Plant Food Toxins in an Evolutionary Context β George Diggs, Ph.D. (AHS14)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: AncestryFoundation
Views: 126,147
Rating: 4.8911567 out of 5
Keywords: AHS14, plant toxins, evolutionary arms race, yt:quality=high
Id: fnjX3cZ4q84
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 47min 28sec (2848 seconds)
Published: Fri Aug 22 2014
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Not super keto related but part of our quest to know what was our evolutionary diet. Depending on your P450s I can imagine you may feel much better cutting out some of these plants.
Great talk. Despite what he eats, I think this is further evidence that questions whether we can be facultative carnivores. I love that someone talked about soy and oxalates at the end there.
https://www.amazon.com/Hunter-Gatherer-Within-Health-Natural-Human/dp/1889878405
Here's his book. This review makes it sound like it's up our alley.
this was absolutely fascinating.
I truly wonder about what we eat. It seems that plants with a closer relationship with water tend to be safer for our biome. I would love a list.
Animals have defenses too :P. Lots of animals are extremely dangerous to hunt without modern technology, some even with. Organic, non-GMO bacon has tusks that can kill you.
You wouldn't be too happy if you bit into most frog or toad species. Just ask any dog. Frogs are very digestible, but eating them is probably not worth it and/or very dangerous unless you know what you're doing, depending on species.
Not sure what the 'some plants aren't good to eat' argument is supposed to demonstrate, to be honest. Of course some are not good to ingest.
I'm sure every animal has plants in its environment it is not adapted to eat.
And just because some are toxic doesn't mean they don't have compounds that are good for us. Most medicines are molecules that were originally found in plants.
Anyway, I'm with you guys that we shouldn't be eating grain or soy. Or most seed oils.