Forces, in the subatomic world, have a different
character than we’re used to when we hear the word “force.” For instance, when we hear the word “force”
we might be thinking about pushing a car, or military might or maybe even “these aren’t
the droids you’re looking for.” But in the quantum realm, forces occur when
a particle carrying some kind of charge emits another particle transmitting a force. I made a video about quantum electrodynamics,
which is the theory of when a particle carrying electric charge emits a photon and another
video about quantum chromodynamics, when a particle carrying the strong charge emits
a gluon. But in this video, I’d like to talk more
about the strong charge. It turns out to be more complicated than the familiar positive
and negative charges of electromagnetism. So how did people figure this all out? It all started back in 1964 when Murray Gell-man
and George Zweig independently proposed what we now call quark theory. We know a lot more
about quarks then they did back then, but they proposed that there were three types
of quarks, with the names up, down and strange. Each quark was a fermion, which means that
they carried subatomic spin and that there were only two kinds of spin: +1/2 and -1/2. Protons and neutrons, which are examples of
a class of particles called baryons, each contained three quarks. Protons contained
two up quarks and a down quark, while neutrons contained two downs and an up. But, beyond the fact that baryons contain
exactly three quarks, there were no rules on which quarks could exist in a baryon. So that means that all other configurations
should exist. They are listed here: “up, up, up”; “up, up down”; “up, down,
down”; and “down, down, down” for example. And then, there are the ones containing strange
quarks, like “up, down, strange”, et cetera. In fact, when the quark model was proposed,
the configuration “strange, strange, strange” hadn’t been found. However, less than a
month after the quark theory paper was released, the Omega minus particle was discovered. The
Omega minus was a particle with three strange quarks. Things were looking good. There was a problem though. There is a principle
of quantum mechanics that governs the behavior of fermions, which is what quarks are. This
rule is called the “Pauli Exclusion Principle,” named after Austrian born physicist Wolfgang
Pauli. What Pauli’s principle says is that it is
impossible for two identical fermions to exist at the same place. This, by the way, is why
electrons surround atoms in the way that they do. If Pauli was wrong, chemistry would be
enormously different. So what does the exclusion principle have
to say about quarks? Well suppose that we have a baryon with three
of the same kind of quarks, say “up, up, up” for example. From an exclusion principle point of view,
having three up quarks in the same place sounds ominous. But spin helps us. The first up quark
could have a spin of +1/2 and the second could have a spin of -1/2. The differences in the
spin make the two fermions different. So- so far, so good. But now, let’s add the third up quark. No
matter if it is a spin +1/2 or -1/2, it will duplicate the spin of an existing quark. And,
according to Pauli’s principle, such a particle cannot exist. Yet they do. With the discovery of the omega
minus, all the possible configurations of three quarks in a baryon had been found. So
either the quark idea was wrong, or someone needed to work out an answer. In October 1964, an American physicist named
Oscar Greenberg (although he prefers to be called Wally) supposed that perhaps each quark
had another property that we now call color. Color, by the way, is the name that we use
for the strong force charge, but we’re getting ahead of ourselves. Color would then come in three varieties.
Quarks would have color, but particles like protons would not. Thus we need to somehow
invent an idea where if we added three different things, they would cancel each other out and
effectively add to zero. That’s like adding a positive and negative number and getting
zero, but with three things and not two. Luckily, there is historical precedent for
such a thing. In 1861, legendary physicist James Clerk Maxwell was working with a photographer
by the name of Thomas Sutton. They were playing around with colors and light. They found that
if they projected a red, blue and green light on a wall, that the combined three colors
looked white. Taking this analogy, we now name the colors
of quarks red, blue and green and take as a metaphor the color white as having no color. In the context of the quark model, we now
can have three up quarks or three down quarks or three strange quarks. Since each quark
has a different color, then no two quarks are the same and the Pauli Exclusion Principle
causes no problems. Proving that color is a real thing is rather
tricky and has to be done indirectly. It boils down to assuming that there are three different
quark strong charges and seeing the implications of that idea. When we do that, we find that
we can explain all the data involving quark interactions. So scientists are now very confident
of the color idea. The invention of the idea of quantum color
is a pretty interesting story. Prior to the quark model, physicists were discovering all
sorts of particles without any sort of unifying idea. The quark model was a piece of the tale,
but the story was made more complete with the invention of color. And, a little more
work resulted in the creation of the full theory of quantum chromodynamics which, of
course, I’ve made another video about. But in this video, I want to concentrate on
Wally Greenberg’s epic idea that made the world a colorful place.
