Mario Galaxy 2 Review
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Matthewmatosis
Views: 356,481
Rating: 4.9038553 out of 5
Keywords: review, analysis, critique, retrospective, comparison, mario 64, mario sunshine, mario galaxy, mario 3d world, super mario 64, super mario sunshine, super mario galaxy, super mario 3d world, platformer
Id: haz4uoY2jYA
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 24min 37sec (1477 seconds)
Published: Sun Feb 22 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I liked the video, but I'm a bit surprised that he didn't mention the bronze stars while talking about the cosmic guide. He even has some dialogue about it pop up on screen.
Completing any star with the cosmic guide gives you a bronze star instead of a gold star, which is a constant reminder that you haven't completed the level properly, and gives you an incentive to return and finish the level later on. I think the final level also requires you to collect all power stars, and stays locked if you've only gotten bronze stars. That way, "cheating" is visible on any screen showing you your stars on the various levels, like the pause menu's star count of the various levels, and using the guide locks you out of 100% completion.
Super Mario 3D Land has a different way to reward good players, but it's done pretty poorly and unfairly. Dying more than 5 times on any level makes the stars on your save game profile dull, and there's no way to revert it. IMO, a very bad idea.
I must admit, back when Mario Galaxy 1 came out I played the absolute shit out of it all the way to the end and loved every bit of it (I played it all the way through as Luigi, too).
However, when I took on SMG2 I was getting a serious case of deja vu, I really didn't enjoy it anywhere near as much and stopped after the pointless green stars appeared. So as much as it pains me to admit, I can see exactly what he means in this video.
I guess that I understand now one of the reasons why I prefer Mario Galaxy 1 over than 2.
I actually liked the galaxy themed stuff, the transition between each area of the stage. And it was kind removed from Galaxy 2, since it focus more on platforming. And some levels barely use the "gravity gimmick" at all.
I don't want straightforward platforming with few gimmicks. I actually liked all the space vibe from Galaxy.
I honestly believe Galaxy 2 is the best Mario game ever made, probably among my top 5 games ever made. So, there's my bias.
I feel like this video was horrifically nit-picky. Complaining about tiny details and edge-cases as if they are representative of an overall experience--like the Cosmic Guide thing, it "devalues" your efforts to know that someone can get the star for free? Are you really that vain that that even crosses your mind when playing a single-player game?
Super Mario Galaxy 2 has some of the best, if not the best, and most varied platforming available. Almost every level takes the player on a seamless journey through learning a mechanic, mastering the mechanic, and achieving their goal, and nearly every level introduces something new in this way. I simply can't believe how many people say they got bored of the game feeling it was "more of the same" from the first galaxy. It seems crazy to me.
SMG 2 is also a pretty challenging game. The later stages and special versions of stages can be pretty tough, and super satisfying to play. Failure isn't frustrating because gameplay/gamefeel is so tight, it never really feels like the game is fucking you over...you do it to yourself.
In this video, he says: "I don't blame the team for wanting to revisit the Galaxy concept, but it definitely loses a little something in the process" but two seconds later says "looking back carefully over both titles, it's probably the better of the two." So we agree that the only thing worse about the game is that it lacks the "wow-factor" we got from Galaxy 1's setting the first time around.
But is there a valid criticism there? It's a 3D Mario game that doesn't do something new; Mario 64 was 3d (wow!), Sunshine had Fludd (cool!), Galaxy had gravity weirdness (neat!)...and Galaxy 2 has...more gravity weirdness? (Hmm...) So sure, it's less memorable, but that's because it refines the concept of the previous game, and refining the idea lead to the creation of a tremendously better game. So by that logic it is pretty much the perfect sequel, and it refines and polishes so well that it ends up being one of the greatest games ever made.
And that's a snippet of my feelings about super mario galaxy 2.
Nice, always great to see another Matthewmatosis video, and his videos on the Mario series, especially Galaxy 1, have been great. It seems like a lot of the issues with the sequel are oversights (like the green star challenges or the relative uselessness of coins), but the core platforming is still solid.
This review wasn't as interesting as I had hoped. I thought there would be a little more compare and contrast. I got bored with the Super Guide and other guide review. Worrying about if other people beat the game in easy mode isn't really a concern for me, and like other people have pointed out, the game gives you a bronze star, so you have motivation to go back and make it gold.
I'm really looking forward to the next review though. SM3DW was a game I thought looked like a disappointing successor to the Galaxy games but turned out to be a really fun surprise. I liked about as much as the Galaxy games, if not a bit more. The gameplay feels a ton different with a much bigger emphasis on platforming, jumping on enemies, and powerups. I think this will give him a lot more to talk about and give some of his clever insights since it's a lot more complicated than a quasi-expansion pack.
I think this is the weakest video in his series. It seems like all he did in this one was whine about how similar it was to the previous game and about macro factors like level selection and help systems.
I much prefer how in ealier videos he analyzed level structure, gameplay elements, and control schemes. You know, the actual GAME part of the game.
Maybe he's getting a little burned out on Mario.
EDIT: Look, I get that's his point, that it's almost the same game. But it shouldn't take 25 minutes to say that and it's just not an interesting thing to say in the first place, we all know that.
For anyone who hasn't seen his videos before, Matthewmatosis is doing a series of extremely in depth reviews on the 3D Mario games. He has also done a series on the 3D Zelda games, which was extremely well done.
The entire series is very much worth a watch, and he raises some very interesting points.
Nice! I loved his other reviews, I can't wait to get into this one. He really knows how to show the brilliance contained within the Mario series.