Climbing the Rating Ladder: 1800-2000
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: John Bartholomew
Views: 331,562
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Ladder (Invention), Chess, Chess Improvement
Id: qf7NifPzeKI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 87min 22sec (5242 seconds)
Published: Sat Sep 12 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
If there is one person that will keep me in chess, it's John. What a great series.
"Well it's pretty long, I'll just watch the first game."
Annnnnd now it's an hour later and I'm going to watch his other videos.
Man, last video I was following John clearly, seeing the things he pointed at very quickly and spotting where his opponents made mistakes. This time, no way... he constantly explained three-four move tactics I totally missed and his candidate moves were entirely different from what I was thinking. Man, I guess I found out what level I have not reached yet.
Can't wait for 2400-2600!
Even at my low level his higher rating videos tech me so much. Thanks John!
I am in this range and I recently assessed exactly like John that my main weaknesses are in the strategic/positional and endgame. It felt great to hear confirmation of that as I am already attacking those weaknesses. Studying Chernev's Capablanca's Best Chess Endings right now, for instance.
haven't even started watching. i just wanted to post how happy i am that this is being continued. i thought maybe getting enough material at this level would take time, but i was also worried that the engine cheater in the last segment upset him!
you do great content, john!
now... for the video.
the first game was really good. someone mentioned in the youtube comments that it was a theoretical draw. i think this supports the theory john kept mentioning.
it's a great coincidence that john spoke of databases near the end. just hours before this video i set up my own database (freeware route) and was beyond blown away by having these millions of games in my hands to study. finding the top games and finding the outlaying lines that had high success is something i will be doing now that i'm able to think with more focus.
also, thanks for the chessbase recommendation. it seems my version of icofy (last updated sometime last year -- unfortunately discontinued until the creator sees how to bring it back more sustainably) still has a discrepancy of 1 million games despite only the year difference. i do have to wonder if that if i get the program and the database, that i do actually own the version of the database i purchased instead of just having access to it.
I was looking forward to 1800-2000 and 2000-2200, as 2000-2100 is where I've been stuck the past few years. That first game was very well played by the challenger, though I think the endgame was a theoretical draw.