Higher Consciousness
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The School of Life
Views: 3,301,234
Rating: 4.9217925 out of 5
Keywords: curriculum, love, lecture, SOL, mood, philosophy, London, the school of life, education, think, sermon, TSOL, talk, secular, wonder, self, alain de botton, wisdom, relationships, improvement, interest, higher consciousness, consciousness, school of life, meditation, brain, body, soul, happiness, learning, human, future, awakening, truth, mental, higher, mind, enlightenment, spirituality, yoga, eckhart tolle, mindfulness, Conscience supérieure, Höheres Bewusstsein, Mayor conciencia, उच्च चेतना, 更高的意识, Maior consciência
Id: vqCOss4hqnE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 4min 33sec (273 seconds)
Published: Mon May 11 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
For me this really helps to illuminate the importance of the Noble Eightfold Path (as well as the precepts) for me, a relative newcomer. We cannot be expected to operate from a higher consciousness at every moment of the day, but by using the fruits of that consciousness - the path - as reference for our behavior, our everyday behavior will begin to resemble that which originates in higher consciousness.
Cool website/videos.
just watched this, their videos are so good!
A thousand recommends. One of the best explanations/descriptions of jhana I've ever heard. Thanks for sharing.
Nice video:) sent it to some colleagues.
Great video!
"Unfortunately, the way in which these spiritual people discuss their states of higher consciousness has a tendency to put a lot of secular types on edge. It can all sound maddeningly vague, wishy-washy, touchy-feely, and for want of a better word: annoying." - from the video I really enjoyed this observation. I am from a Catholic home and when I try to discuss my viewpoints with my dad I feel this sentiment heavily. Edit: spelling
You know... I am not a fan of this video.
First of all, there is this beginning, where spiritual stuff is called annoying and wishy washy. Then the video tries to do better. It tries to provide some scientific background, and tries to explain what spirituality is about from that rational basis.
Emphasis is on tries. I think it fails rather miserably in doing that.
First of all we have a problem with terms. Usually neuroscientists don't talk about the reptilian mind. It's at least not a term I have ever come across. What neuroscientists talk about is the "reptilian brain". But the reptilian brain is not responsible for any of the "lower consciousness actions" this video gives as examples. So far, so confusing.
And then comes the greatest fumble of the video: "We have the privilege of accessing the higher mind, what neuroscientists call the neocortex...", at which point I started snarling. Because that statement is just wrong, in a bad way. Our neocortex is a big anatomical part of our brain. And "higher mind" doesn't refer to an anatomical part of our brain. That (among other reasons, which I can go into if you are interested) is why neuroscientists distinctively won't ever call "higher mind" the neocortex.
So to recap: The two pieces of neuroscientific foundation which this video offers as a rational basis for spirituality seem to be somewhere between badly researched, not understood, and simply wrong.
And the rest of the video? That is good. But by its own standards what this part of the video tells us is as fluffy, unfounded, and touchy-feely as more spiritual sources.
And that combination is what makes me dislike this video so deeply: First it holds up rationality and derides the wishy washy nature of spirituality. And then scientific part is done really really badly, while delivering a good spiritual speech without any more rational foundation to it than spiritual sources provide.
I mean, come on: If one criticizes the wishy washyness of spiritual discourse, one should at least get the research right... It's not like that would have taken much.
Why are people so frightened of anything even resembling spirituality?