Dr. Paul Mason - 'The corrupt history of the food pyramid'

[Music] say good day I'm Dr Paul Mason and you might think that what you're looking at here is a work of science that back in the 1970s scientists without vested interests methodically reviewed the science to determine the healthiest diet and then presented this to the public unsurprisingly this didn't actually happen most of us are acutely aware that science and politics shouldn't mix and yet they're Inseparable the fact is when we mix science with politics we get politics and the food pyramid is the product of Politics the backdrop to the story of the food pyramid begins in postwar 1950s America deaths from competing causes namely war and infection had drastically reduced and at the same time rates of smoking were increasing as a result heart disease rapidly became the leading cause of death and on this backdrop in 1955 president Dwight D Eisenhower suffered a heart attack he was out playing golf in Denver when he felt what he thought was an episode of indigestion from a hamburger and later that night he woke with severe chest pain so his personal physician not realizing he was having a heart attack gave him several shots of morphine and sent him back to sleep it was only after an ECG was performed after he awoke at 1 p.m. the next afternoon that it was understood that he in fact had a heart attack this was Major news which struck a nerve with the US population the life of their leader due for reelection was on a knife's edge with heart disease the new leading cause of death President the American population was gripped by fear so the hunt was on for the root cause of this deadly Scourge unfortunately scientists of the day didn't seem to pay too much attention to Eisenhower's heavy smoking reported to up to four packets a day indeed this was in an age when doctors themselves promoted smoking rather the scourge of heart disease was attributed to dietary saturated fat and if you're a plumber this might make sense after all pouring fat down down a sink can block a drain the rest of us [Laughter] however realize that our physiology does not resemble that of a kitchen sink which begs the question how on Earth did these scientists in the 1950s come to the conclusion that saturated fat was the cause of heart disease an ancient food consumed for Millennia being blamed for a modern disease well it can be traced back to research performed by this man the Russian Nicolai anakov it was in 1913 that he published a paper which has more than 100 years later been described as the birth of the lipid hypothesis the theory that saturated fat can clog the arteries Nicola had demonstrated that feeding rabbits an obvious herbivore lad egg yogs or pure cholesterol dissolved in sunflower oil led to increases in the rabbit's blood cholesterol levels and over time arterial lesion similar to but not identical to that of human heart disease developed now there's a lot wrong with this rabbits shouldn't be eating lad any more than we should be eating grass nonetheless This research planted the seed from which the diet heart hypothesis was born and it was driven by this man anel Keys who was almost singularly responsible for growing that seed of poor Research into the Twisted mess of a food pyramid that we have he was dogmatic belligerent and undeniably political three qualities that he wielded bloody mindedly to steamroll any dissenting views and by that I really mean any reasonable opposition to his outlandish claims he repeatedly broke with the Civil norms of Academia to bully dissenting colleagues and almost brutally silence any opposition and in the context of what was perceived to be a growing public emergency being that of The Unexplained cause of heart disease Health officials were receptive to his message you see two years before Eisenhower's heart attack anel Keys had published a widely criticized graph plotting the average fat consumption in various countries against heart disease the problem was that while he had plotted the data from six countries to make his point the studies critics pointed out that at the time data was actually available for 22 countries and when the data from those 22 countries was plotted as it was in this scientific rebuttal it resembled more of a scatter plot that of course should have been the last we've heard of Key's Theory inexplicably however he was able to establish significant influence within the American Heart Association and by 1958 the American Heart Association with keys now at the helm launched the seven country study not surprisingly he anchored the results with three countries from his six countries graph perhaps foretelling the findings before it was eventually published in 1978 it's also pertinent to point out that at the time the American Heart Association was sponsored by Proctor and Gamble makers of the extremely profitable vegetable oil shortening Crisco and on the back of his political maneuvering anel key star continued to rise in 1961 he fronted the cover of Time magazine in which his views featured prominently in an article vilifying saturated fat and going so far as to claim that smoking played little role in heart disease ironically it's documented that by 19 68 Key's own seven countries study indicated that cardiovascular disease was actually Associated and probably caused by smoking although this competing information was not disclosed to the public until 1980 well after the horse had bolted still the seven country study didn't necessarily have to be the final word on the topic in fact we know epidemiological research like the seven country study is quite weak in terms of proving causality rather experimental studies which can control for confounders provide for much stronger findings the best quality being what we call randomized control trials and before the publication of the S country study in 1978 a large randomized control trial investigating the effects of reducing saturated fat was underway known as the Minnesota coronary survey this study involved more than 9,000 participants and was investigating the effect of reducing saturated fat on heart disease and keys in fact was a co-principal investigator one of two co-principal investigator to this study presumably hoping that it would build his case for the elimination of saturated fats to those pesky scientists who insisted on asking for credible evidence the nerve what he was not counting on however was that the results of this study the Minnesota coronary survey did not go to plan they didn't find saturated fat to be harmful which perhaps explains why the first results weren't published until 1989 despite the study concluding in 1978 the finding being that replacing animal s saturated fats with vegetable oil did not reduce the risk of heart disease and for reasons that have never been explained yet which seem rather obvious Key's name was absent from the eventual publication despite him being one of two principal co-investigators the other principal Co investigator Ivan France the lead author on the eventual paper was interviewed by science journalist Gary tals before his death when asked why they delayed publication of the results by 16 years he replied we were just so disappointed in the way they turned out clearly this basically amounts to a cover up the hiding of unpalatable results conduct that is not becoming of any true scientist as Richard Fineman famous physicist said it doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is it doesn't matter how smart you are if it doesn't agree with experiment it's wrong have no doubt that honesty and transparency of these results would have seen the food periment dispatched before it ever existed before it was hoisted up on to an unsuspecting public of course even the 1989 publication somewhat distorted the truth by a mission you see the 1989 publication provided very limited almost selective data which precluded a proper analysis only allowing the conclusion to be drawn that fat saturated fat didn't appear to be harmful and this man Dr Christopher Ramon is a central figure in the full truth finally coming to light following up on the earlier investigation by Gary tabs Dr ramsten contacted the then deceased Ivan France the lead author's son Robert and Robert after searching through the basement of his childhood home uncovered two ancient magnetic computer tapes containing almost 60,000 records after an exhaustive process of translation to modern computer language and validation of the data the full results were finally published in 2016 in the prestigious British medical journal some 38 years after the study was completed the ultimate conclusion being that while replacing saturated fat with vegetable oil did indeed lower cholesterol levels it did so at the cost of an increased risk of death in other words subjects who consume less saturated fat and more seed oil were more likely to die it simply wouldn't have been possible for the food pyramid to be released had this data been available in 1978 but while the Minnesota coronary study was still underway anel Keys continued to to promote his pet Theory and in 1977 with the US still gripped with fear of heart disease Senator McGavin convened a select committee meeting on nutrition and despite the lack of credible evidence the select committee released a set of nutritional goals which vilified saturated fat this was of course in keeping with Key's pet Theory this report however was not well received by the scientific community and as a general statement it's to say it was widely considered unsound by many leading experts even the American Medical Association warned that the proposed diet raised a potential for harmful effects unfortunately These Warnings were not heeded and politics again entered the picture in his first term Richard Nixon's government had agreed to sell millions of bushel of grain to the Soviet Union unfortunately there was a particularly poor growing season which resulted in a spike in the prices of grain so to minimize public disqui the Department of Agriculture Unleashed a sweet of policies designed to increase grain production and they worked before long there were massive surpluses of grain about the same time this lady Louise light was in charge of a team responsible for crafting the US dietry guidelines this process unfortunately was informed both by the unsound science within the dietary goals that came from the select committee and her Masters within the USDA it seems as though the new dietry guidelines were seen as a vehicle by those within the USDA to deal with their problem of the grain Surplus consistent with anel Keys fear of saturated fat lights team initially recommended to their masters within the USDA that there be a recommended daily intake of three to four servings of whole grain Breads and cereals per day some however this recommendation for three to four serves a day after it went through the senior bureaucrats within the USDA increased to an extraordinary 6 to 11 serves an effective means to address a grain Surplus no doubt but at what cost to Public Health one thing is certain the introduction of these dietary guidelines in 1980 coincided with a steady increase in the diabesity epidemic nowadays in fact only 12% of us adults can be considered metabolically healthy clearly something's gone wrong unfortunately for us here Down Under after these new dietary guidelines took hold in the US the rest of the world began to get infected beginning with Australia this man Professor Stuart truswell originally from South Africa was at the time the chair of human nutrition at the Sydney University he took it upon himself to develop dietary goals for Australians based on the 1977 us dietry goals the problem was that Professor truswell was somewhat unique amongst his colleagues in that he was a vocal supporter of the US dietry goals in his own words he provided a rare positive independent review against what he called a host of critics and so the stage was set already being a firm believer in the US guidelines Again by his own admission he didn't perform his own review of the literature essentially he regurgitated the US dietry goals which had he had already glowingly endorsed this was not as fair to say an independent process the fact is if he had reviewed the literature at the time he would have discovered that even then in 1977 there was an abundance of evidence against the notion of reducing dietary saturated fat more than 70 randomized control trials truswell literally turned a blind eye to the evidence and following publication of the first dietry guidelines in 1980 truswell has remained a key figure in the following additions which continue to discourage the intake of saturated fat the obvious reason that our current guidelines the 2013 edition continues to avoid the science is an open admission by the panel that they deliberately ignored it in the public consultation report in response to a member of the public asking them to review the evidence on saturated fat they responded that the request to review the evidence was not supported by evidence now this makes my head hurt there's not enough evidence to justify looking at the evidence it would be a joke if the consequences weren't so serious and interestingly the document from which I found this information which is about 8 years ago seems to have now disappeared from the internet have no doubt that the dietry guidelines are hugely impactful the principles are taught in schools every child care center Across the Nation they also guide some would say direct the food we feed to patients prisoners and soldiers check out the reduction in fat intake in Australia since the late 1970s the problem is it doesn't seem to be working just like the us Australia has seen an almost inexplicable rise in diabetes this is a graph of the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Australia in 2020 the question is how can we ensure that the guidelines future guidelines consider the science there certainly seems to be a change of heart in some quarters I'd like to introduce you to two experts who appear to have changed their minds this is Professor Janet King the chair of the 2005 diet scientific dietry advisory committee which developed the 2005 iteration of the US dietry guidelines and this is Professor Tom brener a member of the 2015 dietry guidelines advisory committee and what they have in common is that they were both authors on this 2020 review paper concluding that government limits on saturated fat are not justified by the science the paper specifically refers to the fact that Dairy meat and eggs are not associated with an increased risk of heart disease and should not be limited it also makes the point that saturated fats are an ancient food no doubt in an attempt to highlight the Paradox in blaming them for modern disease and so or we'd be more optimistic for the next iteration of the Australian dietry guidelines given that a review is currently underway this here is my good friend Dr James Muki health campaigner and Australian of the year in 2020 and he's had concerns about the adverse houseal impacts of the dietry guidelines for some time which is why he was thrilled when the federal health minister at the time Greg Hunt publicly committed in 2021 at the conclusion of James televis National Press Club address to allow James to be a part of the scientific review process for the next iteration of the Australian dietary guidelines somehow though even a public commitment from the federal health Minister wasn't enough and so our guidelines are currently under development somewhere out of public view I'm unfortunately borderline pessimistic about what the outcome's going to be there is however a glimmer of hope there is currently a commonwealth inquiry into diabetes largely as a result of lobbing by James there are several previous medical doctors in Parliament who are Sitting on This inquiry and that presents a major opportunity submissions which have already been made are all accessible my personal one if you go to this website being number 402 and if you feel passionate about this issue if you've got a personal story to tell please reach out to the committee membership whose details are available on the website if possible meet with them tell them your story if you have one discuss the science through the actions of the very brave 2020 Australian of the Year chams Muki we've got a sliver of opportunity and together we might just be able to take it thank [Applause] [Music] you

Channel: Low Carb Down Under

Views: 199,482

Keywords: Low Carb Down Under, LCDU, www.lowcarbdownunder.com.au, Low Carb Sydney 2023, Dietary Guidelines, Food Pyramid, Lipid Heart Hypothesis, Ancel Keys, Diet Heart Hypothesis, corruption in nutrition

Id: SOgH9LDwBzY

Length: 21min 43sec (1303 seconds)

Published: Sat Oct 28 2023