Science Continues to Reveal God
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The 700 Club
Views: 543,337
Rating: 4.7781458 out of 5
Keywords: 700 club, creation, science and faith, science proves god, revealing god, proof of god, science, christian science, is god real, does god exist, scientific evidence of god, scientific evidence of religion, creation science, hugh ross, the cosmos, studying the universe, creation of earth, proof of god in the universe
Id: i1oCQ6bZ_Ws
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 47sec (947 seconds)
Published: Tue Apr 03 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
That's a fairly dubious claim. I'm sure he provided some evidence, right?
From what I remember of him, it's all about interpreting vague, poetic language in a way that makes it look compatible with contemporary scientific theories, which is a hard sell since Christianity had to be dragged kicking and screaming to accept those theories at all. If it was so clear that the Bible hinted at those theories, then why the delay?
What does peer review say about his conclusions? What methodology did he use to demonstrate the existence of gods?
Just goes to show you that someone may be an expert in one field (as we all are) but blindly stupid about other fields.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go buy whatever Robert Downey Jr. is shilling on TV...
I canβt find anything that indicates that Ross was a practicing astrophysicist after earning his last degree, but went directly into ministry after that. If thatβs correct, then it indicates that he probably went through college and grad school with this Christian nonsense continuously in mind.
I think he's wrong.
If he's the kind of Christian who would appear on The 700 Club, then he instantly loses respect.
In general, though, it doesn't bother me that people see their faith reflected in the universe. It happened to me, too, back when I was a believer.
A true scientist would say: " make it bigger or smaller you don't get life as we know it". There might be a different form of life (which is not carbon-based) but that we don't know about any it doesn't mean that there isn't.
He's an idiot. What are his experiments? Did repeated experimentation yield consistent results? Did his peers who performed the same experiments get the same results?