Chatting with Lady C: The Queen/William fallout re Oprah interview/Piers Morgan/Sharon Osborne

i've written a letter to daddy his address is heaven upon hello mickey and i are here yet again saying hello to you our greetings and shall we plunge right in because i have so many questions and so much ground to cover that i actually doubt that i'm going to be able to get through all of it or in one video but i'm hoping okay so if we can plunge right in not starting with a question i am starting with an observation from william shakespeare in king lear several people have sent me in this quotation and i think it is a very appropriate and i have actually alluded to it previously mickey if you want to sit down you can sit down okay yes baby girl how sharper than the serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child i think we can all sympathize with the prince of wales for having a thankless child and we can all sympathize with thomas markle for having a thankless child and i'm laying my cards very definitely on the table my sympathies are entirely with the families that have been abandoned introduced by megan and now by harry as well so another observation from somebody who i would imagine this is an on the plume although of course he could be a descendant of the famous charles babbage but i suspect he's not because picture is of the original charles babbage but it could be his descendant and he makes a really rather entertaining and witty and so accurate observation i remember when people passed for right to escape persecution now they pass for black to claim persecution i think it's an absolutely damning but so accurate indictment of the ethos of the age and what is going on at the moment and i will make it very clear i do not like racists of any shape kind or color but i also think that racists come in all colors and it does not behoove us to forget that very important fact and with that i will now turn to the questions because i have received literally thousands and i don't mean one or two i mean well into the tens of thousands of communications from members of the public in the last week uh and thank you all very much for all of your communications they have been 99.9 in favor and there's been a miniscule percentage that was not but that's okay too because if we believe in free speech everybody doesn't have to agree with us and i will defend anybody's right to have their opinion in keeping with volatile no matter how much i disagree with you i think you have the right to your opinion even to disagree with me i do think that one or two of you who think that you can abuse me with lies are going a little bit too far but since that's very much a sunshine sex stroke sussex ploy i will say i've got broad shoulders and i have lived through four words and no matter what you throw at me i will survive it because decency truth and right are on my side so first question is from margo lisette if it weren't so hysterical and contrived it would be diabolical in big block capitals do i agree actually yes i do agree and i think it is actually rather entertaining i think it is hysterical i think it is contrived and it's hysterical in the absolute the classical meaning of the word hysterical incidentally and i think it is hysterical and i think it is contrived i think it is a concoction that is very calculated let's make miss no no mistake about this this is not an accidental scenario i do not for one nanosecond believe that oprah just asked the questions and megan didn't know what was coming i'm here to tell you i have done hundreds if not thousands of interviews over the years everything all the terrain is covered before the interview you may not actually stick completely to the script a good interviewer and a good interviewee will stick to the script which is why joan rivers was the best interviewer i ever had in terms of women and clive anderson the english barrister and sometime television pundit and stroke personality stroke interviewer was the best in england oh if we are supposed to be duped into thinking that it was all just spontaneous well yeah let's try it again but anyway whatever it obviously answers deep seated political stroke sociological agendas stroke financial agendas none of which in my view are creditable because of the consequences of such treacherous behavior because the opinions that i have been getting from tens of thousands of people are that harry and megan are treacherous and i cannot say i disagree lucy clark asks nutmeg is playing the race card but what about queen charlotte well lucy clark that is an excellent question to ask and for those of you who don't know this is a book that i wrote i think three years ago people of color and the royals and it covers pretty much all of the european royal families focusing on the british royal family and traces the dis their ancestors of color primarily queen charlotte who was born princess charlotte of mecklenburg strelitz and was the consort of george iii mad king george iii there's even been a plea called the madness of george iii and the film was made called the madness of king george so that the americans would actually know who george iii was that was the purpose of renaming it there was also prior to that queen philipper who was the consort of king edward iii king edward iii was a very great and famous king their son was the black prince some people think so cold because of his shield well no so called evidently because of his complexion and prince that's philippa of anu or as they say in england heynolt she was according to the bishop who went to inspector extremely african in appearance so there is little doubt that the british royal family does have african heritage i mean if you go back far enough of course everybody has african heritage because evidently humanity started in africa and fanned out which has always amused me because when racists come up with the one drop rule that means that everyone is black which i just love you really have to laugh when idiots make fools of themselves so oh next question it's from henry porter lady c what do you think of prince william stating so forcefully that the royal family is definitely not a racist family and is it true he has the backing of the queen and prince charles well i'll take the second first yes it's true he has the backing of the queen and prince charles according to the people i have spoken to who know what is going on uh the queen and prince charles are deeply distressed as is prince william about what has happened they are absolutely spitting bricks and very saddened is putting it mildly about the fact that harry has produced the whole royal family by throwing everybody under the bus in one way or the other he and megan have been very careful to act as if they have kept the queen and prince philip out of the line of fire but in soldering they have completely uh thrown everybody else under the wheels of the bus and yes everybody is very upset about it very upset about it and of course as the queen has rightly said it is a family matter and you know i get where the queen is coming from on this i've lived through similar things i mean i've lived through being produced by my ex-husband who has over the decades sold or given one lie about me after another usually contradicting himself or shades of megan and harry because they couldn't even get their stories straight on a simple little interview with oprah oh you know for instance uh harry says that this earth earth-shattering racist comment took place before the marriage and megan says it took place well she was pregnant with archie isn't it peculiar that such a traumatic event could have been so traumatizing that they can't even remember when it took place i mean let's face facts i mean if they're not lying i'm bugs bunny because i'm here to tell you uh having been through many a trauma in my life and i'm pretty sure everybody who's listening to this has also been through a trauma in their lives you never forget when it happened and the mere fact that they can't agree when it happened means that they're lying it's as simple as that maybe i'm wrong but i doubt it very much unless their behavior is so bizarre that it is off the scale of anything reasonable and sane and rarely is in total land where they are genuinely so insane that they cannot even remember when their traumas took place think prince william was absolutely right i think it's quite obvious that he was spitting mad or you only need to see his face and hair his tone and also the mere fact that practically a week after the airing of the show the brothers haven't spoken now that tells you everything that needs to be told about how furious prince william is and i have to say the comments i have got from people about prince william's conduct are rarely very much in favor of everything he's done and how admirably he's shaping up and i agree with them i think prince william is showing himself to be a man of fine metal and on that note i think we can go to the next question which is from denise whiteley isn't it dangerous that megan and harry are whipping up racial tensions which could boil over and result in someone in the royal family getting hurt i understand the duchess of cambridge has received death threats this has gone beyond personal revenge and seems like a deliberate attempt to trash a british institution and denigrate the british people couldn't she be brought to book for inciting violence well they both incited people to balance if you stop to think of it not only megan harry as well because he has also thrown his hat into the ring so let's not forget that harry also bears responsibility for this inciting racial division and violence is in my view one of the most destructive indeed evil things that any human being can do whether it is of the duke and duchess of sussex doing it in gail king's garden speaking to gail king's good friend oprah good good friends uh or whether it is some redneck southerner uh stringing up innocent black people on trees as used to happen it is racial prejudice and racial divisiveness is always wrong it's always evil and people who do it should be brought to book and in the last year or 18 months there has been wave after wave of racial divisiveness and because i'm jamaican people speak to me very openly and honestly and because i'm in the public eye i get it not only from strangers but people i know television presenters radio interviewers journalists members of the public black people brown people [Music] all different sorts of people are always speaking to me and they speak to me very frankly and many of them are absolutely dead against what is happening and not now referring to the thousands of comments from people of color and the thousands of other communications from people's people of color that i have received in the last week or so i'm referring to other people who some very well known people of color who are terrified absolutely terrified to say how they feel but i'll tell you they feel like the silenced majority very few people except serious troublemakers want to see racial divisiveness and yes you have politicians who do play upon racial divisiveness to further their political agendas but most decent people even those who sometimes are forced to pretend as if they go along with it do not agree with it and let's face that not everybody has courage i mean if everybody had courage what happened in germany during the 1930s and 1940s wouldn't have happened as the famous pastor said you know when they came for my neighbor and this is just a paraphrase i was silent now they've come for me and there's no body to defend me and i'm afraid there is very much a witch hunt atmosphere taking place at the moment which is very very destructive and people are justifiably concerned and justifiably afraid can they be charged with a crime well everybody else who's been inciting race riots in the last 18 months hasn't been charged with a crime on the contrary i think several of them have been admired by their pro-racist cohorts and by pro-racist elements of the media who are as irresponsible as the racists next question and maybe i should say as well i don't mind speaking the truth i'm 71 years old i've had a terribly difficult life and and jamaican and race relations matter to me good race relations i have nothing to gain from being racially prejudiced against any color and i think people who die the lies that the megans and the harrys are pushing and by the looks of it the oprah's of this world are pushing as well as some of the politicians mostly in america but one or two here as well terrible terrible terrible i don't think i should say anymore just terrible but i'm not afraid because i have cousins of various complexions and we all love each other and we were all brought up in a world where color was not an issue and we were certainly brought up in a family where color was not an issue and this is why i sympathize so much with the royal family and what's going on now and i think it is just dreadful that megan and harry are playing the color card purely to satisfy her ambitions her greed let's not pretend it's anything else but greed her greed for attention her greed for money her agreed for congratulation and approbation and also her greed to be the most famous person in the world kim grey asks tell lady c the oprah special should have used the tagline nothing is on the table couldn't agree more oh unless of course we were going to see that horse manure was on the table and false claims here are some explosive questions that would have made for a really interesting bit of journalism rather than that puff pr piece oprah calls the best interview of her life first one have you ever repaired in a pornographic film megan [Laughter] well that would have been an interesting question another interesting question was archie born of a surrogate are you using the services of a surrogate for your second child and at this point i ought to say that i do not think that kim gray is suggesting anything i think she's just asking questions that would be of interest to the public and would clear up rumors which megan knows exists and megan has thrown the whole of the royal family and the british nation and the commonwealth and endangered good commonwealth relations just because there was one little comment that she didn't like and there was one little incident that that she thought it's terrible that they've not denied that i didn't make kate cry when in fact i understand that she did make kate cry but of course she flips everything so maybe she cried as well but evidently katherine cambridge evidently did cry as well so but since those trivialities have warranted such a vitriol and such an explosive and damaging interview oh i think she would have welcomed the opportunity to deny the rumors that float around about her conduct past and present so next one of kim gray's really rather fairy to the point questions which are controversial and would have certainly given everybody even more room for entertainment than the pep that was dished up next one is explain your statement service is universal some would say you are self-serving how do you respond to that whom and how are you serving well i think that's a very good question and i really do wish that oprah had asked it but of course oprah was in collusion with them and it was always going to be giving megan the softest ride possible and maybe not harry quite as soft but you know it was always going to be that but you know she could have actually asked both of them who are they serving because it's quite obvious that they are serving the public and they are public servants however marched public servants because being in the british monarchy being a civil servant in a tiara wasn't good enough for her so they have moved to hollywood where they can't well actually not hollywood they moved to montecito but they're certainly dealing with hollywood where they can march themselves and call it service it's rather like a prostitute calling herself a sex slave then next one what does privacy mean to you is this interview an example of privacy well that is a brilliant question that oprah could have asked because of course megan and harry claim well they used to claim they've stopped claiming it now because i mean let's face facts if it's tuesday they they say that their favorite fruit is melon if it's thursday it's apples if it's saturday it's tamarinds and if it's sunday it's something else so you know they are as consistent as anybody who is incapable of agreeing with him or herself uh because they have forgotten what they said 10 minutes before or maybe they are so arrogant that they actually think that we have forgotten and that if they declare it as a fact it is a fact and it must be accepted as a fact so that i think would have been a really good one because they are always going on and on about their privacy yet they are ravishing us ravishing us two three four times a week with their constant barrage of previously violating previously violating matters and do you think oprah was overly cautious in what questions she asked my opinion is that her questions were designed to paint a very one-sided story when it came to megan your thoughts yes i don't well actually i do not think oprah was over cautious i think oprah was deliberately and calculatingly measured and uh was actually spoon feeding megan opportunities for megan to just spill out the herbal and and i think that if you look at that interview because i looked at it again last night i have to tell you and the first time that i looked at it i thought she came across very well in the first part then i thought towards the end of her solo appearance uh the showgirl showed and she just couldn't resist over-egging and pudding i just you know i'm a diva and i'm a drama queen and i've just gotta over play my hand so she became much less credible then harry came on and retrieved the situation somewhat and uh but i think it was a very carefully calibrated performance and that they were all collusive in ensuring that it would be as damaging and as destructive and as controversial and as sensational as it was one-sided beyond one-sided i mean just farcical but you know i did say a few weeks ago in one of my videos i think i might have said it more than once that because of what was going on behind the scenes that i couldn't speak about this whole sussex business was shaping up to be a combination of ancient greek tragedy shakespearean drama and 18th century french force and it rarely has because last night i thought i'd better look at the interview again well i have to tell you i was in hysterics for most of it it is really fabulous entertainment once you realize that you know it appears from certainly my point of view uh that they are as sincere certainly i think that megan comes across as sincere and true let's say true as a three dollar bill in a turkish bazaar i mean you know it's it's rarely funny i mean it's tragic comedy because it's so serious but it is comedy i mean i would recommend to those who can look at it again and laugh because it is really laughable you know her faux pain her full diana poses her phone oh well donna said that i'd better say the same thing i mean megan's morphed into diana mack too but she is so faux i mean it is so full you know it is like she's like not even a cubic zirconium trying to pass as a diamond she's like not even a crystal trying to pass like as a diamond because that rather has more facets than megan megan is like an ordinary broken piece of cheap glass trying to pass herself off as a fabulous diamond and i'm afraid it doesn't wash with anybody who believes in sincerity that's my point of view i could be wrong but certainly that's how i feel and that's how the tens of thousands of people who have been in touch with me many of them feel as well in fact most of them so albert dweck wants to know harry said himself megan gets what megan wants so why didn't she want to get help i think she's referring to megan's claim of being suicidal but megan didn't actually put it quite like that but she managed to get the point across because mega never really puts things quite like that megan always manages to worm her way around like some commonal garden worm working its way from one rock to another i'll pick up that's what he said sorry i'll pick her back i'll pick her back the question megan gets what megan wants so why didn't she want to get help because it was not good for the institution i'm sorry but that is total nonsense as far as i know in the early 80s dan managed to get all sorts of psychological help and back then those things were not as well accepted as they are nowadays albert dweck i couldn't have put it better myself in fact in the early 80s diana resisted the help that the royal family insisted upon making available for her she continued resisting for about another six or seven years before she began to realize that she actually needed help and it was her in her interest to get help and by the time diana died she had been in therapy and she had started to deal with her personal problems in a very very apparent i mean you only need to look at diana shortly before she died to see that she was very much coming into her own so why didn't megan seek the help i mean megan states in her interview that she contacted a friend of diana's that friend was julia samuel julia samuel is a trained psychotherapist she heads up a grief charity julia samuel is a professional let's not forget as well that doria is supposed to have been trained to help people in distress diana got help even when she didn't want it and there is absolutely no way that i or anybody else with two grains of sense in their head would believe for any length of time that megan was denied help and that the royal family said that megan is not to get help in case it gets out why would he get out prince charles has had psychiatric and help all the members of the family and i'm not going to say who they are have had loads of help i mean you know her story just doesn't make sense if you know the facts her story is just a can of worms quite frankly i think it's an insult to people's intelligence but of course she plays the pity card because she she wavers between being the strong empowered woman just give her a slap give her a slap give her a snap put him down and oh that's such a fragile creature she better make up her mind which one she is because more than one person has said that they're beginning to think she suffers from multiple personality disorder i don't think she suffers from multi-personality disorder at all i've seen megan's sort of personality in operation i saw it in my mother saw the way my mother used to operate and i'm afraid that megan's conduct is very evocative to me at least of the way my mother used to behave and the resourcefulness and the maliciousness with which people like that achieve their objectives is just staggering and i've got news for you if you've not lived through it it's really difficult to spot so i am not really that surprised that a whole load of people actually have bought the act i get that they bought the act because people like that are usually very good at their acting they are very good at it the thing is once you have had experience of someone like that you begin to see them coming a mile off and because megan in my view is not only some of somebody who displays features of narcissistic personality disorder but also displays sociopathic features there is a reason why so many people are starting to spot what's going on because evidently one in every 25 people in the population is sociopathic now don't misunderstand what i'm saying you can be sociopathic and never kill anyone but you can't be sociopathic and actually have empathy or scruples so on that note i will say next question jan kowalski or jan kowalski depending on whether it is the polish or the american pronunciation in her cv megan as i heard stated that she was white now she claims she is biracial and every remark on her is due to someone being racist was megan ever involved in a love relationship with a dark-skinned man and if not why not doesn't she like that kind of men is she a racist therefore if she does not have relationships with dark-skinned men well i would have said people can't really choose how they feel and sexual attraction usually is a matter of feeling and therefore if you are not attracted to someone sexually uh you shouldn't be condemned for it i'm sure that the pro-racists would say not of course in connection with megan because megan is shaping up to be their cult leader because they're shaping up to be meganomaniacs and megan is going to be the leader of the cult or maybe it's the political movement or maybe it's both and of course a cult leader can never be wrong and the cult leader can do no wrong and the cult leader is somebody who if he or she tells you that the spaceship is coming tomorrow and therefore the 300 of the followers should take poison and kill themselves so that everybody can join the spaceship as has happened before oh i think it happened in guyana if i'm not mistaken some man called jones and it happened so cult leaders can be very potent and oh i would have said that to people like that megan of course cannot be adjudged to be racist because she has never had a relationship of any consequence with anything but white men however if it was someone else i bet my bottom dollar they would be saying that that was a sign of racism because if a perfectly innocent conversation and speculation about who a child is going to look like and what features of each parent the child is going to have becomes racist how much more racist is it that somebody of one race studiously avoids ever having physical and carnal congress with anybody of their own race so i think it's a very interesting point sarah hague mem worry about all this is the effect on the commonwealth apparently there are mutterings that the commonwealth should be dismantled after the queen dies because the rest of the family is racist how would harry feel if that happens megan wouldn't care she has no cultural ties with the commonwealth but harry i would hope he'd feel incredibly guilty and utterly devastated in fact i would hope they put out a conciliatory statement before this crisis goes any further than it has got to well said sarah hague yes i would hope that they would have the decency but they're not going to have the decency they're not going to put out any statement of amelioration or palliation they're not going to do anything like that because this has been to whip up a frenzy which will benefit them in terms of their financial and lifestyle objectives so don't think for a second it wasn't very carefully scripted and deliberately and calculatedly executed because it was irrespective of the claims to the country and you don't always have to decide that i'm going to say this and you say that things can be very scripted on a nod and a wink and they can be very very carefully calculated on an unspoken understanding and whether oprah and megan cooked it up orally or cooked it up because they each saw the other for what they are and how they could use each other i don't know but in my opinion it's been totally cooked up will megan care of course not if she cared she wouldn't be doing it harry does he care well he looked a little bit embarrassed once or twice which is to his credit but harry is addicted to megan he's like a drug addict addicted to heroin and a drug addict will step over the corpse of their mother or their baby to get their drug of choice so as long as harry is hooked on megan i'm afraid i think you will find that such little things as conscience and regret are going to be suspended because he is like an addict who cannot help himself next question sherry garroway i have a question to ask lady c were the claims on mental health and racism that came out in the oprah interview mentioned in the book finding freedom and if not why not sherry gary you got the name of the book wrong it wasn't finding freedom it was funding freebies of course these things were not rarely mentioned in the book why weren't they mentioned because they have been remembered since the book was published i think you will find that megan and harry are prone to convenient remembrances or maybe what one could call post effectual post-contemporaneous remembrances oh you know if it suits the narrative if it suits their objective that happened you know i mean let's face facts their memories are so good that they can't even agree when at one of their most significant traumas a troll that was so significant that if they've had to create a worldwide scandal create incite racial tensions throw the royal family and the british people under the wheels of a bus oh and they can't even remember when that took place well i would suggest that that sort of thing plus the omission of such painful things because remember funding freedom and finding freebies was going to be their final say just as how this is now supposed to be going to be their finalcy i mean as far as i'm concerned this is round two of what's going to be a very long fight but there we go oh the queen hopes differently i think the queen is hoping shall we say over optimistically but i would suggest that there's every possibility that they have only been able to retrieve the memories and they will continue to retrieve other memories about the past only as and when in the present and in the future it suits them to retrieve those memories i think harry and megan actually and i'm going to be quite serious now i think they are both very disturbed people i think they are really sick i think we need to have pity for them that doesn't mean that we need to buy the lie whatever the lie is but i think we need to understand that we are dealing with people whose take on reality and version of reality is very much at variance with people who are more spiritually emotionally and mentally and psychologically intact i think you need to understand that very disturbed people have a completely different take on life from you or me that's why they're disturbed they whether it's a serious personality disorder or a mental illness i think we are dealing with and this is on a world stage this has been played out on the world stage and we are witnessing two very sick people playing out their sicknesses on an inch on on the world stage i think it's really very sad very sad uh but i think we need to be aware of it i mean you cannot expect people like that to actually be grounded in reality because they are not grounded in reality and i know what i'm speaking about i lived through it with a mother like that and there is no point expecting people like that to really be connected to reality except when it suits them then they deep in a note but at all other times they are they they function beyond reality and they float above reality it's not that they're not aware of reality it's just that they don't inhabit the real world the way you and i do they're not bound by reality they're not prescribed and proscribed they're not within the circumference of reality they are beyond it and that is what makes mental illness so very difficult to cope with because you never know what these people are going to come up with next they don't know what they're going to come up with next but you can depend on it whatever they come up with they are going to swear blind it's absolutely true and it happened when nine times out of ten it's only happened in their head once they realized or decided or saw that it suited them for it to have happened mariana flores verdusco says the topic i can talk about with a certain assuredness i'm a clinical psychologist is the part of suicidal thoughts suicidal ideation i also am talking from a soul observer point of view therefore there will be no diagnosis just my impressions of megan i'll start by saying she has important narcissistic and sociopathic traits i couldn't agree more it's pretty obvious couldn't agree more she completely manipulated that not very smart by that i mean sort of street smart he's also just dumb intellectually but he's also not street smart naive and unstable harry megan managed to get him isolated from his family his very important brother etc so now he's a fish out of water and got manipulated to feel that megan is the only one who gets him and loves him so he's holding on to her for their life and he'll do whatever megan says and warns i honestly believe he appears to be a kind of prisoner and i see tracy's hair and there of stockholm syndrome and even post-traumatic stress disorder he's a fragile man and he breaks easily about megan it is true that people don't forcefully have to have depression with suicidal ideation but she's looking around not like a person at risk but more like a triumphant smile that reaches her eyes not with warmth but with coldness during the interview she even looks bored food for thought that's all i can say with the data i have the rest would be inconclusive because i can't assume in good conscience other behaviors in good conscience other behaviors i noticed are a hundred percent of something but you can't see what there's a lack of further facts well there we have it and i have had various versions of this from other health professionals megan displays all of the symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and anti-social personality disorder with dashes of other personality disorders and yes i think when you look at her she sits down that smug and self-satisfied while the interview is taking place saying she's like a pig in muck wallowing in the wonderful warmth of the chaos and and and it fills the filth that she and he are generating but let's make no mistake about it she is enjoying it every minute of it and that's what i and many other people have taken away from that display nicholas bilsky am i the only person who thinks megan was trying to draw parallels between herself and diana when she talked about being suicidal when she was pregnant specifically i think she was trying to conjure up images in the media for viewers of diana throwing herself down the stairs when she was pregnant with william absolutely mr bilsky absolutely unless megan has made which i have been informed she has a very careful study of guyana we are experiencing the most extraordinary coincidence of megan dressing like diana using diana's expressions coinciding her life and life experiences with diana's in the most bizarre and obvious way harry may not be able to see it but thousands of people who are looking are seeing it i think this again is why i think they're both sick i mean he has to be rarely not only sick but dumb to have not had one bell go off in his head but i've seen this again with other people i mean hair is not unique it's sad but it's not unique this came from several people and so i have actually consolidated the various questions into one how can mexican justify publicly validating the privacy of the royal family when she has sold the mail on sunday for valiating her privacy through publishing a letter she clearly wrote to her father for publication with its contents being leaked by her friends to people magazine it seems that megan believes that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander am i right yes you are right as far as megan's concerned there are two rules that apply in life one is for all of us and the other is for megan it's obvious megan is not like all disordered personalities constrained by the ordinary morality that would actually constrain you and me no no no why would she be bothering to be constrained by all those petty fogging little restrictions she needs to be free to indulge herself it is beyond unconscionable i'm only sorry mr justice warby rendered his judgment when he did and didn't wait a few more weeks to render it because he would have seen like say if you've looked at psycho and you've seen psycho from beginning to end so you know that norman bates is the killer and you don't think that it's his mummy well i think this is a living evocation of come on ricky come up i think this is a living evocation of of another drama and a psycho drama as well and it's obvious that megan has used the law to muscle her father and to muscle the british press because believe me she has the british breasts are terrified of her personally i think they're gutless wonders and they shouldn't be they should treat her the way they've treated me and several other public figures for whom they've had no respect and absolute contempt as they violated our rights i think they should actually have the courage that they have shown with those they thought they could bully like me and exercise their judgment and their rights and their right to print fact against megan and harry i that's what i think uh because there's they have been colluding by suppressing stuff and the irony of all of this is that megan and harry keep on saying how toxic the british press has been to them but the british press has not been anywhere near as toxic to them as the facts would have allowed them to be had the british press had the courage to actually speak the truth because i've got news for you in the law an absolute defense against defamation is the truth however megan has now in front of the whole world violated the privacy of the royal family she has accused them of racism she has either fabricated or violated private conversations yet her father who did not fabricate anything he and the male on sunday have prayed a very heavy price for having spoken the truth about what she said in that letter so on the one hand we have megan feeling she's entitled to muzzle the press and muscle her father when they speak the truth and on the other hand we have megan plumping herself like a load of something unmentionable on a chair and spewing forth all sorts of fabrications and phantasmagorias in to oprah's air and into the camera and into the microphone much of which is if not a total lie definitely not an accurate version of the truth jen jay says what are your thoughts on pairs morgan i know pears i like pears i've actually crossed swords with pears oh i think he's a great fulminator i have a lot of respect for him oh i think he does sometimes get carried away but i don't think he did in this instance i think he was very measured he said he didn't believe a word that megan said megan and her pr people and her woke followers mounted a campaign to get him driven out so much full press freedom so much for our respect for for the first amendment in america remember megan's an american so she's supposed to respect press freedom except she doesn't and she evidently personally phoned up carolyn mccall who is the ceo of itv complained about the fact that she didn't like can you imagine she didn't like what paris had said about her and demanded an apology and carolyn mccall rather stupidly and ill-advisedly in my opinion and cowardly as well thought oh even though the program was the got the most views ever that any of those programs had ever got so it was a winning program but carolyn mccall demanded that pairs apologize and pairs refused to apologize and left i think i have actually tweeted uh that i think that carolyn mccall should reinstate pairs i think there should be a movement to reinstate pairs i think if she doesn't reinstate pairs i think he should sue her for constructive dismissal or whatever he can come up with uh i think she should be the public should demand that she undertake to never again dismiss a journalist who is espousing a view shared by the majority of people in this country just because she was worried that meghan markle might sue them i mean it's a joke it's a joke the woman is irresponsible she is pussing animals she is not a fit to defend the rights of journalists in this country to espouse a popular opinion it's not a defamatory opinion it's not a lie libelous opinion it's not a slanderous opinion it's his opinion based on fact and it is a popular opinion shared by the majority of people in this country i think it's a disgrace i also think it's a disgrace that sharon osborne who had the courage to say that perez was not racist was was and and and stood her ground on that show the talk uh was then obviously because her career would be on the line otherwise me to apologize because she was saying that pairs isn't a racist and this isn't about racism but because her colleagues and presumably many of the viewers didn't like what she said she was she has been uh effectively brow beaten into giving an apology i'm sorry you know you know people need to grow up and toughen up and understand i have a right to my opinion you have a right to your opinion and if we disagree that's fine that's healthy that's what makes for honest discourse you cannot have honest discourse and you cannot have a healthy society without disagreements and there have to be laws in place that you do not violate the rights of others but saying that you do not believe that meghan markle's speaking the truth when you'd have to be really dumb to think she was because not even she and her husband could agree on the most salient point uh so they're right there that's a suggestion that they are lying at least one of them is if not both i think it's outrageous i think the whole thing is outrageous and i only hope that those of us who believe in honest discourse and a proper exchange of ideas civility requires that we be allowed to disagree with each other and that's called freedom of speech and i do not think that pairs should have been forced out and i do not think that sharon osborne should have been silenced but of course she understood if she didn't put on the muzzle they were going to cancel her disgusting i'll tell you what would happen because it's happened historically repeatedly if the muslims succeed it's only a matter of time before they turn on each other unfortunately they would have damaged us before they managed to damage themselves and i personally would much rather nobody gets damaged and i want to end on a positive note from zena slarossa i am a woman of color and married a white british i never experienced racism from them on the country i was treated like a lady the british are the most decent tolerant polite and kind people i know and i have to tell you to a large extent i agree please like share subscribe and hit the notification bell and thank you very much i hope this has been of interest and please keep the questions coming in god bless

Channel: Lady Colin Campbell

Views: 332,328

Keywords:

Id: -7VMHh-OfMc

Length: 72min 29sec (4349 seconds)

Published: Sat Mar 13 2021