Film Theory: The Lorax Movie LIED To You!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Film Theorists
Views: 615,967
Rating: 4.8819208 out of 5
Keywords: the lorax, lorax, the lorax movie, the lorax full movie, lorax full movie, lorax songs, let it grow lorax, lorax lied, let it grow, the lorax song, how bad can i be lorax, how bad can i be, oncler, the onceler, dr seuss, dr seuss the lorax, once-ler, the once-ler, film theorists, film theory, film theory lied, film theory lorax, the theorizer, the lorax zac efron
Id: m-_GFcWr0lI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 17min 31sec (1051 seconds)
Published: Sat Nov 21 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I mean, okay, in a world where no other cities exist and we have magical technology that can keep all of the air pollution (and any of the other consequences of pollution, for that matter) out of our living spaces, and in a world where corporate actions are completely transparent to consumers and they can clearly make informed choices about their purchasing actions, sure, this makes sense.
*cough*
Yeah this just seemed like capitalist bootlicking to me, what was the actual theory here (I mean I get the premise that we're the villains and that the once ler and o'hare were the good guys because "vote with your wallet") but he completely ignored the actual problems and didn't really say anything substantive here. Like Jesus Christ
This was literally captalist propaganda
As much as I can agree on the idea that consumers are the problem of this environmental destruction I have to disagree that both O'hare and the Once-ler can be considered the "good guys who simply want to do business."
O'hare was already beginning to pollute the air through bottles. His whole business strategy was to create plastic bottles for air in order to pollute the air that is considered "free" in order to increase the demand for O'hare Air.
Once-ler itself was aware of the damage he was potentially doing through the song "Biggering" (a song that wasn't added in the movie but is still in the movie soundtrack, really good song ngl).
"
And the customers are buying,
And the money multiplying
And the PR people lying
And the lawyers are denying,
(Biggering)
Who cares if some things are dying?
"
He admits the lies that the press and the lawyers are making. You can still make the excuse that he didn't realize the consequences until it was too late, but he was still aware that what his actions were wrong; yet he still kept doing it.
This latest film theory was pretty darn cringe. To quote a comment I saw:
"I still feel like this is just you justifying corporate businesses to be terrible by pushing the responsibility to the customer, Matt.
I like your stuff, I really do. But this is on par with your Phoenix Wright theory."
How does MatPat think scuba tanks work?
Also, as he said himself, sustainability is in the best interests of corporations. The only reason that O'hare and the Once-ler go against their own self interests is because they hate trees like some kind of captain planet villain.
I’m a long-time fan of MatPat and the Theorist channels, but every so often there’s a video that really rubs me the wrong way, and this is one of them.
I do understand that part of the “brand” is to make bold claims that directly contradict the source material, and I have mixed thoughts on those - in order to be palatable to me they either have to be well-founded or maintain a self-aware, comedic tone. This episode hits neither of those marks.
This episode takes itself remarkably seriously; it is never made apparent that this defense of the characters is done with comedic or ironic intent. But it also lacks any foundation as a legitimate argument in their favor.
MatPat makes three major claims here: O’Hare improved the lives of Thneedville citizens; Once-ler overcame hardship to achieve success; and that the citizens of Thneedville are to blame for the extreme pollution.
The first argument is by far the most solid, which is actually kind of pathetic. The idea that O’Hare’s control increased the standard of living is apparent in the movie, but it’s undercut by the kind of cherry-picking that I hate to see from this channel. O’Hare also conspires to pollute the air to increase the need for his product He seems to rule as a dictator, and in the *main plot of the movie * he attempts to violently suppress the introduction of trees that would break his monopoly.
That point is lazy, but not abnormal to hear; however, the other two points are just kind of gross to hear from a channel I so enjoy.
MatPat posits that the Once-ler shouldn’t be held accountable for the destruction of an entire ecosystem because of this reason: he worked really hard to achieve success. This is what we call “equating wealth with moral virtue.” In this point, the video takes the song “How bad can I be” literally.
The final point is the worst: pinning blame for the annihilation of the ecosystem on the consumers at large. This is a typical tactic that corporations use to evade responsibility for the consequences of their businesses. The argument goes that the company wouldn’t have done bad things if the consumers hadn’t bought the products they made; so the responsibility for the damages rests not with the company that caused them, but the people who performed transactions with said company.
By this logic, anyone with an iPhone is personally responsible for child labor. If you buy clothes from almost anywhere, you are causing people to work in sweatshops. If you buy anything made in China, you are the reason for greenhouse-gas caused climate change. I find it morally reprehensible to blame the consumers and not the companies that actually do these things.
I could rant on and on about how disingenuous and morally abhorrent this argument is, but this comment is already getting absurdly long, so I’ll wrap it up.
This video is the worst I’ve seen from this channel in a long time, and I hope MatPat understands how problematic it really was.