The woman known to history as Elizabeth Windsor,
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, was born in London on the 21st of April, 1926. Her father was Prince Albert of York, known
to his family and close friends as “Bertie”. Her mother was Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon for whom
Elizabeth was the first born child. She was given the name of Elizabeth Alexandra
Mary, but despite the fact that her regnal name was “Elizabeth II,” she was not named
for the iconic Queen Elizabeth I. Instead she was named for her mother, for her paternal
great-grandmother Queen Alexandra, and for her grandmother Queen Mary. Elizabeth II was named for women who were
consorts rather than those in whom authority was vested, and few imagined that she would
grow up to do much more than marry, have children, and enjoy a life of quiet aristocratic privilege. The first child of the Duke and Duchess of
York, Elizabeth’s birth was happily welcomed, but the family had little expectation of the
grand status which would one day be hers. Her father, Prince Albert of York, was not
the Prince of Wales and heir to the throne of Britain, but rather was the second son
of King George V, who had been King of Britain and Emperor of India since 1910. Bertie’s older brother, Prince Edward, who
was called “David” within the family, was next in line to inherit the throne. David was not yet married, but he was just
thirty-two, only eighteen months older than Bertie. He had not married by the time Elizabeth was
born, but most people were of the opinion that the Prince of Wales still had plenty
of time to marry, have children and secure the royal line in this way. Thus, few people would have imagined when
she was born in the spring of 1926 that Princess Elizabeth of York would one day be Queen. Even though she was the third grandchild of
King George V and Queen Mary, Elizabeth’s birth was accompanied by great excitement,
as she was theoretically the third in line to the throne. For most of the day, a crowd of reporters
and well-wishers stood outside the house at 17 Bruton Street, where the Duchess of York
had given birth, hoping for a glimpse of the members of the royal family coming and going
to meet the newborn princess. King George V and Queen Mary were among the
first to pay a visit to 17 Bruton Street that very day, eager to meet their first granddaughter. The queen pronounced her a, quote, “little
darling with a lovely complexion and pretty, fair hair,” while the King was equally taken
with his newest grandchild. Elizabeth became a great favourite, not only
with the British newspapers and magazines who christened her, “Princess Betty,”
but also with the senior members of the royal family. The Duke and Duchess of York were periodically
busy with royal duties and functions and Elizabeth therefore spent a sizeable proportion of her
childhood being cared for by her nannies and governess, a typical scenario for royal children
in times gone by. However, her parents also placed great importance
on their family life and made sure that they had daily quality time with their daughter
for at least an hour every morning, and every evening between tea-time and bedtime. Neither did Elizabeth lack any family for
company when her parents were away. She either stayed with the King and Queen
at Sandringham or Balmoral, or with her maternal grandparents, the Earl and Countess of Strathmore,
at Glamis Castle in Scotland, or at their London house at 17 Bruton St. where she had
been born. While Bertie and Elizabeth were away on a
royal tour of Australia and New Zealand in 1927, they missed their daughter’s first
word. The princess’ nanny, Clara Knight, reportedly
helped her learn to pronounce the word “Mummy,” although amusingly, Elizabeth used the title
on multiple individuals before her mother’s return. The Duke and Duchess of York were openly overjoyed
at being reunited with their daughter, if not a little dismayed at how much she had
grown and changed in the months that they had been away. Still, they knew she was well-cared for in
their absence, and it was generally not the practice for small children to accompany royals
during extended travel. Elizabeth’s uncle David also showed her
much affection. He visited her often during her childhood,
bringing her gifts and chatting amusedly with his little niece. King George V doted on her and would willingly
play any part in her games. On one occasion, one of the King’s equerries
or attendants was shocked to find the King on his hands and knees pretending to be a
horse, and allowing the two-year-old Princess to lead him around by his beard! Elizabeth called him “Grandpa England,”
which amused him greatly, as did his granddaughter’s inability to pronounce her own name as a toddler. “Lilibet” was the best she could do, and
the King made sure that the nickname stuck. Lilibet had what many observers and historians
characterize as an idyllic childhood. Soon after her birth, the Duke and Duchess
of York moved into a house at 145 Piccadilly in London. Elizabeth spent most of her days with her
nanny, Mrs. Knight, and her nurses, Ruby MacDonald, and her sister Margaret MacDonald, whom Elizabeth
called “Bobo.” She enjoyed regular and daily quality time
with her parents, who believed in the importance of a close, warm, and fun-filled family life. Elizabeth’s favourite activities were playing
with her toy ponies and working in the garden with her father. Her love of the outdoors became apparent very
early on, while she also shared a love of animals with other members of the family,
particularly horses and dogs. Bertie had no less than eight pet dogs during
Elizabeth’s childhood, including three Corgis, which famously became the queen’s favourite
breed, ones she kept several of down to her last years. Elizabeth’s grandfather, George V, shared
her love of horses, and gifted her with her first pony for her fourth birthday, a Shetland
named Peggy. Elizabeth began taking riding lessons the
following year, eventually proving to be an impressively adept equestrienne and as incurably
horse-mad as most of the royal family. Lilibet, who loved to be outdoors getting
dirty, once remarked that she hoped she might marry a farmer, so that she might spend every
day outdoors with horses and dogs. During the summer of 1930, Elizabeth, Duchess
of York, gave birth to her second daughter and last child at her family’s ancestral
home at Glamis Castle in Scotland. She and Bertie named the infant princess Margaret
Rose. Lilibet was delighted with her baby sister. She wrote to a relative that at first, she
thought that Margaret was some kind of “wonderful dolly,” only to discover that she was alive! The next few years were relaxed and happy
ones for the family. Bertie and Elizabeth referred to their family
affectionately as “us four”, a surprisingly close relationship for a royal family unit. Bertie’s relationship with his own parents,
by way of contrast, had been comparatively cold and distant and Elizabeth might be said
to have been the first monarch raised in a relatively modern manner. In 1931, the King gifted the Yorks with Royal
Lodge in Windsor Great Park. After extensive renovation and redecoration,
the family used the house as a weekend retreat. Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon became particularly attached
to the Royal Lodge, and it remained her primary residence for fifty years following her husband’s
passing in 1952. The Yorks had some of their happiest times
together as a family at Royal Lodge in the early-to-mid 1930s. For Elizabeth and Margaret, the days usually
began with chatter and hijinks in their parents’ bedroom before breakfast. The girls would spend the bulk of the day
either playing outdoors or in the nursery with Ruby, Bobo, and Mrs. Knight, whom they
called “Alla,” or attending to their lessons with their governess, Marion Crawford, whom
they called “Crawfie.” There would usually be more family fun time
in the late afternoon or early evening, between teatime and bedtime. Bertie, Elizabeth, and their daughters became
beloved by the British press and the public quite early on. They seemed to project an almost bourgeois
domestic contentment that ordinary people admired, and with which they could identify. This national perception of their family’s
character as loving, stable, and relatable would come to be exceptionally important later
on, when Bertie was called upon to ascend to the throne. Like so many siblings who are close in age,
Elizabeth and Margaret developed very different personalities. Elizabeth was reserved, conscientious, and
dutiful. Adults who met her were impressed by her quiet
dignity and composure from a young age. She was efficient and tidy, carefully arranging
her shoes outside the nursery door and lining up all of her toy ponies in a neat row each
night before bed. That being said, she also had a sense of humor
and fun that were no doubt enhanced by having her sister Margaret as a nursery companion. Whereas Elizabeth was reserved, Margaret was
openly affectionate. While her sister was practical and dutiful,
Margaret was romantic, imaginative, and often mischievous. There were the inevitable struggles between
them as young children. Margaret had a tendency to bite when she was
incensed with Elizabeth, who, equally incensed, would hit her back. Elizabeth expressed annoyance that Margaret
seemed always to want whatever she wanted. Margaret was also given to teasing, which
aggravated Elizabeth, who had a short temper when they were children. But at the same time, she was enormously protective
of her younger sister, conscientious about keeping talk of unpleasant or frightening
things to a minimum in front of her, and mindful to include Margaret as much as possible. Their relationship would eventually be complicated
and strained by the family’s proximity to the crown, but nonetheless, throughout their
lives, the two sisters remained close and loving confidantes. Compared to the royal court, where the monarch
was head of the Church, the York household was a much more secular space. For most of her life, Queen Elizabeth II cherished
a deep religious faith and took her position as the head of the Church very seriously. But during her childhood, her parents placed
far more emphasis on kindness, consideration, order, and good manners than on religious
devotion. Holidays meant large family gatherings and
Elizabeth and Margaret enjoyed summers in Scotland, and Christmases and Easters at Sandringham,
in Norfolk. They received a weekly allowance of one shilling
each and Elizabeth saved most of hers throughout the year to buy Christmas presents for her
family. Small gifts rather than extravagant ones were
preferred and the royal family still observes this tradition of simple gift-giving today
even after Elizabeth’s passing. Even in her later years the Queen enjoyed
the “white elephant” or “gag” gifts most of all. A recent biography noted a bit of whimsy that
sat on a corner of the Queen’s bathtub – a crowned rubber duck, a gift from one of her
grandchildren. During childhood Christmases at Sandringham,
Elizabeth and Margaret often received books, dolls, toy horses, and sweets. Elizabeth kept a careful list of gifts she
had received and who had given them to her, making sure to send a thank-you note to each
one. She also carefully smoothed out and saved
the wrapping paper to be re-used later, as wrapping paper was something of a luxury item
in 1930s Britain. Marion Crawford, or Crawfie as she was known,
Elizabeth and Margaret’s governess, seemed to think that the two girls lived isolated
and lonely lives. She later wrote of her concern that the princesses
did not have the opportunity to see or experience nearly enough of the real world. She wanted to take them on many more excursions
than were permitted: to ride “the tube,” or the London subway, to play in a public
park, to meet and mix with ordinary children. However, such excursions were difficult to
undertake due to the media attention that might ensue. The York princesses were simply too recognizable
to the London public. It is interesting that Crawfie did not reflect
on the fact that Elizabeth and Margaret actually did spend time with quote-unquote, “ordinary”
people all the time. In fact, they spent the bulk of their time
with Ruby, Bobo, Mrs. Knight, and Crawfie herself, all of whom came from working-class
backgrounds. In light of this, it seems doubtful that the
girls could have failed to absorb something of their sensibilities, values, and beliefs. It had been Mrs. Knight who had taught Elizabeth
to save her used wrapping paper, to be conscious of waste and ostentation. It was to Bobo and Crawfie that Elizabeth
would constantly turn, either to share her joys or her worries. Some observers and historians disagree with
Marion Crawford’s perception of the princesses as lonely and isolated. While they concede that the girls generally
did not get many opportunities to meet ordinary children, they point out that they were permitted
to play with plenty of children from “their own set.” This included the children of extended family
members and children of the aristocracy. And while Crawfie’s descriptions of the
princesses portrayed them as mostly down-to-earth, other writers have emphasized that Elizabeth
and Margaret were ultimately never in doubt of their status. They were, after all, curtsied to by almost
everyone after their father became King. And, as many children do when they believe
they can get away with it, they sometimes did not hesitate to remind their playmates
of their right to get their own way. As close-knit as the family was, their social
dynamics could be as complex as those of any other family. Margaret’s outgoing and affectionate nature
resulted in a close relationship with her parents that Elizabeth might have envied. Additionally, as the elder daughter, the expectations
of Elizabeth were higher, and became increasingly so as the family’s proximity to the throne
shifted in the ensuing years. On the other hand, Elizabeth had a stronger
affinity with other members of the royal family as a child, including her grandparents, King
George V and Queen Mary, than Margaret did. The sensible and pragmatic Queen Mary felt
a special kinship to her eldest granddaughter, whose personality and outlook on life strongly
resembled her own. Members of the family were often impatient
with Margaret, seeing her as having a “difficult character,” distrusting her conspicuous
high-spiritedness, her frankness, and her passion. Reserved, neat, practical, and dignified,
Elizabeth had more in common with her grandparents. Despite the difficult dynamics that seemed
to afflict all families, Elizabeth and Margaret had a relatively happy childhood, and a surprisingly
quiet, slow, and predictable one considering their status as royals. The fact that Elizabeth, nor those around
here, ever expected her to be the Queen of Britain is evident from the approach to her
education. With Crawfie, she and Margaret studied English
literature and history. In subsequent years, they received regular
lessons from a French instructor, but this was largely the extent of their formal academic
training in their earlier years. King George V was opposed to the idea of the
princesses attending school and his sons David and Bertie agreed. They believed there were too many public relations
pitfalls involved. For example, which school should they choose
and how could they avoid offending other educational institutions? How could the princesses pursue a normal education
while being constantly singled out and scrutinized? Additionally, Bertie remembered his own awkward
and painful experiences of being bullied at school, of being pressured to succeed, and
he was eager to give his daughters an easier, more carefree childhood and to keep them sheltered
as long as possible. Although one can readily understand his protective
impulse, Bertie almost certainly underestimated his daughters. Even as young girls, they were far more confident
and self-possessed than Bertie had been at their age, and both might have benefitted
greatly from being able to attend school and receive a more varied and challenging education. There was at the time, however, a significant
amount of social pressure not to educate aristocratic women to be scholars or intellectuals. One did not want to be labeled a “bluestocking,”
a derogatory term for an educated woman who ought to prefer a more traditional female
role. Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was initially in favour
of sending the girls to school, but ultimately came to agree with the other senior royals. After all, she herself had also been educated
at home by a governess. Throughout each week, the princesses attended
to their lessons daily but usually did not study for more than two or three hours. Additionally, the Duke and Duchess of York
often thought little of interrupting schoolroom activities in favour of family fun time, a
habit that worried the princesses’ governess. Crawfie privately believed that Elizabeth
and Margaret should have a more rigorous education, but her position in service to the royal family
did not permit her to criticize Bertie and Elizabeth’s approach to educating their
children. Crawfie managed to discreetly bring the matter
to the attention of Queen Mary, who heartily agreed that her granddaughters should have
the most varied education possible, even if under informal circumstances. Queen Mary began to take the girls on regular
outings herself to museums, galleries, and historic sites. In addition to their studies in the schoolroom,
Elizabeth and Margaret received piano, voice, and dance lessons. The naturally charismatic Margaret proved
to be especially talented in the performative arts. She was a natural mimic with a facility for
accents, had a lovely singing voice, and a hilarious knack for comic timing. Famed writer and performer Noel Coward once
observed that had Princess Margaret been permitted to pursue a career in the theatre, she undoubtedly
would have been an enormous success. Elizabeth could play piano decently enough,
but she was far less interested in the arts than Margaret. Interestingly, the sisters also got the chance
to learn and practice domestic arts. They had a child-sized cottage playhouse on
the grounds of their weekend retreat at Royal Lodge, a gift to the princesses from the people
of Wales. Everything was in miniature, but the little
house was stocked with every convenience including hot running water and modern appliances, and
even a wireless set. The girls loved their cottage, and the British
public was charmed by descriptions of the York princesses learning to cook and keep
house, a down-to-earth and inspiring image of royalty in Depression-era Britain. In January 1936, when Elizabeth was nine years
old, her seemingly idyllic and carefree childhood came to an end when her grandfather King George
V died. Elizabeth was deeply saddened by his loss,
but, as Crawfie later wrote admiringly, “she seemed determined to go through it all without
making any fuss.” On the day of George V’s funeral, while
watching the King’s body being loaded onto a train at Paddington Station, Elizabeth stood
silently while dozens in the crowd openly wept. The year following the King’s death was
a strange one for Elizabeth and Margaret and for their parents. There had been fewer and fewer visits from
Uncle David in the last few years, and now they stopped altogether, now that he had automatically
ascended to the throne as King Edward VIII. Edward’s conduct, both before and after
he became King, was troubling to most members of the royal and parliamentary establishment. Such matters were almost certainly never discussed
in front of Elizabeth, but she could probably sense the tension within her own family. Most of the new king’s romantic entanglements
in recent years tended to be with married or divorced women, which complicated his new
status as head of the Church of England. Divorce was largely forbidden by the Church,
except in very select cases of neglect, abuse, or infidelity. Even in these cases, couples were still encouraged
to try to “work it out,” or “come to some arrangement.” Because Edward was destined to become the
head of the Church, which frowned to such an extent on divorce, his relationships in
the past had been controversial. But Edward’s most recent relationship and
the one which he was still involved in when he became king in January 1936, with Mrs.
Wallis Simpson, an American socialite and divorcee who was still married to her second
husband while having an affair with Edward, was scandalous by the standards of the time. Nevertheless, Edward was determined to marry
her, but most members of the British political establishment were overwhelmingly opposed. Ultimately, Edward VIII would choose to abdicate
rather than give up his relationship with Mrs. Simpson. On the 7th of December 1936, the king summoned
Bertie to his house at Fort Belvedere and delivered the news that he had decided to
abdicate the throne. Although Albert was aware that this was a
possibility for some time, he was still devastated by the news. “I’m quite unprepared for it,” he later
confided to his wife. “David’s been trained all his life. I’m only a naval officer, it’s the only
thing I know about.” Though she was deeply worried for her husband
and family, Elizabeth tried to comfort him. “We must take what is coming to us and make
the best of it” she said. It is eminently clear that her eldest daughter
inherited her legendarily “stiff upper lip” from her family. Less than a week after the abdication, when
Bertie returned home from the Accession Council, Elizabeth and Margaret curtsied to their father
for the first time. Their darling “Papa” was now the King. Margaret asked her older sister: “Does this
mean that you will be the Queen one day?” Elizabeth replied gravely and quietly: “Yes,
I suppose it does.” “Poor you,” Margaret said in commiseration. Elizabeth was now her father’s heir-presumptive. The family had to leave their home at 145
Piccadilly, though admittedly they were moving into the plusher surroundings of Buckingham
Palace, the main royal palace in London. Bertie’s transition to being King George
VI, the regnal name he adopted to establish continuity from his father, George V’s reign,
was stressful for the whole family. Bertie and Elizabeth now had far greater responsibilities
and worries, and it became much more difficult for the family to find time to be together. Part of the problem was simply the sheer size
of Buckingham Palace. “People here need bicycles,” ten-year-old
Lilibet observed when they first moved in of those who had to travel between different
parts of the palace grounds. Indeed, it was a substantially long walk from
one end of the palace to the other, and the new King and Queen, with their dramatically
increased duties, had far less time to spend with their daughters in the nursery. They tried to compensate by spending as many
full weekends and holidays as possible at Royal Lodge, where they could play games,
picnic, and ride horses together as a family. But now that he was King, Bertie’s work
never really stopped. Even on the weekends, he only had a few hours
to spend with his family before he inevitably had to get back to his daily “red box”
of state papers. The immensity of Buckingham Palace made adjusting
to their new home difficult in other ways as well. The kitchens were about a half hour’s walk
from the rooms where the royal family actually dined, so the food was constantly served cold. Many rooms were chilly and damp, some with
cracked walls. Some pieces of furniture were a hundred years
old or more and the palace had an aggravatingly persistent rodent infestation. Crawfie was distinctly underwhelmed, not only
by the condition of the palace but also its lack of warmth. “Life in a palace resembles camping in a
museum,” she later wrote. There was also now a good deal less privacy
for the family, who were shadowed constantly by detectives and bodyguards. Such is the lot of being a member of the royal
family, no matter how attractive a prospect it might look from the outside. On the 12th of May 1937, Elizabeth attended
her parents’ coronation at Westminster Abbey and received her first intimation of what
lay in store for her as Queen one day. She sat with her sister Margaret and her grandmother
Queen Mary and watched the proceedings, at first, with fascination. Mindful of her position as his heir presumptive,
Bertie tasked his eldest daughter with writing a detailed account of the coronation, which
today rests in the royal archives. Elizabeth was impressed by the beauty, majesty,
and seeming magic of the service, and she observed that the Abbey itself seemed suspended
in “a haze of wonder.” As the coronation ritual stretched on and
on, however, she became impatient. “The service got rather boring as it was
all prayers,” she later wrote. Anxious to know when it would be over, she
quietly flipped through her program. She then discreetly nudged Queen Mary and
pointed out the word “finis”, meaning ‘the end’ in Latin, on the last page of
her program, and she and her grandmother smiled conspiratorially at one another. The following year, Elizabeth began to attend
private classes at Eton College with the Vice-Provost, Sir Henry Martin. In order to prepare her for her future role
as Queen, she studied constitutional law and the history of the monarchy. Martin emphasized strongly that the secret
of a successful monarchy is adaptability. He pointed to the ongoing collapse of ancient
royal houses, and asserted that the British monarchy had largely forestalled a similar
fate by drawing back the curtain of mystery, allowing themselves to become more accessible
to the public, and by being receptive to public opinion. This contrasted with France where an aloof
and largely uncaring royal establishment in the eighteenth century had been brought to
a shuddering and ultimately bloody end with the French Revolution. By way of contrast Elizabeth’s grandfather,
King George V, cognizant of the anti-German sentiment among the people during the First
World War years, changed the royal family’s name by proclamation in 1917, from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
to Windsor. While this did nothing to erase the King’s
heritage, or make people forget the fact that Kaiser Wilhelm was, in fact, his first cousin,
it was a powerful statement of King George V’s identity as a British king, a leader
and defender of his people. Another key aspect of Sir Henry Martin’s
instruction was his emphasis on the importance of broadcasting, which, since the reign of
George V, has remained one of the primary means the royal family uses to connect with
the public, from radio in George’s time to television speeches, interviews and in-depth
documentary films in more recent decades. When their father ascended the throne, Elizabeth
and Margaret were still very young, and because of their dramatic status change, they were
now destined to live their lives in an even more rarified atmosphere than the one into
which they had been born. There was concern within the family that,
in consequence, the girls might become even more isolated. Bertie’s younger sister Princess Mary, who
was honorary president of the Girl Guides, suggested they might like to join a guide
troupe. There were, of course, major issues with this
proposal, similar to the ones that had prevented the princesses from attending school. How could their security be ensured without
restricting their experience? Would they be accepted in a cooperative, egalitarian
group like the Girl Guides, in light of who they were? Would any accommodations to the princesses
be viewed as preferential treatment? Finally, it was decided that a special troupe
would be formed consisting of relatives and the daughters of the aristocracy. Margaret, who was not yet old enough for the
Girl Guides, was admitted to the troupe as a “Brownie.” Twenty girls roughly Elizabeth’s age met
regularly at Buckingham Palace beginning in 1937. They went on treks and explorations within
the palace’s extensive grounds, earned merit badges, and cooked sausages over an open fire. In later years Elizabeth would speak warmly
and nostalgically of her experience as a Girl Guide and she continued to support the organization
and its values throughout her long reign. During the summer of 1939, the King and Queen,
accompanied by their daughters, paid a visit to the Royal Naval College. It was there that Elizabeth met Prince Philip
of Greece and Denmark for the first time. Philip was her distant cousin and also a descendant
of Queen Victoria. He had been named “Best Cadet” during
his first year at Dartmouth. He was outgoing, funny, and already rather
sophisticated at eighteen years old. He received the King and Queen warmly and
played with Elizabeth and Margaret during their visit. Elizabeth admired his confidence and handsomeness
a great deal, but she was just thirteen and still had her braces on. It would be quite a few years before Philip
would come to see her as a young woman rather than a child. Philip’s uncle and closest male mentor,
Louis Mountbatten, Bertie’s cousin, was especially eager to encourage ongoing interactions
between his nephew and the future Queen, seemingly anxious to have some influence over the next
generation of royals. Throughout 1938 and 1939, London began to
transform in anticipation of a potential war with Germany as the Nazis became ever more
aggressive in their pursuit of land in Central Europe, annexing Austria first, then the Sudetenland
and finally Czechoslovakia. Anti-aircraft batteries were installed, bomb
shelters were constructed, and gas masks were issued to tense and dismayed citizens. When war was finally declared in September
1939, Elizabeth and Margaret began to listen as closely to the wireless as the rest of
the British public, hoping for good news. Crawfie read them the newspapers daily, but
she made efforts to edit out whatever she believed to be too shocking. Elizabeth, in turn, tried to shield Margaret
from news and information about the war that she thought would upset her. Elizabeth was encouraged to try to continue
as normal, but she was as eager to contribute to the war effort and “do her bit” in
the unfolding crisis as were many young people of her generation. She and Margaret organized weekly sewing parties
in their schoolroom during the fall of 1939 and the spring of 1940 to produce goods for
the war effort. The King and Queen insisted that they and
their daughters should follow the rationing requirements, although they still enjoyed
the privileges of having game from their own estate and fresh produce from the gardens. During the autumn of 1940, the princesses
were secretly sent to live at Windsor Castle for the duration of the war, since it was
the most well-defended royal residence. This was in keeping with government policy
which saw London emptied of the vast majority of its children and elderly people during
the Blitz, the bombing campaign by the Germans between the autumn of 1940 and the early summer
of 1941. Bertie and Elizabeth made an effort to spend
as many weekends as possible at Windsor, but because they remained at Buckingham Palace
for most of the week, it was a worrisome and confining adjustment for two young girls. There were blackout curtains at every window,
lights were kept as low as possible, and a small group of carefully-chosen soldiers stood
guard, ready to take the princesses to an undisclosed safe house should an attack occur. The British media, as anxious as the government
to protect the princesses, made no effort to uncover or expose their whereabouts. Newspapers reported only that they were safe
and staying at an undisclosed location “somewhere in the country.” For five years, Elizabeth and Margaret tried
to carry on as normal, attending to their lessons daily, but there were now all kinds
of new and frightening realities to confront, including preparation for air raids. They tried to distract themselves by exploring
the castle and playing hide and seek. The staff tried to keep them as occupied as
possible and treated them kindly. They invited the princesses to tea parties
with cakes and biscuits baked by the mothers and sisters of the guards, and the King’s
librarian took them down to the underground vaults of Windsor Castle to see the Crown
Jewels. Knowing the Nazis’ reputation for plundering
cities like Vienna and Paris that they had conquered, these historic treasures had been
hidden from potential invaders along with innumerable other important artifacts and
pieces of art from British museums and galleries. The British newspapers praised the fortitude
of the princesses in their isolated life, noting that they obeyed rationing, kept their
gas masks clean and near at hand, and planted a “victory garden” in which they grew
fresh vegetables for themselves. The Blitz began across southern England during
the summer of 1940. Like the rest of the people of London who
found it near impossible to sleep during the bombings, Elizabeth and Margaret tried to
stay calm during air raids. They would hurry down into the dungeons of
Windsor Castle and try to distract themselves by reading, singing, or telling stories. By the end of the war, the Germans had dropped
no less than three hundred bombs around the great park of Windsor Castle, just a small
fraction of the tens of thousands of bombs which rained down across England during the
conflict. On the thirteenth of October 1940, fourteen-year-old
Elizabeth gave her first public speech on the wireless during Children’s Hour on the
BBC, in which she offered comfort and encouragement to all of the children displaced by the War. The future queen stated, “We know, every
one of us, that in the end all will be well; for God will care for us and give us victory
and peace. And when peace comes, remember it will be
for us, the children of today to make the world of tomorrow a better and happier place. My sister is by my side and we are both going
to say goodnight to you. Come on, Margaret.” Then came Margaret’s higher and unmistakable
younger tone: “Goodnight children.” The broadcast was an international sensation,
particularly in North America where many British evacuees were sheltering. Hundreds of schools and churches throughout
the United States and Canada installed wireless technology just to hear the Princess’ speech,
and the BBC received numerous requests to repeat the broadcast. London may have been devastated by the Blitz,
but Hitler had utterly failed to weaken British morale, and he then foolishly began to turn
his attention to Russia believing that Britain would soon decide to negotiate peace terms
with the Nazis. He was wrong. It was during the last few years of World
War II that Elizabeth came of age and began to assert her independence. This assertion was more subtle in Elizabeth
than in other young women. She was, overall, dutiful and eager to please
her parents, but she nonetheless had her own convictions and a will of her own. Bertie and Elizabeth were not keen to see
their daughter grow up too quickly. Above all, they wanted to forestall the moment
when their family, “us four,” would be separated. From a public relations standpoint, both the
royal establishment and the media continued to treat and portray Elizabeth as a child. Even at aged 16 or 17, Elizabeth might still
be dressed in an outfit that matched Margaret’s, who was over four years younger. Elizabeth also continued to live in the nursery
wing and complete her lessons daily with Crawfie. It was not until her eighteenth birthday that
she was finally given her own suite of rooms outside of the nursery. In anticipation of her future role as Queen,
she was also made a councilor of state. Her parents began to give her more royal duties,
including giving speeches at public functions and serving in charitable organizations. However, for Elizabeth, this was not enough. Having come of age in the midst of a calamitous
war, she was, like many members of her generation, highly practical. She and Margaret had covertly and longingly
watched debutante balls as children, but much as she had looked forward to a more traditional
entry to adulthood, the current crisis was so much more important. Like others who grew up during the war, she
was a strong believer in fairness and collective responsibility and she yearned to play a greater
part in the War effort. “I ought to do as other girls of my age
do,” she said. Many of her young aristocratic cousins were
already doing their bit for the country, fighting in the field, caring for the sick and wounded
in hospitals, and working in transportation or logistics for the war effort. Elizabeth wanted to play her part also. So, when she turned 16 in April 1942, she
promptly signed on at the Labour Exchange, but was not offered work. It is unclear why. Her status may well have been seen as a potentially
problematic distraction, but the King’s influence may also have played a part. Finally, a month before her nineteenth birthday,
Elizabeth was permitted to join the Auxiliary Territorial Service, the women’s branch
of the British Army. Elizabeth’s service in the ATS was viewed
by many as highly effective propaganda and a morale booster for the British, but the
princess’ experience of service was very different. “It was the only time I had been able to
test myself against people of the same age,” she said later. In March of 1945, Elizabeth began training
as a driver and a mechanic. She worked hard and eventually became adept
at the job, able to disassemble and reassemble an engine quickly and successfully. And yet, like her Girl Guide troupe, a certain
amount of authentic experience remained out of her reach. Quote-unquote “normal” interactions were
made extraordinarily difficult simply because of who she was. Moreover, Bertie only finally allowed his
daughter to enlist, when he knew that the war would be over in mere weeks, with victory
assured when the German campaign in the east against the Soviet Union had failed and new
fronts were opened in southern and western Europe. Elizabeth was not the sort to confront or
fight, but she had a quiet determination to assert her independence and to be her own
person. This is most apparent in her choice to marry
Prince Philip, which was probably the first decision she ever made without consulting
her parents. While Elizabeth remained at Windsor Castle
throughout the war, Philip’s naval service took him to the Mediterranean and the Pacific. He continued to write to Elizabeth and visited
the royal family several times throughout the duration of the war, when he was on leave. Elizabeth seemed to fall more and more in
love with him each time he visited. While Philip was flattered by the young princess’
attention, he still mostly saw her as a child. Yet, he was very fond of her, as he was fond
of her whole family. Bertie, Elizabeth and their daughters had
a closeness that was very attractive to Philip, who had spent much of his childhood lonely
and separated from his own family. He was invited to spend Christmas with the
Windsors in 1943 and Elizabeth bustled excitedly around the nursery. “You know who’s coming this Christmas,
don’t you Crawfie?” she asked happily. After another stay at the palace during the
summer of 1944, Philip appeared to change his mind about Elizabeth. The two were very different people, but that
was perhaps, part of the attraction. He was sophisticated, opinionated, and often
painfully irreverent, whereas she was innocent and demure. But she was also unfailingly faithful, dependable,
and honest as few people in his life had been. And Elizabeth may have found Philip’s tendency
towards plain-speaking refreshing. He certainly said and did things that Elizabeth
could not, but perhaps sometimes wished to. Following Philip’s visit, his uncle, Lord
Mountbatten, known affectionately to the royal family as “Dickie,” promptly broached
the subject of Philip’s marriage to Elizabeth with the King and Queen. Bertie and Elizabeth initially had numerous
reservations about Philip, particularly regarding his temperament, his reputed way with women,
his rebelliousness, and his family’s partial German heritage. Additionally, they believed that Elizabeth,
at eighteen, was still too young to be betrothed. Lord Mountbatten subsequently approached other
courtiers and politicians to advocate for his nephew’s suit. Elizabeth did not display any outward resentment
that her parents were lukewarm about her relationship with Philip, but neither did she hide her
feelings from her family or household. Crawfie later wrote that the princess kept
a picture of Prince Philip displayed in her sitting room. When Crawfie inquired whether it was wise
to do so, as anyone who saw it might begin to gossip and speculate, Elizabeth realized
her governess was right and put the picture away, replacing it instead with a photograph
of the Prince with a thick and unruly beard. “There!” she said satisfied. “I defy anyone to recognize who that is!” Victory in Europe Day on the 8th of May 1945
saw greater crowds in the streets of London than anyone had ever seen before. Multitudes stood outside Buckingham Palace
cheering and calling for the royal family to emerge onto the balcony. “We want the King!” they chanted. Elizabeth stood with her parents, Margaret,
and Prime Minister Winston Churchill, proudly wearing her ATS uniform and waving to the
cheering crowds. That evening, in a burst of high spirits,
the royal family went out on to the streets of London to join the dancing and celebrating
that seemed to be going on everywhere. Elizabeth and Margaret repeated their outing
together the next night as well. “We walked for simply miles,” Elizabeth
wrote in her diary, “through Trafalgar Square, Piccadilly, Pall Mall.” The two sisters, who had grown up so sheltered,
joined their fellows before the gates of Buckingham Palace after midnight, to cheer for their
parents the King and Queen, who waved from the balcony. The evidence everywhere in London of the ravages
of war was as heartbreaking to Elizabeth and Margaret as to the rest of the city. And yet, they walked, cheered, sang, and danced
with other young Londoners who, like the princesses, had shed their childhood in a time of war. Such was the sense of unification among the
Second World War generation when what seemed then like the greatest struggle in history,
came to an end. By 1946, with the war over and England returning
to some form of normality, Elizabeth had established a more adult routine. Each morning she was awakened by Bobo, now
the Princess’ dresser rather than her nanny, who helped her get ready for the day. She attended to her correspondence and her
obligations to her various charities, and attended royal council meetings. She now had her own independent household
in Buckingham Palace, including her own receiving rooms for palace business, two ladies-in-waiting,
a footman, and a housemaid. She was also finally permitted to choose her
own clothes and decided what fashions she preferred. The Depression and the War had had their impact
on fashion. Rationing meant that each person was limited
to one outfit per year. And the struggles of the times made ostentatious
dress seem vulgar and disrespectful. Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon had taken care to dress
her daughters respectably, but simply, and the public admired that she often “made
over” some of her own garments to clothe the girls. Therefore, when Lilibet came of age, she unsurprisingly
showed little interest in high fashion, and seemed to prefer an elegant, but modest and
traditional look. Besides, she was a countrywoman at heart,
and was much more comfortable in clothes that were functional. It is therefore ironic that, as Queen, she
would ultimately prove to be an international fashion icon. The unique outfits created by her personal
staff were designed to be as distinctive and memorable as possible. Throughout her tenure as Queen, she grew to
appreciate the art and artistry of fashion and loved the bright colours and occasionally
avant-garde ensembles that were chosen for her. These amazing outfits certainly made it difficult
to lose the Queen in a crowd! During a visit to Balmoral during the summer
of 1946, Philip proposed to Elizabeth and she accepted. Her father, the King, however, insisted they
wait until after Elizabeth’s twenty-first birthday, the following spring, to announce
the engagement. Some historians speculate that this may have
been a strategy to try and keep them apart long enough for one or both of them to lose
interest. Perhaps Bertie was simply reluctant to let
his beloved Lilibet go just yet. King George VI and Queen Elizabeth took their
daughters with them on a state visit to South Africa in the spring of 1947. During this Elizabeth was warmly and enthusiastically
received by the crowds who came out to greet the royal family. The 21st of April 1947 was Elizabeth’s twenty-first
birthday. It was declared a national holiday and a great
ball was held in her honour at Capetown. Earlier that afternoon, she gave an historic
speech which was broadcast all over the empire, composed by Sir Alan Lascelles. When Elizabeth first read it, tears reportedly
filled her eyes: “I declare before you all that my whole
life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service, and the service of
our great imperial family to which we all belong. But I shall not have the strength to carry
out this resolution alone unless you join in it with me, as I now invite you to do. I know that your support will be unfailingly
given. God help me to make good my vow, and God bless
all of you who are willing to share in it.” The royal family returned to London early
in the summer of 1947. Elizabeth and Philip’s several months of
separation had seemingly had no impact on their determination to marry. In the weeks following her return, she was
often seen out and about with Philip, in the passenger seat of his black MG sports car. On the 8th of July, they announced their engagement. The prospect of having a full-blown and public
royal wedding was something of a public relations gamble during the immediate post-war period. On the one hand, it might bolster British
morale at a time when rationing was still in force and the economy was still recovering
from the long war effort. But conversely, the expense of a royal wedding
could be perceived as totally out of touch with the difficult economic situation confronting
the country. In the end, the British public seemed excited
at the prospect of a royal wedding. Numerous ordinary citizens and well-wishers
donated their clothing ration coupons to help produce the bride’s wedding dress, which
was designed by Norman Hartnell in ivory satin with a fifteen-foot train, with the white
roses of York painstakingly stitched in pearls. Prior to their wedding, Philip renounced his
German surname and his Greek and Danish titles, becoming simply Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten. King George VI then admitted Philip into the
Order of the Garter, reserved for the closest and most trusted companions to the sovereign,
and conferred on him the title of “His Royal Highness, Duke of Edinburgh.” On the 20th of November 1947, Elizabeth and
Philip were finally married with great celebration at Westminster Abbey. From all over the world, the couple received
over ten thousand congratulatory telegrams and nearly three thousand wedding gifts. Two thousand people attended a public reception
just to see the couple’s wedding gifts displayed. The next few years were happy and contented
ones for Elizabeth and Philip. The King gifted them with the royal residence
of Clarence House next to St. James’ Palace, and the newlyweds spent time renovating and
improving it for themselves and their growing family. On the fourteenth of November 1948, just six
days before their first wedding anniversary, Elizabeth gave birth to her first child, Prince
Charles. The following year, on the fifteenth of August,
she and Philip were blessed again, this time with a daughter, Princess Anne. Beginning in 1948, Philip was stationed in
Malta, and despite the birth of two children and her royal duties and responsibilities,
Elizabeth tended to give priority to being at her husband’s side during the early years
of her marriage, even if her children remained in England. Charles took his first steps without either
of his parents there to witness the milestone, just as Elizabeth had spoken her first word
with only Mrs. Knight, Bobo, and Ruby to tell the tale. Elizabeth made efforts to spend at least an
hour with her children every morning and at least another hour between bath time and bedtime. When they did not accompany their parents
abroad, Charles and Anne were left in the care of their nannies at Clarence House, or
stayed with their grandparents, the King and Queen, when they went to Sandringham. While some have criticized Queen Elizabeth
for this approach to motherhood, it is worth noting that her own mother and father had
parented Elizabeth and Margaret in much the same way, and still considered themselves
a close family. In 1950, Marion Crawford published The Little
Princesses to the shock and dismay of the entire royal family. Crawfie had remained one of Lilibet’s closest
confidantes, even after her retirement as governess in 1947. Ms. Crawford had approached Queen Elizabeth
for permission to publish the memoir, and the Queen had refused, horrified by the notion. The publication went ahead regardless and
became an immediate best-seller, netting over £75,000. The Windsors felt utterly betrayed. They severed all ties with Ms. Crawford and
never communicated with her again. From then on, the royal family would refer
to anyone who wrote a royal memoir as “doing a Crawfie.” By the standards of the modern “tell-all”
memoir, The Little Princesses is an overwhelmingly idealized, sentimental, and flattering portrait
of two children Marion Crawford obviously loved dearly following her long years working
with them. But in 1950, it seemed to be a gross and vulgar
violation of the royal family’s privacy and a betrayal of the trust they had placed
in their children’s beloved governess. Since then, the royal family has had many
more people who have worked closely with them “do a Crawfie,” and sharing human and
relatable details about the royal family has become increasingly less objectionable over
time. The royal family themselves have done so several
times since the 1970s. Queen Elizabeth permitted the creation of
two family documentaries, allowing camera crews and production staff into royal residences. Several biographies of Queen Elizabeth and
Prince Philip were published during their lifetimes, particularly so from the 1990s
onwards. By 1951, it became clear that Elizabeth and
Philip’s rather carefree days as a married couple would be coming to an end sooner than
expected. The health of King George VI was precarious. He had contracted lung cancer after years
of chronic smoking, forcing his doctors to remove one of his lungs and he suffered from
various associated ailments. Elizabeth and Philip had to take on far more
royal duties during the king’s illness, and finally, Philip was forced to give up
his naval career. In October, they departed for a royal tour
of the United States and Canada on the King’s behalf. And in January of 1952, they undertook another
major tour, the first stop on which was Kenya. Bertie saw his daughter and son-in-law off
at the airport. It was the last time he would see Elizabeth. King George VI, known to his family as Bertie,
died quietly in his sleep a week later. It was dawn in Nyeri, Kenya, and Elizabeth
was up early, watching the sunrise at a lookout point at the famed Treetops Hotel. Speaking years later to a biographer, former
royal Equerry Mike Parker described a moment of peace and wonder that morning when a magnificent
eagle appeared and hovered above them. “I never thought about it until later,”
he said, “but that was roughly the time when the king died.” Elizabeth’s private secretary, Martin Chartres,
heard the news about the King’s death at a local hotel. He quickly telephoned Mike Parker at Sagana
Lodge where Elizabeth and Philip were staying, and asked him to inform the new Queen of what
had happened. Parker, who couldn’t bear to tell her, asked
Philip to speak to her instead. Philip took his wife into the garden to give
her the terrible news. Elizabeth appeared to pace up and down the
garden agitatedly, but when she came back inside, she was calm. She apologized to her staff for the lack of
notice but said they would have to leave as soon as possible. By the time Chartres arrived, her face was
flushed but she was otherwise composed, writing letters of apology for the abrupt end to the
tour and the necessity of cancelling multiple engagements. Before they departed, Chartres asked her what
regnal name she would choose. Sovereigns often choose a name that shows
continuity with the past or reverence for a certain line of rulers. Elizabeth preferred to keep things simpler. When asked what her regnal name would be,
she replied: “My own name, Elizabeth, of course. What else?” It was a fitting beginning to the straight-forward,
no nonsense reign of Queen Elizabeth II. When Elizabeth returned to London in February
1952, her grandmother, Queen Mary, promptly paid her a visit at Clarence House, insisting
that she, “her old granny and subject, must be the first to kiss her hand.” Elizabeth was shocked and deeply affected
by the reverence and it brought home the reality of her new position to her even more forcefully. The next morning, she addressed the accession
council at St. James’ Palace, affirming in her speech her desire to serve dutifully. When her father had been crowned King, he
had been hailed as both King and Emperor, but in the light of the ongoing collapse of
Britain’s colonial empire, his daughter was styled “Queen of the United Kingdom,
the Head of the Commonwealth, and Queen of her other realms and territories.” This distinction is not necessarily immediately
apparent, but it was an important one, signifying that the British monarch was no longer the
ruler of an empire, but an honorary Queen of individual dominions which would each have
the right to decide their own degree of affiliation and commitment to the Commonwealth. A little over a year later, on the 2nd of
June 1952, Elizabeth’s coronation was held in Westminster Abbey. In a notable break with precedent, it was
the first time that a coronation for a British sovereign had ever been broadcast live. Officials had reacted with horror in previous
decades to the notion of allowing full public consumption of such momentous events in Westminster
Abbey. A live broadcast had been suggested for the
coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in 1937, but the Archbishop of Canterbury
had hotly rejected the proposition, claiming that ordinary people could not be trusted
to show the proper reverence. The Archbishop was particularly disturbed
at the idea that people might be able listen to the sacred service while drinking in their
local pub – and with their hats on! The Duke of Edinburgh, who chaired the planning
committee, was strongly in favour of televising the coronation, making the monarch more accessible
to the people in a modern way. The committee finally agreed, but insisted
that the camera pan away from the ceremony during the anointing and communion. Elizabeth wore an exquisite ivory satin gown,
which, according to her instructions, was minutely embroidered with the floral emblems
of every country in the Commonwealth. After taking the coronation oath, she was
anointed, invested with regalia, and crowned to cheers of “God save the Queen!” The crowds outside the abbey erupted in celebration
and millions of people across Britain who were watching the event on television cheered
along with them. Thousands of households and businesses had
purchased or rented television sets just to see the coronation. From the point that she ascended the throne
in 1952, the central challenge of Queen Elizabeth’s life was to keep personal and family life
firmly compartmentalized from her life and duty as the monarch. Unfortunately, this proved to be an immensely
difficult goal to achieve and was no doubt the cause of great pain and regret to her
over the years, because her duty as Queen had to always come first. Because of her unique position, she could
rarely express her opinions, for fear of potentially sparking a constitutional crisis. She had to be endlessly diplomatic. During the decades following her accession,
the monarchy faced successive challenges including public interrogations of its cost to taxpayers
and questions about its real utility in the modern world. In addition, public fascination with scandals
within the personal lives of the royal family threatened to undermine their legitimacy. The late Queen was often praised for the manner
in which she approached these crises, with her first priority being her position as Head
of State, of the Church, and the Commonwealth. Others criticized her approach to her family’s
personal struggles, and asserted that she could have been a better mother to her children,
or a better sister to Margaret, even if that meant potentially compromising her duty as
Queen. After her sister’s coronation, Princess
Margaret was waiting for her carriage in front of the Abbey when a photographer noticed her
picking a piece of lint off a man’s jacket, that of her father’s equerry, Group Captain
Peter Townsend. Before long, speculation about their relationship
developed into a media frenzy. Elizabeth was reportedly sympathetic to her
sister’s situation, and wished for her to be happy. She had never liked taking sides, so she did
not initially encourage or discourage Margaret in her relationship with Townsend. Unfortunately, Townsend was divorced and his
wife was still living, and therefore, the Anglican Church would not consent to marry
them. Margaret moreover, was third in line to the
throne, and the shadow of the abdication still loomed large in the early post-war period. The royal family and those who worked most
closely with them asked the couple to delay a formal engagement, perhaps hoping that their
feelings for one another would wane. Sadly, they did not, and rather than forfeit
her title, her income, or be forced to live abroad, Margaret and Peter mutually called
off their engagement. Several years later, Princess Margaret married
the photographer, Anthony Armstrong-Jones, with whom she had two children, Sarah and
David. The couple divorced in 1976. Things were chilly not only between the Queen
and her sister in the early years of her reign, but seemingly between herself and her husband
also. Philip had not adjusted well to being the
husband of the Queen of England. Having to give up his naval career had been
a bitter disappointment and he found the endless round of royal duties – of ribbon-cutting,
handshaking, and speechmaking – extraordinarily tiresome. He was accustomed to a much more active life
and it was difficult for him to adjust to being a supporting act for the Queen. By 1957, American newspapers began to gossip
about Philip and the supposedly questionable company he kept at the Thursday Club, a men’s
lunch club featuring a who’s who of politics, finance, and the arts in Soho. Rumours of indiscreet behaviour by Philip
and those accompanying him on the 1957 royal tour began to spread also. The palace denied the rumours. Eventually Philip did manage to carve out
a niche for himself and settle into his royal duties. An endlessly curious and adventurous man,
he remained particularly interested in being a patron for science, technology, sports,
and education initiatives. In 1957, Elizabeth made him a “Prince”
of the United Kingdom through letters patent, to thank him for his service to the Crown
and the Commonwealth. He was not given the title of King Consort
or Prince Consort due to overwhelming political opposition. Elizabeth’s position as a female monarch
was by no means unprecedented but it was still a delicate one, especially in light of her
wedding vows to “love, honour, and obey” her husband, which was the still the conventional
wording in the middle of the twentieth century. Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip eventually
developed into a cohesive and effective team, and she described him on multiple occasions
during their lifetimes as her “strength and stay.” The decades they faced together certainly
did call for both strength and stability. The royal couple welcomed two more children
in the next few years: Prince Andrew was born on the 19th of February 1960 and Prince Edward,
four years later on the 10th of March 1964. Prince Philip was firm in his insistence that
their children be permitted to go to senior school with ordinary young people. Charles, Andrew and Edward attended their
father’s alma mater, Gordonstoun in Scotland, and Anne attended Benenden School in Kent. They grew up nowhere near as sheltered as
their mother had, and as a result, grew into more worldly young adults than Elizabeth had
been when she first entered her adult years. There has been a great deal of disagreement
among observers and biographers about the Queen’s performance as a mother. Charles collaborated in a biographical publication
during the early 1990s which sometimes painted Elizabeth as cold and distant, and at other
times affectionate, but not enough inclined to interfere when she should. The impression was given that, as a result,
her children were all rather lost. Some biographers disagree with this perspective,
pointing out that Elizabeth, despite the rigors of her position, spent as much, if not more
time with her children than most of the aristocratic women of her acquaintance. Speaking to a royal biographer in the early
2000s, all that Prince Philip would say for the record was: “We did our best.” The 1960s saw the beginning of an unprecedented
increase in criticism and satire directed at the monarchy. Only a few years earlier, making fun of members
of parliament or the royal family in public would have been viewed as shamefully disrespectful. But by the 60s, British comedians regularly
began to poke fun at their political elites, especially comedians with republican or progressive
leanings, and British newspapers were far less reticent about publishing items injurious
to their authority figures. In 1969, Prince Philip gave an interview on
American television lamenting the financial situation of the royal family. His references to the exorbitantly expensive
upkeep of palaces and yachts fell flat and were perceived as totally out of touch in
a Britain which still had not achieved a full economic recovery from the Second World War. Commentators began to look much more closely
at the royal family’s income from the Civil List payments, and the cost to the taxpayer. There was increased scrutiny of the fact that
the Queen paid no estate or income tax, and was not required to disclose any details about
her private fortune or finances. At the time, the Queen’s personal fortune
was probably not more than £12,000,000. Her personal fortune however grew much greater. She inherited approximately £70,000,000 from
the Queen Mother’s estate in 2002, but what her total net worth was is difficult to calculate
because many royal resources such as residences, artifacts, and regalia, actually belong to
the nation. In the early 1990s, Queen Elizabeth and Prince
Philip announced that they would begin paying taxes on their personal income. In the 1970s, the royal family began to work
with younger and more modern press officials, and new innovations were introduced to increase
public accessibility to the monarchy. The Royal Walkabout was first introduced in
the course of a royal visit to Australia, during which the Queen undertook a street
visit that was not on the official itinerary to meet people, shake hands with them, and
chat a little. The public responded warmly and positively
to the practice, and it became a permanent and regular event during royal visits all
over the world. In 1977, Queen Elizabeth marked twenty-five
years on the throne with her Silver Jubilee celebrations. The city of London hosted more than six thousand
street parties. The Queen’s popularity had remained consistently
high despite greater expectations of accountability from the public. The Queen made a very successful visit to
Northern Ireland, which was encouraging considering the region had been embroiled in sectarian
conflict since the late 1960s. But the Northern Ireland Troubles struck much
closer to home during the next few years, and was the first in a fairly rapid succession
of dangerous incidents that put the safety of the royal family and those who served them
at risk. In 1979, Lord Mountbatten and his grandson
were killed in a bombing in Ireland for which the IRA, the Irish Republican Army, claimed
responsibility. Similarly deadly attacks were carried out
on several of the Queen’s household cavalry and military musicians at Hyde Park in London,
in 1982. At the annual Trooping of the Colour ceremony
celebrating the Queen’s birthday in 1981, seventeen-year-old Marcus Sarjeant fired six
shots at the Queen, which thankfully, turned out to be blanks. Mounted sidesaddle on her horse Burmese, Elizabeth
was startled, but she recovered quickly enough to effectively soothe her horse and the public
admired her grace under pressure. Only months later, on a visit to Dunedin,
New Zealand, seventeen-year-old Christopher Lewis tried to shoot the Queen with a rifle
from the fifth floor of a building overlooking a parade in her honour. Thankfully, he missed. Both of these would-be assassins faced charges
and jail time. The security of Buckingham Palace itself was
called into question in July of 1982 when it was revealed that a man named Michael Fagan
had somehow managed, without any sort of special equipment or ability, to breach the palace’s
defenses, travel through the corridors unseen and then walk right into the Queen’s bedroom. Multiple and differing accounts of this event
exist, so exactly what happened is still somewhat unclear. But apparently, Fagan simply walked in and
opened the Queen’s curtains. Startled by the intruder, she reportedly pressed
the button next to her bed to summon her staff, but the bell was either broken or simply went
unheard. It seems she managed to slip out of the bedroom
while Fagan was looking around for a cigarette lighter. There was fascinated speculation that the
two might have even had a conversation, as some believed that Fagan had been in the Queen’s
bedroom for as long as ten minutes. Fagan however, speaking to several newspapers
years later, denied that they discussed anything, stating that the Queen had simply run out
of the room at the first opportunity. Such threats to her safety was a reality that
Queen Elizabeth had to face quite frequently throughout her life, but commendably, it did
not curb her willingness to remain accessible to the public. She continued to perform her royal duties
very much in the open. Protecting the Queen during her walkabouts,
for example, was ultimately very difficult, but Elizabeth refused to be intimidated. She was also determined to preserve a sphere
of privacy and comfort for herself and her family, and traditionally opposed measures
that threatened to violate it. Queen Elizabeth worked with no fewer than
fourteen Prime Ministers, but the Thatcher years were particularly interesting for her
from a political standpoint. Margaret Thatcher was not just Britain’s
first female Prime Minister, but she was also the first Elizabeth had worked with who was
her own age. One might imagine that this political relationship
would have been among the Queen’s most harmonious and successful, but multiple biographers and
historians believe that it was not. The Queen was far too devoted to constitutional
norms ever to break the confidentiality of her weekly meetings with Britain’s top elected
official, or to criticize a Prime Minister openly, which she never did. Historians speculate that the strongest division
between the two women may have emerged over Thatcher’s reluctance to approve the recommendation
of sanctions against South Africa to encourage abolition of apartheid, to which the Queen
was deeply committed. According to former Canadian Prime Minister,
Brian Mulroney, Queen Elizabeth was highly active “behind the scenes” in encouraging
international support for an end to the oppressive apartheid government in South Africa. Despite the numerous challenges she had hitherto
faced as both a mother and a Queen, these challenges reached something of a crescendo
during the 1990s. A new decade had brought increased criticism
of the younger members of the royal family and the Queen was increasingly satirized in
television programs. True to form, she attempted to fight fire
with fire by making another documentary film, “Elizabeth R,” for which she allowed cameras
to follow her about for nearly a year while she provided the commentary. The film premiered in 1992, the same year
which the Queen once dubbed in a famous speech at London’s Guildhall, her Annus Horribilis
or Horrible Year. The reasons for her lamenting 1992 are all
too well known. The marriages of three out of four of her
children fell apart in 1992 and a disastrous fire at Windsor Castle caused £60,000,000
in damages to her childhood home. In March of the following year, the Queen’s
former nanny Margaret “Bobo” MacDonald, her confidante and closest friend, passed
away at the age of eighty-nine. She had been by Elizabeth’s side for sixty-seven
years, continuing to serve as her dresser when the young princess moved out of her nursery. Elizabeth was deeply saddened by Bobo’s
passing. Yet another terrible blow struck the royal
family in 1997, when Diana, Princess of Wales, was killed in a car crash in Paris. At the time of the accident, Elizabeth and
Philip were at Balmoral with Charles’ and Diana’s sons, William and Harry, to whom
they now had to explain the terrible reality of their mother’s death. The nation, and many more people around the
world, mourned Diana’s passing. She had been widely popular and much beloved
for her philanthropy and empathetic kindness, and an impromptu shrine consisting of thousands
of cards, flowers, and tokens of sympathy accumulated in front of Buckingham Palace
in the following days. The newspapers began to question why there
was no flag flying at half-mast over Buckingham Palace, why the Queen had not addressed the
nation, and why the royal family did not seem to be mourning Diana’s death with any visibility. There was a fundamental disconnect at work
here. What the public wanted was a show of emotion. What the Queen wanted was to protect her devastated
grandsons and allow them and the rest of the family to mourn privately. But because Diana’s separation from the
royal family had been so acrimonious, the Queen understood that something more was required
to validate the very genuine public mourning. Elizabeth acquiesced, returning to London
and giving a live broadcast the day before Diana’s funeral, expressing her admiration
for her daughter-in-law and the family’s grief at her passing. Public approval of the Queen reached its lowest
point in 1997, but soon rebounded significantly. Elizabeth confronted two more terrible losses
in 2002. In February, her sister Margaret passed away
at the age of seventy-one, and the Queen Mother, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, died just one month
later, at the impressive age of 101. Elizabeth was broken-hearted. As a family, she and Margaret and their mother
had lost Bertie far too soon, but the three women had remained an exceptionally close
family unit for half a century thereafter, one upon which the Queen had always relied
for advice and comfort during her many decades as sovereign. During the same year, the Queen celebrated
her Golden Jubilee and fifty years on the throne. Even as she mourned her mother and sister,
she re-affirmed the vow of service she had made half a century before: “I am driven
by my resolve to continue with the support of my family to serve the people of this great
nation of ours to the best of my ability, through the changing times ahead.” Indeed, times were certainly changing with
regard to what was acceptable within the royal family. In 2005, she gave her blessing for Prince
Charles to marry his longtime love, Camilla Parker-Bowles, who was subsequently made Duchess
of Cornwall. Because both Charles and Camilla were divorced,
the couple were married in a civil service and the Queen and Prince Philip did not attend
the ceremony, but they happily attended the reception. As sovereign, Elizabeth was mindful of her
position as head of the Church, but she understood that times truly had changed considerably
during her reign. Few people now expect that members of the
royal family should marry anyone other than whom they choose. In a move that speaks even more strongly about
letting go of the past, before she died, the Queen expressed her wish that the Duchess
be given the title of “Queen Consort” at Prince Charles’ coronation. This represents a major departure from the
traditional approach to marriage and divorce within the royal family, especially in light
of their longtime affair, and Camilla’s involvement in the breakdown of Charles and
Diana’s marriage. In 2012, the Queen reached the zenith of her
popularity, with incredible approval ratings approaching 90%. That year, she became the only British monarch
besides Queen Victoria to celebrate a Diamond Jubilee. And to a riotous reception, she opened the
Olympic Games in London with a very special James Bond-themed performance with Daniel
Craig, during which she hilariously appeared to parachute out of a plane into the Olympic
Stadium. The royal family has seen a re-emergence of
criticism and scrutiny during the last decade, some of it surrounding the departure of Elizabeth’s
grandson, Prince Harry, and his wife, Megan Markle, from their royal roles, their seeming
estrangement from the royal family, and the much-discussed exclusive interview they gave
to Oprah Winfrey in March of 2021. Public attention was also drawn to the royal
finances with the release of the Paradise Papers. In 2017, it was reported that a sizeable proportion
of the Queen’s wealth from the Duchy of Lancaster rests in offshore tax havens. Different estimates exist of what Her Majesty’s
net worth was, but it was generally reckoned to be between £500,000,000 and £600,000,000. Perhaps most troubling of all to royal supporters
and critics alike in more recent years are Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein
and Ghislaine Maxwell, and the lawsuit for sexual assault launched against him by Virginia
Giuffre, which he settled out of court for an undisclosed sum. In January 2022, just months before her death,
the Queen stripped her son Prince Andrew of his military titles, as well as all royal
duties and patronages, none of which will be returned. In the announcement, it was added that Andrew
would face the lawsuit as a “private citizen,” without the support of his family. Despite the reoccurrence of scandal and criticism
for members of the royal family, which grieved the Queen in the last years of her life, she
remained highly popular both in the United Kingdom and abroad. People all over the world often wrote to her
to express their admiration, and to express sympathy for her various family dramas, an
example of public understanding which she appreciated. Even at the lowest point of her popularity
in 1997, she still had a 70-75% approval rating in the UK, as well as in the “Old Dominions”
of Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. These are polling results that must be the
envy of elected politicians everywhere, and are quite impressive considering the length
of her tenure as Queen. In 2002, opinion was fairly unanimous among
the people of the UK and Britain’s old Dominions: they strongly agreed that the Queen had done
a good job as Head of State and Head of the Commonwealth, but a small majority did not
believe that the monarchy would long outlast her. That opinion has not changed much in the last
two decades, with many people remaining skeptical about the potential success or stability of
a monarch other than Queen Elizabeth. Inevitably, the most basic question most people
have about the Queen is simply: “What was she really like?” Philip said that his wife’s greatest virtue
was her tolerance. He described her as careful, observant, disciplined,
and highly moral, but rarely judgmental. Her Majesty’s dresser for nearly thirty
years, Angela Kelly, wrote of the Queen’s courage, kindness, strength, sense of humour
and sense of fun. She apparently had a notable talent for putting
people at ease, and was a master at helping those who were a little over-awed in her presence
to relax with a little pleasant small-talk. Being the fashion icon that she was, the Queen
grew to appreciate beautiful clothes as much as anyone, but she was always most comfortable
in riding clothes, practical outdoor shoes or boots, and one of her signature headscarves. The photographs and footage in which Elizabeth
appeared to be the most excited, animated, and happy, were when she was spending time
with her dogs and horses, riding, or watching horse-racing. From the late 1960s onwards, Elizabeth enjoyed
pursuing a career breeding and racing horses. She also loved spending time with her family,
which has continued to grow following her passing to eight grandchildren and twelve
great-grandchildren, but she experienced an increasingly solitary time towards the end
of her life, following the death of her husband Prince Philip in 2021, indeed one of the most
poignant images of the Queen in the last years of her reign was her sitting alone in mourning
for her dear husband Prince Philip, due to Covid restrictions that were in force at the
time, in the pews at St George’s Chapel in Windsor. Even though that was arguably the very worst
moment of her life, considering the esteem and affection she had for him, the Queen always
placed duty above her personal needs and unlike many of Britain’s politicians, she led by
example during the Covid pandemic. While in the last few years of her life, she
passed along the bulk of her royal duties to Charles, Camilla, her grandson William,
and his wife Catherine Middleton, Queen Elizabeth still cherished her position and duty as Head
of State and Head of the Commonwealth. She would never have abdicated. “It’s a job for life,” she once remarked. “It’s a question of maturing into something
that one’s got used to doing and accepting the fact that it’s your fate, because I
think continuity is very important.” Some political commentators today are quick
to dismiss the monarchy as outdated, needlessly sentimental, and a waste of resources. But others have argued that few if any elected
politicians could ever hope to exercise the level of “soft power” that was at the
core of the Queen’s influence. “Soft power” refers to the ability to
produce desired outcomes using gentle persuasion rather than compulsion or force. Elizabeth embodied British history. She provided a concrete link to her nation’s
past in the modern world. Further, the Commonwealth continues to play
an important role for those countries that choose to belong to it. The association provides access to numerous
resources for the further development and betterment of all member nations, and it is
through these international partnerships that the Queen was able to concentrate some of
her “soft power.” Commonwealth countries not only share resources
and strategies for development, but also cultural, political, and judicial sensibilities. The Commonwealth is one type of tool for preserving
international cooperation and friendship, and for the continued promotion of the rule
of law, democratic institutions, and both civil and human rights. Elizabeth’s reign witnessed a complete redefinition
of both monarchy and empire, and in a fascinating paradox, the monarchy became in many ways
more influential the more its actual power declined. The most popular members of the royal family
in the twenty-first century function as “super-ambassadors.” Politicians and diplomats who might refuse
to deal with elected British officials invariably jumped at the chance to meet the Queen, who
was called upon many times to encourage political accord by holding a royal event or visit. She left an immense legacy both to the British
people and to the wider world, guiding Britain through greater social, political, economic,
and technological change than perhaps any monarch in history. She also provided leadership, comfort, perspective,
stability and a willingness to make change – whatever her people required of her within
constitutional limits. But beyond this, Elizabeth was also a touchstone
of global decolonization. Countries and peoples with a painful history
of British occupation and colonization came to associate her with the gradual withdrawal
from empire, the end of oppression, the beginning of independence and self-governance, and the
beginning of international friendship on equal terms. It is worth noting that more than half of
Britain’s former colonies remain members of the Commonwealth today, and most of those
who chose to withdraw still maintain good relations with the UK and have largely favourable
approval ratings for the monarchy. All good things come to an end. When Queen Elizabeth II’s platinum jubilee
was celebrated in February 2022 it was done so with the awareness that it would almost
certainly be the last major anniversary of the queen’s accession all the way back in
1952, as by the time the event was held in 2022 she was 95 years of age. As a result, Elizabeth was largely confined
to balcony appearances at Buckingham Palace during the event. In the months that followed her health declined
precipitously, not least perhaps because of the loss of her soul mate and much loved husband
Prince Philip, at this time Prince Charles and other working royals were increasingly
called upon to fill in for her at events. As such, it was perhaps not surprising when
the news was released in early September 2022 that the queen was very ill at her favourite
residence, Balmoral in Scotland. In the end she died faster than many had expected,
though Charles and Anne were by her side when she passed on the afternoon of the 8th of
September at 96 years of age. Her state funeral was particularly long to
accommodate the long lines of people who wished to file by her body as it lay in state at
Westminster Abbey throughout mid-September. Finally, on the 19th of September, after a
private family ceremony, Queen Elizabeth II was laid to rest in the King George VI Memorial
Chapel at Windsor Castle next to her parents and husband. As is the custom with royal succession, Prince
Charles succeeded his mother immediately upon her death, becoming King Charles III. He was 73 when he succeeded to the throne
in September 2022, making him the oldest person to become monarch of Britain. In line with his mother’s wishes Charles’
second wife, Camilla, became his queen consort at his coronation at Westminster Abbey on
the 6th of May 2023. It was a remarkable occasion in the history
of modern Britain, as it was the first royal coronation in over seventy years and only
the sixth coronation in the last 200 years. So what kind of monarch will Charles be? His task is not as arduous as it once would
have been. If Elizabeth had only lived into her seventies
and Charles had become king in the late 1990s or early 2000s it would have been problematic,
given that he was, somewhat unfairly, depicted in many circles as the villain in the demise
of his marriage to Princess Diana and public opinion towards the Prince of Wales was very
low following Diana’s death in 1997. However, with the passage of time people have
warmed again to Charles and his coronation was warmly greeted. His style of kingship will be different to
that of his mother. He believes in a slimmed down monarchy and
will reduce the size of the royal establishment, while he will also try to champion causes
which are closer to his heart to a greater extent that Elizabeth did, notably his life-long
advocacy of environmentalism. Charles has been concerned with climate change
for decades and as such he ascended the throne at just the right moment to be able to champion
this cause. Whatever kind of king he is, it will be different
to his late mother. It will be a tough act to follow. What do you think of Queen Elizabeth II? Will she go down in history as one of Britain’s
most dutiful, respected and revered monarchs or was she a ‘silent’ Queen who was too
reluctant to voice her opinions on important affairs? Please let us know in the comment section
and in the meantime thank you very much for watching!