for them well what look what happens how how could failure to bring values under a unifying principle lead to anything other than fragmentation and confusion and i studied geoffrey gray's book the neuropsychology of anxiety which is the best book ever written about the biology of anxiety hands down and it's a hard book it took psychologists i read that book in 1985 which wasn't very long after it was published and i really read it it took me six months to read that book it was hard and it took the general run of psychologists 30 years to really notice jeffrey gray's book there wasn't a lot of serious discussion about it among personality psychologists and social psychologists people who were far removed from biology and animal experimentation it took 30 years for them to start to digest that book and that process certainly hasn't uh finished yet and so when i say that fragmentation of the value structure necessarily leads to a predominance of negative emotion pain anxiety suffering in general i believe that to be true biologically and i think i understand obviously not completely but i understand the outlines of the neurobiological reasons why that's the case i wrote a paper with my students a while back trying to tie the the phenomenon of anxiety to the the thermodynamic principle of entropy and i think we were quite successful to put physics underneath the site the science of anxiety and i think we were successful in that i mean the paper was published in a very good journal psychological review and as far as i know no one's you know come up with a thorough going and serious refutation of the proposition if you fragment your value structure then you're overwhelmed you become overwhelmed by anxiety and that's the price you pay for not being integrated so fine you don't have to pursue value intensely and seriously you don't have to devote yourself to it you don't have to worship the highest ideal but the price you'll pay for that is fragmentation nihilism enemy existential angst doubt terror stress more rapid aging all of that so fine that's the alternative and that's only on the personal level it says nothing of the sociological level your books help readers become more integrated with themselves in the great mother neumann says that only the individual with integrated consciousness can help the society become healthy only through individuals with integrated consciousness can society properly form and become healthy what tendencies in modern society do you think contribute to the and that's no different by the way that is that is no different than the statement that the imitation of christ is the highest ethical demand placed on every individual in western society it's the same idea it's exactly the same idea the first idea the christian idea is the dream that preceded the psychology and that's i'm and that's what it is minimally that's what it is minimally that's what it is psychologically i'm not speaking as a religious thinker when i make that claim i'm not trying in some sense to tread into religious territory not not not not as a theologian i'm trying to explain something and and to make it real and you know and to make it real what tendencies in modern society do you think contributes to the integrity of consciousness and what tendencies interfere with it some of that guilt that you were talking about that that can be extremely corrosive you know one of the things that i was extremely affected by when i went on my tour i i think this is part of what made me ill although it wasn't all of it but it was it was definitely part of it was i saw i was offering people words of encouragement and it seemed that the people who are benefiting most from that in some sense were young men and i think maybe that's because they have been formally criticized so much in the last 30 or 40 years so they had the the deepest hunger and and and i saw how much hunger how much thirst there was for words of encouragement in the face of that accusation and guilt like we all stagger forward under our burden of sin that's the archaic language and modern people well they don't really understand what that means and yet they're discouraged and guilty about the conditions of their own existence and that's the same thing and so then because i was offering words of encouragement because i would rather that people did well than than do badly and and i mean that most sincerely it was stunning how much impact that had on people and how grateful they were for it and that was very painful to me to observe because i had no idea that the hunger was so deep and that people were so hopeless because they had been crucified by their own guilt and by their accusations of their insufficiency and and the the malevolence of their ambition let's say i mean i experienced that very very personally a friend of mine who was a very intelligent man someone i knew from the time i was about 13 he killed himself and he did that at least in part because he believed that masculine ambition was fundamentally malevolent and so he didn't trust his own forward striving and he couldn't distinguish let's say greed from valid ambition and i mean he wrote a story that really affected me he was quite a good short story writer as it turned out he only had one story published but i have his unfinished novel he wrote a story about a memory he had when he was about 10 years old 11 years old something like that he lived in this northern town high prairie there was a large indigenous population there it's a town very much like the one i grew up in and he was he got beat up by a group of indigenous kids or one or two or one i don't remember exactly the details of the story but he didn't fight back he wouldn't fight back because even at that age he regarded himself as his very presence there as a as morally untenable and you know fair enough there's a real ethical conflict there europeans did come to north america and south america and 95 of the indigenous people died from plague you know measles mumps smallpox and so that was an absolute catastrophe and then well the relationships between the europeans who have come to the western hemisphere and the indigenous people have been fraught with conflict to say the least and no one's exactly sure how to rectify that but he viewed any sign of masculine ambition let's say as fundamentally immoral because of its association with colonial domination and technological nightmare and the despoiling of the planet and all of that struck him to the heart you know lit killed him i mean there was more going on but that was a big part of it and so we bear this terrible guilt all of us and it interferes with our rise with our ability to rise up and all of that has to be sorted out you know we have to distinguish between valid ethical striving to make the world a better place and immoral ambition and we have to be very careful that we don't look at those who have put themselves together perhaps better than we have and have been successful because of it and warp our morality because we want to tear them down because as examples they're examples that we fall short of it's very easy for this sort of thing to become warped by resentment and hatred you know you see this i think i saw an example of that in the united states alexandria ocasio-cortez i i'm probably pronouncing her aoc i'm pronouncing her name wrong she wore a dress to a met gala big fancy artistic affair white dress like a bride's dress in some sense and on it painted in red was taxed the rich and i like that's an example of that political twisting it it it puts itself forward as an ethical statement that's aimed at the betterment of the lives of the poor but lurking underneath that is a hatred for those who have been successful and an insistence that anyone successful has only become successful because they've exploited and hurt others and sometimes that's the case in some situations probably for all of us but sometimes and always are very different and i've i've studied deeply the political consequences the the consequences of that attitude going too far that what happened to the kulaks in the soviet union is a perfect perfect example of that kill all the successful farmers because all they did was exploit despite the fact that all those people were serfs like 50 years previously kill them all take what they earned what happened six million people die it is a very difficult thing with the kulaks this is still a very painful subject for millions of people in our country i can tell you that my family suffered from it my relatives were dispossessed like that everything they had was taken away from them they worked hard for decades and that being said the story is actually more complicated than that there really were such people in the villages who were actually called kulaks who lent to other peasants and then forced them to give back much more than they gave in the beginning i mean they demanded from debtors so much that people could not pay back the debt that's why kulaks were hated in the villages because they were basically users and they could hurt or kill those who delayed or didn't pay their debts the authorities turned a blind eye to this and sided with the kulaks they could do anything they wanted to the poor so when it started there's no doubt there's no doubt that economic exploitation occurs and there's no doubt that economic exploitation occurs there's no doubt that not all material wealth is is is gained in an ethical manner all of that that's why those those discussions about oppression and exploitation always continue there's always some truth in it the thing is now it is perceived as a sort of collective pain and drama i think someday the pain will pass unfortunately this whole phenomenon the dispossession of kulax is now perceived and interpreted rather superficially i would say it was much more complicated than that and the fact that there was a fratricidal war the civil war that occurred before it makes it even more complicated there was no right and wrong there were victims everyone suffered you know i wanted to ask you about beyond order we have already translated it into russian and i think there's a very important point in the eighth chapter the translators and the editors especially liked it it's about beauty dostoyevsky said through one of his characters that beauty will save the world why do you think beauty is so important i think i think i'm so glad that that that that's the case i think that was the chapter that i liked the best of all of both books so i'm very i'm very pleased to hear that that's been the response and and part of that was motivated by my contemplation regarding dostoevsky's statement and and solzhenitsyn's comments about it what does that mean well it means it's a variant of the idea we discussed earlier that all art ascribe all our art aspires to the condition of music it's it's akin to our discussion about the night sky beauty is something that it calls you to that higher unifying ideal it calls you and and it it pulls you and part of that is is a manifestation technically speaking of the of the imitation of the instinct to imitate human beings are unbelievably imitative unbelievably imitative it's our it's our main cognitive transformation i would say i mean every word we speak is the word that everybody else uses that's an example of the depth of this imitative spirit we were so good at imitation and i'll give you a quick example of that so if you watch a child who's three or four years old playing house male or female the females will usually act out mother and the males will act out father and if you casually observe that you'll say well they're imitating but that isn't imitation if i imitated you i would sit like this that's imitation because i'm precisely mimicking you but if i'm what if i'm four years old and i'm watching my father for four years and i'm watching disney movies that feature kings and so forth so i'm getting an image of the father as such i'm abstracting from each particular example of the father the commonality of behavior and perception that characterizes the father across all those instances and i when i'm pretending to be the father i'm attempting to take that abstraction and embody it and that someone a four-year-old is doing that it's unbelievably sophisticated and so the four-year-old is called to manifest the spirit of the father and it doesn't take much imagination to see that transformed into a religious statement to be called to manifest the spirit of the father it sounds like a religious statement but that's what four-year-olds are doing when they play house they're very sophisticated now that imitative instinct imitation that instinct to imitate is so deep in us that we'll we're called to imitate things that aren't even animate so when you walk into it when you see a cathedral and then you walk into the cathedral the cathedral is calling you to imitate it and the beauty beauty is part of that call and it grips you it's pointing to this higher unifying ideal and that's why and the fact that that higher unifying ideal is so vital is what accounts for the fact that beauty compels and it's pre-rational just like music you can't argue with it i mean you can say you could say i suppose that well all all uh opinions about beauty are arbitrary it's just subjective something like that you could you could brush it off intellectually but it just means you're shallow and you're not paying attention beauty is mysterious and it's not completely subjective because there's wide agreement at least in some instances on what is spectacularly beautiful i mean you can see that with the pilgrims that flood into europe and you think well they're not pilgrims well what do you think the tourists are that go to europe if they're not pilgrims what do they go look at they go look at beautiful things and they've fallen out of the religious landscape to such a degree that they don't even know that they're on a pilgrimage and they don't even know that they're called to worship beauty and they don't have any idea that that's a call to a higher form of being because we because we've cr shallowly criticized our religious propositions we don't even understand when they start to manifest themselves in an embodied manner and and pull us here and there it's happening politically all the time so beauty it the reason that that dostoevsky you see it it's interesting to consider the difference between dostoevsky and nietzsche in this regard because their ideas are very similar in many many ways they're like ones more rational and explicit and one's more narrative and literary but they're like the same spirit and and but dostoevsky is in some sense deeper and i think nietzsche would have agreed with this and i know that nietzsche know knew more about dostoevsky than people thought there's been recently scholar scholarly work on that account dostoevsky in some ways was closer to beauty his work was closer to beauty than nietzsche's because dostoevsky's work was literary and artistic and so he dealt in that aesthetic realm and the idiot for example it the idiot's a very interesting book because and and you see this in in other another bits of dostoevsky's work as well is that his his most ethical characters can lose every argument with rationalists and still be better men and you see that in the book because the book allows them to be embodied rather than mere carriers of propositional arguments and beauty is non-propositional and so it it goes under our our our narcissistic and blind rational intellect that over values its ability that's the spirit of lucifer that milton warned everyone about it goes under that and grabs you and if you pay attention to that then it's a it's a pointer to what is beyond your understanding and so it's vital it's vital and dostoevsky knew that and solzhenitsyn read that and he thought i see i see what he means i understand what he means and you know one of the characteristics of our modern culture especially in the architectural realm is that it's replete with ugliness i mean i've gone to medieval villages in europe especially in east what used to be east germany that were so beautiful they just made me cry when i was it was when i was in the downtown i thought my god this is so unbelievably beautiful how did people manage this and and to think about all the effort that was poured into those cathedrals monuments to divine beauty what imagination those people had and what commitment and we we can't do that modern people can't do that and so it's a terrible loss and it's partly because we just don't take such things seriously and that's that's a that's a big mistake because they are more serious than anything else beauty that's more serious than anything except perhaps truth but it's a pointer you know in these religious thinkers philosophically speaking christian thinkers they thought of god as the some some bornum that the sum of all good things well truth is something and and beauty is something and courage is something these virtues that we all recognize as virtues or are tormented by our conscience if we don't you sum those all together that's the ideal that binds us all and that's god for all intents and purposes you might say well is that real it's like well it depends on what you mean by real and people laugh at me because i say that sort of thing fairly frequently you know it depends on what you mean by real but when you ask the question is something real it's like an equation and the right response to that is well what do you mean by real and you think well that's an evasion it's like no i'm just not accepting your presuppositions as a precondition for this discussion you can't use that sleight of hand so beauty it's like that beauty tells you to be more than you are beauty tells you to aspire to that which is beyond you beauty says there is something beyond you all of that and it does that in an enticing manner right it invites you to come along it's the opposite of authoritarianism it's an invitation it's like the most beautiful woman you can possibly imagine waiting there for you on the dance floor inviting you that's beauty and that's an invitation to be the sort of man who could dance with that person you think you don't take that seriously like you get rejected by some woman you you admire that her beauty has captivated you and you're rejected because you're less than you could be you think you don't take that seriously it's a miracle you don't cut your throat throat you take it seriously you just don't know it you don't know what you're what she's angry about why is she react rejecting you because you're not all you could be and some of that's laid at your feet and men are angry with women all the time because that's what women do that's what they tell them all the time and it's a terrible thing but can you blame them what else would they do and what else would you want them to do you know in your shallow thoughts you'd think well i wish that i was always accepted every advance was accepted uncritically well that world would be hell very rapidly if it was actually the case i wanted to ask you about your work on beyond order our translators and editors have pointed out that it has a very distinctive language and many levels of complexity to explore and comprehend the peculiarity of this language is that it somehow helps the reader set his perception set his mind on the book's narrative it flows very easily and deeply into the reader's mind is there a special technique you use when you build up a sentence because we were comparing this book with your other works and we noticed that your wording has changed a bit it became even more accurate even though it seemed like it couldn't be any more accurate but it became even more vivid and we all enjoyed working on the book well that's remarkable that you said deep in a light way when i was teaching at harvard i i was really concentrating on my maps of meaning course although i paid plenty of attention to the personality course as well and they fed into each other quite nicely i was struck by this idea one day and maps a meeting with such a serious course because it dealt with atrocity it dealt with the worst evils that i could extract out from the last hundred years of history and that's pretty dark and so it was very serious heavy and maps of meaning is a heavy book there's there's not much humor in maps of meaning and i had kept having this idea that i should if i would had really mastered this material i could present it in a manner that was light and i thought well how in the world could you possibly present such things in a manner that was light it's not like i don't appreciate the necessity for humor i love talking to comedians the the most enjoyable interviews i've had and i think probably the most successful ones in some ways have been with comedians and the people i grew up with i had a group of close friends from say grade 8 to so i was about 13 until i was about 20. there's five or six of them and all we ever did was try to make each other laugh all of our interactions were wit competitions essentially and some of them were way much funnier than me one friend of mine in particular randy carlstad was he was so insanely funny i saw him again on my 50th birthday and he made me laugh so hard i i could literally i could hardly breathe he was so funny and so i love the humor and most of what i watch on television is stand up comedy or or idiot humor like the trailer park boys or something like some low brow horrible low brow show like that which i really enjoy so there's something to this lightness that's crucially important and i don't i haven't quite puzzled it all out i know when i'm on top of things that i can maintain my sense of humor and i haven't always been able to do that especially in interviews you know over the last five years because they well for a variety of reasons for a variety of reasons sometimes it was the vitriolic nature of the interactions and so forth but i know when i'm at my best that you know i have a sense of humor and i can keep things light even if they're deadly serious and i'm very happy to hear that the translators have seen that combination of lightness but but depth in improve as i continued to write i wasn't sure about that i i wrote beyond order under very uh trying conditions i was unbelievably ill while i wrote that book i um tara it was terrible so i'm glad that that that worked because i didn't i had no idea if it would but i'm very happy to hear that that's been the experience of the translator because they're obviously interacting with this text in a very serious way and i'm thrilled that that it was chapter eight in particular that was most affecting because that was a particular favorite of mine that that issue of beauty is so it's so unbelievably crucially important to to what's happening in the world today because of what it what it implies so you know that people wonder what the purpose of such things as classical music what's the purpose of classical music let's say you say this about any musical form and i like a very wide variety of music well you know and you see this with psychologists even psychologists i admire they tend to just wave their hands about the entire cultural capability of of human beings as if all of this entertainment music drama art literature that some it's just entertainment you know that's all it is it's not in the central part of our of our function as human beings or the central part of our culture it's completely backwards it's absolutely backwards it's it's crucial and vital so the lightness well that's good you know and as i've become more healthy recently in the last month i've recovered a lot thank god i can think again a bit and my sense of humor i'm hoping will come back and and i hope i can maintain it i'm going on tour again i think next year perhaps for the whole year and it would be nice to have a hell a sense of humor while that's happening and that would be wonderful i would love to see you in russia if you are willing to do it that would be wonderful people here like you very much they like you and they would love to meet you i would love to do a lecture in st petersburg and so when we plan the europe european and that's not the only place but i would particularly love to do a lecture in st petersburg um when we plan the european tour we will definitely do everything to make that happen definitely it would be such a striking honor and privilege to be able to do that i can't believe that that's a possibility i would love to do it and the fact that i can speak with russian people and speak with people all over the world this is a miracle really it's amazing that and that you all are doing so much work to make this happen and that you're trying to be so careful with your words i i'm so happy about that it's it's so great you know and that part of that transformation that you were talking about perhaps part of that is a consequence of everybody trying to be very careful with their words it's it's it's not for nothing that our entire culture decided that the essential hallmark of the highest uniting ideal was the word we should take that seriously the word is divine your word is divine if it's true think about that what if that was true what if that was actually how reality was constituted you think you have no relationship with reality with the infinite where are you going to find that other than in truth and and where are you going to approach truth more particularly than with your words or evade or evade the truth with your words and so insofar as you have a relationship with reality and with the infinite and with truth how could that not manifest itself in the word so it's crucially important to pay attention to to what you say and and that's part of what we've all been trying to figure out for thousands and thousands of years trying to understand what that meant trying to make what's most important the word the truthful word that's the most important thing really well that's what we've concluded this immense religious exercise and i'm speaking as a psychologist and it's amazing because the approach we took it worked the same way in different languages lectures in chinese were received just as well by the viewers as they were in other languages and it's amazing all the kind words people write to us they say that it's an amazing translation and that they've discovered a whole new world and new meanings in life we were all very impressed by that and all we did was we were just trying to be accurate trying to avoid adding something unnecessary something of our own invention during the translation process we strive to convey the author's vision and ideas and it works i can tell you that every time the translation deviated from your precise sequence of phrases the book made a completely different impression and it somehow became harder to relate it to the next piece of your work that's how neatly it is structured we noticed it when we were working on the bible series and on beyond order we realized we cannot change your wordings and your choice of words otherwise the book loses its depth and energy it's like we had to follow some kind of star everyone felt that it was something elusive it's hard to put into words it's like music like some sort of magic and when we did it right the text began to flow and it is so pleasant it is as if everything connects with each other and it is impossible to turn away from it some lectures that we have translated and dubbed we listen to again and again you want to get back to them to take a deeper look into them you know and that's the way we translate it beyond order it's a book that you want to read all over again to get back to it i think we'll make sure that every library in russia has this book that people have the opportunity to read it because by maintaining the sequence that you have laid out it's like we're giving people the opportunity to enter another world to get a deep insight into it so my son and i and and a team have been developing software to help people write so it's a it's a word processing program but it's it's it's a tool to write more effectively and it has technology that enables dragging and dropping of sentences and dragging and dropping of paragraphs and modules that help you reshuffle and so and it's based on i i spend a lot of time developing an explicit theory of writing and and also of say text criticism because i had to grade so many essays i i wanted to decompose the grading process and understand what i was doing and formalize it and so then i started to understand that a text it's a it's a multi-level phenomenon a book word phrase sentence paragraph sequence of paragraphs chapters sequence of chapters totality it exists at all those levels simultaneously and although you walk through it like you walk through life from beginning to end as the author you have a god's eye view and you can see all of those structures simultaneously you can see the end even though once you've written the book even though it has a beginning and what that means is that you can make the beginning refer to the end you can make the end refer to the beginning you can make all the parts of the text refer to each other and one of the things that's absolutely remarkable about the bible is that it's hyperlinked like that there's a there's a map that an image online that shows it's beautiful images looks like a rainbow in some sense it shows how many references to each verse are made throughout the text and so the bible is the world's first hyperlink text thoroughly hyperlinked text all of it refers to all of it explicitly and implicitly and the reason for that is because it's been reworked and reworked and reworked and reworked to be made somewhat coherent to be made into an actual narrative by you know an untold number of people working over an untold amount of time the old stories in the bible like the story of adam and eve and the story of noah god only knows how those how old those are i know that historians literary historians perhaps that's the discipline have traced back some fairy tales ten ten thousand years more than that and so and and one if a story is ten thousand years old it's probably a hundred thousand years old because things didn't change much ten thousand years ago rights not changing was how things were not changing and so god only knows how old those stories are and how long they were told for and so when you write if you think about what you're writing deeply you start to make everything refer to everything else and that's part of what makes you experience a text as deep because it's refers there's there's all these references within the text if the writer has done his or her job properly and edited at every one of those levels of analysis which is which you have to do to is the word precise is the phrase right are the phrases sequenced properly in the sentence is the paragraph made of properly sequenced sentences etc and i edited all those levels explicitly over and over over and over and with with maps of meaning i think i probably wrote every sentence 50 times like i literally i mean that literally i'd write a sentence out and then i'd write another version of it then i'd write another version of it continually until i couldn't until i started generating variance and i couldn't make any qualitative distinction between them so i'd write down three and i'd say i can't tell which of those is better so i guess i'm done because i can't make a finer value distinction now i think i probably overworked maps of meaning to some degree because because i did that so continually some of the sentences are very long they work but because they're so long they're hard to it's hard on the reader and i you know with that book i was trying to figure something out i mean i wanted to write a book obviously and i want to communicate with people but fundamentally i was trying to figure something out with 12 rules and beyond order i i was taking what i had figured out and trying to investigate it further but i was also trying to make it much more accessible it was much more a communicative attempt rather than a investigative attempt so and i'm so happy i think part of the reason your trans translations have worked is because of this emphasis on precision you said you're not playing any tricks you're not trying to get false attention and thank god for that you definitely don't want you do not want unearned attention believe me that is not something anyone with any sense would ever wish for because if it's unearned all the people who are devoting that attention they will figure that out and they will not be happy with you and so the catastrophe will be exactly proportional to the degree of attention and the degree that it's unearned that's not a good idea and but you also from what you told me he also realized that you had to really meet your audience halfway you had to you had to understand locally the the vernacular of the community and you and you had enough humility to notice that that was necessary you know i was just talking to somebody a couple economists the other day about the failure of foreign aid the constant failure of foreign aid and part of the reason it fails is because it's like well here is what we know and you you ignorant people can just do it whereas for it to work there has to be a real deep study of the local environment and and and and some attention paid to how these things could be integrated with that environment in an inviting way and so the fact that you paid attention to those local particularities and that you you know you said you only tried to be precise here and now well that was how the translation came through well that's not only that's man if you can do that all the time you're attending to the moment you know accurately you're trying to establish a relationship with truth accurately every moment so that's not only that's that's a that's an act of worship that only trying to be precise here and now and we could talk a little bit about that too because what worship means is imitate and you think well you don't worship i don't worship anything because i don't believe in anything it's like oh yeah you think that's true you don't think you're imitating who are you imitating no one oh you're a completely singular person are you you know there's nothing you're imitating it's like think again sunshine you're imitating you just don't know who you're imitating and maybe you should figure it out because you might be imitating something you do not want to imitate i also want to ask you about the period you were working on the book your daughter michaela was a great help to you she always is she hosts a very interesting podcast she always chooses relevant topics we watch her podcasts and see that she is constantly growing what helps us stay so strong and keep people interested and engaged in your opinion first yes she's been unbelievably helpful to me and she's saved my life but i could say that of many people i'm not trying to devalue what she did at all i'm in fact i thanked her profoundly last night for saving my life literally and her husband as well andre who went far beyond the call of duty caring for me amazingly remarkably inexplicably even but but i've had many many many people have have been of great aid to me my wife so a variety of close friends all sorts of people have really gone out of their way and so michaela had to overcome a tremendous amount of obstacle in her short relatively short life so far i mean she was unbelievably ill as a child and she had 38 affected joints by rheumatoid arthritis and she was in pain all the time and like she basically walked around on two broken legs for like a year when she was a teenager for a variety of reasons joints had deteriorated both in her hip and her ankle to the point where they were non-fun almost non-functional and and the waiting times for surgery were very very long and it wasn't even clear that they could be fixed and her prognosis when we found out what she had i think we discovered that when she was about six or seven was multiple early joint replacements and she was put on an anti-arthritis medication a new biologic she was the first kid in canada who got that medication as it turned out and it really worked it so she had a reprieve for about five years but then her hip disintegrated and then her ankle disintegrated and she and she also has suffered from very serious depression which runs in my family on on my paternal side particularly extremely serious severe depression and it affected my father and his father and a variety of of my relatives and and me and and my daughter not my son thank god so she's had to overcome a lot and she has overcome a lot and she's trying hard and so more power to her as far as i'm concerned and i'm thrilled to see what's happening with her podcast she seems to be uh have enough humility despite her confidence to not presume most of the time that she knows more than she does and to ask you know genuine questions and not to play tricks and and i hope that that that that's working well for her and um yeah she's she's she's been extremely helpful to me and mason made some very wise decisions over the last few years under very very difficult circumstances for example i was written into a comic book in april captain america which is part of the underlying mythology in our in the west now the marvel movies have become so popular and they are presenting mythology essentially to a whole new generation i was written into captain america as uh red skull you know king of the evil super nazis it was quite the shock to me and she helped me weave my way through that quite successfully you know we we put out we put out a line of red skull merchandise and devoted all the profits all the way all that we made to charity and that was a good that that was good it was a nice kind of a judo move in some sense you know we didn't go on the attack because why that's not helpful it's not like i don't wish tanahisi coats the best because i do he's the person who wrote the comic it's like i don't want bad things to happen to him i hope that he straightens up and flies right you know because that would be better for everyone and so it was a tricky thing to manage and she was very helpful in doing that and so she's written she's written a book about her experiences and she's going to hopefully i haven't read it yet i don't know if i can read it i don't know if i'm healthy enough to read it yet but she's investigating all the possibilities that lie ahead of us in this video frontier too and this is so exciting because look at what we can do it's crazy what we can do you know one of the things we're talking about right now i talked to her about this last night is i was and i talked to a couple educators about this you know right now we could put our collective resources together for for a relatively small capital outlay and we could produce a curriculum from kindergarten through grade 12 of the highest quality educational material possible right because who cares if we spent a million dollars per hour i think that maybe you know tens of millions of kids could use it for god only knows how long it would be wouldn't cost anything and it would be basically free and there's absolutely nothing stopping us from doing that and so we're starting to think through how well we could maybe initiate that program you know and that's what faculties of education if they had any sense at all which they don't generally speaking and i don't say that lightly they'd be all over themselves right now thinking look at what we can do we've got this free video technology that enables us to produce material that everyone can access for nothing and we could we could we could scientifically determine how to propel students through learning at the fastest possible rate to cover the deepest possible material over the course of their educational career and to be completely engrossed while they're doing it we could do that and that technology that's only been technologically possible for the last five years let's say there's nothing stopping people from doing that so you know hopefully i'm hoping i'll be healthy enough to engage in some of these projects this is a very important issue and i wonder how we can teach our children to learn and help them develop passion to learn new things it's not something done in a snap do you have any idea how to achieve this i don't think i can tell you how how it's possible to do that um you know i can only speak at the level of the family in some sense well and i guess it's slightly broader i mean the maternal role that's there's a that's a in some sense that's fundamentally protective it's security and and physical well-being it's more than that but but that's part of its core and the core of paternal care i think is encouragement as far as i can tell it's more than that and and of course the paternal and the maternal overlap i'm not trying to segregate them completely and so you love and protect your children and you encourage them to go out into the world and that's that ethos should permeate our educational material although it isn't obvious to me that it should be taught explicitly if it isn't if the material isn't saturated with those intents then that message won't be transmittable anyways you know you already said when you're doing these translations you're trying for precision well there's an ethos then that permeates the translations insofar as you're able to embody that and we want to do that with the educational material that we produce and i think probably the way to do that is to make it beautiful compelling engaging deep rich uh accurate and to have the notion of what's being served firmly in the background surrounding all the attempts to make the material and love encouragement love encouragement and truth let's say that's not a bad triumphant to meditate upon when contemplating educating children you know what would you teach them if you truly loved them and you wanted to encourage them and you wanted to tell them the truth so what would you how would you teach someone in grade one what would you teach them obviously it would rely to some degree on stories i think the first thing we're going to try to do is to i i is to produce video material to teach four-year-olds how to read because if you can really teach kids how to read they're going to educate themselves a lot so and i i've seen material produced by behavioral cognitive psychologists who are effective that enables a four-year-old who's ready to be taught how to read and write in three months with 10-minute lessons per day and it works it's a really i know the program it's a really good program it's brilliantly designed it's a phonics program and it's completely scripted and i think it would work it might work on video and then everyone could have it and so that would be a good place to start you know because everyone should be able to read i don't think we're going to get a lot of disagreement about that you brought up the topic of higher education and establishing proper higher education programs do you think modern academic education continues to yield the same great results that it used to or does it require some changes when i went to university i had good professors and bad professors and i had the best professors i had were at a little college i went to to begin with it was called grand prairie regional college and it was in a town of 25 000 in northern alberta and only had about 500 students the professors really loved to teach and i had great professors i had the two years of education i got there were the best two years of education i got my life i think although i learned a lot in graduate school but that's a whole different story that's that's a different kind of education um so when when students go to university now when i went to a larger university i had good professors and terrible professors and it was sort of incumbent on me to shop and find the professors who could really teach as far as i was concerned or who were teaching what i wanted to learn and and to differentiate between them and i think that that hasn't changed in in any profound sense what i've seen happen over the last 30 years in higher education in in north america at least is that it's got much more expensive especially at the high end and much more much more politicized and much more laden with bureaucracy and and but i still believe that you know what just a discriminating and serious student can go to a good university and and get educated if that's what they're aiming at a lot of that's up to the student themselves um having said that i would also i would say however this tech the technology that we're using right now is absolutely revolutionary because what it means is that the best lectures teaching the deepest material can now go direct to everyone and so that's that will have a revolutionary effect it it can't not and i you know i the the response to my channel to my video efforts is a reflection of that because i was an early adopter in the educational realm of this technology you know and i did it partly as a just an exploratory foray i had these 13 programs that had been made by a small ontario television station tv ontario about maps of meaning and they were professionally edited and came out quite nicely as reasonably digestible summaries of the maps of meaning lectures and i thought well i'll put them on youtube and see what happens and you know back then that was like 2013 i think youtube no one knew what youtube was it was place for cat videos no one took it seriously but you know i kept an eye on i thought well this is interesting this is permanent this is everywhere this is new this is not just cute cat videos not that there's anything wrong with those but and then i watched my you know the viewership rise and rise and rise and i thought well there's something to this and then i started having my courses filmed for that reason it's like i thought well i might as well teach everybody if if they're interested and that's another thing that's lovely about youtube is the only people that watch are people who are interested it's like perfect students you don't want to watch don't watch if you want to great you know and and that's available for everyone and again to hope this is dependent on my health but we're hoping to talk to great lectures everywhere and to invite them and say look you know what would you really like to teach if you could teach anything you wanted what would you really love to teach because you should teach what you love it the fact that you love it is an indication that you should teach it and maybe even that you that you could teach it because you can invite people say look i love this and this is why it's like maybe you'll love it too maybe you won't because not everyone doesn't love everything that's for sure but so what i see the future of education it's like the best lectures possible about every topic conceivable produced in the best manner possible for everyone for nothing because we can do that too and it's going to happen it's going to happen assuming we have any sense like why wouldn't it happen why wouldn't we do that what a deal that is and then you know there's a there's the problem of accreditation but that's a solvable problem you know one way of solving that is to get a panel of experts like real experts in any domain and say well look produce five thousand multiple choice questions that you think cover the entire territory or sample it at least you know because you don't have to ask every expert about everything you just have to randomly sample their knowledge well then you build a system that randomly takes those questions and aggregates them into exams and if someone wants to be accredited they take the exam or maybe they take three of them and then their score is number correct it's absolutely accurate it's absolutely reliable you know you have a sample of their knowledge and maybe then 20 tests like that or 50 tests like that gives you the equivalent of a bachelor's degree something like that the accreditation problem is solvable and without that much expense now you might say well multiple choice tests don't test everything it's like that's true but they can sample pretty well and there are other the problem of how to teach people to write is a more complex one because it's really hard to grade an essay because you don't just write b minus on it you don't just write a percentage you have to tell the person what they did wrong and if someone can't write they did everything wrong the words wrong the phrase is wrong the sentence is wrong the sentences aren't aggregated properly the paragraphs don't make sense they're not sequenced properly the whole essay is a mess and you know to to explain why that's all wrong to someone it's easier just to rewrite the whole essay it's far easier so but this is partly why we built this writing program because we thought well maybe one of the way to teach people how to write is to build how to write into the tool they use to write and so we're hoping that we'll launch that in the next three months something like that the program is done for all intents and purposes we we we're still figuring out how to communicate about it and we're not sure it will work because it's it's a very complicated thing to produce a writing technology and we might have got it wrong i mean we tried to pay attention to the user experience and all of that but my sense was the best way to teach people to write was to give them a tool that would help them write better because that can be scaled right and it's it's dirt cheap it doesn't require someone to do the grading which is we can't automate yet you know you talked about more mechanical translation it doesn't work it's not subtle enough it's not nuanced enough and we can't use automated systems to grade essays we don't have the technology for that and i don't know if we ever will we might it's possible i doubt it because i don't know how you could grade an essay without being human it's so maybe if we built a machine that perfectly mimic being human it could do it but and maybe it's a solvable technical problem but i doubt it we'll see machines are getting smart quick so i hope the future of education the higher education it's like experts who love their material share their love with everyone for nothing and i i would make a business uh for nothing means it would still run on a profit basis because i think that's the most efficient way of doing this but fundamentally the cost would be like 1 100th of a standard university education so now that doesn't solve the problem of the collegial experience of university and the mature maturation that occurs when you leave your group of friends and make new friends and the transformation of personality that moving enables and finding a new group of people to associate with and the introduction to the world of culture you know but i don't know how to port that online and and that might be the most important part of the university experience but on the mere merely educational front well all this technology beckons so i wanted to ask if you're going to write your next book and if you are could you tell us what it will be about yes and then i should stop because i'm starting to get tired and i'm not going to be able to provide any intelligent answers soon but i'll answer that question and then we should stop i am working on a new book it's tentatively titled we who wrestle with god and i took that title from the biblical lectures when because i discovered for my i discovered so that other people didn't know this that the word israel meant we who wrestle with god and and that's embedded in the narrative of jacob wrestling with god or wrestling with an angel it's a very strange story for a rational person it's like what the hell is going on here this jacob is wrestling with god or an angel it's not exactly clear in the story what does that mean and then his leg basically gets broken or dislocated at least it's like well why would god do that it's like well all the atheists that are watching my biblical lectures they're wrestling with god more than religious people usually they're more obsessed with the problem we all wrestle with god it doesn't matter if you're a believer or an unbeliever it doesn't matter at all and you think that you know wrestling with god won't break your leg it's like you're bloody lucky if that's all it does so that's us man we who wrestle with god so this book is about what that means and it's also about what it means if we don't know that that's what we're doing and and and one thing i'm very concerned with is the is the sacralization of politics so there's this comment by christ that we should render unto god what is god and unto caesar what is caesar's and i believe that's true psychologically as well as politically and the consequence of not doing that isn't that god disappears and we all become proper thinking rationalists the consequence is that all sorts of things that should be secular and profane get inflated with religious significance and then we can't even talk you know because someone who has a different political opinion than you isn't merely on the other side of a rational argument about how to progress towards some agreed upon future they're they're like possessed by the spirit of malevolence itself as far as you're concerned because you haven't got your categories straight and so it's about that too it's like there's a religious domain i don't care if you're a believer or an unbeliever that statement is true and if you don't think it's true then you descri defi decide how you would describe the experience of awe well that's not religious it's all right use whatever word you want but it's going to come to mean religious so it doesn't matter because the central characteristic of the phenomenon of awe is what we call religious it's part of what beauty points us to let's say so you can change the surface terminology but it's not going to affect the underlying reality well it's going to affect reality and it will get confused but the issues aren't going to go away and part of what's happening in the west right now it's not good it's really dangerous is that we're having religious discussions disguised as political discussions that's not good it's really not good it's really dangerous and and we have to be very careful and it's going to get worse i think before it's going to get worse for a while so brace yourselves thank you very much for this conversation i really appreciated it was a profound conversation well thank you for for enlightening me as to the extent of this translation enterprise i really appreciate that i really appreciate the fact that you brought up and are attending to precision and and your description of the care that's being taken i really appreciate hearing about the effects that you've observed and the discussion we had about that um i'm thrilled beyond belief that this is happening i can't believe it it's unbelievably remarkable and uh hopefully we're trading a good path and if we're careful all sorts of good things will happen and i'm thrilled that i can i know that i'm be able to communicate with people in russia and all these other countries it's such a privilege it's such a privilege and so remarkable so thank you for the intelligent questions thank you very much goodbye i think we will continue our conversation if you have time we have a lot of questions a lot of questions from different channels people really want to talk to you when asked to ask you these questions and i'm sure it will be just as fascinating as this conversation let's definitely definitely let's do that collect the questions figure out which ones you think are most relevant absolutely let's do that thank you very much jordan goodbye bye [Music] you

Channel: Jordan B Peterson

Views: 632,974

Keywords: Jordan Peterson, Jordan B Peterson, psychology, psychoanalysis, Jung, existentialism, maps of meaning, biblical series, free speech, freedom of speech, biblical lectures, personality lectures, personality and transformations

Id: Cn_lucBscH4

Length: 100min 14sec (6014 seconds)

Published: Thu Jan 13 2022