Comparison: Render Cache and Render in Place. DaVinci Resolve.

I all in this video I'm going to share you guys a comparison of both render cash and render in place in DaVinci Resolve this will be a comparison video this won't be a difference video where we compare both of these functions and decide which one is the best because both of them got their own benefits and depending on the project you are doing one of them will be more beneficial than the other so let's jump into this video first of all render in place and render catch is a catching method for catching process in DaVinci Resolve which will improve damage resource performance and both these options mainly improve two type of performance in DaVinci Resolve first one is the playback performance that is after adding the color grade and fusion effect comply the clip in DaVinci resource timeline without any lag and second type of performance both this option will improve is that by using these two options the time taken to complete the project run will reduce so let's jump into this comparison first one is that render catch is a background process while render in place is a foreground process render catch happens in real time that is ETA runs in the background and it will start the caching process based on the settings you choose so when window cache is happening you can still use the dimension resource or but at the same time while rainbow catch is happening the chance of your system slowing down is little bit High while rendering places a foreground process that is when rendering place is happening you can't use dancing result to do any sort of edit second difference is that rendering place will create a fire that you can reuse on your current project or to any other project while for render catch you won't get any sort of fire render cache files are saved as dot dvcc files which cannot be used on any other application so render Cache can only be used on that single project only third thing is that as a random plays create new file all the fusion effect and the color grade you apply to the clip will be lost this not lost forever but it is lost on the new clip so if you want to make a small adjustment on the edit you made you can't do that so to do that you need to decompose the rendering place to the original one by right clicking and choosing the compose to original then you need to do the edit that you like then you need to do a render in place again but for render catch you won't face any issues like that as you are still using the same file at the same time this is a good thing because if the footage is very big footage and the only changes that you make is at a small area then on rendering place you can cut out that area decompose that area to original and do the changes that you like and do the rendering place for the small area only but for render catch if you want to make changes to that small area then you can make changes to the small area but a render catch will run throughout the entire duration of the clip so the time taken to complete the render cash will be bigger compared to render in place and the fourth comparison is that both render in place and render catch uses timeline resolution for the clip so the output of both render cache and rendering place will have the timelines resolution so if your output is different from the timeline resolution you won't enjoy the benefit of both rendering place and run the patch in the lower page to use render cache you need to tick use render cache images while for render in place you don't need to do any sort of thing like that this automatic and nothing is that the format used by render cache is mainly three format uncompressed GoPro cinephone and DNX HR and it is common for the entire clip in the timeline but for random place you can get lot of different options it is same as that of the option available in the delivery page as well as for individual clip you can change the format that you use on those click another thing is that as render catch only provide these uncompressed versions the file size created by render cache is very huge while for running place as there is lot of format option so the file size for this rendering page will be very less compared to normal catch another thing is that render catch is a automatic process if you choose smart mode in render catch your entire timeline will be rendered automatically but for random page this manual process you need to do rendering price for individual Clips so sometimes if you forgot to turn on this rendering place for some clips you will lose some time so the convenience factor is there on render catch another thing is that in Timeline if you make any changes to the render catch output that is if you cut a small portion out of the render catch output then you need to do a re-render but for render in place if you cut a small portion you won't need to do the preventer so that's it that's all about the comparison of both these render cache and rendering page personally I prefer to use random place after every edit that is every color grade and fusion effect is added to the clip and render catch when I need to still make changes to the cliff but I need to get a more smoother flyback compared to the choppy black pack D2 all the effects and grid so depending on the project you can use rendering catch or random Place both these options are very good and can really improve the playback performance and out performance of Dimension result so that's all about this video I hope you guys find this video useful if you do so hit the like button and don't forget to subscribe

Channel: TechCycle

Views: 283

Keywords: techcycle, tech cycle, how to fix clip cannot be processed rendering error davinic resolve 17 reddit, render cache and render in place difference, render cache in davinci resolve, redner in place davinci reoslve, render cache vs render in place which one, render cache, davinci, davinci resolve 18, resolve, resolve 18, video ediitng resolve, resolve tips, render cache tips davinci reoslve, render in place davinci resolve, compare render cache and render in palce davinci resolve

Id: uVBUcyGfqes

Length: 6min 12sec (372 seconds)

Published: Sun Oct 09 2022