Surveillance Capitalism In Today’s Digital Age | Fortune Global Forum 2019

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Thank You Brian and welcome Shoshana Thank You Adam hello everybody The Guardian called your book a chilling expose of the business model that underpins the digital world you brought a copy of your book on stage with you thank you for doing that paperback what is Shoshana what is surveillance capitalism surveillance capitalism is a new market form born digital in many ways that diverges from everything that we've learned about capitalism for the last few centuries but in this critical way it emulates the old pattern it takes something that lives outside the market dynamic it brings it into the market dynamic for productions and sales that's called making a commodity the thing is we're all familiar with the idea that industrial capitalism claimed nature turned it into land real estate things that could be sold and purchased in the case of surveillance capitalism it takes a dark and startling twist because what it claims for the market dynamic now is private human experience private human experience is Rhian vision as a free source of raw material for new processes of production and sales specifically translation into behavioral data behavioral data that fills new data supply chains on their way to new computational factories that we call AI machine learning in those factories products are made their computational products they predict future human behavior these prediction products are sold not back to us from whence they came but to a new group of business customers with a profound interest in understanding what we will do and later these new markets trade exclusively in human futures of course all of this began with the click-through rate as the first globally successful prediction product and the online targeted advertising markets as the first globally successful human futures markets now it's spread beyond tech beyond the sector into the normal economy so but you've been researching this before gdpr before Cambridge analytic I you've made the case that and and you make it very specifically about Google being the first and the best that they took our data and sold it to others without our permission all right so let's fine-tune that a little bit may I please of course all right they took our data obviously without our permission because most of the taking happens without our knowledge when they write about these I'm getting over a pneumonia I'm not contagious or sick anymore but I've got a little cough so bare water right here if you need it yeah thank you so much so when they write about their mechanisms and methods the patent scientists the data scientists within the company the researchers they celebrate this one key fact that they learned how to take our personal information various aspects of our personal experience while bypassing our awareness this is celebrated this is why it's called surveillance cap this is what puts the surveillance and surveillance capitalism all right so they're taking our data without our personal information or experience without our knowing it they're translating it into data without our knowing it they're not selling the data they're putting it through the factories they're analyzing it they're computing it this was Google's original secret sauce where they produced the quality score that allowed them to Bruce the click-through went rate from the so called data exhaust that no one was using these were the leftover data in their servers that were more than what was needed for product improvement for service improvement so it's it's now these these computational products coming out of the factories atom that's what's getting sold and that's why in hundreds of videos believe me I've watched them all Eric Schmidt can sit on a stage like this and talk to you folks and say we're not selling your data and no one comes in to arrest him or anything for for possibly not telling the truth because they're not actually selling our data they're selling the proprietary meaning that they create from the data about our future behavior and so let me ask you in all earnestness where the harm is and I'll sort of facetiously all by way of asking the question I'll say for example I love Google Maps just love it because it's so helpful to me you understand why I'm making that statement of course I do of course I do there are there are a couple key things to say about this number one nothing that I say or write is an argument against the digital we are citizens of a Democratic Society in the digital century we deserve the services that have been created that have made our lives better in many many ways our societies deserve big data we should be using big data for the new remedies and treatments for all kinds of cancers that were desperate to solve problems were desperate to solve we should be using big data to solve climate catastrophe and to eliminate the plastic particles that are now even in the Arctic snow that's not what we're doing the most powerful companies in this sector with the with the material in structure the corner nearly on the market of data scientists the ones who really know how to do big data they are entirely trained on one thing and that's clickstream science they are entirely trained on these computational products that move into their markets for their revenues and their profits they are not using big data to solve our needs or our society's needs you've said that this that what they're doing is antithetical to democracy how so I understand their it from your perspective they're they're they're Craven they're just trying to make money all right so Adam a minute ago you said I like those maps and we started to talk about that you should be able to have those maps without the overhang of the negative externalities they come with this market form so let me talk quite briefly about what the key externalities are that I'm referring to number one we're talking about an economic logic not about bad people and just rogue bad behavior we're talking about an economic logic that compels certain forms of corporate behavior in order to have great predictions remember that's what they're selling they're selling certainty to business customers they figured out three critical imperatives number one you want to feed AI to get great predictions you need to feed it a lot of data economies of scale intensification of competition turns out scales not enough we also need scoped varieties of data ultimately and this come in this competition they came to understand that the most predictive data comes from intervening in our behavior to learn how to coax tune and herd our behavior in the direction of their game outcomes good for a revenue good for profit good for them good for their business customers this is how the game works this is called economies of action these are designed to utilize the digital architecture to work their will through the medium of digital instrumentation to intervene in our behavior in ways that we are not aware of to push our behavior in the directions that serve the bottom line economies of action are a new zone of experimentation we saw being developed in Facebook's massive scale contagion experiments where they were successful in getting more people to go vote in the 2010 midterm elections they were also successful in creating an emotional contagion making people happier and sadder these things were published in 2012 and 2014 and when they published these findings they celebrated we know we can manipulate queues and social comparison dynamics online to get people to change their behavior and feeling in the real world and we know they can do it without them ever detecting our presence they never know we're doing it so that's number one these experiments continued Adam under pokemons go anybody in this room ever play pokemon go with your friends and family pokemons go incubated in Google over many years brought to you by the same gentleman who brought you Street View and Google Earth who spent most of his career filling Google's supply chains with surplus behavioral data for these new computations in the case of Pokemon go there were businesses from McDonald's and Starbucks to Joe's pizza paying pokemons go for guaranteed footfall and what Pokemon go this group Niantic labs that came out of Google and what they learned how to do was use the rewards and punishments of gamification to herd our behavior through the city the places that we're going to pay them fees for our footfall footfall in the real world being the absolute equivalent of click-through in the online world now the next zone of experimentation Adam is set to be the city this is the war that's going on in Toronto right now we're sidewalk lab / Google / alphabet has its sights set on the Toronto Waterfront and only two weeks ago the citizens of Toronto a group of them in a highly democratic process that they went through good slow democracy beat back the first really extreme aims of this proposal and the elected officials stood up to constrain the proposals so where are we with democracy let me answer you very succinctly number one surveillance capitalism is on a collision course with democracy eroding from below and completely restructuring democracy from above from below it takes aim at human agency its human autonomy at what we consider to be individual sovereignty the things that allow us to have decision rights to be self-determining this now global means of behavior modification takes aim at human autonomy without which a democratic society is impossible to imagine from above we are now entering the third decade of the digital century Adam this was supposed to be the apotheosis of democratization this digital century instead what we see is a new kind of society marked by extreme forms of social inequality a new social inequality what is this social inequality concentrations of knowledge in these companies best expressed in the growing abyss between what we know what can be known about us this is intolerable for a Democratic Society but that's not all these extreme concentrations of knowledge produce extreme concentrations of power that what we can do is now no match for what can be done to us using these extreme concentrations of knowledge through the medium of the digital so when I couldn't help thinking and the the picture that you've painted of these companies is like in the Industrial Age the these factories that that dumped sludge polluted sludge into the river because nobody was stopping them from you nowadays yes then they were the regulations came up to stop them from doing it you are already a philosopher now for about a minute more I'd like you to be a philosopher King and say exactly what democracy should do about this first of all this thing has had 20 years to root and flourish largely unimpeded by law that's to say that we're at the beginning of this not at the end so we have to understand that the root now moves through politics only democracy only law only a new regulatory vision will reign in surveillance capitalism by the way in the massive Pew Research study published just this past week 81% of a US sample says that the risks of corporate surveillance outweigh the benefits eighty-one percent if you want to see what's coming in the future pay attention to that number we need laws that interrupt supply and demand that disassemble the incentives for the surveillance dividend that means we interrupt supply taking our experience without our knowledge and therefore without our consent or the right to combat must be simply illegal let's call it what it would be called in any first or second or third grade classroom it would be called theft let's go to the other end that's supply let's talk about demand we outlaw markets that trade in human futures because we know that they have predictably destructive consequences to human autonomy and to democracy we outlaw them the same way we outlaw markets that trade in human organs or babies or slaves because we know that they have destructive consequences and are incompatible with our aspirations as a Democratic Society that's where we are today Shoshanna I cannot imagine you are a very popular in Mountain View or Menlo Park California but I want to thank you for coming here and giving us your message today [Applause] [Music]
Info
Channel: Fortune Magazine
Views: 8,994
Rating: 4.9338841 out of 5
Keywords: Journalism Franchise, Fortune, business, wall street, finance
Id: 2WYjZo9kNYI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 16min 12sec (972 seconds)
Published: Mon Nov 18 2019
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.