How the Heck Do We Talk About Outer Wilds?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Errant Signal
Views: 110,537
Rating: 4.9535642 out of 5
Keywords: errant signal, the outer wilds, outer wilds
Id: aI__M3Wt6cc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 11min 21sec (681 seconds)
Published: Fri Jun 28 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I love this guy. I have a lot of problems with video essay culture on YouTube. It would take me a long time to make my point, but to sum it up:
Basically, I don't think many of the big YouTube essayists do a good job framing their work as one part of a larger discourse; this includes everything from listing sources (where they got their ideas and where others can see them), to citing evidence for why you think something is the way it is, to including criteria that elucidates the topic at hand. I was watching a Raycevick video recently (I can't remember which) where he literally says a gameplay mechanic is "cancerous" -- that's it, that's the criticism, an argument no more rigorously formed than one of the comments below the video. Like, there are YouTube essays with half a million views that would get a C, tops, in your average Intro to Writing class -- as long as they have flashy editing and good narration, the average viewer of this kind of content just eats it up. And I think that's a problem, because you have people coming away from videos like those by nerdwriter thinking that they learned something, when they just watched a very well-edited, cherry-picked video making a tenuous-at-best argument that's more of an informed opinion than anything else.
I say all this just to say that I think* Errant Signal is not one of those channels. Through well-researched and cited arguments, he creates content that would stand up to rigorous peer review. He incorporates critical theory, but when he's freewheeling with nothing much more than a feeling or an opinion, he makes it clear. He makes maybe a few videos a year, but that's because all of them are well-researched and actually contribute something weighty and meaningful to the videogame discourse community.
Anyway, subscribe to Errant Signal, and thanks for coming to my TED talk.
edit: I forgot some words
I'm so happy to see this getting discussed. It gave me such an awesome feeling of wonder and amazement through playing. It's been a long while since I was able to be constantly surprised by exploring in a game.
Going through this video, it feels like watching the intro to Eva long after knowing the series inside and out. From my current perspective, this feels like a huge series of things 'revealed' but it's only because I understand WHAT the Project is, or WHY the shot of the interloper needs to be from the front, or HOW the Brittle Hollow breaks up...
It's kind of hard to spoil this game, I think, like how out-of-context-jojo-panels don't really spoil anything. It's just cool stuff.