Dirty Jobs' Mike Rowe on the High Cost of College (Full Interview)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: ReasonTV
Views: 1,027,604
Rating: 4.9276009 out of 5
Keywords: reason, reason.com, reason.tv, reason magazine, mike rowe, dirty jobs, discovery channel, nick gillespie, libertarian, college, unemployment, reason foundation, reasontv, profoundly disconnected, qvc, blue collar jobs, mikeroweworks, mike rowe foundation, welding, college loans, debt, university, tv, television
Id: qzKzu86Agg0
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 40min 59sec (2459 seconds)
Published: Fri Dec 13 2013
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
This is a great video and totally worth watching it all! Very good messages here
mike rowe is wicked beast.
I started watching it without looking at how long it was, and at the end saw it was 40 min. I loved every minute of it. I'm the biggest supporter of his philosophy, because I am part of that skilled trade workforce. I'm an aircraft mechanic, and went to a trade school to do it. I make good money. It can and does work. College is not the cure - all answer.
Let's not forget the vast oversupply of money into the education industry peddled by the federal government as student loans and grants. While they do definitely afford an opportunity, they really just wall paper over a K-12 education system that doesn't prepare people for the real world. The value of the high school diploma has plummeted because it doesn't make you ready to face the world at 18.
They talk about the skills gap, but I never see any of the trades or hear about any of the unions advertising for apprentices.
The same exact thing happens in the hospitals I have worked in. Oh you wanna job as a nurse? We are only hiring people with ABC certification and XYZ years of experience. No we are not hiring from within because it costs us too much money to train people, and once they are trained and experienced they just leave to go elsewhere for higher pay.
Nobody wants to train the people they already have and at the same time have no problem stealing people away from wherever they can. And for some jobs like this, these credentials aren't something you can just go take a class for. They require OJT, book work, and certification testing to have it. Radiology is the worst about this. Oh you wanna learn CT or MRI... then you have to have your RT. Oh you want a job as an RT... well we are only hiring people with CT or MRI too. Sorry you need more training/schooling/experience. Then they cry when they can't find people.
This type of thing happens all over the place in many professions... this is just an example from my experiences.
I hope he's promoting a book called "Profoundly Disconnected", because it not, this is way out of line. http://imgur.com/NFdqhsb
While some of what he says is obviously true, he's very much falling victim to what he initially complains about. "Every PR campaign goes too far."
While his tone is reasonable, "safety third," falling behind "money" and "getting the job done" is a mantra that has been demonstrably harmful to workers since time immemorial.
There have been lazy people since time immemorial as well, so pretending that this generation, or the last generation are any less lazy than baby boomers is comical. People are always looking for an angle. Technology has allowed us to "work smarter, not harder," but so did slavery, so has compulsory wage work made things easier for one man to collect a portion of the production of those who work under him.
But we call that "ingenuity," not laziness.
Some people don't appreciate hard work, that is true. Some people have no perspective, and the youth can be over-educated and under-prepared, that is also true. College is far too expensive, that is true. But in this PR... conflict? argument? There is no sense in pushing the scale back to the 1850's. We don't need a generation full of plumbers and farmers any more than we need a generation full of IT consultants.
Some people absolutely should look to manual labor as a method to contribute and be compensated, but there are a lot of dreamers out there that absolutely should follow their dreams. There are actors and painters and musicians, and adventurers, and computer programers and all manner of soft, pink handed, creative, abstract people out there that should contribute and be compensated in a way that is important to them and to the rest of us because they are absolute shit at doing repetitive, boring work.
It takes all kinds. I understand and appreciate the imbalance and understand, in part, his motivations and even agree with them, but Mike's views are colored by his own experiences, and it doesn't seem like he's being terribly objective about the reality of things.
Im almost 100k in debt with a masters degree. I worked with ESPN for a year but had to leave and move back home due to not being able to afford to live where I lived. I wish I had never gotten a masters degree because it took a year out of my life where I could have been getting real world experience in my field. Though there are opportunities in my field, many are held by people who have been in the business many years and the demand for camera operators is not very high. I was mostly forced into getting a masters by my parents but I absolutely do not need it. I feel people see my resume and assume I am over qualified for the job. All I want is to work. What Mike is saying is true, you absolutely do not need a college education to get a job and forking out 50-100 thousand dollars doesn't give you a better shot at those kind of jobs.
Being unemployed this motivates me.