(Facts checked)
Man-made nuclear radiation evokes both fascination and fear. The nuclear disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima
are good examples of this. While the meltdown at the Chernobyl power
plant caused thousands of nearby residents to flee their homes in 1986, tourists now
flock to the area after watching the HBO series Chernobyl 33 years later. Eight years after a large earthquake and tsunami
caused a nuclear meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, some Fukushima evacuees face
an uneasy homecoming marked by mistrust of government officials and worry whenever their
dosimeters detect spikes in radiation. The Fukushima nuclear disaster has also been
the subject of several films, including the documentaries Nuclear Nation and Fukushima:
A Nuclear Story, and a new film is in the works called Fukushima 50. Now another place made radioactive by man
has attracted media attention. A Newsweek article recently reported that
“some of the Marshall Islands [. . .] have radiation levels higher than Fukushima and
Chernobyl, according to scientists.” The Marshall Islands in the Pacific Ocean
might seem like a tropical paradise, but it is far from pristine. Some of the northern Marshall Islands were
part of the Pacific Proving Grounds, and the United States conducted 67 nuclear weapons
tests there from 1946 to 1958. Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands was
the testing site of the world’s first hydrogen bomb in 1952, and the 15-megaton Castle Bravo
hydrogen bomb test occurred on Bikini Atoll in 1954. The Castle Bravo test resulted in the evacuation
of 167 Bikini islanders, who thought their evacuation was temporary, and a little over
200 Marshallese were exposed to radioactive fallout in nearby atolls. The US government has spent millions of dollars
to compensate those displaced and injured by the nuclear testing. It has also attempted to clean up the radioactive
waste left behind by these nuclear tests, but a study recently published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) shows the US government still has a lot more
work to do. For this study, Columbia University researchers
measured the external gamma radiation found in 9 islands in 4 atolls of the northern Marshall
Islands affected by nuclear weapons testing. They took measurements in several islands
in the Bikini and Enewetak atolls because these atolls “were used as ground zero for
the tests.” They also checked gamma radiation levels in
islands in Rongelap and Utirik atolls because they were “affected by radioactive fallout
from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March
1, 1954.” Most of the measurements were taken in 2015,
but additional measurements were made in trips to these areas in 2017 and 2018. The results are given in millirems per year
(mrem/y), which is a measurement of the dose equivalent. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC)
states that the “dose equivalent (or effective dose) combines the amount of radiation absorbed
and the medical effects of that type of radiation.” The USNRC adds that “units for dose equivalent
are the roentgen equivalent man (rem) and sievert (Sv), and biological dose equivalents
are commonly measured in 1/1000th of a rem (known as a millirem or mrem).” The researchers found that external gamma
radiation was highest on Bikini Island in Bikini Atoll and Naen Island in Rongelap Atoll. They took a total of 185 measurements on Bikini
Island. In 2015, the lowest and highest external gamma
radiation measurements on Bikini Island were 11 mrem/y (0.11 mSv/y) and 648 mrem/y (6.48
mSv/y), and these values did not change after additional measurements were taken in 2017
and 2018. However, the mean “for the full data set
increased slightly,” rising from 184 mrem/y to 191 mrem/y. On Naen Island, they took only 18 measurements. The researchers reported that “measured
values ranged from 34 to 543 mrem/y” or 0.34-5.43 mSv/y. They added that “Naen has the highest average
external gamma radiation levels of all of the islands we have visited during 3 trips
to the northern Marshall Islands (2015, 2017, and 2018).” However, they also noted that “large sections
of the island were not measured, causing some uncertainty in the interpolation to those
areas.” To get an idea of just how much radiation
is still in the Marshall Islands, we’ll compare it to radiation from a common radiation
source. According to the CDC, the “typical dose
from a chest x-ray” is .01 rem or 10 millirems. This means that if you were to visit Bikini
Island, you would receive about as much radiation as you would get from one chest x-ray on the
low end to about 64 chest x-rays on the high end. The mean or average amount of radiation you
would receive would be equivalent to about 18 to 19 chest x-rays. On Naen Island, you would receive radiation
that is equivalent to about 3 to 54 chest x-rays. The high end figure of 648 mrem/y of gamma
radiation on Bikini Island is slightly higher than the average dose of radiation people
living in the US are exposed to each year, which the CDC states is 0.62 rem or 620 millirems
per year, while the high end figure of 543 mrem/y of gamma radiation on Naen Island is
slightly lower than this average dose. While researchers describe the gamma radiation
levels found in some parts of the Marshall Islands as “much higher than those found
around the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents” according to one source, this
observation is only partially accurate. Some of the measurements taken in the Marshall
Islands are indeed higher than some of the radiation levels measured at Fukushima. A 2019 Scientific American article about Fukushima
states that “radiation [ . . . ] in some places continues to measure at least 5 millisieverts
(mSv) a year beyond natural background radiation,” which is equivalent to 500 mrem/y. But some areas in Fukushima are still more
radioactive than the Marshall Islands. Scientific American reports that “in certain
spots, radioactivity is as high as 20mSv” or 2000 mrem/y. This level happens to be what one source describes
as the yearly limit for occupational exposure set by the International Commission on Radiological
Protection (ICRP). Like Fukushima and the Marshall Islands, the
radiation measurements taken around Chernobyl vary widely. According to an infographic from a 2019 BBC
news article, current radiation levels in the Chernobyl exclusion zone range from 0
- 12.07+ microsieverts per hour. Some parts of Bikini and Naen islands do have
more radiation than some of the low radiation areas in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, such
as those with a radiation level of 0.02 microSv/hour or 17.52 mrem/y. However, even the highest radiation levels
measured on Bikini and Naen islands of 648 mrem/y and 543 mrem/y are no match for a hot
spot in the Chernobyl exclusion zone with a radiation level of 12.07 microSv/hour, which
is 10,573 mrem/year. This amount of radiation is equivalent to
the radiation you would receive from about 1057 chest x-rays. While this is a large amount of radiation,
it would take much higher doses of radiation to cause serious negative biological effects. According to the CDC, 50 rem (50,000 millirems)
of radiation “causes damage to blood cells,” while 100 rem (100,000 millirems) is the “lowest
dose that could cause acute radiation syndrome.” [show infographic] Being more radioactive than some parts of
Fukushima and Chernobyl is not something positive to brag about. And there is more bad news. Columbia University researchers also measured
the concentrations of several radioisotopes in soil samples taken in the Marshall Islands,
including americium-241 (241Am), plutonium-238 (238Pu), 239,240Pu, and cesium-137 (137Cs). Despite the fact that more than 60 years have
passed since nuclear testing ended, researchers found high concentrations of cesium-137, which
is a major source of gamma radiation. Cesium-137 concentrations were highest in
soil samples taken from Enjebi, Runit, Bikini, and Naen islands. The researchers observed that a few Naen samples,
1 Enjebi sample, and 1 Runit sample were “all above” a Japanese Food Sanitation Law limit
for cesium-134 and cesium-137 in agricultural soils. They also state that these “concentrations
are also all above concentrations found in soil near the Chernobyl power plant less than
10 years after the accident.” The Marshallese have already experienced firsthand
some of the serious negative health effects of cesium-137. The EPA states that “external exposure to
large amounts of Cs-137 can cause burns, acute radiation sickness and even death.” A medical report by Jacob Robbins of the National
Institutes of Health and William H. Adams of Brookhaven National Laboratory documents
some of these symptoms in those living in close proximity to the Castle Bravo test in
1954. It states that “on Rongelap, about two-thirds
of the people developed anorexia and nausea and one-tenth had vomiting and diarrhea.” In addition, it describes how “skin burns
appeared after 12-14 days in about 90% of the Rongelap inhabitants, with ulcerations
in 15%.” According to the EPA, internal exposure to
cesium-137 produces another effect that the Marshallese are too familiar with -- increased
cancer risk. In 2010, the National Cancer Institute published
a study about the cancer risk for Marshall Islands residents exposed to radioactive fallout
from US nuclear weapons tests. The authors of the study “estimate that
as much as 1.6% of all cancers (about 170 cancers) among those alive between 1948 and
1970 might be attributable to radiation exposures resulting from nuclear testing fallout.” Their estimates for people living in Rongelap
are much higher because they were exposed to higher levels of radiation: “For the
82 people who lived on Rongelap atoll, the authors projected 55% of all cancers might
be attributed to fallout exposure.” A Washington Post article sums up the cancer
situation in the Marshall Islands by stating that “everyone seems to have a relative
whose cancer falls on the Energy Department’s list of ailments traceable to radiation.” Cesium-37 has a half-life of about 30 years,
so people living in the Marshall Islands today are not being exposed to as much radiation
as those who were alive during the time the tests were conducted. However, according to Live Science, the “levels
on Bikini and Naen islands were so high, they surpassed the maximum exposure limit that
the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands agreed to in the 1990s.” This limit is 100 millirems per year. This amount is less than the average dose
people in the US receive from naturally occurring background radiation, which the CDC states
is 310 mrem per year. The results of this study may affect plans
to repopulate these islands. The Columbia University researchers made some
recommendations based on these results. One of them is that “given the lifestyle
of people living on remote atolls, it appears to us that clean-up of Naen, and possibly
other northern Rongelap Atoll islands, would be needed before full atoll resettlement can
be envisioned.” Another recommendation is that “the radiation
levels on Bikini Island, which served as the primary island for habitation on the atoll,
before and in the aftermath of the testing, are too high for relocation to Bikini.” Newsweek recently reported that Bikini Island
is still off-limits to residents because the radiation is still over the maximum limit:
“The average value of background gamma radiation levels on Bikini was found to be nearly double
that limit. This means residents will not be able to return
to Bikini.” Residents have mixed reactions to the idea
of returning to their island homes that are more radioactive than some parts of Fukushima
and Chernobyl. Some Marshallese, such as 90-year-old Lirok
Joash from Bikini island, dream of going back even though it is not a realistic dream. In an interview with Aljazeera America, she
expressed her ideas in her native language, so her grandson Alson Kelen translates her
words. “She is trying to say she would like to
die and be buried on her homeland,” Kelen explains, adding: “You and I know that it’s
not possible.” Others who have relocated to other islands
or countries never want to return. The Guardian interviewed one of these “exiles.” “I won’t move there,” said Evelyn Ralpho-Jeadrik
of her home atoll, Rongelap, which was engulfed in fallout from Bravo and evacuated two days
after the test. “I do not believe it’s safe and I don’t
want to put my children at risk.” And then there are others who focus not on
the idea of returning but on other significant damage caused by being forced to leave in
the first place. One of them is Lani Kramer, a councilwoman
in Bikini’s local government. In an interview with the Guardian, she said,
“It is not just their homes that have been lost, [. . . ] but an entire swathe of the
islands’ culture.” She adds, “As a result of being displaced
we’ve lost our cultural heritage – our traditional customs and skills, which for
thousands of years were passed down from generation to generation.” Would you visit the Marshall Islands, Fukushima,
or Chernobyl, or would the radiation keep you away? Let us know in the comments! Also, be sure to check out our other video
Chernobyl Suicide Squad - 3 Men Who Prevented Even Worse Nuclear Disaster! Thanks for watching, and, as always, don’t
forget to like, share, and subscribe. See you next time!
