Could this Thruster transform Aviation?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Peter Muller
Views: 665,201
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: Lrnu0-vL504
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 53min 23sec (3203 seconds)
Published: Sat Mar 04 2023
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
There are some very very good reasons for attaching blades to an axial hub as opposed to running them along the outer radius.
Linear speed of bearing surfaces is far higher = much heavier bearings that are also much larger and don't last as long.
Centrifugal force puts blades in compression instead of tension = you lose the CF stiffening advantage and trade it for buckling/flutter issues.
I'd be curious to see how efficient these blades actually are. My suspicion is that even for this concept they are much too long.
He makes a great job at explaining how much more efficient it is than a 2-blade propeller, which is not surprising it is, but doesnβt show how much more efficient it is than a regular turbofan with a central hub and shaft.
The simple answer is no. It's too complicated and heavy. In theory it's a great idea, in practice not so much.
Lets see that things bearings after 1000hrs and realistic rpm.
The Raptor Aircraft story should be a case study in engineering & design, fascinating to watch but ultimately doomed for so many reasons.
Might have a viable application in water-crafts, submarines or ships.
Same design was used for tidal turbine generator by openhydro
I am not smart enough to know which fan is better. But I am totally distracted by his constant head turning.