Wild Animal Fights Caught On Camera (Wildlife Documentary) | Caught In The Act | Real Wild
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Real Wild
Views: 9,131,103
Rating: 4.5058589 out of 5
Keywords: nature documentary, full documentary, documentary movie, cute animals, baby animals, animals attack, big cats, wildlife documentary, english, hd, discovery channel, national geographic, natgeo wild, Nature documentaries - topic, Animals - topic, planet earth, david attenborough, Animals Do The Funniest Things, Animals Do The Cutest Things, Cute Baby Animals, Funny, Animal, Video, Funny Baby Animal Video, Full Animal Documentary, lions, lion documentary
Id: QkJeiR46jik
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 50min 5sec (3005 seconds)
Published: Sat Feb 24 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I mean, for fuck's sake, at one point they show a video recorded by some random lady of an infant zebra getting tossed around like a ragdoll by some out of control male and all she can say when interviewed about it is; "Well, it's horrible and all, but the male zebra is only acting on instinct. Besides look at how the mother zebra tries to protect her baby! We humans think it's cruel, but the male zebra doesn't know cruelty. It's just nature at work and nature knows best!.".
I mean, god damn it. How can you have borne witness to all that and STILL come away from it thinking that the natural world is in any way redeemable? The male zebra might not know that what it's doing is cruel, but so what? It's still the height of cruelty. Even when the mother zebra is trying to stop him; she fails utterly. It's also interesting the double standard here. The male zebra apparently can't be blamed for being cruel, yet the mother zebra is praised for showing love and self-sacrifice. Yet, I'd argue, the mother zebra has no concept of love, just like the male zebra has no concept of cruelty. So, which is it? Are they driven by unconscious instinct, or aren't they? If you acknowledge one, then you have to acknowledge the other. Yet people want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to pretend that their definition of the good exists, while ignoring and even outright denying the existence of the bad. In the end, both were driven by instinct, and their DNA, to create a situation of extreme torment and agony. The male zebra can't abide the presence of another male's foal in his territory, so he mercilessly stomps it to death. The mother zebra can't abide her foal being killed, only because that would mean a waste of her time and resources. Ultimately, the foal dies an agonizing death and is left to rot and be eaten by ravenous hyenas. Think of how many times this has happened across the spans of not just nature as it exists now, but throughout the eons of time that has already occurred. It's fucking mind boggling.
And that's not even getting into the rest of what's present in that video. Like the 4 lions ganging up on and tearing apart one of their own, as what is otherwise seen as a fairly common place battle for dominance. Even something as brutal, ugly, and disgusting as that, is perceived by some as being an awe inspiring example of nature and natural selection. "The weak are crushed by the strong. Good, that's how it should be.", as some sadistic lunatics would no doubt, and often do, say (just look at the comments). These are people who literally get themselves off to the amount of pain present in the world. The more of it there is, the better. I honestly can't imagine anything more sickening. What's more pathetic is that they somehow think they're examples of the strong, instead of the weak. It's sad that this is the way most of humanity operates. They'd rather be the brutalizer, instead of the brutalized. This "conan the barbarian" type logic where might always makes right is fucking disgusting to the core. And yet most people, on some level, subscribe to and believe that exact sort of thing. Thank goodness for omnicide. Thank fucking goodness.
I remember when I was a young child in the early-mid 2000s there was this channel called animal planet we had on cable. It showed stuff about wildlife and animals some of it was interesting and cool. However though like anything related to nature it showed some gruesome and disturbing things. I hated seeing stuff like that. So when a tv show would come on that showed stuff like that I would turn the channel or stop watching TV and do something else. I never understood how people could watch animals Kill eat and do other horrible things to each other and think it's ok simply because it's nature.
If people had to experience what nature is truly like without modern technology and medicine to help them from common injuries and illnesses or save them from dying very painfully. I don't think many of them would find it beautiful anymore.
Because you always identify yourself with the winners... Everyone identifies themselves with lions ignoring that lions only live up to their 15s!
Nature counts as a synonym for “pure” for most people. They watch documentaries with a narrator that has a friendly voice and quirky personality and correlate this to their view of nature. At least that’s how it was for me back then lol, I was like awe animals are so wholesome. But rarely are you ever stuck in a cage with a lion to witness their sheer brutality and have them trigger your survival instincts so they can’t fathom how nature could possibly be evil