COVID-19 and The Acceleration of Secular Deflation (w/ Raoul Pal & Jeff Booth)

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments

This is great, thanks. Kinda scary to think where the world is going

👍︎︎ 3 👤︎︎ u/zlogic 📅︎︎ Jan 25 2021 🗫︎ replies

If you Google a bit, you can find Jeff Booth's book online: The Price of Tomorrow. An interesting read.

👍︎︎ 2 👤︎︎ u/Wekkel 📅︎︎ Jan 25 2021 🗫︎ replies

Um, this is alarming.

👍︎︎ 2 👤︎︎ u/_main_chain_ 📅︎︎ Jan 25 2021 🗫︎ replies
Captions
RAOUL PAL: Jeff Booth,   welcome back to Real Vision. JEFF BOOTH: Thanks. Thanks,   Raoul. Thanks for having me. RAOUL PAL: There's a lot of   people who said, look, you and I need  to have a chat. So I was really keen  to get this out and done. And I thought  this particular campaign that we're doing,   which is, has everything change, I thought   it's a perfect time to talk to you. I think you  and I share some similar views. And I'd love  to dig into that. Firstly, before we   start all of that, just give everybody a bit  of background about yourself and what you do.  And then we'll dig in a bit to  your macro framework as well.  JEFF BOOTH: I am a technology entrepreneur.  So now, many boards, co-founder of a number of  technology companies, and a reluctant  author. So I wrote the book,   The Price of Tomorrow last year and published it in January before all   of this happened. You had me on your  show. And it just-- it's playing out  like a playbook of what I  talked about in the book.  RAOUL PAL: So give us a bit of a [?]  of the book and the main concepts   that you talked about within that. JEFF BOOTH: So the idea behind the   book is technology is deflationary,  or technology provides efficiency.  Every single person who uses  technology doesn't use it to   increase their costs. Both personally and in businesses, we use it to reduce labor and to   make things more efficient. The  output of that efficiency is  deflation. And so what you have--   and it's not just a little bit deflationary.  People are looking at it through a rear view  mirror. It's exponentially so because  Moore's law and technology is exponential.   And so it's-- and I used an example in our last interview,   where I folded a piece of paper 50  times, if I could fold it on itself 50  times. And most people don't recognize  that on 50 folds, if you could fold a   piece of paper 50 times, it would reach the Sun.   And for the same reason that people don't  realize that it would reach the Sun is the  same reason we massively underestimate  what's happening in technology.  And so if that's true, if that  thesis is true, then what that means   is technology, which was a small driver to deflation, is now the most important driver.   It's moving up and up and up.  And it also means that we're  likely to underestimate by how much. So now, look to the other side to say,   what evidence do we have to say  how much are we missing. And  before COVID, out of $250 trillion in debt  to run an $80 trillion global economy,   $185 trillion of that new debt has come in the last   20 years, as this is happening. That's  not-- that's a problem. That's a really big  problem because it's just a giant debt bubble  and creating mispricing and everything else.   It's a giant problem.  But that's not the real problem. The real problem  is it's exponentially worse going forward.   And that means to fill that hole, you have to ask   exponentially more debt until currencies break. And so economists are looking through a   rear view lens of-- and I fully  expect demographics. Everything  else matters a lot. So do supply  chains. So does a whole bunch of   other things. But the biggest impact in our future on this conversation by   such a far stretch is what I'm talking  about. And the economies aren't  wired for it. So these two great  forces are fighting each other. And   all of the secondary effects, all of them, are because as those two forces fighting   each other. RAOUL PAL:   So we then start with a huge economic-- PETER COOPER: Sorry for interrupting your   video, but I have an important message to share.   At Real Vision, we pride ourselves on providing  the very best in-depth, expert analysis   available to help you understand the complex world  of finance, business, and the global economy. So   if you like what you see on Real Vision’s YouTube  channel, that is just the tip of an iceberg.   You should come over to realvision.com and  see how we're not leaving any stone unturned.   From publishing more in-depth videos,  live discussions, written reports,   and our latest feature, The Exchange, where you  get a chance to engage with experts and fellow   subscribers and learn from everyone's experience.  It is an experience which you live and you learn   from. So if you go to the link in the description  or go to realvision.com, it costs you just $1.   I don't think you can afford to be without it. JEFF BOOTH:   all of them, are because as those  two forces fighting each other.  RAOUL PAL: So we then start with a huge  economic event after you wrote the book.  JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. RAOUL PAL: Where does this now fit into your   framework? My guess is it plays into it perfectly. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah, so all it does is it accelerates   it. So I'm a technology entrepreneur. One of the companies I co-founded was during 200,000 a month   last year at this time. It's now doing $8 and 1/2 million.  RAOUL PAL: Wow. JEFF BOOTH:   It's an acceleration of technology  everywhere. All of those companies--   why do you think technology is   actually a store of value? Why are the top  technology companies working on network effects  racing up in value? They might be too high  priced. But a relative store of value,   the money is just injecting into where can I store value.   And it's actually making it happen faster  so that-- and people aren't connecting  the dots on some of these things. If you think about--   so fill a hole of commercial real estate with  more debt, right? So to prevent the prices  from coming down. Yes, that might work. But people  aren't in the offices. That commercial real estate  shouldn't be priced where it is.  They're on Zoom. Maybe 50% are in   the offices. That means commercial real estate has to fall by that.   Or logically, you would expect a reversion  to the mean of something like that.  But it's not just that. That's the first  order of consequence. The second order   consequence is, as people are working from home, and all those   businesses are saying, hey, it's  OK for work from home, people are  thinking that their labor isn't mobile, right?  If I can hire the-- then they can work from   home. Borders don't matter anymore.  I have a company in India with 100 people  building technology all over the world.   It's growing like a weed. And you can get   great talent and everything else. So now,  there's further labor, further deflation in the  labor. RAOUL PAL: And also,   you know, one of things I've spent a lot of  time looking at recently is at artificial  intelligence and machine learning.  It replaces so many people. Now,   forget about the singularity and all of that. But just at a basic level, tasks that take a   lot of humans a lot of time just now disappear. JEFF BOOTH: I wrote in my book-- and   there's two chapters in my book  on artificial intelligence. I'm  really deep on this subject and know  many of the top researchers that I call   are my friends, very deep. And how fast this is moving. And   people are underestimating it by a  quantum amount. It's just staggering.  You're right. It's moving that fast. And I think people, when they look at that   thesis-- and what I say is, what  is human intelligence, right? It's  just error correction. What you're  doing to a whole bunch of people,   what we're doing on this, and people listening to this, are correcting errors. Maybe   we're wrong. And we build on knowledge. And as we practice, we get better and better and better.   And that practice takes us  down-- we can't do everything. We  practice, and we zone in, and we miss bigger  patterns because we're practicing in an silo.  That's actually all that computers do. It's error  correction at scale. And that error correction   is building in, first of all,   PhDs. Humans are helping error correct. And over  time, it's just error correction at scale. So it's  logical to think, at one point,  we will get to the singularity.  But to the point that you just made, people  are looking at the end point and saying, OK,   it's not deflationary until then.   The jobs come out then. It's like, it's on a light  switch. It's exponentially more deflationary along  that path. And to one day, we might  get there. One day we might not.   We're going to get there. But that  argument is irrelevant to the point that it's  deflationary. It creates way more efficiency.  And here's the thing. That efficiency is a  savings on our time. Why are we blocking that?   So if we block that, if we try to stop that--   we won't stop it anyways. It's a way  bigger force than money printing can be.  And we can talk about what's going-- I think  you and I agree on what's going to happen here.  But by stopping, it we rob society  of the gain, and we force people   to pay for prices that are artificially  high, that will manipulate it  artificially high. We force people on a   treadmill. We force society on a treadmill to pay for those artificially high prices.  And then, because we've broken the rules  of capitalism and not let things fail,   socialism rises because we have to pay a whole bunch of people more money   because of a thing we created  in the first place by trying  to keep prices high. And society  breaks. And it's all a waste of time.   They can't-- it can't solve it because you're fighting nature.  RAOUL PAL: So how do you solve that, the issue  of slowly, over time, that rises exponentially,   loss of the need of certain skills?   Now, the price of goods falling doesn't  necessarily offset that if there's no income.  JEFF BOOTH: So-- but play that. So  again, if people don't see it-- it's   impossible to see an interconnected system by looking at one part.   And that's where people get confused  about a lot. So people who look at  one part, and they'll say, OK, my house  has to go up because that's my savings,   and housing always goes up-- without asking,   would housing have gone up without $185  trillion of stimulus over the last 20 years?  And you know it wouldn't, right?  You would see-- so people think,   oh, no, it's just tech goods that are deflationary. [?] in everything. It's   the only thing that it's not is the  things that we're manipulating higher  and asset prices because of the monetary easing  and the printing of money by warping capitalism.  So what does capitalism call for and a free  market call for? Entrepreneurs racing in   to make products or services that are better for us.   And unless they win, then they fail.  And what that means against technology  is it means that all prices should be  falling. And as technology moves into   more and more industries, prices should be falling more and more.   It's just that's the natural order of things. RAOUL PAL: And how does that not yet go through to   certain goods? Because I mean, look, it's coming, whether it's in farming, where productivity   has increased dramatically [?]  although they've flattened out  somewhat. JEFF BOOTH: I'm a chairmen of two boards in   agriculture. It's coming fast. RAOUL PAL: Yeah.  JEFF BOOTH: It's coming fast. RAOUL PAL: And so there's that area.   The raw material inputs, I guess,   all the things where you get cyclical and sometimes secular   price rises. And people confuse that with  inflation because we're still looking  back at the 1970s. And this is  an entirely different world.  JEFF BOOTH: And without monetary easing and the  amount of credit that is being created, what would  the price of those raw materials  be if you allow the natural   market to take over? They would fall. Right? Look at what happened in 2008 to the price of oil.   As people-- as you printed,  the price of oil just went  straight up. In real terms, you would see  it everywhere. Capitalism would take its   place. There is a thing-- But here's where we're trapped.   There's so much debt. The policy  mistake was made a long, long time ago.  And you know this. And so by decreasing  interest rates instead of increasing   interest rates and letting a recession happen, we built   bigger and bigger debt holes and kept on  decreasing interest rates to the point  that we're trapped. So there's only two choices.   There is choice one. And in fact, there's  only-- there is no good choices. Choice  one is save currencies. Let a depression  happen, deflationary depression happen.   Asset prices correct by 85%, 90%. Everything falls.  But if you carry that on, banks fail. Governments  fail. The entire world goes into-- there's   lineups like in the '30s for-- it's   horrific on society because of something  that happened over here that we're paying no  attention to. So I'm not  arguing that we should do that.  But now, look at the alternative.   The alternative is actually, probably  more horrific for society. And that's  what we're doing. So governments are  going to print. And you as well as I do,   they can't create inflation until the rules change.   So right now, that is going into asset  prices, inflation, and everything else.  But the next thing will go MMT and fiscal response  and everything else. And once inflation starts,   it'll be hyper inflation.   It might take some time. And it might be-- but  currency after currency is going to fail. And  I think we share a similar view. The US might  be the last standing. But as currencies fail,   the feedback effects of other currencies failing   just becomes faster and faster because  trade changes hot flows of money back  and forth as you warp all  sense of reality on markets.  But how do you get out of it? How  do you stop it once it starts?   And I think-- so you've effectively taken out  the fed mandate, and you've given  it to Treasury all around the world,   similar. And now politicians are in charge of that.  And do you remember when Volcker increased rates?  So after the '70s, after the gold reserve, Volcker  increased rates to 20-plus and  caused a massive recession.   Businesses failed and everything else. That was against a debt that was not close to this.   Government debt wasn't close to  this. The fed hadn't absorbed the  risk of the government debt. So if you tried the same thing today,   the government fails. The fed fail--  so once you start that cascade, if  you raise interest rates against  what's happening in the short term by--   you force it to happen fast, and then the entire thing blows up.   So we have some real challenges ahead,  no matter which pick, no matter which  path. RAOUL PAL: The   other part of that I've focused on for a long  time is I have this little moniker that says,  debt plus deflation equals a ticket to bankruptcy. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah.  RAOUL PAL: Because real debts rise  all the time. So in this environment,   where we've got a natural order of deflationary pressure over time   driven by technology, demographics,  and few other things, it means the  debt burden goes up. And so part of the  answer to that is create more debt to   service your debt. We've seen that habit.  What also interests me-- I think people don't  think through, to get back to the commodity   price inflation-- and we've seen it every time.   You raise-- you double the cost of oil now,  it is not inflationary. It's deflationary.  JEFF BOOTH: Exactly. RAOUL PAL:   All spending-- because of this debt burden, all  spending collapses. And people don't get it.  They seem to think this is inflationary.  It's going to feed on itself. There is   no way to generate demand inflation in this economy,   in this structure. It's impossible. JEFF BOOTH: Exactly. It's impossible.   So right now-- that's why I said  we agree-- as you add more debt,  it becomes more disinflationary. It  adds deflation to everything we're   talking about, as if you didn't need more pressure, inflationary pressure.  And people talk about, oh, there's Jeff, the  deflationary guy or this. All I'm-- this is otic.   This is first principles. This is understanding what   is happening. If somebody says a train's  coming and pushes you out of the way  of the train, that's what's  coming. Right? So we can talk about   what the solutions look like and everything else, but there is no good solutions   right now. Central banks have put  themselves in a trap. And we're all  frogs boiling in a pot. And the real risk-- a lot   of your listeners, OK, where can I have  safety of money? And you talk about-- and  you do a really good job of that in Bitcoin  and others. I think it's a lifeboat away from   what's happening here. So I am also irresponsibly long.   But I'm-- RAOUL PAL: Sorry.   Just people don't get that, by the way,  because they say, but you're a deflationist.  Surely it means Bitcoin goes down. I'm like, no. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah.  RAOUL PAL: Because of the outcomes. JEFF BOOTH: Exactly. And even if   that-- the real value of that will go  up. If you-- I would say beyond all  of that, if you look at history and the swinging  pendulum of what ends up happening when we're   in these cycles,   it's revolution. It's people on the street. You're  seeing what's happening in the US. And it's just--  those are glimmers of what's coming. And that's why I wrote the book. I was   hoping to have-- I wrote the book  for my children so that we could  have intelligent dialogue about what must  be done to get to the other side because   the vortex of yelling on both sides of the aisle,   when both sides, Republicans, Democrats,  everything, don't have a clue about what  they're dealing with, it's-- RAOUL PAL: And nor do the central   bank. They don't understand [?]. JEFF BOOTH: Nor do the central banks.   And if they even if they knew  how do they get out, we need some  serious dialogue on that.  Otherwise, society breaks.  And so when I think about  Bitcoin, I think about a lifeboat.   And I hope it goes up slower than fast so more people jump in the lifeboat.   That's it. That's my hope. I'm not-- I  could care less about the money. I care  about safety, what happens to  society and everything else.  And when most people are failing, they rise up  and look for-- and they blame others for that   failing. And so anytime you go through--   if you go through a depression like  we would have to go through, or you go  through a hyper inflation, look at  societies that happens. You have--   it's controlled by the biggest thug. RAOUL PAL: But one of the   other interesting things is, for a long  time-- because I don't know if you've  ever seen it. James Goldsmith, the famous  corporate raider and financier from the UK   and a pure capitalist  appeared on Charlie Rose. And it was all  part of what he was doing at the time.  The WTO agreement was under negotiation. And James  Goldsmith said, this is wrong. And everyone was  like, but you're a free market capitalist  with businesses all around the world. He said,   you have no understanding what   you're about to do. You're about to destroy  society in 20 years' time. And you're going  to create a massive deflationary wave that  makes it almost impossible to compete without   moving all your labor abroad   and the rise of technology, et cetera. That whole thing has come to pass.   And people now think-- because  humans are typical, they look back.  Let's undo globalization. I understand  that maybe over reliances, and we   want to change trade linkages and supply chains. OK, fine.  But in the software age-- and the  profundity of Marc Andreessen's   comment of software is eating the world is still not understood by most people.   They kind of think they get it, but  as a big a rabbit hole as Bitcoin is-  - and it's the rabbit hole that caused  you to write an entire book about it--   is that everything is globalized in a software world.   There is no border. There are no borders.  We're not going back to manufacturing steel  in the United States because we don't care  about steel any longer. We're using software.  JEFF BOOTH: And that software  is-- exactly, it's digital. And   you can-- everything on your phone, why you use all the apps on your phone is   they're free. And it scales across  the world for pennies instead of  having to have control of supply chains to  be able to scale that. It's so different.   But it's so foreign to what people have seen their whole lives.   So I understand why they get trapped. RAOUL PAL: And so why--   so there's a huge shit fight that goes  on all day about the measurement of  inflation. So there's a whole  group of people who will say,   my cost of living is going up. How dare you talk about deflation? And there's a whole group   of people who will say, this is  the most deflationary thing we've  ever seen, and all I can see is deflation. Now, because we don't put in CPI the value of   all of these things that are free-- JEFF BOOTH: Bingo.  RAOUL PAL: Right? That's one  thing. But CPI also doesn't measure   health care costs accurately and other stuff. So how--   people that understand some of this, cost of  living deflation versus product deflation, frame  some of that for people to think about. JEFF BOOTH: That's what I would just say--  RAOUL PAL: Because people are worse off. I mean,  the poorer parts of society are much worse off.  JEFF BOOTH: Well, so if you just--  well, let's start with this.   The first thing I said is technology [?]? Or does it create efficiency on an exponential scale?   And the answer is yes. I don't  think anybody would argue  with that. Then the output   of that has to be deflationary. And it has to  be. If technology is doing that because it's  moving so fast, entrepreneurs are  taking advantage of that and driving   that into society. And it's moving not just into your iPhone. It's   moving into health care, education. I'll  talk about education or health care if  you want me to and how big it's going to make  a difference going forward, not backward.  RAOUL PAL: Yeah, very interesting. JEFF BOOTH: But if you talk about that,   then it's everywhere. And people  think it's just in the-- the only  reason people think it's just in  their phone is they're measuring--   all of the other goods are going up, and it's because we're   arbitrarily making the other things more  expensive by changing the real value of money.  RAOUL PAL: I've just come across another idea that  I've never had before, just talking to you. So we  understand that the poorer  sections of-- let's call the US.   The UK is similar and, in fact, most of Europe as well-- slightly less so because they're a social   state-- are poorer. They see  the price of goods rising.   I'm not sure the price of goods are rising.   I think their wages are deflating. JEFF BOOTH: That's what's happening.   That's what's happening. RAOUL PAL: So it's deflation that they're seeing,   and they're seeing it as inflation because their purchasing power has been diminished   by the lack of value per man hour  that they now have in this new  society. JEFF BOOTH: When you do this-- that's my point   exactly. When you do this, you make labor compete. You have-- essentially, why governments right   now are racing to the bottom  of their currencies is they're  trying to make their labor more  competitive and their labor not understand   that they just got a decrease in wages. Right? That's what they're   doing. That's what ends up happening  because if you're in that country,  you don't know-- because all your goods are priced  in that same currency, you don't know you got a  decrease in wages. And that's what's creating-- And so here's a-- in Canada, where I am, but   my lake house-- seven years  ago, we tore down the old cabin  on the lake house. But in the  winter, we could only rent it   for $600 a month. About a block away, same type of cabin now rents for $1,500 a month.   So what that means is if  somebody's wages hasn't gone up  by 2 and 1/2 times, they've got a decrease  in their wages. And so no wonder they're   mad. No wonder they're racing to   UBI and socialism and saying, this is  broken. But they don't know why it's broken.  RAOUL PAL: Fascinating to think that. Because  essentially, the printing of more currency,   even the closest- - in the United States, where,   sure, there's exports and imports.  But basically, you could survive on US  goods. Monetary printing   and technology means that people's wages  go down in relative purchasing power. And  it's not the demand of commodities  that we had in the '70s from this   massive Baby Boom generation driving up prices because wages followed suit. We had wage   inflation. We've got wage deflation, and nobody understands it because it's insidious,   and it happens over time. JEFF BOOTH: That's exactly it. And   that's why we're frogs in a pot  boiling. And we don't understand--  when I said you can't understand an interconnected  system by looking at its component parts,   all of those people, whether I buy a house,   and it goes up, and I don't question  it, would it have gone up with $185  trillion dollars in stimulus, people  that are on the bottom of that ladder,   that their wages are actually going down in real terms, and they don't know-- these   are people looking at it from a component parts. And I would-- a lot of your listeners, too,   are looking at it in component  parts. And that's why they get  confused on this whole thing. The  entire system-- if you just go--  I could have stopped my book at  this. Technology is efficiency   on an exponential scale. And that creates deflation, period. Nothing else matters.   If that's true, then the entire way  we've built society around needing  inflation is a bug in the system.  It will not work. Nothing will work.   We have to rebuild against a deflationary monetary policy, which Bitcoin will force.   But otherwise, the world burns. RAOUL PAL: So here's another question   that comes across my mind is--  by doing this, we are increasing  productivity. We're kind of arbitraging.  That's what technology does.   Why does productivity measurement  not increase? JEFF BOOTH:   Because we're masking it in the printing. The  productivity is going straight up. But we're  concentrating that productivity  and wealth in all of the   technology companies' hands. That's what we're doing. What do you think's happening at Apple?   What you think is happening at Amazon? What do you think's happening at many of the companies that   I'm sitting on the boards of. And what's happening,   you drive-- have any of your listeners look  up network effects and what drives that.  Networks effects are responsible  for about 70% of the value   of these companies we're talking about. And you concentrate it faster because   you stop capitalism from working. So  you're concentrating that inequality  faster. RAOUL PAL: It's   been an extraordinary time since post-COVID.  It's ultra-accelerated. If I look at the shares  of the BBB-rated, massive indebted companies, the  AT&Ts, the General Electrics, the Fords, the GMs,   and they're going down.  JEFF BOOTH: Right. RAOUL PAL: But all the technology, or all   free cash flow, no debt, are doing the opposite. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. And it's-- again,   where do you think the AI  researchers are going? Where are the  top AI researchers? If you looked  at where-- because those companies   have the ability to pay extraordinary to get the best talent. And again, it   concentrates. It concentrates on  the network effect. And it makes it  stronger and stronger throughout time.  And then the AI takes over. And then you   don't need the same labor to do the same thing. So   the efficiency is there. You just remove  labor, and it's all-- and we're pushing it to  the top tech companies. RAOUL PAL: So then,   to go back to the big issue then, OK,  we've identified-- I'm going to go back to  some of these industries you talked about in  a bit because I want to dig into that. But   you've identified the fact that, OK, wages are deflating.   It's almost impossible to get out of  the way of this deflationary wave.  And we're not benefiting because our wages-- well,  some people's wages-- if you work for Google, your  wages are inflating faster. JEFF BOOTH: Yes. Or if you've   taken your money, and you put it into  assets that are inflating faster, or  if you own most of the stocks that are  going up. So that's actually why [?]   is driving the wealth inequality at a rate that is unmatched in history.  RAOUL PAL: So how does that get  solved for the average person,   who doesn't-- who's not in control? I mean, clearly, Bitcoin is one way. It   gives you an anchor onto something  else. What else can be done here  while this plays out? JEFF BOOTH: It's the only   way. Unfortunately, it's the only way.  Today, there is going to be-- so if you  think about what asset prices-- let's  connect the dots on a bunch of these.   If you believe that governments aren't willing to go into a deflationary spiral,   which the probabilities are  very low. They could make policy  mistakes, and it could get away on  them before-- but the probabilities   are very low that they allow that to happen. So you can expect more printing   all over the world. In the more  printing, you can expect housing  prices to keep going up, stock prices to  keep going up, and maybe not in real terms.  If you look at the next step, why  didn't people in Nazi Germany leave?   Why didn't the wealthy leave? And you could see it coming for years.   So if you look throughout history--  or Venezuela or Turkey today, why  don't they leave? Because what ends up happening   is all of their wealth is denominated  in that currency-- their real estate,  their stocks, their gain, everything.  And leaving is leaving as a refugee. And   back in those times, even leaving as a refugee,   you try to dew gold into your clothes, and  then the ship goes down, and you sink to  the bottom, and everything else.  And we see that throughout history.  But it's because you long for  better times, looking backwards.   And you're actually-- because you have the assets, you're sitting in that as the   fires are burning, and you don't  know when-- and you can't get out.  Your assets are going up. You're  actually enriching yourself as others   are getting poorer. But you don't see the break to society happening. And   by the time you get out, you can't  get out. Or by the time you want to  get out, you can't get out. And so that's a lot of people   today are in that boat. And a lot of  people on the wealthy side are in that  boat. They're sitting there, thinking,  wow, this is not a bad thing,   not looking at the consequence of why their asset prices and everything's   rising so fast, and not looking at tons  of the population doesn't have that  privilege. And so you can expect,  if this printing continues,   society to get worse and then get locked up in that currency, get locked up. And then there   becomes capital controls. You  can't get your money out and  everything else. And it becomes really ugly. History shows it over and over and over again.   And we have evidence of this  right now. Look at Hong Kong  right now. And so you start  to get to some of this.  Bitcoin is an escape hatch. It's a safety. RAOUL PAL: It's also--   what is interesting to me about Bitcoin, it  started from the ground up, from the little  guy. It was not started by the big wealth.  They owned gold, and they owned property.   But they didn't own this. And this is the   one thing that little guy can get. And the genius of being able to   stack sacks, as they call it, or buying  stuff, buying some-- because it's  affordable because it breaks  down to small component parts--   and it's so broad, it's available to anybody, while anything else--  If we were to say, oh, yeah, well,  obviously, Manhattan apartments, well,   especially luxury apartments, they don't go down much. Great. You need   20 million bucks to do that. JEFF BOOTH: Exactly.  RAOUL PAL: But here's something you need $1 for. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. And that's the thing. And it   works on a network. And the  more people that trust it,  the more people that trust it. And  then it builds on itself, and it builds   on itself. It's beautifully designed protocol. There's a beautiful design.  And it plays on all of the things-- I talk  about it-- I talk about Bitcoin a tiny it   in the book. Most of the book sets up for why that thing is   going to be so incredible because if you  look at this through a first principle  lens, you know where it's going. Here's  a roadmap for where everything is going.  And I looked at the interview I did  with Max on Real Vision in January.   There's a bunch of comments that says, this aged like a fine wine.   And it's because if you understand  what's happening in the overall system,  and what must happen from policies, or what  is the probabilities of policy response,   you know what's going to happen next,   and you know what's going to happen after  that, and you know what's going to happen  after that. RAOUL PAL: I mean,   as far as I see it, there's one reaction function,   which is printing more money. It's the only thing that they can do.  Now, even MMT, yes, you might be able to increase  generalized productivity in the United States by  implementing the right thing. But  in the end, you're still devaluing   your currency to do it. And that's a hell of a tradeoff, and it's unlikely to work.  JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. RAOUL PAL:   And again, when I talk about devaluing the  currency, I don't mean in relative terms to  others. I mean the whole fiat currency system,  because everybody's doing the same thing.  JEFF BOOTH: Yeah, but let's just take MMT. So  what we're really doing-- so MMT is a response by  governments from breaking capitalism's rules,  a whole bunch of people losing out that can't   pay for their bills.  I force prices up. There's a whole bunch  of people that can't pay for housing,   or medical, or food, and everything else.   And then they come back to the same government  who manipulated prices higher in the  first place, and say, I need something so I  can manipulate prices higher that you created   in the first place. It's a response.  So it's crazy to me that you're going to  jump on MMT on top of this whole thing.   But it's going to help. It is logical that, at some point--   because either the Fed cannot create  inflation for the same reasons you and I  talked about, so it has to be something  like that. And you put politicians in   control. But once you do, look out. You're going to-- it's a   path to hyper inflation and all currencies  failing. That's what's going-- that path  it's going out. And there's this belief that,   oh, don't worry, the politicians will now  increase the interest rates and cause a  depression. So we didn't do it  over here when the problem--   when the fire was smaller. We didn't do it when the fire was really small because we can grow   out of this forever by printing more debt. Now, we could create this massive fire. We'll do it   over here when the fire is as big as the sun. It's just ridiculous. It's not going to happen.  RAOUL PAL: Right. I'm going to ask-- I want to go  through some industries. A few people have asked  about agriculture. You mentioned to it.  You've got some experience in it. I want   to talk about agriculture, health care, and education.  Let's tackle agriculture. Talk to me  about deflation in agriculture. Because,   again, there's a lot of people that are like, well, the dollar is going down,   or I think there's inflation coming,  I want to buy agricultural stuff.  And I'm like, look at the trend over  the last 50 years. It's just gone down.   And if you look at productivity, it went up and up and up from crops over time.   What is your view on this? What do you see? JEFF BOOTH: So I'm chairman of a board called   CubicFarms. And the company actually shouldn't be public now. It's public on the TSX, the stock   exchange. And it went public too  early. But I joined as chairman  because the innovation is so staggering  and what's happening. And I can't give   what's happening kind of public information.  But what I would say is, in a  backdrop-- what is agriculture today?   You have these long supply chains that actually are more fragile with weather   dependencies, pesticides, everything  else. But the supply chains work  because of the distribution function to large  retail, everything else. And so it's really   hard to break that-- almost like Walmart   or Sears or anything else. It's actually the  supply chain that makes it efficient. And then  all of the labor comes into the farm  and everything else. And you grow these   giant tracts of farmland and everything else.  But you build fragility into the system.   And then you have weather events  and crop failures and everything  else. And there's more fragility into the  system. And margins go down when it's our turn.  They call it ag anywhere. And they've  built these, effectively, containers   that have undulating paths that grow 10 to 100 times more product   per footprint into this. No  pesticides, anything else. And they're  commercial scale ag units. And you can put  them together. And you could do lettuce,   or this, and this. You could put how many you   want together. In other words-- RAOUL PAL: So you're making   distributed agriculture. JEFF BOOTH: You can localize   that agriculture. So instead of looking  like a large supply chain, which  requires-- in a world where things are  breaking, governments are breaking all   over, food matters a lot. Right? Food matters a lot.  RAOUL PAL: Here's another thing for you to put  into that equation. About 100 years ago, there was  something like 1,200 varieties of wheat. There  are now seven on a commercial scale globally.  JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. RAOUL PAL: S So what   you've created is a huge fragility. Now, if you look at where the wheat's   produced, it's basically the US,  Canada, Australia, and Russia, and  Ukraine. That's it. And we've just gone  through a pandemic now. People cannot   get their heads around the fact that you can basically   destroy all wheat with one blight. And  there's nothing we can do about it. Even  Monsanto didn't figure it out in advance. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah, but even Monsanto.   And then we eat that wheat with  pesticides we know are terrible  for us. And it's in all of these other foods. And  we have to because there-- the bugs are resistant.  Actually, I'm chairman of another board, a private  company called Terramera that makes ag inputs,  essentially reduces pesticides  by making ag inputs 10 times more   effective. So you need 1/10 the amount of pesticide to make the yield better.   Or it drives natural inputs 10  times more effective and makes them  able to be cost effective with pesticides. So these changes dramatically have downstream   effects on cost of everything.  So when you're changing a  function by 10 times-- and one of the big  costs inputs for farmers is pesticides   and crop failure and everything else-- and you reduce that by--   the downstream effects to some  of these innovations, it's  staggering. So it's more  deflationary. That's one industry.  But one I'd like to pick on is  education. What is-- yeah, so today,   universities are really [?] where-- and they get away with it because more people talk. People   go there. More people go there. Top researchers go there. So they can attract more talent.  But what's valuable in the education?  And I would say it looks exactly the   same as book stores thinking they could compete against Amazon.   It's the information. And what's going to happen   here-- Google just did it three weeks  ago, where they launched a program, a  six-month program or, I think  it's $400, that they'll hire over   a four-year degree. Because when you understand what can happen,   you can digitize that same content and  sell it for exactly what Google is, for  nothing, or almost anything in their  content. And with that, you can   attract all the best professors. RAOUL PAL: I mean, isn't it   that what Real Vision is? JEFF BOOTH: Yeah, exactly.  RAOUL PAL: It's basically applied learning  at scale from the best, smartest people in   the world that you'd never get access to.   It would have been prohibitive ever to do  it any other way. And now, basically, it's  bordering on free, it's so cheap for what you get. JEFF BOOTH: Totally. And actually,   if you think about that, what you're  saying is content everywhere is  free. You could get-- or bordering  on free, or picked for pennies. Or   what you charge for Real Vision for the value is staggering for that   type of content. Why can you do that?  Because you can digitize that content,  and it can play on for years and years and  years. And you can charge people a penny   across the world, and it distributes everywhere,   instead of having to go and learn  in a 30-person classroom. That's the  difference. And by the way, the technology where it's going,   I saw a demo of a product that  blew me away just recently  that makes the Zoom call-- we could put  other people in the room, and it feels   like we're in the room. And I could whisper just to you,   and the other people couldn't hear it. So again, people underestimate where technology is   going because they're looking at where we are now, not even where it actually really is now. They're   looking at where-- they're  looking backwards. And it's  moving so fast. And these  technology innovations are just--   it's staggering what it does to the change. And why businesses don't understand it   or existing infrastructure doesn't  understand it is for the same reason  Blockbuster didn't understand Netflix.  The entire business model is framed   around a different thing. And when download speeds change,   good night. RAOUL PAL: I mean-- so I mean,   at Real Vision, we've made no secret  of the fact that education is going  to be a big part of we're going as well. There  is no reason we can't create our own university.  Now, if you think of two of the big  inputs we talked about in traditional   CPI, or just the cost of living for people, there have been monopolies or   oligopolies. Education, you can  only get to a certain number of  providers, et cetera, et cetera.  Well, that's going to go entirely   because people like us can walk in, offer a better product at a fraction of the price. So   as we move out towards something  of that sort, becomes a huge  change. And it becomes massively deflationary. Because what happens is entrepreneurs look   for excess profits and try and  exploit them until so many people  come in. And then the excess profits go away. And  the supernormal profits go, and you end up with a  normal margin. SAS still has like 70%   profit margins. And so that means it can  destroy every business model until it gets  destroyed itself by competition. So the overall  amount goes down. But we're nowhere near that yet.  JEFF BOOTH: No, nowhere near that, yeah. RAOUL PAL: So it encourages every entrepreneur   to put their money into something  that generates SASlike revenues.  JEFF BOOTH: That's correct.  Yeah. And then those get   taken over time as more entrepreneurs come in to compete. And that's kind of the natural evolution   of things, that prices should be going down. RAOUL PAL: Now, talk a bit about health   care. I mean, I've witnessed of  some of this, with what's going  on in India, where there's a  lot of cutting edge changes to   health care in terms of robots having positions in different countries, all sorts of stuff.   What are you seeing there? Where is  health care going in all of this?  Because right now, this is a typical  oligopoly, where they're clinging onto power,   keeping up the price of pharmaceuticals,   keeping up the price of operations, et cetera.  But it feels like it's a house of cards.  JEFF BOOTH: It is. And that's why it'll  be innovated away as well. But let's   look at health cares through the lens of data and AI.   And let's look at why drugs cost  what they cost, just that aspect.  Drugs cost what they cost because  to invent a drug, the amount of   science that's needed, and then trials, and trials, and trials. What you're doing is   testing people in small batches  and then ever bigger trials over  years to see what effects are going to--  what side effects. And is the drug effective?   You're doing trials. Think about that from a--   and why do you have to do that? You have  to do that because your gut biome is  different than mine. So is what you eat. So is  your genetic code. So is how you exercise. So   is where you live.  And all of these things, if you looked at  yourself as a data system, it's just data.   And what you're doing is you're taking humans, and you're saying,   I can figure out all this. And  there's no way to do it because all  these things, that your genome against  something else, again something else--   this staggering combinatorial problem is too hard for people to figure out.   So they think they can, and they  do it in small trials. And they  only see a tiny bit of the picture. And then after 10 or 20 years of these trials,   you launch it to a wider audience,  who shows up differently.  And the drug fails, or it has tremendous  side consequences. All that cost is embedded   into our system today. AI changes that dramatically.   It sees these things. It does all these  tests. And as you have more data into the  system-- I say in, eventually, AI conferences,   why is Google as big as it is?  Why is Amazon as big as it is?  There is no second best algorithm. The  best algorithm wins. And it consolidates   data. And as it consolidates data, more data rushes in   because the outcomes are so much better.  And it keeps on going. And then health  care is going to look the same thing. So right now, all of these silos of information   are in silos. And there's different  researchers in every different  silo, thinking that their silo is the most  important. As you look across the silo and   you put some of these data sets together,   this watch knows more about me than my doctor.  It now knows my heart rate all times. It  knows how much I exercise. It knows  how much I sleep. It knows my-- it   knows more about me than my doctor. And it's native.   It's getting more and more. So if Apple said-- and I trust   the privacy of their network-- hey,  Jeff, send me your genome sequence, or  we're going to give you a test to  be able to do your genome sequence,   and we can make your outcomes 10 times, 100 times better.   If I trusted them with the data, I would  do it. Now, it's the same reason I use the  watch in the first place,  because it gives me value.  And there's nothing governments  can do to stop it. It's coming.   And that radically changes health care. Now, that's still is a long time out   you're going to see these things  change. But if you think about US and  some of the other regions, imagine what's  happening in China. They don't have to ask.  RAOUL PAL: I've long argued about  the impact of big data on science,   particularly medicine. Because if you think of how we discovered cholera,   what was done was to create the  right hypothesis. That's the hard  thing about science. Because if you create lots  of wrong hypotheses, it takes a lot of testing,   and you waste a lot of time.  But with cholera, the genius who  found cholera in London, there was   all this ideas. It's airborne. It's this. It's that. And he mapped out London and mapped out the   incidences, and went to each spot, and realized each spot happened to have a water supply.   And then he realized that some  water supplies came from the  Thames and others didn't. And therefore, those  two differences were probably where the issue lay.  We know that so much of human illness is driven by  factors of yet which we do not understand. And we  tend to do it in lab conditions as  opposed to an AI massive data set   conditions. The more you put this stuff into massive data set conditions,   the more you will find the answers  much faster. And we're not doing that  yet. JEFF BOOTH: AI sees things that we don't see.  RAOUL PAL: Yeah. JEFF BOOTH:   And it's understandable because we run at  of time in our brains to be able to do the  combinatory-- as you have trillions of  combinations, you can't do it in your   mind. And there's no way. So you have to take shortcuts.   Humans have to take shortcuts to be able to-- And then we have a whole bunch of biases on   top of those shortcuts that we  think we're right and everything  else. And only in time do we realize it  was a bias. It's how the human brain works.   The computers don't suffer from that. They keep on--  And actually, if you saw what's  happening today in some of these sectors   in AI, how fast it's moving, it isn't the scale we're talking about yet.   But it is making dramatic differences  in cancer prevention and some of  those things that-- dramatic.  It's moving really fast.  RAOUL PAL: Fascinating. Well, I'm going  to ask you-- we've been going an hour,   actually. I could talk for hours. But I've got a   bunch of questions from our members. So  I thought I'd ask some of these because  they're always keen to have them. JEFF BOOTH: OK, awesome.  RAOUL PAL: OK, there's a  bunch of gold, Bitcoiny ones.   So "why is Bitcoin, and gold for that matter, completely correlated with the US equities?   The US dollar seems to offer a  much better hedge against equity  weakness. Maybe the dollar  isn't so bad after all."  So I think there's a bit about  gold and Bitcoin, just a bit more   explanation over that. I think the correlation between equities you explained, which is   the printing of money is driving all of them. JEFF BOOTH: Driving all of them. I   expect that correlation to  break and Bitcoin to be,   at some point, to move way to the upside, way to the upside.   But the correlation is caused by all the printing. And so if you-- on a different show,   actually, the day before Bitcoin fell a  little bit, and all equities sold off,  I said, listen, if there's not more  stimulus, you can expect equities to fall.   Eventually, if there is no more stimulus, equities would fall by 80%.   You would have a deflationary  depression. And in that event, Bitcoin  would probably fall short term too. RAOUL PAL: Yeah, and I've always said,   it's a passing correlation  because of the network effect and  everything else that's going on  in it. It's a much bigger thing.  JEFF BOOTH: Bingo. RAOUL PAL: OK, more questions.   This is actually a good question  because of what you've talked about.  Tech is this huge thing that's going  on and software is eating the world,   and all the things we're talking about. But is it overvalued? What   does overvalued mean in-- JEFF BOOTH:   That's the thing. In today, all you're looking  at, everything's overvalued. The natural world,  if you just said there was no printing,  there's-- first, is $185 trillion of   additional debt in the last 20 years, is there a possibility to pay back that   debt? The answer is no, right? So  what it says is without that, would  there be the real value. The debt right now is--   we're going to try to inflate it away.  And that's going-- where is value?   Today, it's relative value right now. But where is   free market telling you where there is [?]. RAOUL PAL: But the problem is, if we say,   OK, the government's going to  keep printing, therefore, keep  owning equities, but that's not  necessarily the case because equities--   I mean, they have a significant downside risk within them   embedded as well. They don't necessarily  have to outperform in this situation.  JEFF BOOTH: Yeah. But if you looked at  equities in Venezuela in the currency--  RAOUL PAL: Yes. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah.   Right And that's what's fooling people. And  so that's actually why I'm irresponsibly  long Bitcoin because it fools people  to think they'll always go up. And they   get caught into that trap. It's really the currency going down.  RAOUL PAL: So I looked at all asset classes in the  denominator of the G4 central bank balance sheets.  Fascinating. Gold underperformed  by 50%. So it didn't offset it.   Most things didn't do particularly well. Equities over time haven't done well but in   periods of fast, rapid printing have done OK. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah.  RAOUL PAL: There was only one asset I  could find anyone in the world that has   massively outperformed, yet it's correlated,   which is Bitcoin. I mean, fascinating. JEFF BOOTH: Really fascinating.   Really fascinating. RAOUL PAL: Right.   I think-- yeah, this is a question I'd like to  hear as well. Is UBI, Universal Basic Income,  necessary in this transition period  where we-- we haven't got to a new   place yet. You can't give everybody Bitcoin. Not everyone is going to   get them. So does it help? JEFF BOOTH: So I think--  RAOUL PAL: Or maybe the other way  of saying it is also welfare state   because Europe is-- well, Europe will probably try both. But welfare   states have some of those benefits as well. JEFF BOOTH: So capitalism itself is the   best. And so what is capitalism,  free market capitalism? It's where  entrepreneurs race in to try to  create value for you. And if it works,   you get value. And that's good. And if it doesn't, the entrepreneur goes broke,   so does the debt against the  entrepreneur, everything. So that's  what it looks like. But because we are not all   equal, capitalism values different people  at different times and everything else,  it's a really fine line. And you do  need kind of checks and balances to   stop that from going out of control. So I am a free market capitalist,   absolutely. It's the best system. But  it's a delicate balance. And once you  start manipulating it, you reinforce  it. And that's where we are today.   So you have these massive reinforcement things that   are creating problems all over the world. I didn't answer the question yet.   I believe that if you add the UBI right  now, without looking at the thing that  matters, you blow up the whole system  faster. The whole system-- I think you   need a total rewrite of how things look around the world.   And then what ends up happening is  you probably need some sort of social  safety net and checks and balances on capitalism.  That's what I believe. And that social safety net   might look like UBI.  I hate calling it UBI right now because  it just says, yeah, let's go UBI right   now on top of this broken system. And a broken system will make it--   it's going to be way worse. But do I  think we should let the whole thing  fail and put people on the street  and everything else? No, I don't.  And we don't have good options  going forward. I suspect as Bitcoin   grows-- and the same thing is going to happen as governments. All flows of capital,   if you think about it, I could  get a golden visa to Portugal  right now for my family for $250,000. And there's  a whole bunch of people. So where should I go and  everything else as countries compete  for capital. If this happens right   now, it happens all over the world right now. You move because safety,   functioning society, and everything else. I suspect that's going to happen on Bitcoin.   And I suspect that people that  own Bitcoin are going to be able  to help write the rules for what  that looks like because countries   are going to be begging them to move and everything else. And they will move to safe havens   that also have some sort of  social safety net so society  functions. RAOUL PAL:   I mean, yeah, and one of the reasons-- it's no  coincidence I ended up in the Cayman Islands.  And it wasn't-- it was for-- I kind  of knew where the world was going,   and I wanted to be in a place where- - it's not perfect. There's some   fragility in places here. But for these  reasons, it made sense to me. But also,  they're also very much looking at the  whole kind of digital assets space. And   what does it mean for a country like this?   You know, what is its strategic advantage? And there was a paper I tweeted out earlier   today. Europe is starting to  move very fast down this route. I  think everybody's realizing it is a competition. JEFF BOOTH: It's going to be a competition.  RAOUL PAL: And you can try and fight  it. And there's a question here about   government regulation. But the regulation is going the opposite way because   they will lose people and capital if they don't. JEFF BOOTH: Well, that's the thing. So some   will close it down. Some will  close it. But because it's a  distributed network, it can't be closed  down everywhere. And in game theory,   as some governments close  it down, they actually create more  value for other governments to   accept it. And so that's exactly why that the people-- if you just carry that forward,   the people that are owning Bitcoin  have a good chance to actually  contribute to the new rules of how  things should function in society.  RAOUL PAL: Yeah, and people don't get  their heads around the fact that this   is not a corporation. There's nobody to send a legal notice to.  JEFF BOOTH: That's right. RAOUL PAL: There's nothing you can do.  JEFF BOOTH: Nothing. RAOUL PAL: I can move,   be in a different country, get on a plane.  And I can use my Bitcoin, even though  you've banned it there. I mean, it  is almost impossible. It's a virus.   And viruses are incredibly difficult to  destroy. JEFF BOOTH: Yeah.   I don't think you're going to-- there is no  way to shut it down. I think it's going to  grow. It's going to grow on the network.  In fact, people are going to realize, wow,   why do I trust a piece of paper that I know is   being manipulated? Ask that question, right?  Why do I trust that so implicitly? I trust  that that piece of paper that  I know is being manipulated,   and I don't trust this thing that I know can't be manipulated. Over time, people are going to   realize, huh. RAOUL PAL:   So final question. Why the hell does the Fed  not understand this? Or are they too deep in  the game that they can't even  do anything about it anyway,   so they might as well perpetuate the old game? What's the final thoughts on the Fed   and where this is. JEFF BOOTH: I think   they understand this. I don't think they  understand how fast this is coming, but it's  the same reason I said that fold 50  takes you to the Sun. I think-- and   the same reason why Blockbuster management aren't bad people-- is   once they missed the path and it's  moved so fast, there's nothing they  can do. So right now,   we have two really bad choices. And because  short-term thinking in political circles, we're  leaning into making it worse  and being disingenuous with   the population through that. And being disingenuous is causing heat on both sides.   And so, again, that's why I wrote  the book. I wrote the book--  you're not going to stop gravity.  This is going to happen anyways.  And I look at the Fed like I would  look at-- and I look at a lot of   people in the system. They're not bad people. Some are. But I look at them as   the executives at Kodak, the executives  at Blockbuster, the executives  at Barnes % Noble, not understanding  how fast technology was moving   and thinking they could stop it like Barnes & NOBLE by putting coffee aisles   in their stores because people  love the convenience of shopping  for books in my store. So it's the same thing.   And so it's not bad people. It's they're  stuck in a system, an interconnected system,  that they don't know how fast the  rules just changed. And so they're   trying to drive that old system on its last breaths harder and harder and harder   with their old tools, and it's not working. RAOUL PAL: I mean, it's incredible to me that the   Fed have not fully embraced an understanding of behavioral economics. Because now, with huge data   sets and the ability to use AI, we can understand incentive systems across whole economic   structures. The Fed aren't even  anywhere near this stuff. They're  still thinking that putting interest rates up and  down is how you create incentive systems. I mean,   this is madness.  JEFF BOOTH: Madness. RAOUL PAL: I mean,   the whole computer gaming industry figured  this out years ago. You can do anything  by using the right incentive  systems, all behavioral economics.  JEFF BOOTH: Exactly. In fact, I  wrote about it in the book as well.   The science of how our brains work and behavioral economics has   moved so much right now that it's  embedded into the products we use every  day, all the time. That's actually  why the products become so addictive,   everything. That's why your iPhone is addictive. That's why   the things you use are so addictive  because it's been embedded into making it  addictive into the product  design of the technology.  And here's the thing. I do this. I  do this for a living. I know how fast   this is moving. And I know it on all these different tangents what you can   do to be able to drive that. RAOUL PAL: Fascinating. Jeff,   really, really great conversation. I  thoroughly enjoyed it. It gave me a lot  to think about. And hopefully, it's given  other people a lot to think about as well.  Because what I really like about  how you've brought new knowledge   to old discussions is you've said, yeah, you're all talking about this thing over here,   but you're actually missing  what is probably the much bigger  thing. And I think most people are.  I think people don't understand it.   They don't even understand what inflation is. I don't think they understand   this rise of technology and how  it's changing everything and that  the system is just not even set up to deal  with that. I mean, there's just now way.  And you know, it's sad. But there  is one option. And you know,   I didn't set you up for that. I had no idea that you liked Bitcoin. But it was just   like-- it was the only thing I could  see that makes real sense as a way  to-- as you said, opt out. And you the lifeboat. When I first got into Bitcoin, I presented to   global macro investor people  back in 2011. This was 2013  when I did this presentation. And I  said, OK, the world's pretty fucked.   We need a lifeboat. And I created this cartoon of a lifeboat   in graphic imagery and loaded some things  onto it, of which Bitcoin was the first  thing I loaded in and said, you need to  row away because everything is changing.  One of the reasons I'm here is tax regimes  across the world because the other function   of what's going on is taxes will go up for everybody.  JEFF BOOTH: Right. RAOUL PAL: That's coming.   There's nothing going to change that  now. And so it's all of these big things  that they're all coming. And people just need to  open their eyes to it and then take action early.  JEFF BOOTH: You do a really good job, and your  show does a really good job of [?] some incredible  people and teaching that to  an audience. So a huge thanks   to you. Huge thanks to Max, your editor, who brought me on when I first wrote the book. And so   you make a difference, and you're going to make a difference of people having a lifeboat in what's   happening. So I appreciate what you do here, too. RAOUL PAL: Thank you. Brilliant, Jeff. Great to   speak to you. And I'm sure we'll get you on again. JEFF BOOTH: OK.  RAOUL PAL: There's so many topics to talk about. NICK CORREA: Thank you for watching this   interview. This is just a taste of what we do at  Real Vision. To learn more about the complex world   of finance, business, and the global economy,  click on the membership link in the description.   Give us 7 days to change your life. This  will be the best dollar you'd ever invest.
Info
Channel: Real Vision Finance
Views: 98,365
Rating: 4.8678474 out of 5
Keywords: Finance, Markets, Economy, Stock Market, Investing, Trading, Education, Financial Literacy, Recession, Interview, Conversation, Strategy, Insight, Analysis, Facts, Data, Fraud, Entertainment, Thesis, Short Seller, Real Vision, Equities, raoul pal, real vision finance, jeff booth, covid-19, secular deflation, deflation, inflation, monetary policy, central banks, central bank, the fed, fed, federal reserve, coronavirus, corona
Id: 3Re8utN9zLg
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 70min 43sec (4243 seconds)
Published: Tue Jan 19 2021
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.