M3 and M3A1 Grease Gun SMGs

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Hi guys, thanks for tuning in to another video on ForgottenWeapons.com. I'm Ian McCollum, and I'm here today at the Rock Island Auction house taking a look at some of the guns that are going to be coming up for sale in their May of 2017 Premiere auction. Today we are looking at a pair of American World War Two submachine guns, specifically an M3 and an M3A1 submachine gun, typically known as the "Grease Gun", because, well, they kind of look like an automotive mechanic's grease gun. This was really America's entry into the modern generation of stamped, cheap, sheet metal submachine guns. So the US had started the war of course with the Thompson submachine gun, which you might note was the M1 submachine gun. .45 calibre, a lot of firepower, guys liked them, but they were really quite expensive. At the beginning of the war the commercial cost for a Thompson was like $200, which was a lot. Now the US military through the war would simplify them and bring the cost down quite a bit, but even very early in the war they recognised that they were going to want something that was a lot more cost-effective to manufacture. So development of the M3 began in late 1942, or mid 1942. By November Aberdeen Proving Ground had five of the guns for testing. The development, the design was actually done by a guy named George Hyde, and you may recognise that name if you've watched a lot of these videos. George Hyde is one of the lesser known, but prominent, American gun designers of this period. He was involved in the M1 Carbine trials, he had an entry there. And he did a lot of work on military firearms, but his name doesn't get associated with much. Well, he was the design engineer, primarily, behind the Grease Gun. The project's other main contributor was a guy named Frederick Sampson, who was a chief design engineer for GM in Inland. And where George Hyde was the gun guy, Sampson was the manufacturing guy. So he knew GM stamping equipment and its capabilities and how to take the gun design and turn it into very cheaply manufacturable parts that GM could quickly and easily make. Because that's the whole point, it has to be a gun that works, but in order to fulfil the design requirements it also had to be cheap and easy and fast to make. So together they came up with this. Now you'll note that the Thompson was the M1 and this is the M3. There was actually an M2 submachine gun adopted very briefly, never put into mass manufacture, and then dropped as soon as the M3 was available. So the M2 pretty much is a non-thing. The M3 was adopted formally in January of 1943, so from Aberdeen's testing in November to adoption in January of '43 only a couple of months. The gun pretty much right off the bat worked quite well. It did have some reliability issues, which were pretty much all problems with the magazine. The magazine here is very much based on the Sten magazine, and it is a single position feed magazine, which is not generally considered the best design. But it was done, and it pretty much worked, and that was good enough, and no one was ever really able to ... get past the bureaucratic inertia to change the magazine, which would have set back production and everything. So it went out with that magazine which was really the cause of all the problems that the Grease Gun ever had. Which weren't huge, it was overall quite a reliable and effective and well-liked gun, once guys had the chance to actually start using it. Troops initially looking at this thing had a very, very negative opinion of it, which is understandable just taking a look at the thing. It looks like, well, it looks like a Sten gun, it's a stamped together, cheap, crude looking, you know, "Oh man, you've given me this and you expect me to go, you know, put my life in the hands of this crude looking thing?" But once they got a chance to actually start using them, guys really kind of liked these guns. They were actually a lot better than you would think by looking at them. Now production began in early '43, but it wasn't really until July of '43 that the first guns really reached combat troops at the front. A little longer than people had anticipated. They would be manufactured for about two years. ... After these guns went into production, well, a year after, April '44, they started a program to develop the M3A1. Because there were a number of problems that had come to light with this, and the biggest one was the charging handle. We'll take a look at that in a moment, but in April of '44 they start a program to ... update this, fix some of the problems with it, and make it even cheaper to manufacture. And the result of that was the M3A1. Now in World War Two the vast majority of guns used were the original M3. It's like 640,000 of these made, and 15,000 of the M3A1s just at the end of the war. So while this is technically a World War Two gun, this is what most of the fighting was done with, with these. And it wasn't until late in the war that there were really starting to be a lot of these guns actually in the hands of troops at the front. So it wasn't until ... part of the way through 1945 that the M3 formally replaced the Thompson as the standard submachine gun. Until then there just weren't enough of these out there yet. The original M3 is very easily distinguishable by this lever on the side, that is the charging lever. And let's start with controls. We have a big, but very well shielded, magazine release button here on the left side. That's a pretty strong spring in there too. That allows me to take out the magazine. This is a 30 round mag, and as you can see it's a double stack but single feed magazine, patterned on the Sten. Easier to demonstrate the rest of the stuff here with the magazine out. Now we have a hole here, which is for this, which is the safety for this thing. That metal tab, when you fold the dust cover down, is going to slide into that hole and it prevents the bolt from going back. If I use the handle it pushes the cover up and disengages it. But the bolt can't just move backwards once the dust cover is down. That means even if you drop it on the butt end of the gun, inertia can't cycle the bolt back far enough to pick up a cartridge and fire inadvertently. Which is the major safety concern with submachine guns. So this does also work if the bolt is cocked, the gun's ready to fire. In order to cock it we have that lever which just... It's a very simple lever, it's independent from the bolt, and it's just an arm that pushes the bolt back. Once it's in that position then the safety pretty much does the same thing. It's going to actually push the bolt just slightly farther back, which means now when I drop the sear with the trigger, nothing happens, because that metal tab is preventing the bolt from going forward. Of course that's the open position, and as you can imagine that's pretty easy to bend or damage if you're giving this thing some rough handling. So it was not all that uncommon, or certainly not unheard of, for guys to bend this or this and disable the safety function of the gun. There is no semi-auto mechanism on the Grease Gun, it is full-auto only. However, it fires very slowly. It's a rate of fire of 350 or maybe 400 rounds a minute. And at that rate of fire it's actually very easy to fire single shots, or pairs... Trigger control is quite easy at that low rate of fire. That was also a rate of fire that was low enough that it made these guns a ... lot easier to use with minimal amounts of training. So typically full-auto, especially full-auto weapons with high rates of fire, require a lot of practice and a lot of training in order to shoot effectively. Because there's a lot of practice that you have to have in recoil control and operating a gun. At 350 Or 400, even though this is a large .45 calibre cartridge, this gun was pretty easy to handle. Which is nice today, and it was a nice thing for the US Army when they were bringing in a lot of new soldiers and ... you know, these weren't career guys who'd spend 10 years learning how to shoot the gun, they spent a few weeks, a few months maybe, in basic training before going into the field. The rear sight is an aperture. It is a really simple aperture, it's just one piece of sheet metal bent at a 90 degree angle and welded to the receiver. The front sight right there is just a blade, there's really very little to this. It works, it's a 100 metre, or 100 yard, zero. And then our buttstock. I will point out this is actually an M3A1 stock that's been put on this gun. The only difference is this metal tab welded in the back here. That is actually a loading tool. Single feed magazines are notoriously difficult to load when you get to the end, and having a loading tool helps. But loading tools are very easily lost, so what you do? Well, one of the M3A1 upgrades was to add a loading tab fixed to the stock. But I'm getting ahead of myself here. The stock itself has a release button right here. It's just a bar that runs across, I push that and then, in theory, (come on, there we go), push that in, and then you can pull the ... stock out to that position. And that is your shooting stock. So not a whole lot in the way of a cheek weld, but you're actually not getting a ton of recoil from this thing. The M3 here weighed just over 8 pounds, the M3A1 would weigh just under 8 pounds. And that's plenty, especially with all the forward bias of the weight, to keep this thing under control. The stock's crude, but it works. Manufacturing-wise, these were made as two stamped sides which were then seam welded together. So there's a seam that runs all the way around the circumference of the gun. You know, one little tab of sheet metal here for the trigger guard. A cover here so you can get the working trigger bits in, not that there's a whole lot of stuff there. Welding is not very fancy. It didn't need to be, it just needed to be good enough to work. There is a pad here to dampen the sound of that. And a pair of sling bars on the side. These were set up to use the same slings as the M1 carbine. Also worth noting: here on the left side of the receiver is a little riveted on tab, a keeper to hold a little oil bottle. It's the same oiler that was used in the M1 carbine, just to make things more efficient. So if you do need some oil for the gun, that's where it is. Pretty much all of our relevant markings are going to be here on the left side of the magazine housing. Submachine gun, calibre .45, M3, serial number and Guide Lamp. There are drawing numbers on a number of the other parts. You can see one here on the bottom of the trigger group cover. You can see one here on the trigger guard. Those are not serial numbers, those are drawing numbers. So as the parts ... potentially underwent any sort of iterations, this made it very easy to keep track of what parts were of what generation, when the iterations, the changes, were things that would have been potentially very subtle, just manufacturing type changes. You'll see the same sort of thing on the M1 Garand. A lot of the parts have, not serial numbers, but drawing numbers to keep track of exactly what generation of the gun they are. Now the markings on this guy are ... they're not coloured in and they're a little shallower, but this is an M3A1, again made by Guide Lamp, Springfield, and a serial number. You'll notice this is a rather large serial number. This is once they have started making M3A1s. So what's the difference? So the big obvious difference between the regular and the A1 is they got rid of this charging handle. Turns out these were being made with not quite the right alloy of steel, and when they went to heat treat them the heat treat didn't really take, and these handles had a habit of breaking off in the field. That was one of the few mechanical problems with the gun. So when they updated them in '44, or when they updated the design, they just got rid of that handle entirely. And instead you would stick your [finger] in the bolt, there's now a big cutout here at the front ... and just pull the bolt back by hand. Really, really simple. And that's the primary thing that made the guns even cheaper to manufacturer was getting rid of half a dozen different parts or more right there that you don't need. Now in the process of doing this, they also ... lengthened the ejection port and the dust cover with it. You can see the difference there, and that was done because you needed more space in here in order to be able to cock the bolt by hand. And it didn't really hurt anything, so why not? The rear sight on the M3 had been a very fragile piece of unreinforced sheet metal, so on the M3A1 they did actually make that a little beefier, now it's got these side wings, so if you drop the gun on the rear sight you're much less likely to substantially bend it. As I mentioned earlier, they added this magazine loader tab to the stock. Of course, both of these guns have A1 stocks on them. And they got rid of this oiler on the side, that was extraneous, got in the way, not a good solution. So instead they actually fitted a little threaded oil bottle inside the pistol grip. And they also extended the barrel retaining catch, so this is the M3, that's the M3A1. This one is long enough that you can easily grab it with a finger and we'll get to that when we do disassembly in a moment. One last modification made, the M3 had just this smooth profile to the barrel nut. On the M3A1 they cut a pair of profiles in here. And that was done so that you could actually slide the stock over, and we'll get to disassembly in a moment, but this allowed you to use the stock as a wrench to help take the barrel out should it get stuck or tight. There were a few other elements to the Grease Guns. In March of '45 they adopted a flash hider as well, which isn't on this particular example. There was a suppressor made for the gun, the OSS was interested in that, among other people. It would work fine, it was reputedly not quite as quiet as the suppressed Sten guns, but just a big old can suppressor on the end. Because you can take the entire barrel assembly off, the suppressed barrel assembly was a very easy thing to make and attach whenever you wanted it. One of the more interesting bits ... actually goes back to the original design intent of the gun. One of the criteria that was originally put into the design, but never really acted on, was that the military wanted these guns to be easily convertible from 9mm to .45 and back. And so that is the case, in late '43, early '44, they actually made about 500 9mm conversion sets. Which means just a new barrel and a new bolt, that's all you needed. You pull those two parts off, drop the new ones in, and you could run the gun in 9mm using adapted 9mm magazines. Never really all that important of a thing, so it didn't really see any use. But you will occasionally find 9mm conversion kits for these things out there. Alright, let's take a look at disassembly. It's as you would expect, very simple. The barrel has these teeth going around the outside which are held in place by this sheet steel spring, so what I'm going to do is pull this down, and then I can unscrew the barrel. Barrel comes out. Alright, now I have left the bolt cocked which I should not have, so I'm going to depress the trigger, let that down slowly. Once the barrel's out, all I have to do is just dump out the [bolt] and spring assembly. This is all one captive unit based on this wire spring here at the front. If you take that off, then the two guide rods come out and the bolt comes off. But there's really not even any reason to do that. It's a solid bolt, you just have the two springs here captive in the back. And this whole thing rides inside the gun. So there are two tabs up here that lock into two notches in the front trunnion to keep it in place. Same thing ... at the back. And so you can have a pressed sheet metal receiver ... without needing a whole lot of tolerancing. So looking inside it really is just a hollow shell. Two halves seam welded together with a few things riveted or welded onto the outside. This thing that's sticking up right in the middle here, right there, that is the ejector. So there's a slot in the bolt, you can see it right at the bottom of the bolt there. That slot is open for the ejector to run in. And you can see even the ejector is just a stamped sheet. It's got that reinforcing rib in the middle. Really, really simple gun. Once these were in production the unit cost was $20.94 for a complete Grease Gun. That was less than half of the cost of an M1A1 Thompson. So even once the Thompson had been simplified as much as the army would ever simplify it, the Grease Gun was still less than half the cost. So in theory the M3 was only really a front line issue combat weapon until 1957, when the M14 was adopted, which replaced, or was intended to replace, a wide swath of guns. However, this did stay in the service as the official standard weapon for a couple of different groups, primarily tank crewman and truck drivers. Guys who needed some sort of personal defence weapon and they gave them these because they were more compact than M1 carbines with the collapsing stocks. And in that role these would actually stay in the US military system until 1992. So tankers going into the Gulf War in the early '90s had ... M3A1 submachine guns with them. So really quite a long period of service for guns that were this crude and put into production as quickly. But they really did work, they got the job done. Even today, they're a very comfortable, efficient, effective submachine gun. There's really a lot to say for that very slow rate of fire, it makes them exceedingly controllable. And especially for people who don't have a lot of training on full-auto guns, on submachine guns or automatic rifles, that low rate of fire makes them much more controllable than something that's going to be firing at 700 or 800 or even 1,000 rounds per minute. So in that guise, you know, well done George Hyde, nice. Well, these two are both coming up for sale here at Rock Island. So if you would like to have one or the other or both, take a look at the description text below. You'll find links there to Rock Island's catalogue pages on both of them. They are of course both machine guns. They're both transferable NFA machine guns, so you will have to go through that process. It means anyone who can pass the background check can own these here in the US. Anyway, you can take a look at their pictures, provenance, description etc. on-line, place bids on-line, or come here live to the auction if you prefer. Thanks for watching.
Info
Channel: Forgotten Weapons
Views: 1,418,338
Rating: 4.9500089 out of 5
Keywords: m3, m3a1, grease gun, ww2 smg, american smg, submachine gun, 45acp, 45 smg, SMG, Thompson submachine gun, M3 Submachine Gun, World War II, entirely stamped firearm, inland, guide lamp, george hyde, crude looking weapon, Magazine, war, 45 ACP, smgs, WWII, WW2, Gun, M3A1, M3, Forgotten Weapons, Inland chief engineer, Review, Invention, reliable gun, military, mccollum, history, development, kasarda, inrange, inrangetv, m2, m1 carbine, m14, korean war, vietnam war
Id: 6ivr4QdhVtU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 20min 0sec (1200 seconds)
Published: Fri Apr 14 2017
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.