Ethnic Gnosticism | Dr. Voddie Baucham
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Founders Ministries
Views: 496,975
Rating: 4.9033504 out of 5
Keywords: ethnic gnosticism, voddie baucham, culturalmarxism, racial reconciliation, foundersminstries, racism, wokechurch, mattchandler, biblicaljustice, socialjustice, woke, reformed, baptist, pastoralteaching, pastoralministry, ethnicity, gospel, gospelandjustice, statement on social justice
Id: Ip3nV6S_fYU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 50min 23sec (3023 seconds)
Published: Thu Mar 28 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
“Ethnic Gnosticism” by Voddie Baucham
The son in law of Voddie Baucham, who is somewhat representative of this kind of position, posted a good set of questions to follow up to his father in law, for people who share this video.
Am I posting this to shut down all conversations on race?
Given the current climate, why am I okay posting this without offering additional commentary so that it's clear what I'm saying and not saying?
Does the topic of racism make me uncomfortable? If so, why? (See a related link here.)
Am I hoping that my black brothers and sisters will be convinced by Voddie because he's black?
Am I assuming that it's impossible to largely agree with Voddie AND still discuss racism or do I think they hold these positions or talk about racism because they're ignorant?
Have I ever considered that many pro-lifers in the black community may not be as vocal about abortion because of how organized and powerful the movement already is but notice that the church is largely silent on the militarization of police and the criminal justice system which primarily affects the black community? (Abortion affects all communities while the justice system problems most negatively affect black/brown communities.)
Have I ever considered the fact that Voddie's son-in-law and daughter talk about racism, justice, and black identity (his daughter wrote a whole book), and Voddie endorsed the book? (See the comments for Voddie's endorsement of the book.) Is it possible that I'm misapplying Voddie's words in this context?
Do I assume the black community doesn't talk about black on black crime and if so, what proof do I have to back that up? Or am I trusting the ratings-driven media to tell me or my few black friend's opinions/timelines to form my opinion of the black community's actions? (Facts: A few black friends that aren't a good data sample according to any analyst that cares about the truth. Furthermore, black people are not a monolith and have no reason to bring up these conversations with you as it's a sensitive subject in multi-ethnic circles.)
Have I taken time to humbly listen to other voices that have sound doctrine even though they may disagree with the views I've adopted?
Am I capable of learning from non-Christians due to common grace or am I incapable of thinking for myself and do I only read a list of approved books by my pastor or idealogical camp's influencers? And if so, what if racism is my camp's blind spot and because I haven't taken time to think for myself how will I be held accountable for spreading things I don't understand?
What if all of my friends started posting a sermon by Dr. Ligon Duncan, a white Southerner, in response to your Voddie sermon with zero context? (I'm not inferring that their views conflict. See the comments for links.)
Would I listen to Dr. Duncan's sermon?
If not, why not?
If yes, did I think Dr. Duncan's exposition and his application was mostly faithful to the text? (Personally, I think we have a bigger problem if you don't.)
If yes, why is it possible for me to be silent on race yet appreciate Ligon's sermon but think it's impossible for others to talk about race and appreciate (or even agree) with Voddie's sermon?
Do I think it's possible for someone to have concerns about cultural marxism and critical race theory yet still think it's important to talk about racism and partiality?
Do I believe the only biblical option is to be silent or minimalist at best about the topic of racism?
If I believe racism exists but is only a minor problem in the church or for minority people, does the fact that it's a small problem makes it less important to God?
If I think the solution to racism is the just "preach the Gospel" have I faithfully applied this logic to other justice issues? (i.e. abortion)
My goodness, if only this sentiment was adopted more fully by us all.
Good stuff
So, creating and condemning this category doesn't seem very persuasive to me. At the root of what he's condemning is the assumption that people who have to deal with something regularly know more about it than people who don't. That seems like an obvious truism to me, but at the least I would hope we would all take it as plausible. People in rural areas dislike it when city-bred government officials come around and tell them what's best for their land, because those people have lived on that land and have insight into what's going on. An electrician is going to know more about why someone's light is flickering than I would. Even if I'm really smart and have thought it out and have an explanation that is persuasive and internally consistent logically, the flickering light is best explained by the electrician.
I don't see a particularly strong argument here for why racism would be very different. If an electrician tells me "your wiring is bad and you're going to cause a fire if you don't fix it" I'm probably going to ask for another opinion, sure, but I'm also not going to trust my own experience of things being fine. But petulantly demanding evidence wouldn't really resolve much, either, because I'd be poorly equipped to understand the evidence that was presented, let alone judge whether the evidence pointed in the direction they said.
Most Black people assert, with arguments that grow more persuasive the more I learn, that racism exists systemically today. The fact that people who deal with that racism on a daily basis know more about it than me is entirely reasonable and predictable. It seems strange that we would accept that people can have whole kinds of knowledge specialized to their experiences and education, but deny that such a thing is ever possible with racial and ethnic experiences.
Calling this idea culturally Marxist doesn't do anything to establish or disestablish that it is true, though I'd argue that the idea as I'm presenting it and as most people describe it is much more post-positivist than Marxist, but whatever. I dislike the idea that we should expect all information to be available to neutral, rational outsiders just using reason and evidence. While we're playing with the genetic fallacy, that's the foundational assumption of Enlightenment Liberalism, and I don't think it serves as an adequate epistemological basis for church life.
Just watched this the other day. Very good for us to hear especially nowadays.
Thank you. I'll watch it again.
Absolutely the best man to talk about this topic
I met Pt Holmes - Baucham’s son in law - before I got in touch with his theology on ethnicity. On twitter, all parts (including Jasmine Holmes, Baucham’s daughter) have been in a constant back and forth on the subject, on BLM, on the place of racial theory on reformed theology... all in good discourse.
The same cannot be said for people using Baucham’s preaching to confront other black christians - it got to a point where people tried to police his own daughter’s use of his name and ideas. Let’s see how this all develops hence forward, I think this is an important and fundamental time for the US church.