NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super GPU Review & Benchmarks: Power Efficiency & Gaming

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
[Music] we have a lot of cool benchmarks today we're adding GPU power efficiency testing so FPS per watt like we did for CPUs except for gpus it's the debut of this testing it's not anywhere near final we have a ton more we can do with it but we're excited to share that with you in our 4070 TI super review which is what this is we also added cyberpunk RT back in so we have some R tracing benchmarks with cyberp Punk 2077 we're planning to add non RT cyberp punk in the future as well and we're looking into Alan W too for our next iterative Edition because we're basically doing kind of one step at a time let's add some new types of tests to refresh the GP reviews because that's what the manufacturers are doing anyway they're refreshing it with the Super Series and amd's got the 7600 XT coming out tomorrow I don't think I get to go home tonight or tomorrow night but we'll get them done let's start with the 4070 TI super review so I don't have to face reality which is is that I'm staying here for a few days this video is brought to you by us and storu Gamers access.net for our limited edition disappointment PCT t-shirt recapping all the most disappointing Hardware events of 2023 in a commemorative band style tour date shirt the front features a memory stick with an exploded diagram revealing an accurate representation of memory while the back features our limited time tour dates with the best hits such as snake oil the original 4070 TI launch and a Obsession we still have every size available in our comfortable charcoal Heather material but we're running low fast and we won't be making another run of these your purchases of shirts like our charcoal Heather disappointment shirt help directly fund our new testing Innovations like GPU FPS per wat power efficiency and our recently introduced 3D laser scanner for testing coolers so head over to store. Gamers access.net to grab a shirt today all right the overview so there's a 4070 super we already reviewed that it's on the channel that's $600 it slots in alongside the 470 which has dropped about 50 bucks or so plus or minus a little bit when this goes up uh then there's the 470 TI super which is this one and just as a reminder there's also a 4070 TI and there's a 470 and then there's the 470 super we just talked about so we're up to four 4070 cards getting a little confusing andv video is helping out by eliminating one of them to think about the doesn't actually help that much there's still a lot of 407s and then there's the 4080 super that is the one that people in our comments appeared to be the most excited about or at least discussing the most when it was all announced in nvidia's news coverage that's because it comes down to $11,000 from 1,200 for Baseline uh and that should be in theory a pretty significant shift for Value we'll see how it plays out but it looks a little bit like Nvidia has maybe couched the less interesting of these cards between the two that are potentially more appealing for value so the 4070 TI super comes in with a solid meh right in between the two potentially more appealing cards but uh there's a lot to talk about today so a couple of things interesting findings 4K skews higher for the performance difference between the ti super and the nons super TI which is because of the memory subsystem change so the 4070 TI super we already talked about the specs in the specs video but it's increased the memory capacity and in step with that there's also a memory bandwidth change memory bus width increase so this is the entire memory sub system has been overhauled on the ti super uh and that's going to reflect more in those higher memory load scenarios like 4K okay Power efficiencies first we're not really going to spend a ton of time setting this one up so for power efficiency testing this is something we already debuted with our CPU bench marks the video was called Intel problem or something CP power efficiency and that looked at primar IL FPS per watt or some other metric so like mips per watt for example interestingly FPS per watt could be simplified into effectively frames per Jewel cancel the per second cancels out for both uh and that's what we're going be looking at now for sake of using phrases that people are familiar with and metrics people know watts and FPS we're going to stick with FPS per watt but that's kind of the idea the purpose of FPS per watt testing or efficiency testing is very simple typically we'll test a full load power virus scenario for gpus just like we test a full load scenario with blender for CPUs what that misses and what we've been pretty open about it missing over the years is gaming workloads which are not anywhere near that simple it is never simple with gaming the reasons it's different are many we explain them in that CPU piece but as a couple examples uh where the bottleneck is can change the efficiency so Shifting the load more to the CPU to where the GPU can't even fully stretch its legs that doesn't necessarily increase the efficiency and in fact can instead hurt it we saw this with the CPU test too where even when we were GPU bound the CPU was still having to to burn at fairly High wattage just to keep the GPU supplied with frames to render now FPS per watt with gpus produces mostly sub 1.0 numbers and that's just because the power consumption is higher than typically the frame rate is in terms of pure numerical value for what we're looking at today uh it doesn't particularly mean or affect anything it's just that you might ask well why not watts per FPS as an example then you get a nice positive number maybe it's 10.5 or something as opposed to 0.47 and the only real answer we have for that is just consistency we're just going with FPS per watt because we already used it for the CPU one people seem familiar with it they seem to like it and the response from you all was positive uh however if everyone would prefer to see watts per FPS we could do that too it's kind of all the same it doesn't really matter at the end of the day but also FPS per wat allows us to go for a bigger number better and as we all know thanks to Intel bigger number better means better number gets more bigger better so that's better because it's bigger let's get started Starfield at 4K starts us off for efficiency in this one the most efficient card in the test was the RTX 480 at 0.27 FPS per watt or if you want to look at it another way about 3.7 Watts per FPS or in another way still 0.27 frames per jeel there are a lot of options here the 4070 TI super is about equal with the original 470 TI the latter of which technically has a 2.1% Improvement in efficiency here compared to the 7900 XT the 4070 TI super is about 4% more efficient in fps per watt at 1440p the 490 slips down the ranks a bit more as it approaches a CPU bind this reveals interesting data that shows that although the CPU may start limiting performance that doesn't necessarily make the GPU more efficient it's similar to the IOD Baseline power requirement buffer that we saw for AMD CPUs in the past efficiency test anyway the 4070 TI super again allows the 4070 TI El lead in efficiency This Time by about 4.1% the 4070 TI super lead over the 7800 XT is relatively large 15% here showing that AMD is trading power for performance at 1080p the 480 Remains the most efficient while the 490 continues to slip down the ranks its Baseline power requirement to maintain operation with its default settings as in the card settings is reducing its efficiency as it gets increasingly Tangled Up by other components this is really interesting data and it implies that the entire system will in fact be less efficient as CPU load increases as we saw in our previous CPU efficiency test or at least in the scenarios we've benchmarked so far the 4070 TI super produced 0.57 FPS per watt here that has the 4070 TI original card 4.4% more efficient or the 4070 TI super as 25% more efficient than the 7800 XT the 7800 XT is also becoming limited causing a further Gulf so let's unbind it in Resident Evil 4 at 4K without RT we found the 4070 TI to be the least efficient card with the 4070 TI super improving by 6% it could be the case that the uplift in this title comes from the memory subsystem change as opposed to frequency the 7800 XT is significantly more efficient here due to overall higher performance than previously allowing it to roughly tie the R TX 480 the 7800 XT sits between the ti super and the original TI at 1440p the 470 TI super still leads the 470 TI Now by about 2.7% so it's reduced with the 7800 XT still relatively high up on the chart the 470 super ends up striking the strongest balance overall on this one at 1080p the 480 and the 7900 XT still have some scaling Headroom for frame rate the90s overall comparative efficiency has fallen but it still pulls 357 watts and it remains It's relatively heavily loaded despite being limited on total CPU scale the 4070 TI super is roughly tied with the 4070 TI at this resolution so it's lead shrank with each resolution decrease the 7800 XT allows the 47 TI super a lead of 1.4% so they're about tied and the 470 super strikes the best balance so far once again in Rainbow Six Siege at 4K the RTX 480 Remains the most efficient of the group followed by the 470 super which is now establishing a trend and then the 490 the 490 is slightly lower on the efficiency curve for volt frequency tuning to maximize performance the 4070 TI super leads the 4070 TI by 8.3% in this title a result of the average FPS increase being higher than we've seen in some other games where that 8.3% lead is for efficiency the 700 XT ends up between the two TI class cards now we're going to quickly look at some 10p and 30p point non-c consecutive highs from the entire test run including loading screens in this chart we're looking at just Watts the 490 pulled 52 Watts for its average on the highest 10 points of data with 498 Watts for the highest 30 points averaged this won't capture the smallest transin which will Spike higher still but that's something we looked at in the past the 700 XT pulled 385 Watts as it's 10o high with the 470 TI super at 330 watts to the TI's 321 watts and Starfield at 1440p that drops to 382 Watts on the 700 XT 372 on the 490 which is becoming CPU constrained and 26 6 6 on the 4070 TI super the 480 shows why it was so power efficient here so that's the foundation of efficiency testing I am really excited to see where this goes we put this together just in the last week so uh again there's a lot that can be changed there's a lot we can improve we're aware of it this is nowhere near sort of like the perfect end game of how we want to represent this but it's an initial representation gives you some ideas to play around with Post in the comments and we'll keep tweaking it as well and post a separate Standalone piece as we continue to figure it out but um we did this just in the last week alongside adding cyberpunk rage tracing and starting to explore Allen wake 2 testing so there's a lot going on for our GPU reviews but of all of that we think the GPU efficiency stuff is going to be the most interesting and promising anyway we'll start with some game Benchmark summary charts and then we'll get into the individual game benchmarks here's a summary chart of the 4070 TI super versus the 4070 TI nons super non non-ti the bars indicate percent Improvement by moving two the 4070 TI super from the 4070 TI in general we're seeing about a 10 to 11% uplift at 4K our testing tends to be at highly intensive settings to minimize CPU load so especially when at 4K this makes sense with the memory subsystem and frame BFF for improvement two of the older games here Horizon zero Dawn and Total War Warhammer 3 posted gains higher than we saw in other titles on this chart at 1440p we saw about a 7% average or so uplift in the 470 TI super versus the 470 TI that's not particularly exciting it reduces from the 4K gains because the memory just isn't as impactful at 1080p we typically saw from 2% to 6% gains with a few breakouts higher generally speaking it's call it about 5% or so uplift at 1080p now we have two identical 4070 TI Super Cards the tough models and so we also decided to run these through Port Royal for frequency validation the brief test established an average frequency 2746 MHz for the unit we tested for our review with the more recently tested unit that wasn't used in the review today at 2725 MHz this is about a 20 MHz or so Delta it's within manufacturing variants but the Silicon quality on the unit we chose at random appears to be a little higher than the secondary model and obviously the one that ran 20 MHz higher smelled freshly of leather jackets handpicked definitely a golden sample that was SAR ASM but someone was typing it it'll SN it a little bit though but let's move on to the 7900 XT versus the 4070 TI we broke this into RT and non-rt charts because the scale slides opposing directions and we'd prefer to do as much of that math in a single direction or percent Improvement as possible that just keeps it cleaner now that said when you're talking about a percentage Point change of 0.5 between going positive or negative Direction the impact isn't that big regardless but we are trying to keep it all showing as much as possible in percent Improvement regardless the RT performance strongly benefits the 4070 TI super we noticed that cyberpunk scales insanely in favor of Nvidia as all graphic settings increase with customized ultra settings without upscaling pushing the ti super in the range of 70 plus% for its lead over the 7900 XT with cyberpunk using medium settings instead but still RT we saw the gains have down to something like 35% for the 4070 TI super over the 700 XD as a workload for RT amplifies the favor for NVIDIA likewise seems to disproportionately amplify in less intensive RT scenarios the lead is often below 20% there's one 4K upscaled result favoring the 7900 XT in Resident Evil 4 which progressively moves toward Nvidia favor as the resolution decreases in non-rt workload switching the chart to show to the 7900 XT from the 4070 TI super we see that 7900 XT starts pulling ahead on average depending on resolution it's anywhere from equal to 14% ahead with losses toward the bottom of the chart time to move into specific game Benchmark charts we have a lot of cards on here so depending on which chart you look at goes back to the 2070 uh there's 1080ti in there 3060 variants are in there uh 6600 variants are in there it depends on the resolution but there's a lot to look at so feel free to pause for the specific card you might have and if your specific card is not there remember you can go and grab a a reference to a card that is on our charts with a known percent difference from that card and you can start kind of calculating it roughly on your own it's not perfect but I'll get you pretty close to it okay let's get into those charts Starfield is up next another of our 2023 titles with 2024 patches to test at 4K the RTX 470 TI super landed at 62 FPS average with lows proportional and well timed that has it ahead of the 4070 TI by relatively uneventful 6.3% the lead over the 4070 super is 18% and compared to some cards you might upgrade from it's ordered as follows 79% over the 3070 and 161% over the 2070 the RX 7900 XT leads the 470 TI super by 10% here so AMD is still leveraging its advantage in this particular game and has a wider lead than it does in some others and just for reference the 490 leads the 4070 TI super by 47% here at 92 FPS average if you were curious what that jump would do at 1440p the 4070 TI super still has full scaling in this Benchmark its lead over the nons super variant 95 FPS average is just 4.4% now down from the already low 6% at 4K and the ti super now only leads the 470 super by 14.7% so it's even less exciting than before let's move on Resident Evil 4 is another 2023 game that we've added recently and this one tested at 4K and rasterized first the 4070 TI super ran at 87 FPS average and led the 4070 TI by 10. 6% with the 7800 XT leading the ti super by 12% 480 is just ahead of that looking down the stack the 6800 XT remains one of the most powerful and viable options at the $500 Mark that's assuming it's still there when this goes up although it's not the most viable in every game on the Nvidia side the ti super leads the new RTX 470 Sans TI super at 71 FPS for that 4070 super by 23% over possible upgrade Pathways the lead over the 3070 the 20 70 non super and the 2080 is significant respectively at 86% 190% on the 2070 and 139% on the 2080 scaling is clean at 1440p lows are proportional so since the 0.1% lows don't indicate anything noteworthy here we've removed them to instead accommodate more gpus on this chart that's the trade-off the 470 TI super is 172 FPS average as at 7.8% ahead of the 4070 TI reduced from the 10.6% result at 4K scaling Titans as resolution fall for these two the 4070 TI super is still bed by the 7800 XT here this time by 6.8% this chart added a bunch of mid-range cards from ages past so for some potential Pathways there's the RX 6600 shown at 58 FPS average the 6600 XT at 70 and the 360 at 57 FPS average with the 360 TI at 78 respectively these would SE Improvement of 200% on the 6600 147% on the 66 XT and then 2011% and 121% for the 2360 class cards at 1080p the 4070 TI super is still scaling with the CPU it's at 253 FPS average leading the 470 TI by 5.1% predictably less than at 1440p and 4K the 7800 xt's lead also reduces here down to 3.4% d light 2 is a 2022 game that's up now tested at 4K first the 4070 TI super leads the 470 TI by 12.6% better than we saw in the last game the 700 XT is about equal with the 4070 TI super and can't be told apart at a functional level owners of the 2070 nons super would see massive gains under these test conditions at about 178% a lot of that is from the Intensive 4K load that the 2070 is struggling with the 2080 would likewise get multiples of uplift alternatives to the 4070 TI super might include the 7800 XT at equivalent performance or the 470 super at reduced performance but it still achieves 83% of the performance of the ti super the 6800 XT would be another option here and is one that has aged relatively well with its price drops up next 1440p 0.1% lows scaled perfectly fine with this there were no abnormalities so we removed them to permit space for more cards on the chart this includes fresh retest of the 6600 the 6600 XT and the 6700 XT in this test the 470 TI suers lead over the 470 TI is reduced to 8.4% with gains against the 6600 XT and 6600 at 152% and 197% respectively mentioned just in case that's something you're considering upgrading from Alternatives still include the 700 XT ahead by 3.1% and the 480 more meaningfully ahead but we would strongly advise against a 480 given the 480 sup is inbound status in basically a week and lower price and the 470 super is another alternative at 85% of the performance of the 4070 TI super at 1080p the 4070 TI supers lead over the the 4070 TI is now even lower at 5.8% the 700 XT is tied so its lead has also Fallen scaling is clean from a testing standpoint just that this isn't particularly interesting so let's move forward now we're moving on to our set of benchmarks that we keep around for reliability and long-term validation because the numbers rarely change for these so it's easier to keep a huge amount of cards on the charts in Tomb Raider at 4K the 4070 TI super tough leads the 4070 TI by 12% in this regard it's roughly Tied by the 7 00 XT for upgrade references the lead over the 2070 XC is 167% it's the same over the 6600 XT and the RTX 3060 XC at 1440p the 4070 TI super led the 470 TI by 85% posting full scaling with the lead over the new 4070 super at about 16.5% compared to older generation cards you might upgrade from options include a doubling over the RTX 360 TI and RTX 2080 a 171 1% boost over the 6600 non XT at 82 FPS and similar over the original RTX 360 in f-122 at 4K the RTX 470 TI super ran at 137 FPS average leading the 470 TI by 11% that has the 7800 XT ahead of the 4070 TI super by 8.7% and the 480 is just past that compared to upgrade options the lead of the 4070 TI super over the 2070 XC is 163% against the 52 FPS average result it's about the same Boost from the 6600 XD and 360 XC Alternatives might include the 4070 super which achieves 82% of the performance of the ti super for 75% of the price or the 6800 XT which achieves 84% of the performance for 63% of the cost in this game although that changes with rt at 1440p the 4070 TI super post full scaling at 228 FPS average leading the 470 TI by 6. . 3% reduction against 4K despite Unbound scaling the 7800 XT is closer to the 480 than the ti super meanwhile the 470 super gives the ti super a 15% lead bringing upgrades back into the picture the 1080 TI would gain more than double the frame rate although the 108ti is still plenty good for a lot of rasterized games RX 6600 users would jump 167% from 86 FPS average we're still not CPU bound at 1080p for the 407 TI super the ti super leads the ti by 5.8% now down again and the 470 super by 12% the 700xt has climbed the ranks a little and established a 14% lead over the 4070 TI super revisiting those upgrade options the 2070 was down at around 120 FPS average so there'd be a huge boost here with the 3060 at 126 FPS average the 1080t at 142 and the 6600 XT at 152 FPS average in any of those scen scenarios the ti super would be a big jump with rt jumping even more whether or not that's worth it really depends on the games you play and if you notice that your card is feeling slow if you're not playing heavier newer games it's obviously less likely to be critical Rainbow Six Siege is up now we ran efficiency tests for this earlier but remember the FPS numbers aren't taken from this chart they were tested separately with the background tasks the 4070 TI sup 184 FPS average had it 10% ahead of the 4070 TI and 21% ahead of the 407 super the AMD 7900 XT puts up a strong fight here technically anyway but it's not particularly noticeable it does however outpace the 470 TI super price is what'll matter there compared to the 2070 super at 84 FPS average we're seing a 120% Improvement in the ti super the 3060 isn't distant from that math down at 71 FPS average 1440p reduces the ti Super's lead to just 3 and a half% over the 4070 TI an unexciting move the 7900 XTX and 490 indicate that we still have plenty of CPU Headroom so this is an unfortunately real and boring change from the 4070 TI there's no point spending more time here it doesn't meaningfully move the needle from the 4070 TI it's boring and it certainly arrests the price of the card at the $800 Mark Final Fantasy 14 is up now first at 4K the 470 TI super ran at 129 FPS average here establishing a 15 FPS lead over the 4070 TI or about 12.5% the 7800 XT sits close to the ti super but behind it and AMD has worst .1% lows in this game then would be proportional to the average against the 470 super the ti super is 23% better and against the Baseline 2070 it's 178% improved we haven't retested it in a while but the RTX 2060 is on this chart as a point of reference its frame rate may have moved slightly in the past year generally speaking though we don't see meaningful gaps to developed with this game at this point which is why it's here finally for the Old Reliable benchmarks GTA 5 at 4K has the 4070 TI super at 140 FPS average leading the 4070 TI by 11.6% and the 470 super by 19% if you bought an RTX 26d when it launched an upgrade here would yield a 185% uplift the 7900 XT is just behind the ti super here as well we'll open our rate tracing testing with cyberpunk Phantom Liberty which was only just added to the test suite and therefore has fewer cars than the RT test we'll look at after it we're iterating and adding to this each review and we'll keep adding new types of tests too as we continue to do more reviews all of these tests were conducted in the last two days and were done across two groups of settings the first batch uses RT Ultra with upscaling disabled Ray reconstruction disabled and overdrive off the second batch uses a much lighter RT medium which we found to have lower scaling impact overall and more favorable but still weak AMD performance and these performance deficit widens as RT load increases and again upscaling is off for both of these here's the chart at 4K first the 4070 TI super ran at about 23 FPS average this average is low but the lows are spaced proportionally and well as compared to the average despite being unplayable this is a good academic study of bandwidth and why we included this test the 4070 TI ran at 20.6 FPS average allowing the ti super a lead of 133% that breaks rank from some of the others we've seen critically the original TI has significantly worse lows here you wouldn't use these settings for either card but it does show that the memory bandwidth and capacity change influenced the performance in some key areas the closest AMD card here is the 7800 XTX which underperformed against the 4070 super but held stronger lows at 1440p Ultra the 4070 TI Super's lead over the 4070 TI drops to 8% the cards diverge as load increases as a result of the memory subsystem changes so it does in fact do something but the impact becomes largely academic since we were in unplayable territory at 4K Ultra the 7800 XTX runs below the 4070 super here the 490 posts a massive lead of 58% over the 470 TI super just to set the ceiling at 1080p Ultra the 470 TI Super's lead was reduced to 6% the memory subsystem overhaul doesn't matter much here it's not as heavily loaded as at 4K the 480 leads by 15% here with the 7800 XTX still tied with the 470 look at RT medium briefly here the 4070 TI super lead the ti by 12% at 57.7 to 51.6 the 7800 XTX is much more competitive here than it was at Ultra now surpassing the 470 super and roughly tying with the 470 TI it's still not competitive on the whole in this test but this illustrates that heavier RT loads disproportionately separate AMD and Nvidia favoring Nvidia as RT workload goes higher finally at 1080p medium the 4070 TI super leads the 4070 TI by 7% the lowest of this game in settings so far the 7800 XTX is about equal with the 470 super here with the XT about equal to the 470 and's relative rank overall has fallen at this resolution it's benefited by the higher resolution combination with lower rate tracing settings in Resident Evil 4 with rate tracing and at 4K we're using FSR as a test of both upscaling and RT impact we measured the 4070 TI Supra at 101 FPS average here leading the 4070 TI by 11% the 700xt manages to outperform the 470 super in this one although that doesn't persist to heavier RT games like cyberpunk as we saw earlier compared to the 4070 super the ti super is about 22% better and compared to the older 2070 back when RTX was new it's about 150% better at 1440p the 4070 TI super runs at 165 FPS average with upscaling and RT that has it just ahead of the 7800 XT and 7.7% ahead of the 4070 TI finally for Resident Evil RT 1080p has the 47 TI super at 2011 FPS average with FSR reducing the lead over the ti original to 5.7% the 7900 XT sits closer at this point to the original 4070 TI than the 4070 TI super but overall it's between them in dlight 2 with r tracing and equivalent upscaling between all the vendors we saw the 4070 TI super at 51.8 FPS average leading the 4070 TI by just 9% the 700 XT Trails the 4070 super here down at 38 FPS a average and just ahead of the 4070 Baseline card so the XT is not in a great spot competitively Nvidia is advantaged it's not as Extreme as in cyberp Punk or Allen wake 2 but it's definitely more than in Resident Evil 4 generationally the 470 TI super leads the 370 by 86% and the RTX 2080 by 182% at 1440p we've added some mid-range past gen cards to the list the RTX 2070 now appears down at 30 FPS PS average ahead of the 6600 xt's 27 FPS average result and behind the 3060 TI's 46 result the 4070 TI super is 96 FPS average leads the 4070 TI by about 7% so it's dropping once again the 700xt is behind the 380 and the 4070 super in this one and ahead of the 4070 it's not competing with the ti class cards directly at 1080p the 4070 TI super lead over the 4070 TI is reduced to just 4.4% the 7800 XT is about 5 to 6% ahead of the 470 and it continues to yield an advantage to Nvidia not much has changed for these ranks finally we're on power although we looked at Power efficiency earlier now we'll briefly look at our standardized total power consumption against more cards the 4070 TI super tough card pulled 291 Watts with the Quiet bios or 296 Watts with the default performance feed bios that are shipped in overclocking allows a maximum power consumption of 321 Watts with the OC on the performance bios the 296 watt figure has it about the same as a 6800 XT and less than an RX 7900 XT by 10 to 25 watts depending on which card you look at the 4070 TI was about 5 Watts less at 290 watts in our original testing and that contributes to some of the performance Gap as well well it's a lot of numbers first on our side of things we're excited not because of this this is like we'll talk about it we're excited because the efficiency testing the latency stuff's really cool um it's coming back in for the 480 super like stated but we wanted to kind of get the efficiency stuff in this one so we're experimenting with a couple different approaches to reviewing gpus that aren't just frame rate which is what we've historically done there's obviously uh plenty of different approaches out there but our primary focus has been frame times frame pacing frame rate and then power in total uh power consumption workloads like power virus so we're overhauling that and uh the efficiency stuff I'm personally really excited about now uh as for the rest of this so for the cards you have all the numbers we'll let you make your own decision but if you want some stances on it as briefly as possible uh this launch can largely be summed up with a very Advanced word me it's really not particularly strong but it's also not offensively bad the price is locked so probably the worst or biggest downside there is is that we might traditionally have received the price cut here with the ti but instead the ASP or the average selling price remains up as a result of this launch but the performance also goes up a little bit with it and so we're back to me it's not the the worst a card could receive on this channel it's just kind of in the middle so it seems like Nvidia as we said in the beginning has chosen to couch this car in the middle of maybe two more interesting launches but especially the 480 super uh looks interesting now that said we haven't tested it yet so we'll see we'll know how that pans out somewhere around January 31st or so as when it's supposed to be launching so reviews plus or minus day on that but the 4070 TI super puts pressure on AMD 7900 xte if you care a lot about Super heavy rage tracing like Ultra or high settings in games like cyberp Punk or Allen wake then that's where the difference really starts to appear and you've also got things like Ray reconstruction to consider uh that is basically entirely subjective we have a separate video on that where we just show you the uh A and B comparison for it if you don't care about Ray tracing or you play games that are Ray traced but typically with something like a single RT feature Shadows Reflections things like that but not typically combined or generally lower uh RT intensity then the 7900 XT remains a good consideration especially because of its new found price drops little hesitant to commit to calling a particular price for it right now cuz it's kind of in flux but the last we checked for Hardware news uh there's evidence of it on New Egg it was like 710 bucks uh sometimes 750 but 710 seem to be starting to become at least available in the US North American market so anyway that's been changing a lot it's largely going to come down the price on those and if you care about RT or particularly heavy RT like uh as high settings as you might be able to realistically set with a particular card but that'll be it for the review You've got a lot of numbers to work with and make a choice on it um we've been experimenting with totally over hauling the test one Benchmark at a time so next one we're hoping to bring the latency back in we debuted again the 70 super uh we've got some changes we're do into that to further improve it hopefully make it even more useful and explain it some more further and then we also have the 7600 XT review next it is about 30 hours be well just give everyone some perspective uh it's less than 12 hours before this review has to go live so I need to finish editing the rest of it uh and then I need need to start writing the 7600 XT which will go up 24 hours after that so see you soon and otherwise the 480 super should be the one where we have about a week to work on it so check back for that as well okay we'll see you all tomorrow about 24 hours I think I don't I don't know thanks for watching as always go to store. Gamers access.net grab one of these shirts to support our in-depth testing efforts and our overhauls and and you can go to patreon.com Gamers ACC helps out directly we'll see you all next time
Info
Channel: Gamers Nexus
Views: 437,618
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: gamersnexus, gamers nexus, computer hardware, NVIDIA GeForce, graphics cards, best graphics cards 2024, gpu benchmarks 2024, gpu power efficiency, rtx 4070 ti super review, rtx 4070 ti super benchmarks, rtx 4070ti super, rtx 4070 super ti, rtx 4070 ti super vs rx 7900 xt, rtx 4070ti super ray tracing, rtx 4070 ti super vs rtx 4070 ti, rtx 3070 in 2024, rtx 2070 in 2024, gtx 1080 ti 2024 benchmarks
Id: QruyaA0ZrLk
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 35min 31sec (2131 seconds)
Published: Tue Jan 23 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.